Articles | Volume 25, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-355-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-355-2018
Research article
 | 
03 May 2018
Research article |  | 03 May 2018

Feature-based data assimilation in geophysics

Matthias Morzfeld, Jesse Adams, Spencer Lunderman, and Rafael Orozco

Related authors

A comprehensive model for the kyr and Myr timescales of Earth's axial magnetic dipole field
Matthias Morzfeld and Bruce A. Buffett
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 26, 123–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-123-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-123-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Predictability, probabilistic forecasts, data assimilation, inverse problems | Topic: Climate, atmosphere, ocean, hydrology, cryosphere, biosphere
Prognostic assumed-probability-density-function (distribution density function) approach: further generalization and demonstrations
Jun-Ichi Yano
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 359–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-359-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-359-2024, 2024
Short summary
Bridging classical data assimilation and optimal transport: the 3D-Var case
Marc Bocquet, Pierre J. Vanderbecken, Alban Farchi, Joffrey Dumont Le Brazidec, and Yelva Roustan
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 335–357, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-335-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-335-2024, 2024
Short summary
Leading the Lorenz 63 system toward the prescribed regime by model predictive control coupled with data assimilation
Fumitoshi Kawasaki and Shunji Kotsuki
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 319–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-319-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-319-2024, 2024
Short summary
Selecting and weighting dynamical models using data-driven approaches
Pierre Le Bras, Florian Sévellec, Pierre Tandeo, Juan Ruiz, and Pierre Ailliot
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 303–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-303-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-303-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improving ensemble data assimilation through Probit-space Ensemble Size Expansion for Gaussian Copulas (PESE-GC)
Man-Yau Chan
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 287–302, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-287-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-287-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Agapiou, S., Papaspiliopoulos, O., Sanz-Alonso, D., and Stuart, A.: Importance sampling: computational complexity and intrinsic dimension, Stat. Sci., 32, 405–431, 2017. a, b, c
Arulampalam, M., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., and Clapp, T.: A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking, IEEE T. Signal Proces., 50, 174–188, 2002. a
Atkins, E., Morzfeld, M., and Chorin, A.: Implicit particle methods and their connection with variational data assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 1786–1803, 2013. a
Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., and Brunet, G.: The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction, Nature, 252, 45–55, 2015. a
Bishop, C.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 2006. a
Download
Short summary
Many applications in science require that computational models and data be combined. In a Bayesian framework, this is usually done by defining likelihoods based on the mismatch of model outputs and data. However, matching model outputs and data in this way can be unnecessary or impossible. This issue can be addressed by selecting features of the data, and defining likelihoods based on the features, rather than by the usual mismatch of model output and data.