Articles | Volume 26, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-37-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-37-2019
Research article
 | 
05 Apr 2019
Research article |  | 05 Apr 2019

Competition between chaotic advection and diffusion: stirring and mixing in a 3-D eddy model

Genevieve Jay Brett, Larry Pratt, Irina Rypina, and Peng Wang

Related authors

Sensitivity of 21st-century projected ocean new production changes to idealized biogeochemical model structure
Genevieve Jay Brett, Daniel B. Whitt, Matthew C. Long, Frank Bryan, Kate Feloy, and Kelvin J. Richards
Biogeosciences, 18, 3123–3145, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3123-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3123-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Bifurcation, dynamical systems, chaos, phase transition, nonlinear waves, pattern formation | Topic: Climate, atmosphere, ocean, hydrology, cryosphere, biosphere
Aggregation of slightly buoyant microplastics in 3D vortex flows
Irina I. Rypina, Lawrence J. Pratt, and Michael Dotzel
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 25–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-25-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-25-2024, 2024
Short summary
Existence and influence of mixed states in a model of vegetation patterns
Lilian Vanderveken, Marina Martínez Montero, and Michel Crucifix
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 585–599, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-585-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-585-2023, 2023
Short summary
Rate-induced tipping in ecosystems and climate: the role of unstable states, basin boundaries and transient dynamics
Ulrike Feudel
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 481–502, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-481-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Review article: Dynamical systems, algebraic topology and the climate sciences
Michael Ghil and Denisse Sciamarella
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 399–434, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-399-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-399-2023, 2023
Short summary
A new approach to understanding fluid mixing in process-study models of stratified fluids
Samuel George Hartharn-Evans, Marek Stastna, and Magda Carr
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1920,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1920, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abernathey, R., Marshall, J., Mazloff, M., and Shuckburgh, E.: Enhancement of mesoscale eddy stirring at steering levels in the Southern Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40, 170–184, 2010. a
Aref, H.: Stirring by chaotic advection, J. Fluid Mech., 143, 1–21, 1984. a
Branicki, M. and Kirwan Jr., A.: Stirring: the Eckart paradigm revisited, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 48, 1027–1042, 2010. a
Brett, G.: 3D rotating cylinder eddy codes, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1560663, 2018. a
Brett, G. and Wang, P.: 3D rotating cylinder eddy data, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1560204, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
The relative importance of chaotic stirring and smaller-scale turbulent mixing for the distribution of dye in an idealized ocean flow feature is quantified using three different methods. We find that stirring is the dominant process in large areas with fast stirring, while mixing dominates in small fast-stirring regions and all slow-stirring regions. This quantification of process dominance can help oceanographers think about when to model stirring accurately, which can be costly.