Articles | Volume 28, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-61-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-61-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
22 Jan 2021
Research article |
| 22 Jan 2021
| 22 Jan 2021
Ensemble-based statistical interpolation with Gaussian anamorphosis for the spatial analysis of precipitation
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Thomas N. Nipen
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Ivar A. Seierstad
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Christoffer A. Elo
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Related authors
Cristian Lussana, Emma Baietti, Line Båserud, Thomas Nils Nipen, and Ivar Ambjørn Seierstad
Adv. Sci. Res., 20, 35–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-20-35-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-20-35-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have compared hourly precipitation totals measured by rain gauges installed and maintained by citizens against professional weather stations managed by the national weather services of Finland, Norway and Sweden. The manufacturer of the citizen rain gauges is Netatmo. Despite the heterogeneity of citizens' measurements, our results show that the two data sources are comparable with each other, though with some limitations. The results also show how to improve the accuracy of citizens' data.
Line Båserud, Cristian Lussana, Thomas N. Nipen, Ivar A. Seierstad, Louise Oram, and Trygve Aspelien
Adv. Sci. Res., 17, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the open source project Titan for automatic quality control of meteorological in-situ observations. The quality control strategy adopted is a sequence of tests, where several of them utilize the expected spatial consistency between nearby observations.
Titan serves real-time operational applications that process massive amounts of observations measured by networks of automatic weather stations. Further developments include transforming Titan into a more flexible library of functions.
Cristian Lussana, Ole Einar Tveito, Andreas Dobler, and Ketil Tunheim
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1531–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
seNorge_2018 is a collection of observational gridded datasets for daily total precipitation and daily mean, minimum, and maximum temperature for the Norwegian mainland covering the time period from 1957 to the present day. The fields have 1 km of grid spacing. The data are used for applications in climatology, hydrology, and meteorology. seNorge_2018 provides a "gridded truth", especially in data-dense regions. The uncertainty increases with decreasing data density.
Cristian Lussana, Tuomo Saloranta, Thomas Skaugen, Jan Magnusson, Ole Einar Tveito, and Jess Andersen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 235–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The observational gridded climate datasets are among the primary sources of information for climate analysis and monitoring. The seNorge2 high-resolution dataset of daily total precipitation (1957–2017) constitutes a valuable meteorological input for snow and hydrological simulations which are routinely conducted over Norway for research and to support operational applications for civil protection purposes. The dataset and the seNorge2 software are publicly available for download.
F. Uboldi, A. N. Sulis, C. Lussana, M. Cislaghi, and M. Russo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 981–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, 2014
C. Lussana
Adv. Sci. Res., 10, 59–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, 2013
Cristian Lussana, Emma Baietti, Line Båserud, Thomas Nils Nipen, and Ivar Ambjørn Seierstad
Adv. Sci. Res., 20, 35–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-20-35-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-20-35-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have compared hourly precipitation totals measured by rain gauges installed and maintained by citizens against professional weather stations managed by the national weather services of Finland, Norway and Sweden. The manufacturer of the citizen rain gauges is Netatmo. Despite the heterogeneity of citizens' measurements, our results show that the two data sources are comparable with each other, though with some limitations. The results also show how to improve the accuracy of citizens' data.
Line Båserud, Cristian Lussana, Thomas N. Nipen, Ivar A. Seierstad, Louise Oram, and Trygve Aspelien
Adv. Sci. Res., 17, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the open source project Titan for automatic quality control of meteorological in-situ observations. The quality control strategy adopted is a sequence of tests, where several of them utilize the expected spatial consistency between nearby observations.
Titan serves real-time operational applications that process massive amounts of observations measured by networks of automatic weather stations. Further developments include transforming Titan into a more flexible library of functions.
Cristian Lussana, Ole Einar Tveito, Andreas Dobler, and Ketil Tunheim
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1531–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
seNorge_2018 is a collection of observational gridded datasets for daily total precipitation and daily mean, minimum, and maximum temperature for the Norwegian mainland covering the time period from 1957 to the present day. The fields have 1 km of grid spacing. The data are used for applications in climatology, hydrology, and meteorology. seNorge_2018 provides a "gridded truth", especially in data-dense regions. The uncertainty increases with decreasing data density.
Cristian Lussana, Tuomo Saloranta, Thomas Skaugen, Jan Magnusson, Ole Einar Tveito, and Jess Andersen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 235–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The observational gridded climate datasets are among the primary sources of information for climate analysis and monitoring. The seNorge2 high-resolution dataset of daily total precipitation (1957–2017) constitutes a valuable meteorological input for snow and hydrological simulations which are routinely conducted over Norway for research and to support operational applications for civil protection purposes. The dataset and the seNorge2 software are publicly available for download.
F. Uboldi, A. N. Sulis, C. Lussana, M. Cislaghi, and M. Russo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 981–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, 2014
M. Bentsen, I. Bethke, J. B. Debernard, T. Iversen, A. Kirkevåg, Ø. Seland, H. Drange, C. Roelandt, I. A. Seierstad, C. Hoose, and J. E. Kristjánsson
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 687–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, 2013
C. Lussana
Adv. Sci. Res., 10, 59–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Time series, machine learning, networks, stochastic processes, extreme events | Topic: Climate, atmosphere, ocean, hydrology, cryosphere, biosphere | Techniques: Big data and artificial intelligence
The sampling method for optimal precursors of El Niño–Southern Oscillation events
A comparison of two causal methods in the context of climate analyses
A two-fold deep-learning strategy to correct and downscale winds over mountains
Downscaling of surface wind forecasts using convolutional neural networks
Data-driven methods to estimate the committor function in conceptual ocean models
Exploring meteorological droughts' spatial patterns across Europe through complex network theory
Integrated hydrodynamic and machine learning models for compound flooding prediction in a data-scarce estuarine delta
Predicting sea surface temperatures with coupled reservoir computers
Using neural networks to improve simulations in the gray zone
The blessing of dimensionality for the analysis of climate data
Producing realistic climate data with generative adversarial networks
Identification of droughts and heatwaves in Germany with regional climate networks
Extracting statistically significant eddy signals from large Lagrangian datasets using wavelet ridge analysis, with application to the Gulf of Mexico
Applications of matrix factorization methods to climate data
Detecting dynamical anomalies in time series from different palaeoclimate proxy archives using windowed recurrence network analysis
Remember the past: a comparison of time-adaptive training schemes for non-homogeneous regression
Bin Shi and Junjie Ma
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 165–174, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-165-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-165-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Different from traditional deterministic optimization algorithms, we implement the sampling method to compute the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations (CNOPs) in the realistic and predictive coupled ocean–atmosphere model, which reduces the first-order information to the zeroth-order one, avoiding the high-cost computation of the gradient. The numerical performance highlights the importance of stochastic optimization algorithms to compute CNOPs and capture initial optimal precursors.
David Docquier, Giorgia Di Capua, Reik V. Donner, Carlos A. L. Pires, Amélie Simon, and Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 115–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-115-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-115-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Identifying causes of specific processes is crucial in order to better understand our climate system. Traditionally, correlation analyses have been used to identify cause–effect relationships in climate studies. However, correlation does not imply causation, which justifies the need to use causal methods. We compare two independent causal methods and show that these are superior to classical correlation analyses. We also find some interesting differences between the two methods.
Louis Le Toumelin, Isabelle Gouttevin, Clovis Galiez, and Nora Helbig
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 75–97, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-75-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-75-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasting wind fields over mountains is of high importance for several applications and particularly for understanding how wind erodes and disperses snow. Forecasters rely on operational wind forecasts over mountains, which are currently only available on kilometric scales. These forecasts can also be affected by errors of diverse origins. Here we introduce a new strategy based on artificial intelligence to correct large-scale wind forecasts in mountains and increase their spatial resolution.
Florian Dupuy, Pierre Durand, and Thierry Hedde
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 553–570, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasting near-surface winds over complex terrain requires high-resolution numerical weather prediction models, which drastically increase the duration of simulations and hinder them in running on a routine basis. A faster alternative is statistical downscaling. We explore different ways of calculating near-surface wind speed and direction using artificial intelligence algorithms based on various convolutional neural networks in order to find the best approach for wind downscaling.
Valérian Jacques-Dumas, René M. van Westen, Freddy Bouchet, and Henk A. Dijkstra
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 195–216, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-195-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-195-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Computing the probability of occurrence of rare events is relevant because of their high impact but also difficult due to the lack of data. Rare event algorithms are designed for that task, but their efficiency relies on a score function that is hard to compute. We compare four methods that compute this function from data and measure their performance to assess which one would be best suited to be applied to a climate model. We find neural networks to be most robust and flexible for this task.
Domenico Giaquinto, Warner Marzocchi, and Jürgen Kurths
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 167–181, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-167-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-167-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Despite being among the most severe climate extremes, it is still challenging to assess droughts’ features for specific regions. In this paper we study meteorological droughts in Europe using concepts derived from climate network theory. By exploring the synchronization in droughts occurrences across the continent we unveil regional clusters which are individually examined to identify droughts’ geographical propagation and source–sink systems, which could potentially support droughts’ forecast.
Joko Sampurno, Valentin Vallaeys, Randy Ardianto, and Emmanuel Hanert
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 301–315, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-301-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-301-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we successfully built and evaluated machine learning models for predicting water level dynamics as a proxy for compound flooding hazards in a data-scarce delta. The issues that we tackled here are data scarcity and low computational resources for building flood forecasting models. The proposed approach is suitable for use by local water management agencies in developing countries that encounter these issues.
Benjamin Walleshauser and Erik Bollt
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 255–264, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-255-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-255-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
As sea surface temperature (SST) is vital for understanding the greater climate of the Earth and is also an important variable in weather prediction, we propose a model that effectively capitalizes on the reduced complexity of machine learning models while still being able to efficiently predict over a large spatial domain. We find that it is proficient at predicting the SST at specific locations as well as over the greater domain of the Earth’s oceans.
Raphael Kriegmair, Yvonne Ruckstuhl, Stephan Rasp, and George Craig
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 171–181, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-171-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-171-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Our regional numerical weather prediction models run at kilometer-scale resolutions. Processes that occur at smaller scales not yet resolved contribute significantly to the atmospheric flow. We use a neural network (NN) to represent the unresolved part of physical process such as cumulus clouds. We test this approach on a simplified, yet representative, 1D model and find that the NN corrections vastly improve the model forecast up to a couple of days.
Bo Christiansen
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 409–422, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-409-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-409-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In geophysics we often need to analyse large samples of high-dimensional fields. Fortunately but counterintuitively, such high dimensionality can be a blessing, and we demonstrate how this allows simple analytical results to be derived. These results include estimates of correlations between sample members and how the sample mean depends on the sample size. We show that the properties of high dimensionality with success can be applied to climate fields, such as those from ensemble modelling.
Camille Besombes, Olivier Pannekoucke, Corentin Lapeyre, Benjamin Sanderson, and Olivier Thual
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 347–370, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-347-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-347-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the potential of a type of deep generative neural network to produce realistic weather situations when trained from the climate of a general circulation model. The generator represents the climate in a compact latent space. It is able to reproduce many aspects of the targeted multivariate distribution. Some properties of our method open new perspectives such as the exploration of the extremes close to a given state or how to connect two realistic weather states.
Gerd Schädler and Marcus Breil
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 231–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-231-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-231-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We used regional climate networks (RCNs) to identify past heatwaves and droughts in Germany. RCNs provide information for whole areas and can provide many details of extreme events. The RCNs were constructed on the grid of the E-OBS data set. Time series correlation was used to construct the networks. Network metrics were compared to standard extreme indices and differed considerably between normal and extreme years. The results show that RCNs can identify severe and moderate extremes.
Jonathan M. Lilly and Paula Pérez-Brunius
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 181–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-181-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-181-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Long-lived eddies are an important part of the ocean circulation. Here a dataset for studying eddies in the Gulf of Mexico is created through the analysis of trajectories of drifting instruments. The method involves the identification of quasi-periodic signals, characteristic of particles trapped in eddies, from the displacement records, followed by the creation of a measure of statistical significance. It is expected that this dataset will be of use to other authors studying this region.
Dylan Harries and Terence J. O'Kane
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 453–471, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-453-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-453-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Different dimension reduction methods may produce profoundly different low-dimensional representations of multiscale systems. We perform a set of case studies to investigate these differences. When a clear scale separation is present, similar bases are obtained using all methods, but when this is not the case some methods may produce representations that are poorly suited for describing features of interest, highlighting the importance of a careful choice of method when designing analyses.
Jaqueline Lekscha and Reik V. Donner
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 261–275, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-261-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-261-2020, 2020
Moritz N. Lang, Sebastian Lerch, Georg J. Mayr, Thorsten Simon, Reto Stauffer, and Achim Zeileis
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 23–34, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-23-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-23-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Statistical post-processing aims to increase the predictive skill of probabilistic ensemble weather forecasts by learning the statistical relation between historical pairs of observations and ensemble forecasts within a given training data set. This study compares four different training schemes and shows that including multiple years of data in the training set typically yields a more stable post-processing while it loses the ability to quickly adjust to temporal changes in the underlying data.
Cited articles
Amezcua, J. and Leeuwen, P. J. V.: Gaussian anamorphosis in the analysis step of the EnKF: a joint state-variable/observation approach, Tellus A, 66, 23493, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v66.23493, 2014. a
Båserud, L., Lussana, C., Nipen, T. N., Seierstad, I. A., Oram, L., and Aspelien, T.: TITAN automatic spatial quality control of meteorological in-situ observations, Adv. Sci. Res., 17, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, 2020. a
Bertino, L., Evensen, G., and Wackernagel, H.: Sequential Data Assimilation Techniques in Oceanography, Int. Stat. Rev., 71, 223–241, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2003.tb00194.x, 2003. a, b, c
Bocquet, M., Raanes, P. N., and Hannart, A.: Expanding the validity of the ensemble Kalman filter without the intrinsic need for inflation, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 22, 645–662, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-22-645-2015, 2015. a, b
Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L., and Evensen, G.: Data assimilation in the geosciences: an overview of methods, issues, and perspectives, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change, 9, e535, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.535, 2018. a, b, c
Chiles, J.-P. and Delfiner, P.: Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118136188, 2012. a
CIMO: WMO Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, Tech. Rep., World Meteorological Organization, ISBN 978-92-63-10008-5, 2014. a
Crespi, A., Lussana, C., Brunetti, M., Dobler, A., Maugeri, M., and Tveito, O. E.: High-resolution monthly precipitation climatologies over Norway (1981–2010): Joining numerical model data sets and in situ observations, Int. J. Climatol., 39, 2057–2070, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5933, 2019. a
Desroziers, G., Berre, L., Chapnik, B., and Poli, P.: Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis-error statistics in observation space, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 3385–3396, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.108, 2005. a
de Vos, L. W., Droste, A. M., Zander, M. J., Overeem, A., Leijnse, H., Heusinkveld, B. G., Steeneveld, G. J., and Uijlenhoet, R.: Hydrometeorological Monitoring Using Opportunistic Sensing Networks in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E167–E185, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0091.1, 2020. a
Diamond, P. and Armstrong, M.: Robustness of variograms and conditioning of kriging matrices, Math. Geol., 16, 809–822, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01036706, 1984. a
Dyrrdal, A. V., Lenkoski, A., Thorarinsdottir, T. L., and Stordal, F.: Bayesian hierarchical modeling of extreme hourly precipitation in Norway, Environmetrics, 26, 89–106, https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2301, 2015. a
Erdin, R.: Combining rain gauge and radar measurements of a heavy precipitation event over Switzerland: Comparison of geostatistical methods and investigation of important influencing factors, PhD thesis, Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie, MeteoSchweiz, Zurich, Switzerland, 2009. a
Erdin, R., Frei, C., and Künsch, H. R.: Data transformation and uncertainty in geostatistical combination of radar and rain gauges, J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 1332–1346, 2012. a
Evensen, G.: The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation, Ocean Dyn., 53, 343–367, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9, 2003. a, b
Evensen, G.: Data assimilation. The Ensemble Kalman Filter, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-38301-7, 2006. a
Fletcher, S. J. and Zupanski, M.: A data assimilation method for log-normally distributed observational errors, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 2505–2519, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.222, 2006. a
Fortin, V., Roy, G., Stadnyk, T., Koenig, K., Gasset, N., and Mahidjiba, A.: Ten Years of Science Based on the Canadian Precipitation Analysis: A CaPA System Overview and Literature Review, Atmosphere-Ocean, 56, 178–196, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2018.1474728, 2018. a
Frei, C.: Interpolation of temperature in a mountainous region using nonlinear profiles and non-Euclidean distances, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 1585–1605, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3786, 2014. a
Frei, C. and Isotta, F. A.: Ensemble spatial precipitation analysis from rain gauge data: Methodology and application in the European Alps, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 5757–5778, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030004, 2019. a, b
Frogner, I.-L., Singleton, A. T., Køltzow, M. Ø, and Andrae, U.: Convection-permitting ensembles: Challenges related to their design and use, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 145 (Suppl. 1), 90–106, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3525, 2019. a, b, c
Gandin, L. S.: Complex Quality Control of Meteorological Observations, Mon. Weather Rev., 116, 1137–1156, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1988)116<1137:CQCOMO>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
Gaspari, G. and Cohn, S. E.: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 125, 723–757, 1999. a
Germann, U. and Joss, J.: Operational Measurement of Precipitation in Mountainous Terrain, 52–77, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05202-0_2, 2004. a, b
Greybush, S. J., Kalnay, E., Miyoshi, T., Ide, K., and Hunt, B. R.: Balance and ensemble Kalman filter localization techniques, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 511–522, 2011. a
Hersbach, H.: Decomposition of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score for Ensemble Prediction Systems, Weather and Forecasting, 15, 559–570, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0559:DOTCRP>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 Global Reanalysis, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 149, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. a
Hiebl, J. and Frei, C.: Daily temperature grids for Austria since 1961: concept, creation and applicability, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 124, 161–178, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1411-4, 2016. a
Hiebl, J. and Frei, C.: Daily precipitation grids for Austria since 1961–development and evaluation of a spatial dataset for hydroclimatic monitoring and modelling, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 132, 327–345, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2093-x, 2018. a
Hofstra, N., Haylock, M., New, M., Jones, P., and Frei, C.: Comparison of six methods for the interpolation of daily, European climate data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D21110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010100, 2008. a
Huang, S., Eisner, S., Magnusson, J. O., Lussana, C., Yang, X., and Beldring, S.: Improvements of the spatially distributed hydrological modelling using the HBV model at 1 km resolution for Norway, J. Hydrol., 577, 123585, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.051, 2019. a
Isotta, F. A., Begert, M., and Frei, C.: Long-Term Consistent Monthly Temperature and Precipitation Grid Data Sets for Switzerland Over the Past 150 Years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 3783–3799, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029910, 2019. a, b
Jermey, P. and Renshaw, R.: Precipitation representation over a two-year period in regional reanalysis, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 1300–1310, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2733, 2016. a, b
Jolliffe, I. T. and Stephenson, D. B.: Forecast verification, Wiley Oxford, Chichester, West Sussex, England, UK, 2012. a
Kalnay, E.: Atmospheric modeling, data assimilation and predictability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003. a
Kotlarski, S., Szabó, P., Herrera, S., Räty, O., Keuler, K., Soares, P. M., Cardoso, R. M., Bosshard, T., Pagé, C., Boberg, F., Gutiérrez, J. M., Isotta, F. A., Jaczewski, A., Kreienkamp, F., Liniger, M. A., Lussana, C., and Pianko-Kluczyńska, K.: Observational uncertainty and regional climate model evaluation: A pan-European perspective, Int. J. Climatol., 39, 3730–3749, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5249, 2017. a
Kuusela, M. and Stein, M. L.: Locally stationary spatio-temporal interpolation of Argo profiling float data, Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 474, 20180400, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0400, 2018. a, b
Lanzante, J. R.: Resistant, robust and non-parametric techniques for the analysis of climate data: theory and examples, including applications to historical radiosonde station data, Int. J. Climatol., 16, 1197–1226, 1996. a
Lespinas, F., Fortin, V., Roy, G., Rasmussen, P., and Stadnyk, T.: Performance Evaluation of the Canadian Precipitation Analysis (CaPA), J. Hydrometeorol., 16, 2045–2064, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0191.1, 2015. a, b
Lien, G.-Y., Kalnay, E., and Miyoshi, T.: Effective assimilation of global precipitation: simulation experiments, Tellus A, 65, 19915, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v65i0.19915, 2013. a, b, c
Lönnberg, P. and Hollingsworth, A.: The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data Part II: The covariance of height and wind errors, Tellus A, 38A, 137–161, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.1986.tb00461.x, 1986. a
Lorenc, A. C.: Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 112, 1177–1194, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711247414, 1986. a
Lundquist, J., Hughes, M., Gutmann, E., and Kapnick, S.: Our skill in modeling mountain rain and snow is bypassing the skill of our observational networks, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 2473–2490, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0001.1, 2019. a, b
Lussana, C., Salvati, M. R., Pellegrini, U., and Uboldi, F.: Efficient high-resolution 3-D interpolation of meteorological variables for operational use, Adv. Sci. Res., 3, 105–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-3-105-2009, 2009. a
Lussana, C., Uboldi, F., and Salvati, M. R.: A spatial consistency test for surface observations from mesoscale meteorological networks, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 136, 1075–1088, 2010. a
Lussana, C., Saloranta, T., Skaugen, T., Magnusson, J., Tveito, O. E., and Andersen, J.: seNorge2 daily precipitation, an observational gridded dataset over Norway from 1957 to the present day, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 235–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, 2018. a
Lussana, C., Seierstad, I. A., Nipen, T. N., and Cantarello, L.: Spatial interpolation of two-metre temperature over Norway based on the combination of numerical weather prediction ensembles and in situ observations, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 3626–3643, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3646, 2019. a
Lussana, C., Tveito, O. E., Dobler, A., and Tunheim, K.: seNorge_2018, daily precipitation, and temperature datasets over Norway, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1531–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, 2019. a
Magnusson, J., Eisner, S., Huang, S., Lussana, C., Mazzotti, G., Essery, R., Saloranta, T., and Beldring, S.: Influence of Spatial Resolution on Snow Cover Dynamics for a Coastal and Mountainous Region at High Latitudes (Norway), Water Resour. Res., 55, 5612–5630, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024925, 2019. a
MET Norway: Frost API, available at: https://frost.met.no/ (last access: 20 January 2021), 2019. a
Müller, M., Homleid, M., Ivarsson, K.-I., Køltzow, M. A. Ø., Lindskog, M., Midtbø, K. H., Andrae, U., Aspelien, T., Berggren, L., Bjørge, D., Dahlgren, P., Kristiansen, J., Randriamampianina, R., Ridal, M., and Vignes, O.: AROME-MetCoOp: a nordic convective-scale operational weather prediction model, Weather Forecast., 32, 609–627, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0099.1, 2017. a, b, c
Nipen, T. N., Seierstad, I. A., Lussana, C., Kristiansen, J., and Hov, Ø.: Adopting Citizen Observations in Operational Weather Prediction, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E43–E57, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0237.1, 2020. a, b
Norwegian Meteorological Institute: MEPS Archive, MET Norway Thredds Service, available at: https://thredds.met.no/thredds/catalog/meps25epsarchive/catalog.html, last access: 12 January 2021a. a
Norwegian Meteorological Institute: Radar accr archive (Norway), MET Norway Thredds Service, available at: https://thredds.met.no/thredds/catalog/remotesensingradaraccr/catalog.html, last access: 12 January 2021b. a
Pollock, M., Dutton, M., Quinn, P., O'connell, P., Wilkinson, M., and Colli, M.: Accurate rainfall measurement: The Neglected Achilles Heel of hydro-meteorology, in: WMO technical conference on meteorological and environmental instruments and methods of observation, St. Petersburg, Russia, 7–9 July 2014, pp. 7–9, 2014. a
Raanes, P. N., Carrassi, A., and Bertino, L.: Extending the Square Root Method to Account for Additive Forecast Noise in Ensemble Methods, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 3857–3873, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00375.1, 2015. a, b
Savage, L. J.: The foundations of statistics, Courier Corporation, New York, USA, 1972. a
Soci, C., Bazile, E., Besson, F., and Landelius, T.: High-resolution precipitation re-analysis system for climatological purposes, Tellus A, 68, 29879, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v68.29879, 2016. a, b, c
Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Edn: Softcover reprint of the hardcover (1st Edn.), Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8, 1988. a
Tarantola, A.: Inverse Problem Theory and methods for model parameter estimation, edited by: Society for Industrial and applied mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, USA, ISBN 978-0-89871-572-9, eISBN 978-0-89871-792-1, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717921, 2005. a, b
Thunis, P. and Bornstein, R.: Hierarchy of mesoscale flow assumptions and equations, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 380–397, 1996. a
Tian, Y., Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Tang, L., Sapiano, M., Maggioni, V., and Wu, H.: Modeling errors in daily precipitation measurements: Additive or multiplicative?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2060–2065, 2013. a
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Van der Schrier, G., Begueria, S., Azorin-Molina, C., and Lopez-Moreno, J.-I.: Contribution of precipitation and reference evapotranspiration to drought indices under different climates, J. Hydrol., 526, 42–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.025, 2015. a
Wackernagel, H.: Multivariate Geostatistics, An Introduction with Applications, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05294-5, 2003. a, b, c
Wolff, M. A., Isaksen, K., Petersen-Øverleir, A., Ødemark, K., Reitan, T., and Brækkan, R.: Derivation of a new continuous adjustment function for correcting wind-induced loss of solid precipitation: results of a Norwegian field study, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 951–967, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-951-2015, 2015.
a
Zahumensky, I.: World Guidelines on Quality Control Procedures for Data from Automatic Weather Stations, World Meteorological Organization, Geneve, Switzerland, 2004. a
Short summary
An unprecedented amount of rainfall data is available nowadays, such as ensemble model output, weather radar estimates, and in situ observations from networks of both traditional and opportunistic sensors. Nevertheless, the exact amount of precipitation, to some extent, eludes our knowledge. The objective of our study is precipitation reconstruction through the combination of numerical model outputs with observations from multiple data sources.
An unprecedented amount of rainfall data is available nowadays, such as ensemble model output,...
