Articles | Volume 28, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-295-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-295-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Ensemble Riemannian data assimilation over the Wasserstein space
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo-Engineering, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
Ardeshir Ebtehaj
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo-Engineering, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
Peter J. van Leeuwen
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Dongmian Zou
Division of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China
Gilad Lerman
School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
Related authors
Sagar K. Tamang, Ardeshir Ebtehaj, Peter Jan van Leeuwen, Gilad Lerman, and Efi Foufoula-Georgiou
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 77–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-77-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-77-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The outputs from Earth system models are optimally combined with satellite observations to produce accurate forecasts through a process called data assimilation. Many existing data assimilation methodologies have some assumptions regarding the shape of the probability distributions of model output and observations, which results in forecast inaccuracies. In this paper, we test the effectiveness of a newly proposed methodology that relaxes such assumptions about high-dimensional models.
Nicholas Williams, Nicholas Byrne, Daniel Feltham, Peter Jan Van Leeuwen, Ross Bannister, David Schroeder, Isobel Lawrence, Lars Nerger, Jack Landy, and Geoffrey Dawson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-742, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-742, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we present three satellite era Arctic sea ice reanalyses, each assimilating different combinations of sea ice concentration and thickness observations. Results show that using year-round thickness observations substantially improves reanalysis compared to winter-only data. The best-performing reanalysis reveals a seasonally compensating bias cycle, suggesting errors in ice growth, leads, refreezing, marginal ice zone dynamics, redistribution, and melt timing mask model errors.
Nicholas Williams, Nicholas Byrne, Daniel Feltham, Peter Jan Van Leeuwen, Ross Bannister, David Schroeder, Andrew Ridout, and Lars Nerger
The Cryosphere, 17, 2509–2532, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2509-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2509-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Observations show that the Arctic sea ice cover has reduced over the last 40 years. This study uses ensemble-based data assimilation in a stand-alone sea ice model to investigate the impacts of assimilating three different kinds of sea ice observation, including the novel assimilation of sea ice thickness distribution. We show that assimilating ice thickness distribution has a positive impact on thickness and volume estimates within the ice pack, especially for very thick ice.
Sagar K. Tamang, Ardeshir Ebtehaj, Peter Jan van Leeuwen, Gilad Lerman, and Efi Foufoula-Georgiou
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 77–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-77-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-77-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The outputs from Earth system models are optimally combined with satellite observations to produce accurate forecasts through a process called data assimilation. Many existing data assimilation methodologies have some assumptions regarding the shape of the probability distributions of model output and observations, which results in forecast inaccuracies. In this paper, we test the effectiveness of a newly proposed methodology that relaxes such assumptions about high-dimensional models.
Nicholas J. Kedzuf, J. Christine Chiu, V. Chandrasekar, Sounak Biswas, Shashank S. Joshil, Yinghui Lu, Peter Jan van Leeuwen, Christopher Westbrook, Yann Blanchard, and Sebastian O'Shea
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6885–6904, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6885-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6885-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ice clouds play a key role in our climate system due to their strong controls on precipitation and the radiation budget. However, it is difficult to characterize co-existing ice species using radar observations. We present a new method that separates the radar signals of pristine ice embedded in snow aggregates and retrieves their respective abundances and sizes for the first time. The ability to provide their quantitative microphysical properties will open up many research opportunities.
Concetta Di Mauro, Renaud Hostache, Patrick Matgen, Ramona Pelich, Marco Chini, Peter Jan van Leeuwen, Nancy K. Nichols, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4081–4097, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4081-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4081-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates how the sequential assimilation of flood extent derived from synthetic aperture radar data can help improve flood forecasting. In particular, we carried out twin experiments based on a synthetically generated dataset with controlled uncertainty. Our empirical results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed data assimilation framework, as forecasting errors are substantially reduced as a result of the assimilation.
Cited articles
Agueh, M. and Carlier, G.: Barycenters in the Wasserstein space, SIAM J.
Math. Anal., 43, 904–924, 2011. a
Altman, A. and Gondzio, J.: Regularized symmetric indefinite systems in
interior point methods for linear and quadratic optimization, Optim.
Method. Softw., 11, 275–302, 1999. a
Amezcua, J., Ide, K., Kalnay, E., and Reich, S.: Ensemble transform
Kalman–Bucy filters, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
140, 995–1004, 2014. a
Anderson, J. L.: A method for producing and evaluating probabilistic forecasts
from ensemble model integrations, J. Climate, 9, 1518–1530, 1996. a
Beezley, J. D. and Mandel, J.: Morphing ensemble Kalman filters, Tellus A, 60, 131–140, 2008. a
Benamou, J.-D. and Brenier, Y.: A computational fluid mechanics solution to the
Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem, Numer. Math., 84, 375–393,
2000. a
Berardi, M., Andrisani, A., Lopez, L., and Vurro, M.: A new data assimilation
technique based on ensemble Kalman filter and Brownian bridges: an
application to Richards’ equation, Comput. Phys. Commun., 208,
43–53, 2016. a
Bocquet, M., Pires, C. A., and Wu, L.: Beyond Gaussian statistical modeling in
geophysical data assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 2997–3023, 2010. a
Brenier, Y.: Décomposition polaire et réarrangement monotone des champs
de vecteurs, CR Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 305, 805–808, 1987. a
Burgers, G., Jan van Leeuwen, P., and Evensen, G.: Analysis scheme in the
ensemble Kalman filter, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 1719–1724, 1998. a
Carrassi, A. and Vannitsem, S.: Accounting for model error in variational data
assimilation: A deterministic formulation, Mon. Weather Rev., 138,
3369–3386, 2010. a
Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L., and Evensen, G.: Data assimilation in
the geosciences: An overview of methods, issues, and perspectives, WIRES Clim. Change, 9, e535, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.535, 2018. a
Chen, B., Dang, L., Gu, Y., Zheng, N., and Principe, J. C.: Minimum Error
Entropy Kalman Filter, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2019.2957269, 2019. a
Cramér, H.: Mathematical methods of statistics, vol. 9, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999. a
Cuturi, M.: Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport,
in: Advances in neural information processing systems, edited by: Burges, C. J. C., Bottou, L., Welling, M., Ghahramani, Z., and Weinberger, K. Q., Curran Associates, Inc., pp. 2292–2300, available at: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2013/file/af21d0c97db2e27e13572cbf59eb343d-Paper.pdf (last access: 1 May 2020), 2013. a, b
Dee, D. P.: Bias and data assimilation, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 131, 3323–3343, 2005. a
De Lannoy, G. J., Houser, P. R., Pauwels, V. R., and Verhoest, N. E.: State and
bias estimation for soil moisture profiles by an ensemble Kalman filter:
Effect of assimilation depth and frequency, Water Resour. Res., 43, W06401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005100,
2007a. a
De Lannoy, G. J., Reichle, R. H., Houser, P. R., Pauwels, V., and Verhoest,
N. E.: Correcting for forecast bias in soil moisture assimilation with the
ensemble Kalman filter, Water Resour. Res., 43, W09410, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005449, 2007b. a, b
Doucet, A. and Johansen, A. M.: A tutorial on particle filtering and smoothing:
Fifteen years later, Handbook of nonlinear filtering, 12, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 656–704, 2009. a
Drécourt, J.-P., Madsen, H., and Rosbjerg, D.: Bias aware Kalman filters:
Comparison and improvements, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 707–718, 2006. a
Ebtehaj, A. M. and Foufoula-Georgiou, E.: On variational downscaling, fusion,
and assimilation of hydrometeorological states: A unified framework via
regularization, Water Resour. Res., 49, 5944–5963, 2013. a
Ebtehaj, A. M., Zupanski, M., Lerman, G., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E.:
Variational data assimilation via sparse regularisation, Tellus A, 66, 21789 pp., https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v66.21789, 2014. a, b
Evensen, G.: The ensemble Kalman filter: Theoretical formulation and practical
implementation, Ocean Dynam., 53, 343–367, 2003. a
Feyeux, N., Vidard, A., and Nodet, M.: Optimal transport for variational data assimilation, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 25, 55–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-55-2018, 2018. a, b
Fréchet, M.: Les éléments aléatoires de nature quelconque dans
un espace distancié, Ann. I. H. Poincare,
10, 215–310, 1948. a
Furtado, H. C. M., de Campos Velho, H. F., and Macau, E. E. N.: Data
assimilation: Particle filter and artificial neural networks, in: J.
Phys. Conf. Ser., 135, 012073, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/135/1/012073, 2008. a
Goodliff, M., Amezcua, J., and Van Leeuwen, P. J.: Comparing hybrid data
assimilation methods on the Lorenz 1963 model with increasing non-linearity,
Tellus A, 67, 26928 pp., https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v67.26928, 2015. a
Gordon, N. J., Salmond, D. J., and Smith, A. F.: Novel approach to
nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation, in: IEE Proc.-F, 140, 107–113, 1993. a
Hamill, T. M.: Interpretation of rank histograms for verifying ensemble
forecasts, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 550–560, 2001. a
Han, X. and Li, X.: An evaluation of the nonlinear/non-Gaussian filters for the
sequential data assimilation, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 1434–1449,
2008. a
Hellinger, E.: Neue begründung der theorie quadratischer formen von
unendlichvielen veränderlichen, J. Reine Angew.
Math., 1909, 210–271, 1909. a
Hurkmans, R., Paniconi, C., and Troch, P. A.: Numerical assessment of a
dynamical relaxation data assimilation scheme for a catchment hydrological
model, Hydrol. Process., 20, 549–563, 2006. a
Jordan, R., Kinderlehrer, D., and Otto, F.: The variational formulation of the
Fokker-Planck equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 29, 1–17,
https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141096303359, 1998. a
Kalman, R. E.: A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems,
J. Basic Eng., 82, 35–45, 1960. a
Kalnay, E.: Atmospheric modeling, data assimilation and predictability,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003. a
Kantorovich, L. V.: On the translocation of masses, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. USSR
(NS), 37, 199–201, 1942. a
Kim, S., Eyink, G. L., Restrepo, J. M., Alexander, F. J., and Johnson, G.:
Ensemble filtering for nonlinear dynamics, Mon. Weather Rev., 131,
2586–2594, 2003. a
Kollat, J., Reed, P., and Rizzo, D.: Addressing model bias and uncertainty in
three dimensional groundwater transport forecasts for a physical aquifer
experiment, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L17402, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035021, 2008. a
Kullback, S. and Leibler, R. A.: On information and sufficiency, Ann.
Math. Stat., 22, 79–86, 1951. a
Kutta, W.: Beitrag zur naherungsweisen Integration totaler
Differentialgleichungen, Z. Math. Phys., 46, 435–453, 1901. a
Lauritzen, S. L.: Statistical manifolds, Differential Geometry in Statistical
Inference, 10, 163–216, 1987. a
Le Dimet, F.-X. and Talagrand, O.: Variational algorithms for analysis and
assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects, Tellus A, 38, 97–110, 1986. a
Li, H., Kalnay, E., and Miyoshi, T.: Simultaneous estimation of covariance
inflation and observation errors within an ensemble Kalman filter, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 523–533, 2009. a
Li, T., Bolic, M., and Djuric, P. M.: Resampling methods for particle
filtering: classification, implementation, and strategies, IEEE Signal
Proc. Mag., 32, 70–86, 2015. a
McCann, R. J.: A convexity principle for interacting gases, Adv.
Math., 128, 153–179, 1997. a
Meng, C., Ke, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, M., Zhong, W., and Ma, P.: Large-scale
optimal transport map estimation using projection pursuit, in: Advances in
Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by: Wallach, H., Larochelle, H.,
Beygelzimer, A., d'Alché-Buc, F., Fox, E., and Garnett,
R., vol. 32, Curran Associates, Inc., available at:
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/file/4bbbe6cb5982b9110413c40f3cce680b-Paper.pdf (last access: 1 August 2020),
2019. a
Monge, G.: Mémoire sur la théorie des déblais et des remblais,
Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris, pp. 666–704, 1781. a
Moradkhani, H., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H. V., and Houser, P. R.: Dual
state–parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman
filter, Adv. Water Resour., 28, 135–147, 2005. a
Nakano, S., Ueno, G., and Higuchi, T.: Merging particle filter for sequential data assimilation, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 14, 395–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-14-395-2007, 2007. a
Orlin, J. B.: A faster strongly polynomial minimum cost flow algorithm,
Oper. Res., 41, 338–350, 1993. a
Otto, F.: The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: The porous medium
equation, Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 26, 101–174,
https://doi.org/10.1081/PDE-100002243, 2001. a
Park, S. K. and Županski, D.: Four-dimensional variational data
assimilation for mesoscale and storm-scale applications, Meteorol.
Atmos. Phys., 82, 173–208, 2003. a
Pennec, X.: Intrinsic statistics on Riemannian manifolds: Basic tools for
geometric measurements, J. Math. Imaging Vis., 25, 127,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-006-6228-4, 2006. a
Pires, C. A., Talagrand, O., and Bocquet, M.: Diagnosis and impacts of
non-Gaussianity of innovations in data assimilation, Physica D, 239, 1701–1717, 2010. a
Rao, C. R., Rao, C. R., Statistiker, M., Rao, C. R., and Rao, C. R.: Linear
statistical inference and its applications, vol. 2, Wiley New York, New York, NY, 1973. a
Ravela, S., Emanuel, K., and McLaughlin, D.: Data assimilation by field
alignment, Physica D, 230, 127–145, 2007. a
Reich, S.: A nonparametric ensemble transform method for Bayesian inference,
SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 35, A2013–A2024, 2013. a
Reichle, R. H. and Koster, R. D.: Bias reduction in short records of satellite
soil moisture, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L19501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020938, 2004. a, b
Reichle, R. H., McLaughlin, D. B., and Entekhabi, D.: Hydrologic data
assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter, Mon. Weather Rev., 130,
103–114, 2002. a
Runge, C.: Über die numerische Auflösung von Differentialgleichungen,
Math. Ann., 46, 167–178, 1895. a
Spiller, E. T., Budhiraja, A., Ide, K., and Jones, C. K.: Modified particle
filter methods for assimilating Lagrangian data into a point-vortex model,
Physica D, 237, 1498–1506, 2008. a
Talagrand, O. and Courtier, P.: Variational assimilation of meteorological
observations with the adjoint vorticity equation. I: Theory, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 113, 1311–1328, 1987. a
Tamang, S. K.: tamangsk/EnRDA: Ensemble Riemannian Data Assimilation (Version v1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5047392, 2021. a
Tandeo, P., Ailliot, P., Ruiz, J., Hannart, A., Chapron, B., Cuzol, A., Monbet,
V., Easton, R., and Fablet, R.: Combining analog method and ensemble data
assimilation: application to the Lorenz-63 chaotic system, in: Machine
learning and data mining approaches to climate science, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 3–12,
2015. a
Tarantola, A.: Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation, vol. 89, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2005. a
Trevisan, A., D'Isidoro, M., and Talagrand, O.: Four-dimensional variational
assimilation in the unstable subspace and the optimal subspace dimension,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136,
487–496, 2010. a
Tsuyuki, T. and Miyoshi, T.: Recent progress of data assimilation methods in
meteorology, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 85,
331–361, 2007. a
Villani, C.: Topics in optimal transportation, 58, American Mathematical Soc., Providence, RI, https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/058,
2003. a, b
Walker, J. P., Willgoose, G. R., and Kalma, J. D.: One-dimensional soil
moisture profile retrieval by assimilation of near-surface measurements: A
simplified soil moisture model and field application, J.
Hydrometeorol., 2, 356–373, 2001. a
Woodbury, M. A.: Inverting modified matrices, Statistical Research Group, Princeton, NJ, Memo. Rep., 42, 1950. a
Zhang, X., Heemink, A., and Van Eijkeren, J.: Data assimilation in transport
models, Appl. Math. Model., 21, 2–14, 1997. a
Short summary
Data assimilation aims to improve hydrologic and weather forecasts by combining available information from Earth system models and observations. The classical approaches to data assimilation usually proceed with some preconceived assumptions about the shape of their probability distributions. As a result, when such assumptions are invalid, the forecast accuracy suffers. In the proposed methodology, we relax such assumptions and demonstrate improved performance.
Data assimilation aims to improve hydrologic and weather forecasts by combining available...