Articles | Volume 30, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-195-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-195-2023
Research article
 | 
28 Jun 2023
Research article |  | 28 Jun 2023

Data-driven methods to estimate the committor function in conceptual ocean models

Valérian Jacques-Dumas, René M. van Westen, Freddy Bouchet, and Henk A. Dijkstra

Related authors

Greenland tip jet and deep convection in the Irminger Sea: disentangling the roles of heat loss and wind stress
Aleksandr M. Fedorov, M. Femke De Jong, Claudia E. Wieners, Elodie Duyck, and Henk A. Dijkstra
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-918,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-918, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).
Short summary
Critical freshwater forcing for AMOC tipping in climate models – compensation matters
Oliver Mehling, Elian Vanderborght, and Henk A. Dijkstra
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6215,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6215, 2026
Short summary
Effect of a Bering Strait Closure on AMOC Resilience in a Climate Box Model
Jelle Soons, Elian Vanderborght, and Henk A. Dijkstra
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6565,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6565, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).
Short summary
Interaction of AMOC and Intrinsic Multi-decadal Southern Ocean Variability
Emma J. V. Smolders, René M. van Westen, and Henk A. Dijkstra
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-209,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-209, 2026
Short summary
Changing European hydroclimate under a collapsed AMOC in the Community Earth System Model
René M. van Westen, Karin van der Wiel, Swinda K. J. Falkena, and Frank Selten
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 6607–6630, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6607-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6607-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Altman, N. S.: An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression, Am. Stat., 46, 175–185, https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879, 1992. a
Armstrong McKay, D. I., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Rockström, J., and Lenton, T. M.: Exceeding 1.5 C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points, Science, 377, eabn7950, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950, 2022. a
Baars, S., Castellana, D., Wubs, F., and Dijkstra, H.: Application of adaptive multilevel splitting to high-dimensional dynamical systems, J. Comput. Phys., 424, 109876, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109876, 2021. a, b
Benedetti, R.: Scoring Rules for Forecast Verification, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 203–211, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2945.1, 2010. a, b
Bentley, J. L.: Multidimensional Binary Search Trees Used for Associative Searching, Commun. ACM, 18, 509–517, https://doi.org/10.1145/361002.361007, 1975. a
Download
Short summary
Computing the probability of occurrence of rare events is relevant because of their high impact but also difficult due to the lack of data. Rare event algorithms are designed for that task, but their efficiency relies on a score function that is hard to compute. We compare four methods that compute this function from data and measure their performance to assess which one would be best suited to be applied to a climate model. We find neural networks to be most robust and flexible for this task.
Share