Articles | Volume 29, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-171-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-171-2022
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
02 May 2022
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 02 May 2022

Using neural networks to improve simulations in the gray zone

Raphael Kriegmair, Yvonne Ruckstuhl, Stephan Rasp, and George Craig

Related authors

The effect of lossy compression of numerical weather prediction data on data analysis: a case study using enstools-compression 2023.11
Oriol Tintó Prims, Robert Redl, Marc Rautenhaus, Tobias Selz, Takumi Matsunobu, Kameswar Rao Modali, and George Craig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-753,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-753, 2024
Short summary
Influence of radiosonde observations on the sharpness and altitude of the midlatitude tropopause in the ECMWF IFS
Konstantin Krüger, Andreas Schäfler, Martin Weissmann, and George C. Craig
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 491–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-491-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-491-2024, 2024
Short summary
Understanding the dependence of mean precipitation on convective treatment and horizontal resolution in tropical aquachannel experiments
Hyunju Jung, Peter Knippertz, Yvonne Ruckstuhl, Robert Redl, Tijana Janjic, and Corinna Hoose
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 1111–1134, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-1111-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-1111-2023, 2023
Short summary
The three-dimensional structure of fronts in mid-latitude weather systems in numerical weather prediction models
Andreas A. Beckert, Lea Eisenstein, Annika Oertel, Tim Hewson, George C. Craig, and Marc Rautenhaus
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4427–4450, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4427-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4427-2023, 2023
Short summary
The three-dimensional structure of fronts in mid-latitude weather systems as represented by numerical weather prediction models
Andreas Alexander Beckert, Lea Eisenstein, Annika Oertel, Timothy Hewson, George C. Craig, and Marc Rautenhaus
Weather Clim. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2022-36,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2022-36, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Time series, machine learning, networks, stochastic processes, extreme events | Topic: Climate, atmosphere, ocean, hydrology, cryosphere, biosphere | Techniques: Big data and artificial intelligence
Representation learning with unconditional denoising diffusion models for dynamical systems
Tobias Sebastian Finn, Lucas Disson, Alban Farchi, Marc Bocquet, and Charlotte Durand
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 409–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-409-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-409-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterisation of Dansgaard–Oeschger events in palaeoclimate time series using the matrix profile method
Susana Barbosa, Maria Eduarda Silva, and Denis-Didier Rousseau
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 433–447, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-433-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of forecasts by a global data-driven weather model with and without probabilistic post-processing at Norwegian stations
John Bjørnar Bremnes, Thomas N. Nipen, and Ivar A. Seierstad
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 247–257, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-247-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-247-2024, 2024
Short summary
The sampling method for optimal precursors of El Niño–Southern Oscillation events
Bin Shi and Junjie Ma
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 165–174, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-165-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-165-2024, 2024
Short summary
A comparison of two causal methods in the context of climate analyses
David Docquier, Giorgia Di Capua, Reik V. Donner, Carlos A. L. Pires, Amélie Simon, and Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 115–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-115-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-115-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bocquet, M., Brajard, J., Carrassi, A., and Bertino, L.: Bayesian inference of chaotic dynamics by merging data assimilation, machine learning and expectation-maximization, Foundations of Data Science, 2, 55–80, https://doi.org/10.3934/fods.2020004, 2020. a
Bolton, T. and Zanna, L.: Applications of Deep Learning to Ocean Data Inference and Subgrid Parameterization, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 376–399, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001472, 2019. a
Brajard, J., Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., and Bertino, L.: Combining data assimilation and machine learning to emulate a dynamical model from sparse and noisy observations: A case study with the Lorenz 96 model, J. Comput. Sci., 44, 101171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101171, 2020. a
Brajard, J., Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., and Bertino, L.: Combining data assimilation and machine learning to infer unresolved scale parametrization, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 379, 20200086, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0086, 2021. a
Brenowitz, N. D. and Bretherton, C. S.: Spatially Extended Tests of a Neural Network Parametrization Trained by Coarse-Graining, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 2728–2744, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001711, 2019. a, b
Download
Short summary
Our regional numerical weather prediction models run at kilometer-scale resolutions. Processes that occur at smaller scales not yet resolved contribute significantly to the atmospheric flow. We use a neural network (NN) to represent the unresolved part of physical process such as cumulus clouds. We test this approach on a simplified, yet representative, 1D model and find that the NN corrections vastly improve the model forecast up to a couple of days.