Articles | Volume 27, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-187-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-187-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
16 Apr 2020
Research article |
| 16 Apr 2020
| 16 Apr 2020
Simulating model uncertainty of subgrid-scale processes by sampling model errors at convective scales
Michiel Van Ginderachter
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Meteorological Research and Development, Royal Meteorological Institute, Brussels, Belgium
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent university, Ghent, Belgium
Daan Degrauwe
Department of Meteorological Research and Development, Royal Meteorological Institute, Brussels, Belgium
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent university, Ghent, Belgium
Stéphane Vannitsem
Department of Meteorological Research and Development, Royal Meteorological Institute, Brussels, Belgium
Piet Termonia
Department of Meteorological Research and Development, Royal Meteorological Institute, Brussels, Belgium
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent university, Ghent, Belgium
Related authors
Olivier Giot, Piet Termonia, Daan Degrauwe, Rozemien De Troch, Steven Caluwaerts, Geert Smet, Julie Berckmans, Alex Deckmyn, Lesley De Cruz, Pieter De Meutter, Annelies Duerinckx, Luc Gerard, Rafiq Hamdi, Joris Van den Bergh, Michiel Van Ginderachter, and Bert Van Schaeybroeck
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1143–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1143-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1143-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium and Ghent University have performed two simulations with different horizontal resolutions of the past observed climate of Europe for the period 1979–2010. Of special interest is the new way of handling convective precipitation in the model that was used. Results show that the model is capable of representing the European climate and comparison with other models reveals that precipitation patterns are well represented.
Martin Bonte and Stéphane Vannitsem
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3915, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3915, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years, there has been more and more floods due to intense precipitation, such as the July 2021 event in Belgium. Predicting precipitation is a difficult task, even for the next hours. This study focuses on a tool to assess whether a given situation is stable or not (i.e. is likely to stay as it is or could evolve in an unpredictable manner).
Stéphane Vannitsem, X. San Liang, and Carlos A. Pires
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3308, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3308, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale modes of variability are present in the climate system. These modes are known to have influences on each other, but usually viewed as linear influences. The nonlinear connections among a set of key climate indices are here explored using tools from information theory, which allow for characterizing the causality between indices. It is found that quadratic nonlinear dependencies between climate indices are present at low-frequencies, reflecting the complex nature of its dynamics.
Anupama K. Xavier, Jonathan Demaeyer, and Stéphane Vannitsem
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 893–912, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-893-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-893-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research focuses on understanding different atmospheric patterns like blocking, zonal, and transition regimes and analyzing their predictability. We used an idealized land–atmosphere coupled model to simulate Earth's atmosphere. Then we identified these blocking, zonal, and transition regimes using Gaussian mixture clustering and studied their predictability using Lyapunov exponents.
David Docquier, Giorgia Di Capua, Reik V. Donner, Carlos A. L. Pires, Amélie Simon, and Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 115–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-115-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-115-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Identifying causes of specific processes is crucial in order to better understand our climate system. Traditionally, correlation analyses have been used to identify cause–effect relationships in climate studies. However, correlation does not imply causation, which justifies the need to use causal methods. We compare two independent causal methods and show that these are superior to classical correlation analyses. We also find some interesting differences between the two methods.
Stijn Van Leuven, Pieter De Meutter, Johan Camps, Piet Termonia, and Andy Delcloo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5323–5338, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5323-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5323-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Precipitation collects airborne particles and deposits these on the ground. This process is called wet deposition and greatly determines how airborne radioactive particles (released routinely or accidentally) contaminate the surface. In this work we present a new method to improve the calculation of wet deposition in computer models. We apply this method to the existing model FLEXPART by simulating the Fukushima nuclear accident (2011) and show that it improves the simulation of wet deposition.
Michel Journée, Edouard Goudenhoofdt, Stéphane Vannitsem, and Laurent Delobbe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3169–3189, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3169-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3169-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The exceptional flood of July 2021 in central Europe impacted Belgium severely. This study aims to characterize rainfall amounts in Belgium from 13 to 16 July 2021 based on observational data (i.e., rain gauge data and a radar-based rainfall product). The spatial and temporal distributions of rainfall during the event aredescribed. In order to document such a record-breaking event as much as possible, the rainfall data are shared with the scientific community on Zenodo for further studies.
Jonathan Demaeyer, Jonas Bhend, Sebastian Lerch, Cristina Primo, Bert Van Schaeybroeck, Aitor Atencia, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Jieyu Chen, Markus Dabernig, Gavin Evans, Jana Faganeli Pucer, Ben Hooper, Nina Horat, David Jobst, Janko Merše, Peter Mlakar, Annette Möller, Olivier Mestre, Maxime Taillardat, and Stéphane Vannitsem
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2635–2653, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2635-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2635-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A benchmark dataset is proposed to compare different statistical postprocessing methods used in forecasting centers to properly calibrate ensemble weather forecasts. This dataset is based on ensemble forecasts covering a portion of central Europe and includes the corresponding observations. Examples on how to download and use the data are provided, a set of evaluation methods is proposed, and a first benchmark of several methods for the correction of 2 m temperature forecasts is performed.
David Docquier, Stéphane Vannitsem, and Alessio Bellucci
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 577–591, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-577-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-577-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The climate system is strongly regulated by interactions between the ocean and atmosphere. However, many uncertainties remain in the understanding of these interactions. Our analysis uses a relatively novel approach to quantify causal links between the ocean surface and lower atmosphere based on satellite observations. We find that both the ocean and atmosphere influence each other but with varying intensity depending on the region, demonstrating the power of causal methods.
Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-1-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of climate change on weather pattern dynamics over the North Atlantic is explored through the lens of information theory. These tools allow the predictability of the succession of weather patterns and the irreversible nature of the dynamics to be clarified. It is shown that the predictability is increasing in the observations, while the opposite trend is found in model projections. The irreversibility displays an overall increase in time in both the observations and the model runs.
David Docquier, Stéphane Vannitsem, Alessio Bellucci, and Claude Frankignoul
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1340, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1340, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding whether variations in ocean heat content are driven by air-sea heat fluxes or by ocean dynamics is of crucial importance to enhance climate projections. We use a relatively novel causal method to quantify interactions between ocean heat budget terms based on climate models. We find that low-resolution models overestimate the influence of ocean dynamics in the upper ocean, and that changes in ocean heat content are dominated by air-sea fluxes at high resolution.
Nicolas Ghilain, Stéphane Vannitsem, Quentin Dalaiden, Hugues Goosse, Lesley De Cruz, and Wenguang Wei
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1901–1916, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1901-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1901-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Modeling the climate at high resolution is crucial to represent the snowfall accumulation over the complex orography of the Antarctic coast. While ice cores provide a view constrained spatially but over centuries, climate models can give insight into its spatial distribution, either at high resolution over a short period or vice versa. We downscaled snowfall accumulation from climate model historical simulations (1850–present day) over Dronning Maud Land at 5.5 km using a statistical method.
Tommaso Alberti, Reik V. Donner, and Stéphane Vannitsem
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 837–855, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-837-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-837-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a novel approach to diagnose the strength of the ocean–atmosphere coupling by using both a reduced order model and reanalysis data. Our findings suggest the ocean–atmosphere dynamics presents a rich variety of features, moving from a chaotic to a coherent coupled dynamics, mainly attributed to the atmosphere and only marginally to the ocean. Our observations suggest further investigations in characterizing the occurrence and spatial dependency of the ocean–atmosphere coupling.
Stephan Hemri, Sebastian Lerch, Maxime Taillardat, Stéphane Vannitsem, and Daniel S. Wilks
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 519–521, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-519-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-519-2020, 2020
Jonathan Demaeyer and Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 307–327, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-307-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-307-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Postprocessing schemes used to correct weather forecasts are no longer efficient when the model generating the forecasts changes. An approach based on response theory to take the change into account without having to recompute the parameters based on past forecasts is presented. It is tested on an analytical model and a simple model of atmospheric variability. We show that this approach is effective and discuss its potential application for an operational environment.
Andreas Müller, Willem Deconinck, Christian Kühnlein, Gianmarco Mengaldo, Michael Lange, Nils Wedi, Peter Bauer, Piotr K. Smolarkiewicz, Michail Diamantakis, Sarah-Jane Lock, Mats Hamrud, Sami Saarinen, George Mozdzynski, Daniel Thiemert, Michael Glinton, Pierre Bénard, Fabrice Voitus, Charles Colavolpe, Philippe Marguinaud, Yongjun Zheng, Joris Van Bever, Daan Degrauwe, Geert Smet, Piet Termonia, Kristian P. Nielsen, Bent H. Sass, Jacob W. Poulsen, Per Berg, Carlos Osuna, Oliver Fuhrer, Valentin Clement, Michael Baldauf, Mike Gillard, Joanna Szmelter, Enda O'Brien, Alastair McKinstry, Oisín Robinson, Parijat Shukla, Michael Lysaght, Michał Kulczewski, Milosz Ciznicki, Wojciech Piątek, Sebastian Ciesielski, Marek Błażewicz, Krzysztof Kurowski, Marcin Procyk, Pawel Spychala, Bartosz Bosak, Zbigniew P. Piotrowski, Andrzej Wyszogrodzki, Erwan Raffin, Cyril Mazauric, David Guibert, Louis Douriez, Xavier Vigouroux, Alan Gray, Peter Messmer, Alexander J. Macfaden, and Nick New
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4425–4441, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4425-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4425-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an overview of the ESCAPE project. Dwarfs (key patterns in terms of computation and communication) are identified in weather prediction models. They are optimised for different hardware architectures. New algorithms are developed that are specifically designed for better energy efficiency and improved portability through domain-specific languages. Different numerical techniques are compared in terms of energy efficiency and performance for a variety of computing technologies.
Emmanuel Roulin and Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2019-45, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2019-45, 2019
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
We need seasonal predictions of temperature and precipitation to prepare hydrological outlooks. Since the skill is limited, statistical correction and combination of outputs from multiple models are necessary. We use the forecasts of past situations from the EUROSIP multi-model system for 6 case studies in Western Europe and the Mediterranean Region. We identify skill for spring temperature in most areas and winter precipitation in Sweden and Greece. Sample size for training appears crucial.
Jonathan Demaeyer and Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 25, 605–631, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-605-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-605-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the modeling of the effects of the unresolved scales on the large scales of the coupled ocean–atmosphere model MAOOAM. Two different physically based stochastic methods are considered and compared, in various configurations of the model. Both methods show remarkable performances and are able to model fundamental changes in the model dynamics. Ways to improve the parameterizations' implementation are also proposed.
Stéphane Vannitsem and Pierre Ekelmans
Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1063–1083, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1063-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1063-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The El Niño–Southern Oscillation phenomenon is a slow dynamics present in the coupled ocean–atmosphere tropical Pacific system which has important teleconnections with the northern extratropics. These teleconnections are usually believed to be the source of an enhanced predictability in the northern extratropics at seasonal to decadal timescales. This question is challenged by investigating the causality between these regions using an advanced technique known as convergent cross mapping.
Lesley De Cruz, Sebastian Schubert, Jonathan Demaeyer, Valerio Lucarini, and Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 25, 387–412, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-387-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-387-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The predictability of weather models is limited largely by the initial state error growth or decay rates. We have computed these rates for PUMA, a global model for the atmosphere, and MAOOAM, a more simplified, coupled model which includes the ocean. MAOOAM has processes at distinct timescales, whereas PUMA surprisingly does not. We propose a new programme to compute the natural directions along the flow that correspond to the growth or decay rates, to learn which components play a role.
Piet Termonia, Claude Fischer, Eric Bazile, François Bouyssel, Radmila Brožková, Pierre Bénard, Bogdan Bochenek, Daan Degrauwe, Mariá Derková, Ryad El Khatib, Rafiq Hamdi, Ján Mašek, Patricia Pottier, Neva Pristov, Yann Seity, Petra Smolíková, Oldřich Španiel, Martina Tudor, Yong Wang, Christoph Wittmann, and Alain Joly
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 257–281, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-257-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-257-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the ALADIN System that has been developed by the international ALADIN consortium of 16 European and northern African partners since its creation in 1990. The paper also describes how its model configurations are used by the consortium partners for their operational weather forecasting applications and for weather and climate research.
Julie Berckmans, Olivier Giot, Rozemien De Troch, Rafiq Hamdi, Reinhart Ceulemans, and Piet Termonia
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 223–238, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-223-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-223-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The regional climate of western Europe was simulated using an atmospheric and land surface model. This study aims at improving the coupling of the models, by applying an alternative method for the update frequency of the atmospheric and soil parameters. The results show that a daily update of the atmosphere and soil outperforms a continuous approach. However, keeping the land surface continuous but having daily atmospheric updates is preferable at times, as it benefits from soil moisture memory.
Lesley De Cruz, Jonathan Demaeyer, and Stéphane Vannitsem
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2793–2808, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2793-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2793-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale weather patterns such as the North Atlantic Oscillation, which dictates the harshness of European winters, vary over the course of years. By recreating it in a simple ocean-atmosphere model, we hope to understand what drives this slow, hard-to-predict variability. MAOOAM is such a model, in which the resolution and included physical processes can easily be modified. The modular system allowed us to show the robustness of the slow variability against changes in model resolution.
Daan Degrauwe, Yann Seity, François Bouyssel, and Piet Termonia
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2129–2142, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2129-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2129-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
In its purest essence, numerical weather prediction boils down to solving the fundamental laws of nature with computers. Such fundamental laws are the conservation of energy and the conservation of mass. In this paper, a framework is presented that allows to respect these laws more accurately, which should lead to weather forecasts that correspond better to reality. Under specific circumstances, such as heavy precipitation, the proposed framework has a significant impact on the forecast.
Olivier Giot, Piet Termonia, Daan Degrauwe, Rozemien De Troch, Steven Caluwaerts, Geert Smet, Julie Berckmans, Alex Deckmyn, Lesley De Cruz, Pieter De Meutter, Annelies Duerinckx, Luc Gerard, Rafiq Hamdi, Joris Van den Bergh, Michiel Van Ginderachter, and Bert Van Schaeybroeck
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1143–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1143-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1143-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium and Ghent University have performed two simulations with different horizontal resolutions of the past observed climate of Europe for the period 1979–2010. Of special interest is the new way of handling convective precipitation in the model that was used. Results show that the model is capable of representing the European climate and comparison with other models reveals that precipitation patterns are well represented.
A. Duerinckx, R. Hamdi, J.-F. Mahfouf, and P. Termonia
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 845–863, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-845-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-845-2015, 2015
S. Vannitsem and L. De Cruz
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 649–662, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-649-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-649-2014, 2014
R. Hamdi, D. Degrauwe, A. Duerinckx, J. Cedilnik, V. Costa, T. Dalkilic, K. Essaouini, M. Jerczynki, F. Kocaman, L. Kullmann, J.-F. Mahfouf, F. Meier, M. Sassi, S. Schneider, F. Váňa, and P. Termonia
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 23–39, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-23-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-23-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Subject: Predictability, probabilistic forecasts, data assimilation, inverse problems | Topic: Climate, atmosphere, ocean, hydrology, cryosphere, biosphere | Techniques: Simulation
A comparison of two nonlinear data assimilation methods
Leading the Lorenz 63 system toward the prescribed regime by model predictive control coupled with data assimilation
Quantum data assimilation: a new approach to solving data assimilation on quantum annealers
Comparative study of strongly and weakly coupled data assimilation with a global land–atmosphere coupled model
Reducing manipulations in a control simulation experiment based on instability vectors with the Lorenz-63 model
Control simulation experiments of extreme events with the Lorenz-96 model
A range of outcomes: the combined effects of internal variability and anthropogenic forcing on regional climate trends over Europe
Using a hybrid optimal interpolation–ensemble Kalman filter for the Canadian Precipitation Analysis
Control simulation experiment with Lorenz's butterfly attractor
Reduced non-Gaussianity by 30 s rapid update in convective-scale numerical weather prediction
A study of capturing Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) regime transition through observation-constrained model parameters
Fast hybrid tempered ensemble transform filter formulation for Bayesian elliptical problems via Sinkhorn approximation
Data-driven versus self-similar parameterizations for stochastic advection by Lie transport and location uncertainty
Generalization properties of feed-forward neural networks trained on Lorenz systems
Vivian A. Montiforte, Hans E. Ngodock, and Innocent Souopgui
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 463–476, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-463-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-463-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Advanced data assimilation methods are complex and computationally expensive. We compare two simpler methods, diffusive back-and-forth nudging and concave–convex nonlinearity, which account for change over time with the potential of providing accurate results with a reduced computational cost. We evaluate the accuracy of the two methods by implementing them within simple chaotic models. We conclude that the length and frequency of observations impact which method is better suited for a problem.
Fumitoshi Kawasaki and Shunji Kotsuki
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 319–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-319-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-319-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, scientists have been looking into ways to control the weather to lead to a desirable direction for mitigating weather-induced disasters caused by torrential rainfall and typhoons. This study proposes using the model predictive control (MPC), an advanced control method, to control a chaotic system. Through numerical experiments using a low-dimensional chaotic system, we demonstrate that the system can be successfully controlled with shorter forecasts compared to previous studies.
Shunji Kotsuki, Fumitoshi Kawasaki, and Masanao Ohashi
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 237–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-237-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-237-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In Earth science, data assimilation plays an important role in integrating real-world observations with numerical simulations for improving subsequent predictions. To overcome the time-consuming computations of conventional data assimilation methods, this paper proposes using quantum annealing machines. Using the D-Wave quantum annealer, the proposed method found solutions with comparable accuracy to conventional approaches and significantly reduced computational time.
Kenta Kurosawa, Shunji Kotsuki, and Takemasa Miyoshi
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 457–479, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-457-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-457-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study aimed to enhance weather and hydrological forecasts by integrating soil moisture data into a global weather model. By assimilating atmospheric observations and soil moisture data, the accuracy of forecasts was improved, and certain biases were reduced. The method was found to be particularly beneficial in areas like the Sahel and equatorial Africa, where precipitation patterns vary seasonally. This new approach has the potential to improve the precision of weather predictions.
Mao Ouyang, Keita Tokuda, and Shunji Kotsuki
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 183–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-183-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-183-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This research found that weather control would change the chaotic behavior of an atmospheric model. We proposed to introduce chaos theory in the weather control. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed approach reduced the manipulations, including the control times and magnitudes, which throw light on the weather control in a real atmospheric model.
Qiwen Sun, Takemasa Miyoshi, and Serge Richard
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 117–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper is a follow-up of a work by Miyoshi and Sun which was published in NPG Letters in 2022. The control simulation experiment is applied to the Lorenz-96 model for avoiding extreme events. The results show that extreme events of this partially and imperfectly observed chaotic system can be avoided by applying pre-designed small perturbations. These investigations may be extended to more realistic numerical weather prediction models.
Clara Deser and Adam S. Phillips
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 63–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-63-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-63-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Past and future climate change at regional scales is a result of both human influences and natural (internal) variability. Here, we provide an overview of recent advances in climate modeling and physical understanding that has led to new insights into their respective roles, illustrated with original results for the European climate. Our findings highlight the confounding role of internal variability in attribution, climate model evaluation, and accuracy of future projections.
Dikraa Khedhaouiria, Stéphane Bélair, Vincent Fortin, Guy Roy, and Franck Lespinas
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 329–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-329-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-329-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a well-known use of hybrid methods in data assimilation (DA) algorithms that has not yet been explored for precipitation analyses. Our approach combined an ensemble-based DA approach with an existing deterministically based DA. Both DA scheme families have desirable aspects that can be leveraged if combined. The DA hybrid method showed better precipitation analyses in regions with a low rate of assimilated surface observations, which is typically the case in winter.
Takemasa Miyoshi and Qiwen Sun
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 133–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-133-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-133-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The weather is chaotic and hard to predict, but the chaos implies an effective control where a small control signal grows rapidly to make a big difference. This study proposes a control simulation experiment where we apply a small signal to control
naturein a computational simulation. Idealized experiments with a low-order chaotic system show successful results by small control signals of only 3 % of the observation error. This is the first step toward realistic weather simulations.
Juan Ruiz, Guo-Yuan Lien, Keiichi Kondo, Shigenori Otsuka, and Takemasa Miyoshi
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 615–626, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-615-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-615-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Effective use of observations with numerical weather prediction models, also known as data assimilation, is a key part of weather forecasting systems. For precise prediction at the scales of thunderstorms, fast nonlinear processes pose a grand challenge because most data assimilation systems are based on linear processes and normal distribution errors. We investigate how, every 30 s, weather radar observations can help reduce the effect of nonlinear processes and nonnormal distributions.
Zhao Liu, Shaoqing Zhang, Yang Shen, Yuping Guan, and Xiong Deng
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 481–500, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-481-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-481-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A general methodology is introduced to capture regime transitions of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC). The assimilation models with different parameters simulate different paths for the AMOC to switch between equilibrium states. Constraining model parameters with observations can significantly mitigate the model deviations, thus capturing AMOC regime transitions. This simple model study serves as a guideline for improving coupled general circulation models.
Sangeetika Ruchi, Svetlana Dubinkina, and Jana de Wiljes
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 23–41, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-23-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-23-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To infer information of an unknown quantity that helps to understand an associated system better and to predict future outcomes, observations and a physical model that connects the data points to the unknown parameter are typically used as information sources. Yet this problem is often very challenging due to the fact that the unknown is generally high dimensional, the data are sparse and the model can be non-linear. We propose a novel approach to address these challenges.
Valentin Resseguier, Wei Pan, and Baylor Fox-Kemper
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 209–234, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-209-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-209-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Geophysical flows span a broader range of temporal and spatial scales than can be resolved numerically. One way to alleviate the ensuing numerical errors is to combine simulations with measurements, taking account of the accuracies of these two sources of information. Here we quantify the distribution of numerical simulation errors without relying on high-resolution numerical simulations. Specifically, small-scale random vortices are added to simulations while conserving energy or circulation.
Sebastian Scher and Gabriele Messori
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 26, 381–399, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-381-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-381-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Neural networks are a technique that is widely used to predict the time evolution of physical systems. For this the past evolution of the system is shown to the neural network – it is
trained– and then can be used to predict the evolution in the future. We show some limitations in this approach for certain systems that are important to consider when using neural networks for climate- and weather-related applications.
Cited articles
Baker, L. H., Rudd, A. C., Migliorini, S., and Bannister, R. N.: Representation of model error in a convective-scale ensemble prediction system, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 21, 19–39, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-21-19-2014, 2014. a, b, c, d
Banacos, P. C. and Schultz, D. M.: The Use of Moisture Flux Convergence in
Forecasting Convective Initiation: Historical and Operational Perspectives,
Weather Forecast., 20, 351–366, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF858.1, 2005. a
Berner, J., Shutts, G. J., Leutbecher, M., and Palmer, T. N.: A Spectral
Stochastic Kinetic Energy Backscatter Scheme and Its Impact on Flow-Dependent
Predictability in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System, J. Atmos. Sci., 66,
603–626, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2677.1, 2009. a
Berner, J., Achatz, U., Batté, L., Bengtsson, L., Cámara, A. D. L.,
Christensen, H. M., Colangeli, M., Coleman, D. R. B., Crommelin, D.,
Dolaptchiev, S. I., Franzke, C. L. E., Friederichs, P., Imkeller, P.,
Järvinen, H., Juricke, S., Kitsios, V., Lott, F., Lucarini, V., Mahajan, S.,
Palmer, T. N., Penland, C., Sakradzija, M., von Storch, J.-S., Weisheimer,
A., Weniger, M., Williams, P. D., and Yano, J.-I.: Stochastic
Parameterization: Toward a New View of Weather and Climate Models, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 98, 565–588, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00268.1, 2017. a
Boisserie, M., Arbogast, P., Descamps, L., Pannekoucke, O., and Raynaud, L.:
Estimating and diagnosing model error variances in the Météo-France
global NWP model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 846–854,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2173, 2014. a
Bowler, N. E., Arribas, A., Mylne, K. R., Robertson, K. B., and Beare, S. E.:
The MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 134, 703–722, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.234, 2008. a
Brown, T. A.: Admissible Scoring Systems for Continuous Distributions,
Manuscript P-5235 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1974. a
Buizza, R. and Leutbecher, M.: The forecast skill horizon, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 141, 3366–3382, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2619, 2015. a
Buizza, R., Milleer, M., and Palmer, T. N.: Stochastic representation of model
uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 125, 2887–2908,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712556006, 1999. a
Calas, C., Ducrocq, V., and Sénési, S.: Contribution of a mesoscale
analysis to convection nowcasting, Phys. Chem. Earth, 23, 639–644,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-1946(98)00101-3, 1998. a
Catry, B., Geleyn, J.-F., Tudor, M., Bénard, P., and
Trojáková, A.: Flux-conservative thermodynamic equations in a
mass-weighted framework, Tellus A, 59, 71–79,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2006.00212.x, 2007. a, b, c
Copernicus Climate Change Service: ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF
atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate, copernicus Climate Change
Service Climate Data Store (CDS), September 2018, 2017. a
Dalcher, A. and Kalnay, E.: Error growth and predictability in operational
ECMWF forecasts, Tellus A, 39, 474–491,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.1987.tb00322.x, 1987. a
Deckmyn, A.: Rfa: Read and work with binary ALADIN files, R package version
4.1.0, 2016. a
Degrauwe, D., Seity, Y., Bouyssel, F., and Termonia, P.: Generalization and application of the flux-conservative thermodynamic equations in the AROME model of the ALADIN system, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2129–2142, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2129-2016, 2016. a
Deng, A. and Stauffer, D. R.: On Improving 4 km Mesoscale Model Simulations, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 45, 361–381, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2341.1, 2006. a
Deng, Q., Khouider, B., and Majda, A. J.: The MJO in a Coarse-Resolution
GCM with a Stochastic Multicloud Parameterization, J. Atmos. Sci., 72,
55–74, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0120.1, 2015. a
Frenkel, Y., Majda, A. J., and Khouider, B.: Using the Stochastic Multicloud
Model to Improve Tropical Convective Parameterization: A Paradigm Example, J.
Atmos. Sci., 69, 1080–1105, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0148.1, 2012. a
Gebhardt, C., Theis, S., Krahe, P., and Renner, V.: Experimental ensemble
forecasts of precipitation based on a convection-resolving model, Atmos. Sci.
Lett., 9, 67–72, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.177, 2008. a
Gebhardt, C., Theis, S., Paulat, M., and Ben Bouallègue, Z.: Uncertainties in
COSMO-DE precipitation forecasts introduced by model perturbations and
variation of lateral boundaries, Atmos. Res., 100, 168–177,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.12.008, 2011. a
Geleyn, J.-F.: Use of a Modified Richardson Number for Parameterizing the
Effect of Shallow Convection, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 64A, 141–149,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.64A.0_141, 1986. a
Geleyn, J.-F., Vana, F., Cedilnik, J., Tudor, M., and Catry, B.: An
intermediate solution between diagnostic exchange coefficients and prognostic
TKE methods for vertical turbulent transport, WGNE Blue Book, 2006, 11–12,
2006. a
Geleyn, J.-F., Catry, B., Bouteloup, Y., and Brožková, R.: A
statistical approach for sedimentation inside a microphysical precipitation
scheme, Tellus A, 60, 649–662, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00323.x, 2008. a
Gerard, L., Piriou, J.-M., Brožková, R., Geleyn, J.-F., and Banciu, D.:
Cloud and Precipitation Parameterization in a Meso-Gamma-Scale Operational
Weather Prediction Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 3960–3977,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2750.1, 2009. a, b
Khouider, B., Biello, J., and Majda, A. J.: A stochastic multicloud model for
tropical convection, Commun. Math. Phys., 8, 187–216,
2010. a
Lean, H. W., Clark, P. A., Dixon, M., Roberts, N. M., Fitch, A., Forbes, R.,
and Halliwell, C.: Characteristics of High-Resolution Versions of the Met
Office Unified Model for Forecasting Convection over the United Kingdom, Mon.
Weather Rev., 136, 3408–3424, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2332.1, 2008. a
Leutbecher, M., Sarah-Jane, L., Pirkka, O., K., L. S. T., Gianpaolo, B., Peter,
B., Massimo, B., M., C. H., Michail, D., Emanuel, D., Stephen, E., Michael,
F., M., F. R., Jacqueline, G., Thomas, H., J., H. R., Stephan, J., Heather,
L., Dave, M., Linus, M., Sylvie, M., Sebastien, M., Irina, S., K., S. P.,
Aneesh, S., Frederic, V., Nils, W., and Antje, W.: Stochastic representations
of model uncertainties at ECMWF: state of the art and future vision, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2315–2339, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3094, 2017. a, b
Lopez, P.: Implementation and validation of a new prognostic large-scale cloud
and precipitation scheme for climate and data-assimilation purposes, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 229–257, https://doi.org/10.1256/00359000260498879, 2002. a
Lorenz, E. N.: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of
motion, Tellus, 21, 289–307, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x, 1969. a
Lorenz, E. N.: Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical
model, Tellus, 34, 505–513, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1982.tb01839.x, 1982. a
Louis, J.-F.: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 17, 187–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117978, 1979. a
Matheson, J. E. and Winkler, R. L.: Scoring Rules for Continuous Probability
Distributions, Manag. Sci., 22, 1087–1096,
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.22.10.1087, 1976. a
Nicolis, C.: Dynamics of Model Error: Some Generic Features, J. Atmos. Sci.,
60, 2208–2218, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<2208:DOMESG>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a, b, c
Nicolis, C.: Dynamics of Model Error: The Role of Unresolved Scales Revisited,
J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1740–1753,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1740:DOMETR>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a, b, c
Nicolis, C., Perdigao, R. A. P., and Vannitsem, S.: Dynamics of Prediction
Errors under the Combined Effect of Initial Condition and Model Errors, J.
Atmos. Sci., 66, 766–778, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2781.1, 2009. a, b, c
Ollinaho, P., Bechtold, P., Leutbecher, M., Laine, M., Solonen, A., Haario, H., and Järvinen, H.: Parameter variations in prediction skill optimization at ECMWF, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 20, 1001–1010, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-1001-2013, 2013. a
Ollinaho, P., Lock, S.-J., Leutbecher, M., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A., Bozzo,
A., Forbes, R. M., Haiden, T., Hogan, R. J., and Sandu, I.: Towards
process-level representation of model uncertainties: stochastically perturbed
parametrizations in the ECMWF ensemble, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143,
408–422, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2931, 2017. a, b
Orrel, D.: Role of the metric in forecast error growth: how chaotic is the
weather?, Tellus A, 54, 350–362, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.2002.01389.x,
2002. a
Palmer, T., Shutts, G., Hagedorn, R., Doblas-Reyes, F., Jung, T., and
Leutbecher, M.: Representing model uncertainty in weather and climate
prediction, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 33, 163–193,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122552, 2005. a, b
Palmer, T., Buizza, R., Doblas-Reyes, F., Jung, T., Leutbecher, M., Shutts, G.,
Steinheimer, M., and Weisheimer, A.: Stochastic parametrization and model
uncertainty, ECMWF, 598, https://doi.org/10.21957/ps8gbwbdv, 2009. a, b
R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,
available at: https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 20 April 2019), 2017. a
Roberts, N. M. and Lean, H. W.: Scale-Selective Verification of Rainfall
Accumulations from High-Resolution Forecasts of Convective Events, Mon. Weather
Rev., 136, 78–97, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007MWR2123.1, 2008. a
Schwartz, C. S., Kain, J. S., Weiss, S. J., Xue, M., Bright, D. R., Kong, F.,
Thomas, K. W., Levit, J. J., Coniglio, M. C., and Wandishin, M. S.: Toward
Improved Convection-Allowing Ensembles: Model Physics Sensitivities and
Optimizing Probabilistic Guidance with Small Ensemble Membership, Weather
Forecast., 25, 263–280, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222267.1, 2010. a
Seiffert, R., Blender, R., and Fraedrich, K.: Subscale forcing in a global
atmospheric circulation model and stochastic parametrization, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 132, 1627–1643, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.139, 2006. a
Shutts, G.: A kinetic energy backscatter algorithm for use in ensemble
prediction systems, Q. J. Roy Meteor. Soc., 131, 3079–3102,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.106, 2005. a
Shutts, G. and Pallarès, A. C.: Assessing parametrization uncertainty
associated with horizontal resolution in numerical weather prediction models,
Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 372, 20130284, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0284, 2014. a
Shutts, G., Leutbecher, M., Weisheimer, A., Stockdale, T., Isaksen, L., and
Bonavita, M.: Representing model uncertainty: stochastic parametrizations at
ECMWF, ECMWF Newsletter, 19–24, https://doi.org/10.21957/fbqmkhv7, 2011. a
Subramanian, A. C. and Palmer, T. N.: Ensemble superparameterization versus
stochastic parameterization: A comparison of model uncertainty representation
in tropical weather prediction, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 9, 1231–1250,
10.1002/2016MS000857, 2017. a
Termonia, P., Fischer, C., Bazile, E., Bouyssel, F., Brožková, R., Bénard, P., Bochenek, B., Degrauwe, D., Derková, M., El Khatib, R., Hamdi, R., Mašek, J., Pottier, P., Pristov, N., Seity, Y., Smolíková, P., Španiel, O., Tudor, M., Wang, Y., Wittmann, C., and Joly, A.: The ALADIN System and its canonical model configurations AROME CY41T1 and ALARO CY40T1, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 257–281, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-257-2018, 2018. a, b
Thompson, P. D.: Uncertainty of Initial State as a Factor in the Predictability
of Large Scale Atmospheric Flow Patterns, Tellus, 9, 275–295,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01885.x, 1957. a
Vannitsem, S. and Nicolis, C.: Lyapunov Vectors and Error Growth Patterns in a
T21L3 Quasigeostrophic Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 347–361,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0347:LVAEGP>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
a
Vannitsem, S. and Toth, Z.: Short-Term Dynamics of Model Errors, J. Atmos.
Sci., 59, 2594–2604, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2594:STDOME>2.0.CO;2,
2002. a
van Zomeren, J. and van Delden, A.: Vertically integrated moisture flux
convergence as a predictor of thunderstorms, Atmos. Res., 83, 435–445,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2005.08.015, 2007. a
Waldstreicher, J.: A guide to utilizing moisture flux convergence as a
predictor of convection, Natl. Wea. Dig., 14, 20–35, 1989. a
Waliser, D. E., Moncrieff, M. W., Burridge, D., Fink, A. H., Gochis, D.,
Goswami, B. N., Guan, B., Harr, P., Heming, J., Hsu, H.-H., Jakob, C.,
Janiga, M., Johnson, R., Jones, S., Knippertz, P., Marengo, J., Nguyen, H.,
Pope, M., Serra, Y., Thorncroft, C., Wheeler, M., Wood, R., and Yuter, S.:
The “Year” of Tropical Convection (May 2008–April 2010): Climate
Variability and Weather Highlights, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 1189–1218,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS3095.1, 2012. a
Wilks, D.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Academic Press,
Elsevier Science, 2011. a
Wilks, D. S.: Effects of stochastic parametrizations in the Lorenz '96 system,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 389–407, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.03, 2005. a
Yano, J.-I., Ziemiański, M. Z., Cullen, M., Termonia, P., Onvlee, J.,
Bengtsson, L., Carrassi, A., Davy, R., Deluca, A., Gray, S. L., Homar, V.,
Köhler, M., Krichak, S., Michaelides, S., Phillips, V. T. J., Soares, P.
M. M., and Wyszogrodzki, A. A.: Scientific Challenges of Convective-Scale
Numerical Weather Prediction, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 699–710,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0125.1, 2018. a, b
Short summary
A generic methodology is developed to estimate the model error and simulate the model uncertainty related to a specific physical process. The method estimates the model error by comparing two different representations of the physical process in otherwise identical models. The found model error can then be used to perturb the model and simulate the model uncertainty. When applying this methodology to deep convection an improvement in the probabilistic skill of the ensemble forecast is found.
A generic methodology is developed to estimate the model error and simulate the model...
