Articles | Volume 32, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-32-367-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.The stochastic skeleton model for the Madden–Julian Oscillation with time-dependent observation-based forcing
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 06 Oct 2025)
- Preprint (discussion started on 06 Feb 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-343', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Mar 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Emilio Hernández-García, 30 May 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-343', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Mar 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Emilio Hernández-García, 30 May 2025
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Emilio Hernández-García on behalf of the Authors (30 May 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (04 Jun 2025) by Jezabel Curbelo
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (16 Jun 2025)

RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (21 Jun 2025)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (29 Jun 2025) by Jezabel Curbelo

AR by Emilio Hernández-García on behalf of the Authors (09 Jul 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (18 Jul 2025) by Jezabel Curbelo
AR by Emilio Hernández-García on behalf of the Authors (21 Jul 2025)
Author's response
Manuscript
This manuscript is both clear and well-structured. The authors extend the stochastic skeleton model for the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) by incorporating realistic, time-dependent forcing derived from observational data. By combining a minimal nonlinear oscillator model with observation-based forcings, they achieve more accurate estimates of key MJO characteristics—such as lifetime, extent, and amplitude—compared to simpler, time-independent forcing approaches. This approach illustrates the model’s potential to capture essential large-scale features of the MJO.
I also appreciate the authors’ honesty regarding the model’s limitations, particularly its difficulty in reproducing the seasonality of MJO events and reflecting the differences in MJO characteristics under various ENSO conditions. They offer plausible explanations for these limitations in their discussion section, which underscores the transparency and rigor of their work.
I therefore recommend accepting this manuscript in its current form.