Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA
Abstract. In this study, we discuss the role of the linear heating term and nonlinear terms associated with a nonlinear feedback loop in the energy cycle of the three-dimensional (X–Y–Z) non-dissipative Lorenz model (3D-NLM), where (X, Y, Z) represent the solutions in the phase space. Using trigonometric functions, we ﬁrst present the closed-form solution of the nonlinear equation d2X/dτ2 + (X2/2)X = 0 without the heating term (i.e., rX), (where τ is a non-dimensional time and r is the normalized Rayleigh number), a solution that has not been previously documented. Since the solution of the simpliﬁed 3D-NLM is oscillatory (wave-like) and since the nonlinear term (X3) is associated with the nonlinear feedback loop, here, we suggest that the nonlinear feedback loop may act as a restoring force. When the heating term is considered, the system yields three critical points. A linear analysis suggests that the origin (i.e., the trivial critical point) is a saddle point and that the other two non-trivial critical points are stable. Here, we provide an analysis for three types of solutions that are associated with these critical points. Two of the solutions represent closed curves that travel around one non-trivial critical point or all three critical points. The third type of solution, appearing to connect the stable and unstable manifolds of the saddle point, is called the homoclinic orbit. Using the solution that contains one non-trivial critical point, here, we show that the competing impact of the nonlinear restoring force and the linear (heating) force determines the partitions of the averaged available potential energy from the Y and Z modes. Based on the energy analysis, an energy cycle with four different regimes is identiﬁed. The cycle is only half of a "large" cycle, displaying the wing pattern of a glasswinged butterﬂy. The other half cycle is antisymmetric with respect to the origin. The two types of oscillatory solutions with either a small cycle or a large cycle are orbitally stable. As compared to the oscillatory solutions, the homoclinic orbit is not periodic because it "takes forever" to reach the origin. Two trajectories with starting points near the homoclinic orbit may be diverged because one moves with a small cycle and the other moves with a large cycle. Therefore, the homoclinic orbit is not orbitally stable. In a future study, dissipation and/or additional nonlinear terms will be included in order to determine how their interactions with the original nonlinear feedback loop and the heating term may change the periodic orbits (as well as homoclinic orbits) to become quasi-periodic orbits and chaotic solutions.
How to cite. Shen, B.-W.: On periodic solutions associated with the nonlinear feedback loop in the non-dissipative Lorenz model, Nonlin. Processes Geophys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2016-40, 2016.
Received: 11 Aug 2016 – Discussion started: 23 Sep 2016
Using a nondissipative Lorenz model, we show that the nonlinear feedback loop alone may act a restoring forcing and the heating term alone can produce a saddle point. We illustrate that the nonlinear feedback loop and heating term collectively lead to three critical points and three types of solutions, which may contain a small or big energy cycle. The existence of the homoclinic orbit and two types of oscillatory solutions suggests the appearance of diverged trajectories.
Using a nondissipative Lorenz model, we show that the nonlinear feedback loop alone may act a...