Articles | Volume 33, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-33-313-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-33-313-2026
Research article
 | 
19 Jun 2026
Research article |  | 19 Jun 2026

Quantitative comparison of causal inference methods for climate tipping points

Niki Lohmann, David Strahl, Annika Högner, Willem Huiskamp, Matthias Boehm, and Nico Wunderling

Viewed

Total article views: 4,487 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,771 1,539 177 4,487 476 475
  • HTML: 2,771
  • PDF: 1,539
  • XML: 177
  • Total: 4,487
  • BibTeX: 476
  • EndNote: 475
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Dec 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Dec 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,487 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,422 with geography defined and 65 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 04 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Causal inference methods could be used to study the interaction of climate tipping elements, which may degrade abruptly due to climate change. We compare three of these methods to determine their reliability and apply two of them to the Arctic summer sea ice and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Our results imply that a weaker AMOC would stabilize Arctic summer sea ice, and that a loss of Arctic summer sea ice would likely stabilize the AMOC in the short term.
Share