Brezzi, L., Gabrieli, F., Marcato, G., Pastor, M., and Cola, S.: A new data assimilation procedure to develop a debris flow run-out model, Landslides, 13, 1083–1096,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0625-y, 2016.
a
Chowdhary, A., Tong, S., Stadler, G., and Alexanderian, A.: Sensitivity Analysis of the information gain in infinite-dimensional Bayesian linear inverse problems, Int. J. Uncertain. Quan., 14, 17–35,
https://doi.org/10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2024051416, 2024.
a
Cui, X., Sun, W., Teng, J., Song, H., and Yao, X.: Effect of length of the observed dataset on the calibration of a distributed hydrological model, Proc. IAHS, 368, 305–311,
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-368-305-2015, 2015.
a,
b
Ekmekcioğlu, Ö., Demirel, M. C., and Booij, M. J.: Effect of data length, spin-up period and spatial model resolution on fully distributed hydrological model calibration in the Moselle basin, Hydrol. Sci. J., 67, 759–772,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2046754, 2022.
a
Etter, S., Strobl, B., Seibert, J., and van Meerveld, H. J. I.: Value of uncertain streamflow observations for hydrological modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5243–5257,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5243-2018, 2018.
a
Fischer, J. T., Kofler, A., Huber, A., Fellin, W., Mergili, M., and Oberguggenberger, M.: Bayesian inference in snow avalanche simulation with r.Avaflow, Geosci., 10, 191,
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10050191, 2020.
a
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., and Goodman, J.: emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 125, 306–312,
https://doi.org/10.1086/670067, 2013.
a
Froese, C. R., Charrière, M., Humair, F., Jaboyedoff, M., and Pedrazzini, A.: Characterization and management of rockslide hazard at Turtle Mountain, Alberta, Canada, 310–322, Cambridge Univ. Press, ISBN 9781107002067, 2012. a
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., and Rubin, D. B.: Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd edn., Chapman and Hall/CRC,
https://doi.org/10.1201/b16018, 2013.
a
Gu, M. and Berger, J. O.: Parallel partial Gaussian process emulation for computer models with massive output, Ann. Appl. Stat., 10, 1317–1347,
https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOAS934, 2016.
a
Haeusel, L. J., Nitzler, J., Köglmeier, L. J., and Wall, W. A.: Multi-physics-enhanced Bayesian inverse analysis: Information gain from additional fields, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 452, 118735,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2026.118735, 2026.
a
Hartland, N.: KL-divergence-estimators, GitHub [code],
https://github.com/nhartland/KL-divergence-estimators (last access: 15 September 2025), 2020. a
Heo, Y., Graziano, D. J., Guzowski, L., and Muehleisen, R. T.: Evaluation of calibration efficacy under different levels of uncertainty, J. Build. Perform. Simu., 8, 135–144,
https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2014.896947, 2015.
a,
b
Heredia, M. B., Eckert, N., Prieur, C., and Thibert, E.: Bayesian calibration of an avalanche model from autocorrelated measurements along the flow: Application to velocities extracted from photogrammetric images, J. Glaciol., 66, 373–385,
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.11, 2020.
a,
b
Huber, H. A., Georgia, S. K., and Finley, S. D.: Systematic Bayesian posterior analysis guided by Kullback-Leibler divergence facilitates hypothesis formation, J. Theor. Biol., 558, 111341,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111341, 2023.
a
Hungr, O.: A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows and avalanches, Can. Geotech. J., 32, 610–623,
https://doi.org/10.1139/t95-063, 1995.
a,
b
Hübl, J., Suda, J., Proske, D., Kaitna, R., and Scheidl, C.: Debris Flow Impact Estimation, in: Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Water Manag. Hydraul. Eng., Faculty of Civil Engineering, edited by: Popovska, C. and Jovanovski, M., University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia, 137–148, ISBN 978-9989-2469-7-5, 2009. a
Iverson, R. M.: How should mathematical models of geomorphic processes be judged?, in: Prediction in Geomorphology, vol. 135 of Geophys. Monogr., Am. Geophys. Union,
https://doi.org/10.1029/135GM07, 2003.
a
Kavetski, D., Fenicia, F., and Clark, M. P.: Impact of temporal data resolution on parameter inference and model identification in conceptual hydrological modeling: Insights from an experimental catchment, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05501,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009525, 2011.
a,
b,
c
Kennedy, M. C. and O'Hagan, A.: Bayesian Calibration of Computer Models, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 63, 425–464,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00294, 2001.
a,
b,
c,
d
Khorashadi Zadeh, F., Nossent, J., Woldegiorgis, B. T., Bauwens, W., and van Griensven, A.: Impact of measurement error and limited data frequency on parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification, Environ. Model. Softw., 118, 35–47,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.022, 2019.
a
Kumar, R., Carroll, C., Hartikainen, A., and Martin, O.: ArviZ: a unified library for exploratory analysis of Bayesian models in Python, J. Open Source Softw., 4, 1143,
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01143, 2019.
a
Li, C., Wang, H., Liu, J., Yan, D., Yu, F., and Zhang, L.: Effect of calibration data series length on performance and optimal parameters of hydrological model, Water Sci. Eng., 3, 378–393,
https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2010.04.002, 2010.
a,
b,
c
Mancarella, D. and Hungr, O.: Analysis of run-up of granular avalanches against steep, adverse slopes and protective barriers, Can. Geotech. J., 47, 827–841,
https://doi.org/10.1139/t09-143, 2010.
a
McMillan, H. and Clark, M.: Rainfall-runoff model calibration using informal likelihood measures within a Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling scheme, Water Resour. Res., 45,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007288, 2009.
a
Moretti, L., Mangeney, A., Walter, F., Capdeville, Y., Bodin, T., Stutzmann, E., and Le Friant, A.: Constraining landslide characteristics with Bayesian inversion of field and seismic data, Geophys. J. Int., 221, 1341–1348,
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa056, 2020.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Navarro, M., Le Maître, O. P., Hoteit, I., George, D. L., Mandli, K. T., and Knio, O. M.: Surrogate-based parameter inference in debris flow model, Comput. Geosci., 22, 1447–1463,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-018-9765-1, 2018.
a,
b
Oden, J. T.: Foundations of Predictive Computational Science, Lecture Notes, CSE 397/EM 397: Special Topics in Computational Science, ICES, The University of Texas at Austin,
https://www.oden.utexas.edu/media/reports/2017/1701.pdf (last access: 15 September 2025), 2016.
a,
b,
c
Pastor, M., Blanc, T., Manzanal, D., Drempetic, V., Pastor, M. J., Sánchez, M., Crosta, G., Imposimato, S., Roddeman, D., Foester, E., Kobayashi, H., Delattre, M., and Issler, D.: Landslide Runout: Review of Analytical/Empirical Models for Subaerial Slides, Submarine Slides and Snow Avalanche. Numerical Modelling. Software Tools, Material Models, Validation and Benchmarking for Selected Case Studies, Deliverable D1.7, Revision 2, SafeLand, EU FP7 Grant Agreement No. 226479,
https://www.ngi.no/globalassets/bilder/prosjekter/safeland/rapporter/d1.7_revised.pdf (last access: 15 September 2025), 2012. a
Robert, C. P. and Casella, G.: Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, Springer Texts in Statistics, Springer, New York, 2nd edn., ISBN 978-0387212395, 2004. a
Seibert, J., Clerc-Schwarzenbach, F. M., and van Meerveld, H. J.: Getting your money's worth: Testing the value of data for hydrological model calibration, Hydrol. Process., 38, e15094,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15094, 2024.
a,
b
Trujillo-Vela, M. G., Ramos-Cañón, A. M., Escobar-Vargas, J. A., and Galindo-Torres, S. A.: An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling, Earth-Sci. Rev., 232, 104135,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104135, 2022.
a
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., and Bürkner, P.-C.: Rank-Normalization, Folding, and Localization: An Improved
for Assessing Convergence of MCMC (with Discussion), Bayesian Anal., 16, 667–718,
https://doi.org/10.1214/20-BA1221, 2021.
a
Wang, Q., Kulkarni, S. R., and Verdú, S.: Divergence Estimation for Multidimensional Densities Via
k-Nearest-Neighbor Distances, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 55, 2392–2405,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2009.2016060, 2009.
a,
b,
c
Wang, X., Wang, Y., Lin, Q., and Yang, X.: Assessing global landslide casualty risk under moderate climate change based on multiple GCM projections, Int. J. Disast. Risk Sc., 14, 751–767,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00514-w, 2023.
a
Willenberg, H., Eberhardt, E., and Loew, S.: Hazard assessment and runout analysis for an unstable rock slope above an industrial site in the Riviera valley, Switzerland, Landslides, 6, 111–119,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0146-7, 2009.
a
Wu, X., Kozlowski, T., Meidani, H., and Shirvan, K.: Inverse uncertainty quantification using the modular Bayesian approach based on Gaussian process, Part 1: Theory, Nucl. Eng. Des., 335, 339–355,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.06.004, 2018.
a
Xu, T. and Valocchi, A. J.: A Bayesian approach to improved calibration and prediction of groundwater models with structural error, Water Resour. Res., 51, 9290–9311,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017912, 2015.
a
Xu, X., Jin, F., Sun, Q., Soga, K., and Zhou, G. G.: Three-dimensional material point method modeling of runout behaviour of the Hongshiyan landslide, Can. Geotech. J., 56, 1318–1337,
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0638, 2019.
a
Yan, Y., Cui, Y., Huang, X., Zhou, J., Zhang, W., Yin, S., Guo, J., and Hu, S.: Combining seismic signal dynamic inversion and numerical modeling improves landslide process reconstruction, Earth Surf. Dynam., 10, 1233–1252,
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-1233-2022, 2022.
a
Yildiz, A., Zhao, H., and Kowalski, J.: Computationally-feasible uncertainty quantification in model-based landslide risk assessment, Front. Earth Sci., 10, 1032438,
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1032438, 2023.
a,
b
Zhao, H.: PSimPy: Predictive and probabilistic simulation with Python, Git,
https://git.rwth-aachen.de/mbd/psimpy (last access: 15 September 2025), 2022. a
Zhao, H. and Kowalski, J.: Bayesian active learning for parameter calibration of landslide run-out models, Landslides, 19, 2033–2045,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01857-z, 2022.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
