Articles | Volume 27, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-147-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-147-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Baroclinic and barotropic instabilities in planetary atmospheres: energetics, equilibration and adjustment
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Invited contribution by Peter Read, recipient of the EGU Lewis Fry Richardson Medal 2016.
Daniel Kennedy
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik,
Greifswald, Germany
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Neil Lewis
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Hélène Scolan
Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et d'Acoustique, Université de Lyon, France
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Fachreddin Tabataba-Vakili
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Yixiong Wang
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Susie Wright
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Roland Young
Department of Physics & National Space Science and Technology Center,
United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Related subject area
Subject: Bifurcation, dynamical systems, chaos, phase transition, nonlinear waves, pattern formation | Topic: Climate, atmosphere, ocean, hydrology, cryosphere, biosphere | Techniques: Theory
Review article: Interdisciplinary perspectives on climate sciences – highlighting past and current scientific achievements
Variational techniques for a one-dimensional energy balance model
Sensitivity of the polar boundary layer to transient phenomena
High-frequency Internal Waves, High-mode Nonlinear Waves and K-H Billows on the South China Sea's Shelf Revealed by Marine Seismic Observation
Existence and influence of mixed states in a model of vegetation patterns
Rate-induced tipping in ecosystems and climate: the role of unstable states, basin boundaries and transient dynamics
Review article: Dynamical systems, algebraic topology and the climate sciences
Review article: Large fluctuations in non-equilibrium physics
Climate bifurcations in a Schwarzschild equation model of the Arctic atmosphere
Effects of rotation and topography on internal solitary waves governed by the rotating Gardner equation
Review article: Hilbert problems for the climate sciences in the 21st century – 20 years later
Anthropocene climate bifurcation
Vera Melinda Galfi, Tommaso Alberti, Lesley De Cruz, Christian L. E. Franzke, and Valerio Lembo
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 185–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-185-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-185-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In the online seminar series "Perspectives on climate sciences: from historical developments to future frontiers" (2020–2021), well-known and established scientists from several fields – including mathematics, physics, climate science and ecology – presented their perspectives on the evolution of climate science and on relevant scientific concepts. In this paper, we first give an overview of the content of the seminar series, and then we introduce the written contributions to this special issue.
Gianmarco Del Sarto, Jochen Bröcker, Franco Flandoli, and Tobias Kuna
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 137–150, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-137-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-137-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We consider a one-dimensional model for the Earth's temperature. We give sufficient conditions to admit three asymptotic solutions. We connect the value function (minimum value of an objective function depending on the greenhouse gas (GHG) concentration) to the global mean temperature. Then, we show that the global mean temperature is the derivative of the value function and that it is non-decreasing with respect to GHG concentration.
Amandine Kaiser, Nikki Vercauteren, and Sebastian Krumscheid
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 45–60, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-45-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-45-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Current numerical weather prediction models encounter challenges in accurately representing regimes in the stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer (SBL) and the transitions between them. Stochastic modeling approaches are a promising framework to analyze when transient small-scale phenomena can trigger regime transitions. Therefore, we conducted a sensitivity analysis of the SBL to transient phenomena by augmenting a surface energy balance model with meaningful randomizations.
Linghan Meng, Haibin Song, Yongxian Guan, Shun Yang, Kun Zhang, and Mengli Liu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-92, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-92, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In the seismic section, high-frequency and mode-2 internal waves, along with shear instability, were identified in the ocean. Strong nonlinear high-frequency waves, believed to be from shoaling, Behind them are larger mode-2 internal solitary waves. These waves show instability, notably the second mode-2 internal waves with distinct K-H billows. Seismic data revealed that diapycnal mixing from these events in the shelf area is 3.5 times greater than than that in the slope area.
Lilian Vanderveken, Marina Martínez Montero, and Michel Crucifix
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 585–599, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-585-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-585-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In semi-arid regions, hydric stress affects plant growth. In these conditions, vegetation patterns develop and effectively allow for vegetation to persist under low water input. The formation of patterns and the transition between patterns can be studied with small models taking the form of dynamical systems. Our study produces a full map of stable and unstable solutions in a canonical vegetation model and shows how they determine the transitions between different patterns.
Ulrike Feudel
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 481–502, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-481-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Many systems in nature are characterized by the coexistence of different stable states for given environmental parameters and external forcing. Examples can be found in different fields of science, ranging from ecosystems to climate dynamics. Perturbations can lead to critical transitions (tipping) from one stable state to another. The study of these transitions requires the development of new methodological approaches that allow for modeling, analyzing and predicting them.
Michael Ghil and Denisse Sciamarella
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 399–434, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-399-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-399-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The problem of climate change is that of a chaotic system subject to time-dependent forcing, such as anthropogenic greenhouse gases and natural volcanism. To solve this problem, we describe the mathematics of dynamical systems with explicit time dependence and those of studying their behavior through topological methods. Here, we show how they are being applied to climate change and its predictability.
Giovanni Jona-Lasinio
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 253–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-253-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-253-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Non-equilibrium is dominant in geophysical and climate phenomena. Most of the processes that characterize energy flow occur far from equilibrium. These range from very large systems, such as weather patterns or ocean currents that remain far from equilibrium, owing to an influx of energy, to biological structures. In the last decades, progress in non-equilibrium physics has come from the study of very rare fluctuations, and this paper provides an introduction to these theoretical developments.
Kolja L. Kypke, William F. Langford, Gregory M. Lewis, and Allan R. Willms
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 219–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-219-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-219-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is causing rapid temperature increases in the polar regions. A fundamental question is whether these temperature increases are reversible. If we control carbon dioxide emissions, will the temperatures revert or will we have passed a tipping point beyond which return to the present state is impossible? Our mathematical model of the Arctic climate indicates that under present emissions the Arctic climate will change irreversibly to a warm climate before the end of the century.
Karl R. Helfrich and Lev Ostrovsky
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 207–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-207-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-207-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Internal solitons are an important class of nonlinear waves commonly observed in coastal oceans. Their propagation is affected by the Earth's rotation and the variation in the water depth. We consider an interplay of these factors using the corresponding extension of the Gardner equation. This model allows a limiting soliton amplitude and the corresponding increase in wavelength, making the effects of rotation and topography on a shoaling wave especially significant.
Michael Ghil
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 429–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-429-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-429-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The scientific questions posed by the climate sciences are central to socioeconomic concerns today. This paper revisits several crucial questions, starting with
What can we predict beyond 1 week, for how long, and by what methods?, and ending with
Can we achieve enlightened climate control of our planet by the end of the century?We review the progress in dealing with the nonlinearity and stochasticity of the Earth system and emphasize major strides in coupled climate–economy modeling.
Kolja Leon Kypke, William Finlay Langford, and Allan Richard Willms
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 391–409, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-391-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-391-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The climate of Earth is governed by nonlinear processes of geophysics. This paper presents energy balance models (EBMs) embracing these nonlinear processes which lead to positive feedback, amplifying the effects of anthropogenic forcing and leading to bifurcations. We define bifurcation as a change in the topological equivalence class of the system. We initiate a bifurcation analysis of EBMs of Anthropocene climate, which shows that a catastrophic climate change may occur in the next century.
Cited articles
Anderson, J. D. and Schubert, G.: Saturn's gravitational field, internal
rotation, and interior structure, Science, 317, 1384–1387, 2007. a
Andrews, D. G.: On the existence of nonzonal flows satisfying sufficient
conditions for stability, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 28, 243–256,
1984a. a
Andrews, D. G.: On the stability of forced non-zonal flows, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 110, 657–662, 1984b. a
Antuñano, A., del Río‐Gaztelurrutia, T. and. Sánchez‐Lavega, A.,
Read, P. L., and Fletcher, L. N.: Potential Vorticity of Saturn's Polar
Regions: Seasonality and Instabilities, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 186–201,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JE005764, 2019. a
Barnes, J. R.: Linear baroclinic instability in the Martian atmosphere, J.
Atmos. Sci., 41, 1536–1550, 1984. a
Bouchet, F. and Venaille, A.: Statistical mechanics of two-dimensional and
geophysical flows, Phys. Rep., 515, 227–295,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.001, 2012. a
Bowden, M.: An experimental investigation of heat transfer in rotating fluids,
PhD thesis, Durham University, UK, 1961. a
Branscombe, L. E.: The Charney Baroclinic Instability Problem: Approximate
Solutions and Modal Structures, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 1393–1409, 1983. a
Butchart, N., Haines, K., and Marshall, J. C.: A theoretical and diagnostic
study of solitary waves and atmospheric blocking, J. Atmos. Sci., 46,
2063–2078, 1989. a
Charney, J. G. and Stern, M. E.: On the Stability of Internal Baroclinic Jets
in a Rotating Atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 19, 159–172, 1962. a
Dowling, T.: A relationship between potential vorticity and zonal wind on
Jupiter, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 14–22, 1993. a
Drazin, P. G.: Non-linear baroclinic instability of a continuous zonal flow,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 96, 667–676, 1970. a
Eady, E. T.: Long Waves and Cyclone Waves, Tellus, 1, 33–52, 1949. a
Flór, J.-B., Scolan, H., and Gula, J.: Frontal instabilities and waves in a
differentially rotating fluid, J. Fluid Mech., 685, 532–542,
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2011.338, 2011. a
Fraedrich, K., Kirk, E., Luksch, U., and Lunkeit, F.: The Portable University
Model of the Atmosphere (PUMA): Storm track dynamics and low frequency
variability, Meteorol. Zeitschrift, 14, 735–745, 2005. a
Frisius, T., Lunkeit, F., Fraedrich, K., and James, I. N.: Storm-track
organization and variability in a simplified global circulation model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 1019–1043, 1998. a
Garcia-Melendo, E. and Sánchez-Lavega, A.: A study of the stability of
Jovian zonal winds from HST images: 1995–2000, Icarus, 152, 316–330,
2001. a
Geisler, J., Pitcher, E., and Malone, R.: Rotating-Fluid experiments with an
atmospheric general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 9706–9716,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC14p09706, 1983. a
Gierasch, P. J., Ingersoll, A. P., and Pollard, D.: Baroclinic instabilities in
Jupiter's zonal flow, Icarus, 40, 205–212, 1979a. a
Gierasch, P. J., Thomas, P., French, R., and Veverka, J.: Spiral clouds on
Mars: a new artmospheric phenomenon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 6, 405–408,
1979b. a
Guillot, T.: The Interiors of Giant Planets: Models and Outstanding Questions,
Ann. Rev. Earth Planet Sci., 33, 493–530,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120325, 2005. a, b, c
Gula, J., Plougonven, R., and Zeitlin, V.: Ageostrophic instabilities of fronts
in a channel in a stratified rotating fluid, J. Fluid Mech., 627, 485–507,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112009006508, 2009. a
Hayashi, Y.-Y. and Young, W. R.: Stable and unstable shear modes of rotating
parallel flows in shallow water, J. Fluid Mech., 184, 477–504, 1997. a
Held, I. M. and Larichev, V. D.: A scaling theory for horizontally homogeneous baroclinically unstable flow on a beta plane, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 946–952, 1996. a
Hide, R.: Some laboratory experiments on free thermal convection in a rotating
fluid subject to a horizontal temperature gradient and their relation to the
theory of the global atmospheric circulation, in: The Global Circulation of
the Atmosphere, edited by: Corby, G. A., pp. 196–221, Royal Meteorological
Society, London, 1969. a, b
Hide, R. and Titman, C. W.: Detached shear layers in a rotating fluid, J. Fluid
Mech., 29, 39–60, 1967. a
Hollerbach, R., Futterer, B., More, T., and Egbers, C.: Instabilities of the
Stewartson layer Part 2. supercritical mode transitions, Theoret. Comput.
Fluid Dyn., 19, 197–204, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-004-0125-5, 2004. a
Hunt, B. G.: The influence of the Earth's rotation rate on the general
circulation of the atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1392–1408, 1979. a
Ingersoll, A., Gierasch, P., Banfield, D., and Vasavada, A.: Moist convection
as an energy source for the large-scale motions in Jupiter's atmosphere.
Galileo Imaging Team, Nature, 403, 630–2, https://doi.org/10.1038/35001021, 2000. a
Ingersoll, A. P. and Cuzzi, J. N.: Dynamics of Jupiter's cloud bands, J.
Atmos. Sci., 26, 981–985, 1969. a
Kaspi, Y. and Showman, A. P.: Atmospheric dynamics of terrestrial exoplanets
over a wide range of orbital and atmospheric parameters, Astrophys. J., 804,
60, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/60, 2015. a, b, c, d
Kaspi, Y., Galanti, E., Hubbard, W. B., Stevenson, D. J., Bolton, S. J., Iess,
L., Guillot, T., Bloxham, J., Connerney, J. E. P., Cao, H., Durante, D.,
Folkner, W. M., Helled, R., Ingersoll, A. P., Levin, S. M., Lunine, J. I.,
Miguel, Y., Militzer, B., Parisi, M., and Wahl, S. M.: Jupiter's
atmospheric jet streams extend thousands of kilometres deep, Nature, 555,
223–226, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25793, 2018. a
Kong, D., Zhang, K., Schubert, G., and Anderson, J. D.: Origin of Jupiter's
cloud-level zonal winds remains a puzzle even after Juno, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 115,
8499–8504, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805927115, 2018. a
Lebonnois, S., Hourdin, F., Eymet, V., Crespin, A., Fournier, R., and Forget,
F.: Superrotation of Venus' atmosphere analyzed with a full general
circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 115, E06006,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JE003458, 2010. a
Lebonnois, S., Lee, C., Yamamoto, M., Dawson, J., Lewis, S. R., Mendonca, J.,
Read, P., Parish, H. F., Schubert, G., Bengtsson, L., Grinspoon, D., Limaye,
S. S., Schmidt, H., Svedhem, H., and Titov, D. V.: Models of Venus'
atmosphere, in: Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus: Applications of
Terrestrial Models to Our Sister Planet, edited by: Bengtsson, L., Bonnet,
R.-M., Grinspoon, D., Koumoutsaris, S., Lebonnois, S., and Titov, D., Springer, New York,
129–156, 2013. a
Lebonnois, S., Sugimoto, N., and Gilli, G.: Wave analysis in the atmosphere of
Venus below 100-km altitude, simulated by the LMD Venus GCM, Icarus, 278,
38–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.06.004, 2016. a
Lee, C. and Richardson, M. I.: A general circulation model ensemble study of
the atmospheric circulation of Venus, J. Geophys. Res., 115, E04002,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JE003490, 2010. a, b, c, d
Lewis, G. M. and Nagata, W.: Linear stability analysis for the differentially
heated rotating annulus, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 98, 129–152, 2004. a
Lewis, G. M., Périnet, N., and van Veen, L.: Primary flow transitions in
the baroclinic annulus: Prandtl number effects, in: Modelling Atmospheric and
Oceanic Flows: Insights from Laboratory Experiments and Numerical
Simulations, edited by: von Larcher, T. and Williams, P. D.,
American Geophysical Union and Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 45–60, 2015. a
Lewis, S. R., Dawson, J., Lebonnois, S., and Yamamoto, M.: Modeling efforts,
in: Towards Understanding the Climate of Venus: Applications of Terrestrial
Models to Our Sister Planet, edited by: Bengtsson, L., Bonnet, R.-M.,
Grinspoon, D., Koumoutsaris, S., Lebonnois, S., and Titov, D., pp. 102–128,
Springer, New York, 2013. a
Lewis, S. R., Mulholland, D. P., Read, P. L., Montabone, L., Wilson, R. J., and
Smith, M. D.: The solsticial pause on Mars: 1. A planetary wave reanalysis,
Icarus, 264, 456–464, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.039, 2016. a
Lian, Y. and Showman, A. P.: Deep jets on gas-giant planets, Icarus, 194,
597–615, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2007.10.014, 2008. a
Lian, Y. and Showman, A. P.: Generation of equatorial jets by large-scale
latent heating on the giant planets, Icarus, 207, 373–393,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.10.006, 2010. a
Lindzen, R. S.: Instability of a plane-parallel shear flow (Toward a mechanism
for how it works), PAGEOPH, 126, 103–121, 1988. a
Liu, J. and Schneider, T.: Mechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets,
J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3652–3672, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3492.1, 2010. a
Lucarini, V.: Thermodynamic efficiency and entropy production in the climate
system, Phys. Rev. E, 80, 021118, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021118, 2009. a
Mankovitch, C., Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., and Movshovitz, N.: Cassini ring
seismology as a probe of Saturn's interior. I. rigid rotation, Astrophys.
J., 871, 1, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf798, 2019. a
Margules, M.: Über die Energie der Stürme, Jahrb. Kais.-kön Zent. für
Met. und Geodynamik, Vienna, pp. 1–26, 1903. a
Mendonça, J. M. and Read, P. L.: Exploring the Venus global
super-rotation using a comprehensive general circulation model, Planet. Space
Sci., 134, 1–18, 2016. a
Merlis, T. M. and Schneider, T.: Atmospheric dynamics of Earth-like tidally
locked aquaplanets, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 2, 13, https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2010.2.13, 2010. a
Millour, E., Forget, F., Spiga, A., Vals, M., Zakharov, V., Montabone, L., Lefèvre, F., Montmessin, F., Chaufray, J.-Y., López-Valverde, M. A., González-Galindo, F., Lewis, S. R., Read, P. L., Desjean, M.-C., Cipriani, F., and the MCD development team: The Mars Climate Database (Version 5.3), Proceedings of Scientific Workshop: “From Mars Express to ExoMars”, 27–28 February 2018, European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC), Madrid, Spain, 2018. a
Mitchell, J. L. and Vallis, G. K.: The transition to superrotation in
terrestrial atmospheres, J. Geophys. Res., 115, E12008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JE003587, 2010. a
Montabone, L., Marsh, K., Lewis, S. R., Read, P. L., Smith, M. D., Holmes, J.,
Spiga, A., Lowe, D., and Pamment, A.: The Mars Analysis Correction Data
Assimilation (MACDA) Dataset V1.0, Geosci. Data J., 1, 129–139,
https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.13, 2014. a
Mu, M. and Wu, Y.-H.: Arnol'd nonlinear stability theorems and their
application to the atmosphere and oceans, Surv. Geophys., 22, 383–426,
2001. a
Niino, H. and Misawa, N.: An experimental and theoretical study of barotropic
instability, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 1992–2011, 1984. a
Palotai, C., Dowling, T. E., and Fletcher, L. N.: 3D Modeling of interactions
between Jupiter's ammonia clouds and large anticyclones, Icarus, 232,
141–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.01.005, 2014. a
Pedlosky, J.: Finite-amplitude baroclinic waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 15–30,
1970. a
Pedlosky, J.: Finite-amplitude baroclinic waves with small dissipation, J.
Atmos. Sci., 28, 587–597, 1971. a
Peixoto, J. and Oort, A.: The Annual Distribution of Atmospheric Energy on a
Planetary Scale, J. Geophys. Res., 20, 2149–2159,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JC079i015p02149, 1974. a
Read, P. L.: Dynamics and circulation regimes of terrestrial planets, Plan.
Space Sci., 59, 900–914, 2011. a
Read, P. L. and Lebonnois, S.: Superrotation on Venus, on Titan, and
Elsewhere, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 46, 175–202,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-082517-010137, 2018. a, b
Read, P. L., Rhines, P. B., and White, A. A.: Geostrophic scatter diagrams and
potential vorticity dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 3226–3240, 1986. a
Read, P. L., Gierasch, P. J., Conrath, B. J., Simon-Miller, A., Fouchet, T.,
and Yamazaki, Y. H.: Mapping potential-vorticity dynamics on Jupiter. I:
Zonal-mean circulation from Cassini and Voyager 1 data, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 132, 1577–1603, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.34, 2006. a, b, c, d
Read, P. L., Conrath, B., Fletcher, L., Gierasch, P., Simon-Miller, A., and
Zuchowski, L.: Mapping potential-vorticity dynamics on Saturn: Zonal-mean
circulation from Cassini and Voyager data, Planet. Space Sci., 57,
1682–1698, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.03.004, 2009a. a, b, c
Read, P. L., Dowling, T. E., and Schubert, G.: Saturn's rotation period from
its planetary wave configuration, Nature, 460, 608–610,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08194, 2009b. a
Read, P. L., Pérez, E. P., Moroz, I. M., and Young, R. M. B.: General
Circulation of Planetary Atmospheres: Insights from Rotating Annulus and
Related Experiments, in: Modelling Atmospheric and Oceanic Flows: Insights
from Laboratory Experiments and Numerical Simulations, edited by: von
Larcher, T. and Williams, P. D., American Geophysical Union and
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp. 9–44, 2015. a, b
Read, P. L., Tabataba-Vakili, F., Wang, Y., Augier, P., Lindborg, E., Valeanu,
A., and Young, R. M. B.: Comparative terrestrial atmospheric circulation
regimes in simplified global circulation models. Part II: Energy budgets
and spectral transfers, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 2558–2576,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3351, 2018. a
Ripa, P.: General stability conditions for zonal flows in a one-layer model on
the β-plane or the sphere, J. Fluid Mech., 126, 463–489, 1983. a
Sakai, S.: Rossby–Kelvin instability: a new type of ageostrophic
instability caused by a resonance between Rossby waves and gravity waves,
J. Fluid Mech., 202, 149–176, 1989. a
Salyk, C., Ingersoll, A. P., Lorre, J., Vasavada, A., and Del Genio, A. D.:
Interaction between eddies and mean flow in Jupiter's atmosphere: analysis
of Cassini imaging data, Icarus, 185, 430–442,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2006.08.007, 2006. a, b
Sánchez-Lavega, A., Lebonnois, S., Imamura, T., Read, P., and Luz, D.: The
Atmospheric Dynamics of Venus, Space Sci. Rev., 212, 1541–1616,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0389-x, 2017. a, b, c, d
Scott, R. K. and Dunkerton, T. J.: Vertical structure of tropospheric winds on
gas giants, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 3073–3081, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072628,
2017. a, b
Seviour, W. J. M., Waugh, D. W., and Scott, R. K.: The stability of Mars's
annular polar vortex, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 1533–1547,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0293.1, 2017. a, b
Sommeria, J., Meyers, S. D., and Swinney, H. L.: Experiments on vortices and
Rossby waves in eastward and westward jets, in: Nonlinear Topics in Ocean
Physics, edited by: Osborne, A. R., pp. 227–269, North Holland, Amsterdam,
1991. a
Spiga, A., Guerlet, S., Millour, E., Indurain, M., Meurdesoif, Y., Cabanes, S.,
Dubos, T., Leconte, J., Boissinot, A., Lebonnois, S., Sylvestre, M., and
Fouchet, T.: Global climate modeling of Saturn's atmosphere. Part II:
Multi-annual high-resolution dynamical simulations, Icarus, 335, 113377, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.07.011,
2020. a
Stamp, A. P. and Dowling, T.: Jupiter's winds and Arnol'd's second stability
theorem: slowly moving waves and neutral stability, J. Geophys. Res., 98,
18847–18855, 1993. a
Sugimoto, N., Takagi, M., and Matsuda, Y.: Baroclinic instability in the Venus
atmosphere simulated by GCM, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 1950–1968,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JE004624, 2014. a, b, c
Tabataba-Vakili, F., Read, P. L., Lewis, S. R., Montabone, L., Ruan, T., Wang,
Y., Valeanu, A., and Young, R. M. B.: A Lorenz/Boer energy budget for the
atmosphere of Mars from a “reanalysis” of spacecraft observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8320–8327, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065659, 2015. a, b, c
Wang, Y., Read, P. L., Tabataba-Vakili, F., and Young, R. M. B.: Comparative
terrestrial atmospheric circulation regimes in simplified global circulation
models. Part I: From cyclostrophic super-rotation to geostrophic
turbulence, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 2537–2557,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3350, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Williams, G. and Holloway, J.: The range and unity of planetary circulations,
Nature, 297, 295–299, 1982. a
Young, R., Read, P., and Wang, Y.: Simulating Jupiter's weather layer: Accompanying data for Parts I and II, University of Oxford, https://doi.org/10.5287/bodleian:PyYbbxpk2, 2018. a
Young, R. M. B.: The Lorenz energy cycle in simulated rotating annulus flows,
Phys. Fluids, 26, 056602, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4873921, 2014. a, b
Young, R. M. B. and Read, P. L.: Forward and inverse kinetic energy cascades in
Jupiter's turbulent weather layer, Nature Phys., 13, 1135–1140,
https://doi.org/10.1038/NPHYS4227, 2017. a, b
Young, R. M. B., Read, P. L., and Wang, Y.: Simulating Jupiter’s weather
layer. Part II: Passive ammonia and water cycles, Icarus, 326, 253–268,
2019b. a
Zurita-Gotor, P.: The sensitivity of the isentropic slope in a primitive
equation dry model, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 43–65, 2008. a
Short summary
Baroclinic and barotropic instabilities are well known as the processes responsible for the production of the most important energy-containing eddies in the atmospheres and oceans of Earth and other planets. Linear and nonlinear instability theories provide insights into when such instabilities may occur, grow to a large amplitude and saturate, with examples from the laboratory, simplified numerical models and planetary atmospheres. We conclude with a number of open issues for future research.
Baroclinic and barotropic instabilities are well known as the processes responsible for the...