the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Simulation characteristics of seismic translation and rotation under the assumption of nonlinear small deformation
Abstract. The conventional theory of elastic-wave propagation is based on classical elastodynamics, assuming linear small deformations of particles. However, recent observations of seismic rotation have revealed significant disparities between actual rotational motions induced by earthquakes in focal areas and near fields compared to theoretical calculations and simulations. Considering the nonlinearity may be the main cause of the discrepancies and based on classical elastodynamic principle, we derive seismic elastic-wave equations with Green strain tensor without the linear small deformation assumption, a different way from using complex nonlinear constitutive relation and try to interpret the mechanism of seismic rotation. By simulating and analyzing translational and rotational components subjected to the three basic and typical vibrating sources, namely, isotropic (ISO), double couple (DC), and compensated linear vector dipole (CLVD), represented by moment tensors, we investigate the wavefield differences between elastic-wave equations based on linear and nonlinear geometric relations and quantify the differences in homogeneous elastic full-space model. Subsequently, we simulate two observed six-component Taiwan earthquakes and compare their differences caused by nonlinear simulations. The results indicate that linear approximation errors are more pronounced in seismic ISO and CLVD sources. And the nonlinearity of small deformation has a more pronounced effect on rotational motions deduced by strong earthquakes. Also, the nonlinear mechanics of seismic rotation can attribute to the complex propagation paths and source mechanisms simultaneously.
- Preprint
(7605 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on npg-2024-17', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Aug 2024
The paper deals with a generally interesting topic, namely nonlinear effects on both the translational ground motion components
(which are the domain of traditional seismology), and on rotational components. Rotational seismology is currently a rapidly developing field,
hence the subject is highly topical. The authors investigate the numerical solution of the equation of motion with a strain tensor that includes some
nonlinear terms in addition to the linear ones and compare this with the 'classical' solution considering linear strain tensor that is commonly used
because of the small-deformation assumption. For numerical simulations they use a staggered grid finite difference scheme. The authors then
confront the simulations with the records of two selected Taiwan earthquakes.Unfortunately the paper is not well written and will require significant refinement in a number of respects. The level of English is not good and often
makes it very difficult for the reader to understand the meaning. The quantities and equations should be better described in accordance to
mathematical conventions. The numerical models do not appear to be properly tested, and there is a lack of numerical error estimates.
Comparisons with real data from two selected Taiwan earthquakes are not convincing. The references show deficiencies or errors.
In my opinion, the paper requires MAJOR REVISION.See the list of comments in the attached file.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Wei Li, 17 Oct 2024
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for your thorough review and comments on our manuscript. We appreciate the time and effort you have invested in providing detailed feedback. We take your feedback seriously, will complete the related work and revisions on the manuscript as soon as possible, and hope to receive your further review and approval after the improvements. We have responded to each of your comments. Please see the attachment. We hope that the information and explanations meet your expectations.
Best regards,
Authors
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Wei Li, 17 Oct 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on npg-2024-17', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Sep 2024
Please find attached my comments.
Best regards,
The reviewer
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Wei Li, 17 Oct 2024
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript and provide valuable feedback. We take your comments seriously and make theoretical improvements to revise the manuscript. We have considered and discussed the points you have raised and hereby respond to them, please see the attachment, in an effort to further refine our research.
Best regards,
Authors
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Wei Li, 17 Oct 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
293 | 98 | 27 | 418 | 15 | 10 |
- HTML: 293
- PDF: 98
- XML: 27
- Total: 418
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1