Chib, S. and Greenberg, E.: Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, Am. Stat., 49, 327–335, https://doi.org/10.2307/2684568, 1995.
Clochard, V., Delépine, N., Labat, K., and Ricarte, P.: Post-stack versus pre-stack stratigraphic inversion for monitoring purposes: a case study for the saline aquifer of the Sleipner field, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2417–2421, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255345, 2009.
de Lima, P. D. S., Corso, G., Ferreira, M. S., and de Araújo, J. M.: Acoustic full waveform inversion with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method, Physica A, 617, 128618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128618, 2023.
Duane, S., Kennedy, A. D., Pendleton, B. J., and Roweth, D.: Hybrid Monte Carlo, Phys. Lett. B, 195, 216–222, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X, 1987.
Fichtner, A. and Zunino, A.: Hamiltonian nullspace shuttles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 644–651, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080931, 2019.
Gebraad, L., Boehm, C., and Fichtner, A.: Bayesian elastic full-waveform inversion using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2019JB018428, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018428, 2020.
Goodway, B.: AVO and Lamé constants for rock parameterization and fluid detection, CSEG Recorder, 26, 39–60, 2001.
Hampson, D. P., Russell, B. H., and Bankhead, B.: Simultaneous inversion of prestack seismic data, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1633–1637, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2148008, 2005.
Hastings, W. K.: Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika, 57, 97–109, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.1.97, 1970.
Helland-Hansen, D., Magnus, I., Edvardsen, A., and Hansen, E.: Seismic inversion for reservoir characterization and well planning in the Snorre field, Leading Edge, 16, 269–274, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437616, 1997.
Infante, S., Sanchez, L., and Hernández, A.: Stochastic models to estimate population dynamics, Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing, 7, 311–328, https://doi.org/10.19139/soic.v7i2.538, 2019.
Izzatullah, M., van Leeuwen, T., and Peter, D.: Accelerated Langevin Dynamics for Bayesian seismic inversion, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2019JB018428, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018428, 2020.
Izzatullah, M., van Leeuwen, T., and Peter, D.: Bayesian seismic inversion: a fast sampling Langevin dynamics Markov chain Monte Carlo method, Geophys. J. Int., 227, 1523–1553, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab287, 2021.
Landa, E. and Treitel, S.: Seismic inversion: What it is, and what it is not, Leading Edge, 35, 277–279, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle35030277.1, 2016.
Lemons, D. S. and Gythiel, A.: Paul Langevin's 1908 paper “On the Theory of Brownian Motion” [“Sur la théorie du mouvement brownien,” C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 146, 530–533 (1908)], Am. J. Phys., 65, 1079–1081, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18725, 1997.
Ma, X.: Simultaneous inversion of prestack seismic data for rock properties using simulated annealing, Geophysics, 67, 1877–1885, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1527087, 2002.
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E.: Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087–1092, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114, 1953.
Neal, R. M.: MCMC using Hamiltonian dynamics, in: Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, edited by: Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G. L., and Meng, X.-L., Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 113–162, https://doi.org/10.1201/b10905-6, 2012.
Nemeth, C. and Fearnhead, P.: Stochastic Gradient Markov Chain Monte Carlo, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 116, 433–450, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1847120, 2021.
Niu, L., Geng, J., Wu, X., Zhao, L., and Zhang, H.: Data-driven method for an improved linearised AVO inversion, J. Geophys. Eng., 18, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxaa065, 2020.
Roberts, G. and Stramer, O.: Langevin diffusions and Metropolis-Hastings algorithms, Methodol. Comput. Appl., 4, 337–357, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023562417138, 2002.
Roberts, G. O. and Rosenthal, J. S.: Optimal scaling of discrete approximations to Langevin diffusions, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 60, 255–268, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00123, 1998.
Roberts, G. O. and Tweedie, R. L.: Exponential convergence of Langevin distributions and their discrete approximations, Bernoulli, 2, 341–363, https://doi.org/10.2307/3318418, 1996.
Roberts, G. O., Gelman, A., and Gilks, W. R.: Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms, Ann. Appl. Probab., 7, 110–120, https://doi.org/10.1214/aoap/1034625254, 1997.
Stuart, A. M., Voss, J., and Wilberg, P.: Conditional path sampling of SDEs and the Langevin MCMC method, Commun. Math. Sci., 2, 685–697, https://doi.org/10.4310/CMS.2004.v2.n4.a7, 2004.
Sánchez, L., Infante, S., Griffin, V., and Rey, D.: Spatio-temporal dynamic model and parallelized ensemble Kalman filter for precipitation data, Braz. J. Probab. Stat., 30, https://doi.org/10.1214/15-BJPS297, 2016.
Tarantola, A.: Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717921, 2005.
Vats, D., Flegal, J. M., and Jones, G. L.: Multivariate output analysis for Markov chain Monte Carlo, Biometrika, 106, 321–337, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asz002, 2019.
Welling, M. and Teh, Y. W.: Bayesian learning via stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics, in: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2011), Bellevue, WA, USA, 681–688, 2011.
Wu, H., Chen, Y., Li, S., and Peng, Z.: Acoustic impedance inversion using Gaussian Metropolis-Hastings sampling with data driving, Energies, 12, 2744, https://doi.org/10.3390/en12142744, 2019.
