Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
NPG
Articles | Volume 32, issue 3
Articles | Volume 32, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-32-281-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-32-281-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 32, issue 3
Research article
 | 
15 Aug 2025
Research article |  | 15 Aug 2025

Evaluation of the effectiveness of an intervention strategy in a control simulation experiment through comparison with model predictive control

Rikuto Nagai, Yang Bai, Masaki Ogura, Shunji Kotsuki, and Naoki Wakamiya

Viewed

Total article views: 565 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
466 73 26 565 26 48
  • HTML: 466
  • PDF: 73
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 565
  • BibTeX: 26
  • EndNote: 48
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Dec 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Dec 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 565 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 518 with geography defined and 47 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Aug 2025
Download
Short summary
Controlling chaotic systems is a key step toward weather control. The control simulation experiment (CSE) modifies weather systems using small perturbations, as shown in studies with the Lorenz-63 model. However, the effectiveness of CSE compared to other methods is unclear. This study evaluates CSE against model predictive control (MPC). Simulations reveal that MPC achieves higher success rates with less effort under certain conditions, linking control theory and atmospheric science.
Read more
Share