Daley, R.:
Atmospheric Data Assimilation (Special Issue Data Assimilation in Meteorology and Oceanography: Theory and Practice), J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 75, 319–329, 1997. a
Diab-Montero, H. A., Li, M., van Dinther, Y., and Vossepoel, F. C.:
Estimating the occurrence of slow slip events and earthquakes with an Ensemble Kalman Filter, Earth ArXiv, in review,
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5135N, 2023.
a
Dieterich, J. H.:
Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 84, 2161–2168, 1979.
a,
b
Doucet, A., De Freitas, N., and Gordon, N. (Eds.): An introduction to sequential Monte Carlo methods, in: Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice, Springer, New York, 3–14,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9, 2001.
a
Du, M., Zheng, F., Zhu, J., Lin, R., Yang, H., and Chen, Q.:
A New Ensemble-Based approach to correct the systematic ocean temperature bias of CAS-ESM-C to improve its simulation and data assimilation abilities, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2020JC016406,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016406, 2020.
a
Erickson, B., Birnir, B., and Lavallée, D.:
A model for aperiodicity in earthquakes, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 15, 1–12,
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-15-1-2008, 2008.
a,
b,
c,
d
Erickson, B., Birnir, B., and Lavallée, D.:
Periodicity, chaos and localization in a Burridge–Knopoff model of an earthquake with rate-and-state friction, Geophys. J. Int., 187, 178–198, 2011.
a,
b
Evensen, G., Vossepoel, F. C., and Van Leeuwen, P. J.:
Data Assimilation Fundamentals: A Unified formulation for State and Parameter Estimation, Springer,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96709-3, Open access, 2022.
a,
b,
c
Fakuda, J., Johnson, K., Larson, K., and Miyazaki, S.:
Fault friction parameters inferred from the early stages of afterslip following the 2003 Tokachi-Oki earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 114, B04412,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006166, 2009.
a,
b
Gu, J., Rice, J. R., Ruina, A., and Tse, S.:
Slip motion and stability of a single degree of freedom elastic system with rate and state dependent friction, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 32, 167–196, 1984. a
Hirahara, K. and Nishikiori, K.:
Estimation of frictional properties and slip evolution on a long-term slow slip event fault with the ensemble Kalman filter: numerical experiments, Geophys. J. Int., 62, 2074–2096, 2019. a
Hol, J. D., Schon, T. B., and Gustafsson, F.:
On resampling algorithms for particle filters, in: 2006 IEEE nonlinear statistical signal processing workshop, Cambridge, UK, 3–15 September 2006, 79–82,
https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSPW.2006.4378824, 2006.
a
Hori, T., Miyazaki, S., Hyodo, M., and Nakata, R., and Kanata, Y.:
Earthquake forecasting system based on sequential data assimilation of slip on the plate boundary, Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Japan, 62, 179–189, 2014. a
Hsu, Y.-J., Simons, M., Avouac, J.-P., Galetzka, J., Sieh, K., Chlieh, M., Natawidjaja, D., Prawirodirdjo, L., and Bock, Y.:
Frictional afterslip following the 2005 Nias-Simeulue earthquake, Sumatra, Science, 312, 1921–1926, 2006. a
Hu, C.-C. and Van Leeuwen, P. J.:
A particle flow filter for high-dimensional system applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 2352–2374,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4028, 2021.
a
Kano, M., Miyazaki, S., Ishikawa, Y., Hiyoshi, Y., Ito, K., and Hirahara, K.:
Estimation of frictional parameters and initial values of simulation variables using an adjoint data assimilation method with synthetic afterslip data, Zishin 2, 63, 57–69, 2010.
a,
b
Kano, M., Miyazaki, S., Ito, K., and Hirahara, K.:
An adjoint data assimilation method for optimizing frictional parameters on the afterslip area, Earth Planets Space, 65, 1575–1580,
https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2013.08.002, 2013.
a,
b
Lapusta, N. and Barbot, S.:
Models of earthquakes and aseismic slip based on laboratory-derived rate and state friction laws, in: The mechanics of faulting: From laboratory to real earthquakes, 661, 153–207, 2012. a
Lapusta, N., Rice, J. R., Ben-Zion, Y., and Zheng, G.:
Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate-and state-dependent friction, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 105, 23765–23789, 2000. a
Li, H., Kalnay, E., Miyoshi, T., and Danforth, C. M.:
Accounting for model errors in ensemble data assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 3407–3419, 2009. a
Li, M., Pranger, C., and van Dinther, Y.: Characteristics of earthquake cycles: A cross‐dimensional comparison of 0D to 3D numerical models, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2021JB023726,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023726, 2022.
a,
b,
c
Marone, C.:
Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 26, 643–696, 1998. a
Marzocchi, W., Taroni, M., and Falcone, G.:
Earthquake forecasting during the complex Amatrice-Norcia seismic sequence, Science Advances, 3, e1701239,
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701239, 2017.
a
Miyazaki, S.-I., Segall, P., Fukuda, J., and Kato, T.:
Space time distribution of afterslip following the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake: Implications for variations in fault zone frictional properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06623,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019410, 2004.
a
Nakatani, M.:
Conceptual and physical clarification of rate and state friction: Frictional sliding as a thermally activated rheology, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 106, 13347–13380, 2001. a
Niemeijer, A. and Vissers, R.:
Earthquake rupture propagation inferred from the spatial distribution of fault rock frictional properties, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 396, 154–164, 2014.
a,
b,
c
Rice, J. R. and Tse, S. T.:
Dynamic motion of a single degree of freedom system following a rate and state dependent friction law, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 91, 521–530, 1986.
a,
b
Ruina, A.:
Slip instability and state variable friction laws, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 88, 10359–10370, 1983.
a,
b,
c
Snyder, C., Bengtsson, T., Bickel, P., and Anderson, J.:
Obstacles to high-dimensional particle filtering, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 4629–4640, 2008. a
Sørensen, J. V. T. and Madsen, H.:
Data assimilation in hydrodynamic modelling: on the treatment of non-linearity and bias, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 18, 228–244, 2004. a
Van Dinther, V., Kunsch, H. R., and Fichtner, A.:
Ensemble data assimilation for earthquake sequences: Probabilistic estimation and forecasting of fault stresses, Geophys. J. Int., 217, 1453–1478, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g
Van Leeuwen, P. J.:
Particle filtering in geophysical systems, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 4089–4114, 2009. a
Van Leeuwen, P. J.:
Representation errors and retrievals in linear and nonlinear data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 1612–1623,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2464, 2015.
a
Vossepoel, F. C. and van Leeuwen, P. J.:
Parameter estimation using a particle method: Inferring mixing coefficients from sea level observations, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 1006–1020, 2007.
a,
b
Werner, M. J., Ide, K., and Sornette, D.:
Earthquake forecasting based on data assimilation: sequential Monte Carlo methods for renewal point processes, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 18, 49–70,
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-49-2011, 2011.
a,
b