Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
NPG
Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-22-403-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-22-403-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
Research article
 | 
24 Jul 2015
Research article |  | 24 Jul 2015

Verification against perturbed analyses and observations

N. E. Bowler, M. J. P. Cullen, and C. Piccolo

Viewed

Total article views: 1,733 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
986 626 121 1,733 149 124
  • HTML: 986
  • PDF: 626
  • XML: 121
  • Total: 1,733
  • BibTeX: 149
  • EndNote: 124
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jul 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jul 2015)

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
It has long been known that verification of a forecast against the sequence of analyses used to produce those forecasts can under-estimate the magnitude of forecast errors. Here we show that under certain conditions the verification of a short-range forecast against a perturbed analysis coming from an ensemble data assimilation scheme can give the same root-mean-square error as verification against the truth. This means that a perturbed analysis can be used as a reliable proxy for the truth.
Read more