Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-22-403-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-22-403-2015
Research article
 | 
24 Jul 2015
Research article |  | 24 Jul 2015

Verification against perturbed analyses and observations

N. E. Bowler, M. J. P. Cullen, and C. Piccolo

Viewed

Total article views: 1,574 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
867 598 109 1,574 134 116
  • HTML: 867
  • PDF: 598
  • XML: 109
  • Total: 1,574
  • BibTeX: 134
  • EndNote: 116
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jul 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jul 2015)

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
It has long been known that verification of a forecast against the sequence of analyses used to produce those forecasts can under-estimate the magnitude of forecast errors. Here we show that under certain conditions the verification of a short-range forecast against a perturbed analysis coming from an ensemble data assimilation scheme can give the same root-mean-square error as verification against the truth. This means that a perturbed analysis can be used as a reliable proxy for the truth.