Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2018-13
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2018-13
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
06 Mar 2018
| 06 Mar 2018
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.
Brief communication: Electron pair donors and Earth's energy generation
Abstract. This Brief Communication presents a series of model calculations for the electron pair donor densities required for tresino thermal energy generation in the Earth. The crucial density of electron donors is determined from the ratio of He3 and He4 after many years starting from initial densities of the donor pairs. In addition, a new proposal is introduced that connects Cooper pair formations to the deuteron tresino nuclear reaction chain (the chain that determines the He3 / He4 ratio). Furthermore, it is proposed that magnetotelluric (MT) observations may be connected to Cooper pair formation either with or without substantial heating.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
How to cite. Mayer, F.: Brief communication: Electron pair donors and Earth's energy generation, Nonlin. Processes Geophys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2018-13, 2018.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Download & links
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(720 KB)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
AC1: 'new research impacting the physics in this Brief Communication', Frederick Mayer, 30 Mar 2018
-
RC1: 'Referee comments to the author', stefano Gariglio, 13 Apr 2018
-
AC2: 'Reply to comments of Referee 1', Frederick Mayer, 21 Apr 2018
-
RC2: 'Suggest rejection', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 May 2018
-
AC3: 'Author’s reply to Anonymous Referee #2', Frederick Mayer, 09 May 2018
-
EC1: 'Comment on the reply to Rev#2', Richard Gloaguen, 11 Jun 2018
-
EC1: 'Comment on the reply to Rev#2', Richard Gloaguen, 11 Jun 2018
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
AC1: 'new research impacting the physics in this Brief Communication', Frederick Mayer, 30 Mar 2018
-
RC1: 'Referee comments to the author', stefano Gariglio, 13 Apr 2018
-
AC2: 'Reply to comments of Referee 1', Frederick Mayer, 21 Apr 2018
-
RC2: 'Suggest rejection', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 May 2018
-
AC3: 'Author’s reply to Anonymous Referee #2', Frederick Mayer, 09 May 2018
-
EC1: 'Comment on the reply to Rev#2', Richard Gloaguen, 11 Jun 2018
-
EC1: 'Comment on the reply to Rev#2', Richard Gloaguen, 11 Jun 2018
Viewed
Total article views: 1,845 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Mar 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,277 | 488 | 80 | 1,845 | 94 | 92 |
- HTML: 1,277
- PDF: 488
- XML: 80
- Total: 1,845
- BibTeX: 94
- EndNote: 92
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,601 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,587 with geography defined
and 14 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Frederick Mayer
Mayer Applied Research Inc., 1417 Dicken Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, USA
Short summary
This paper presents a comparison of two processes that start the generation of energy from the Earth. It does this by using a sequence of equations to provide the level of either process by using previously determined from geophysical measurements far from active volcanic sites and a few hundred years after the activity. This work is necessary in order for us and other geophysicists to examine the various nuclei present in this energy generating process after the reactions are completed.
This paper presents a comparison of two processes that start the generation of energy from the...