Articles | Volume 20, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-1127-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-1127-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
On the nonstationarity of the decadal periodicities of the length of day
P. De Michelis
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 00143 Rome, Italy
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 00143 Rome, Italy
G. Consolini
INAF – Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, 00133 Rome, Italy
Related authors
Mirko Piersanti, Paola De Michelis, Dario Del Moro, Roberta Tozzi, Michael Pezzopane, Giuseppe Consolini, Maria Federica Marcucci, Monica Laurenza, Simone Di Matteo, Alessio Pignalberi, Virgilio Quattrociocchi, and Piero Diego
Ann. Geophys., 38, 703–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-703-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-703-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the solar event that occurred on 25 August 2018. This kind of comprehensive analysis plays a key role in better understanding the complexity of the processes occurring in the Sun–Earth system determining the geoeffectiveness of manifestations of solar activity. The analysis presented here shows for the first time a direct link between characteristics of solar perturbation, the magnetosphere–ionosphere system response and space weather effects.
Tommaso Alberti, Mirko Piersanti, Antonio Vecchio, Paola De Michelis, Fabio Lepreti, Vincenzo Carbone, and Leonardo Primavera
Ann. Geophys., 34, 1069–1084, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1069-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1069-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the time variation of the magnetospheric and Earth's magnetic field during both quiet and disturbed periods. We identify the timescale variations associated with different magnetospheric current systems, solar-wind–magnetosphere high-frequency interactions, ionospheric processes, and internal dynamics of the magnetosphere. In addition, we propose a new local index for the identification of the intensity of a geomagnetic storm on the ground.
G. Consolini, R. De Marco, and P. De Michelis
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 20, 455–466, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-455-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-455-2013, 2013
Mirko Piersanti, Paola De Michelis, Dario Del Moro, Roberta Tozzi, Michael Pezzopane, Giuseppe Consolini, Maria Federica Marcucci, Monica Laurenza, Simone Di Matteo, Alessio Pignalberi, Virgilio Quattrociocchi, and Piero Diego
Ann. Geophys., 38, 703–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-703-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-703-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the solar event that occurred on 25 August 2018. This kind of comprehensive analysis plays a key role in better understanding the complexity of the processes occurring in the Sun–Earth system determining the geoeffectiveness of manifestations of solar activity. The analysis presented here shows for the first time a direct link between characteristics of solar perturbation, the magnetosphere–ionosphere system response and space weather effects.
Tommaso Alberti, Mirko Piersanti, Antonio Vecchio, Paola De Michelis, Fabio Lepreti, Vincenzo Carbone, and Leonardo Primavera
Ann. Geophys., 34, 1069–1084, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1069-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1069-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the time variation of the magnetospheric and Earth's magnetic field during both quiet and disturbed periods. We identify the timescale variations associated with different magnetospheric current systems, solar-wind–magnetosphere high-frequency interactions, ionospheric processes, and internal dynamics of the magnetosphere. In addition, we propose a new local index for the identification of the intensity of a geomagnetic storm on the ground.
G. Consolini, R. De Marco, and P. De Michelis
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 20, 455–466, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-455-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-455-2013, 2013