9 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Identification of geochemical anomalies by using of number–size (N–S) fractal model in Bardaskan area, NE Iran M. Hashemi & P. Afzal https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0657-8
2. Correlation between mineralization intensity and fluid–rock reaction in the Xinli gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, China: Constraints from petrographic and statistical approaches L. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.04.005
3. Identifying geochemical anomalies associated with Cu mineralization in stream sediment samples in Gharachaman area, northwest of Iran A. Darehshiri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.06.009
4. The fractal relationship between orebody tonnage and thickness Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.06.018
5. Comparative study of C–A, C–P, and N–S fractal methods for separating geochemical anomalies from background: A case study of Kamoshgaran region, northwest of Iran A. Daya https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.12.015
6. Application of a Multifractal Model for Identification of Lithology and Hydrothermal Alteration in the Dasuji Porphyry Mo Deposit in Inner Mongolia, China M. Xi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15235532
7. Estimating the average concentration of minor and trace elements in surficial sediments using fractal methods T. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.08.008
8. Metallic Mineral Resources in the Twenty-First Century: II. Constraints on Future Supply A. Patiño Douce https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-015-9265-0
9. Geochemical distribution mapping by combining number-size multifractal model and multiple indicator kriging M. Mohammadpour et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.01.018