Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/npgd-2-1553-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/npgd-2-1553-2015

  24 Nov 2015

24 Nov 2015

Review status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Power law distributions of wildfires across Europe: benchmarking a land surface model with observed data

B. Di Mauro1, F. Fava1, P. Frattini2, A. Camia3, R. Colombo1, and M. Migliavacca4,1 B. Di Mauro et al.
  • 1Remote Sensing of Environmental Dynamics Laboratory, Earth and Environmental Sciences Department University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
  • 2Earth and Environmental Sciences Department University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
  • 3European Commission – Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Varese, Italy
  • 4Biogeochemical Integration Department, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany

Abstract. Monthly wildfire burned area frequency is here modeled with a power law distribution and scaling exponent across different European biomes are estimated. Data sets, spanning from 2000 to 2009, comprehend the inventory of monthly burned areas from the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) and simulated monthly burned areas from a recent parameterization of a Land Surface Model (LSM), that is the Community Land Model (CLM). Power law exponents are estimated with a Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) for different European biomes. The characteristic fire size (CFS), i.e. the area that most contributes to the total burned area, was also calculated both from EFFIS and CLM data set. We used the power law fitting and the CFS analysis to benchmark CLM model against the EFFIS observational wildfires data set available for Europe.

Results for the EFFIS data showed that power law fittings holds for 2–3 orders of magnitude in the Boreal and Continental ecoregions, whereas the distribution of the Alpine, Atlantic are fitted only in the upper tail. Power law instead is not a suitable model for fitting CLM simulations.

CLM benchmarking analysis showed that the model strongly overestimates burned areas and fails in reproducing size-frequency distribution of observed EFFIS wildfires. This benchmarking analysis showed that some refinements in CLM structure (in particular regarding the anthropogenic influence) are needed for predicting future wildfires scenarios, since the low spatial resolution of the model and differences in relative frequency of small and large fires can affect the reliability of the predictions.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

B. Di Mauro et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

B. Di Mauro et al.

B. Di Mauro et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 976 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
643 277 56 976 42 56
  • HTML: 643
  • PDF: 277
  • XML: 56
  • Total: 976
  • BibTeX: 42
  • EndNote: 56
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Nov 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Nov 2015)

Saved

Latest update: 21 Sep 2021
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
In this paper, we analyse the probability distribution of wildfires burned area at European scale. We evaluate the performance of a land surface model using power law scaling as a benchmark. Our analysis suggests that only high latitude biomes are described by a power law distribution, and we relate this feature with the less impact of antrhopogenic activity. The benchmarking analysis showed that some refinements are needed in the model structure for reproducing emerging properties of wildfires