Articles | Volume 20, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-417-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-20-417-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Comment on "Fractal analysis of ULF electromagnetic emissions in possible association with earthquakes in China" by Ida et al. (2012)
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, L'Aquila, Italy
J. N. Thomas
Northwest Research Associates, Redmond, Washington, USA
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Digipen Institute of Technology, Redmond, Washington, USA
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
Related authors
Fabrizio Masci, Jeremy N. Thomas, and James A. Secan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1461–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1461-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1461-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In a recent paper, the authors report the analysis of ionospheric TEC data from GPS measurements around the time of the 6 April 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. According to them, an anomalous change in TEC difference from two GPS receivers in central Italy may be explained as related to the earthquake. We have conducted our own independent analysis using the same GPS data. We have shown that in TEC difference there is no evidence of actual seismogenic effects close to the time of L'Aquila earthquake.
F. Masci and J. N. Thomas
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2697–2701, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2697-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2697-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Reports of possible earthquake precursors have social responsibility. They motivate the idea that earthquakes may be predicted in the future. Thus, these papers should be convincing about the seismogenic origin of the reported precursors. We have reviewed Febriani et al. (2014). We have shown that the pre-earthquake magnetic changes they reported are not seismogenic but global-scale variations in the geomagnetic field in response to Sun–Earth interactions.
J. N. Thomas, F. Masci, and J. J. Love
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1061–1068, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1061-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1061-2015, 2015
F. Masci and J. N. Thomas
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2189–2194, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2189-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2189-2013, 2013
F. Masci and G. De Luca
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1313–1319, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1313-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1313-2013, 2013
F. Masci
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 187–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-187-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-187-2013, 2013
F. Masci
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 193–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-193-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-193-2013, 2013
Fabrizio Masci, Jeremy N. Thomas, and James A. Secan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1461–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1461-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1461-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In a recent paper, the authors report the analysis of ionospheric TEC data from GPS measurements around the time of the 6 April 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. According to them, an anomalous change in TEC difference from two GPS receivers in central Italy may be explained as related to the earthquake. We have conducted our own independent analysis using the same GPS data. We have shown that in TEC difference there is no evidence of actual seismogenic effects close to the time of L'Aquila earthquake.
F. Masci and J. N. Thomas
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2697–2701, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2697-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2697-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Reports of possible earthquake precursors have social responsibility. They motivate the idea that earthquakes may be predicted in the future. Thus, these papers should be convincing about the seismogenic origin of the reported precursors. We have reviewed Febriani et al. (2014). We have shown that the pre-earthquake magnetic changes they reported are not seismogenic but global-scale variations in the geomagnetic field in response to Sun–Earth interactions.
J. N. Thomas, F. Masci, and J. J. Love
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1061–1068, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1061-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1061-2015, 2015
F. Masci and J. N. Thomas
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2189–2194, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2189-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2189-2013, 2013
F. Masci and G. De Luca
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1313–1319, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1313-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1313-2013, 2013
F. Masci
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 187–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-187-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-187-2013, 2013
F. Masci
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 193–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-193-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-193-2013, 2013