Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 18, 147–160, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-147-2011
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 18, 147–160, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-147-2011

Research article 07 Mar 2011

Research article | 07 Mar 2011

Post-processing through linear regression

B. Van Schaeybroeck and S. Vannitsem B. Van Schaeybroeck and S. Vannitsem
  • Koninklijk Meteorologisch Instituut (KMI), Ringlaan 3, 1180 Brussels, Belgium

Abstract. Various post-processing techniques are compared for both deterministic and ensemble forecasts, all based on linear regression between forecast data and observations. In order to evaluate the quality of the regression methods, three criteria are proposed, related to the effective correction of forecast error, the optimal variability of the corrected forecast and multicollinearity. The regression schemes under consideration include the ordinary least-square (OLS) method, a new time-dependent Tikhonov regularization (TDTR) method, the total least-square method, a new geometric-mean regression (GM), a recently introduced error-in-variables (EVMOS) method and, finally, a "best member" OLS method. The advantages and drawbacks of each method are clarified.

These techniques are applied in the context of the 63 Lorenz system, whose model version is affected by both initial condition and model errors. For short forecast lead times, the number and choice of predictors plays an important role. Contrarily to the other techniques, GM degrades when the number of predictors increases. At intermediate lead times, linear regression is unable to provide corrections to the forecast and can sometimes degrade the performance (GM and the best member OLS with noise). At long lead times the regression schemes (EVMOS, TDTR) which yield the correct variability and the largest correlation between ensemble error and spread, should be preferred.

Download