Journal cover Journal topic
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.558 IF 1.558
  • IF 5-year value: 1.475 IF 5-year
    1.475
  • CiteScore value: 2.8 CiteScore
    2.8
  • SNIP value: 0.921 SNIP 0.921
  • IPP value: 1.56 IPP 1.56
  • SJR value: 0.571 SJR 0.571
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 55 Scimago H
    index 55
  • h5-index value: 22 h5-index 22
Volume 14, issue 2
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 14, 181–192, 2007
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-14-181-2007
© Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 14, 181–192, 2007
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-14-181-2007
© Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.

  14 May 2007

14 May 2007

Data assimilation in a sparsely observed one-dimensional modeled MHD system

Z. Sun1, A. Tangborn2,3, and W. Kuang4 Z. Sun et al.
  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • 2Joint Center for Earth Sciences Technology, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • 3Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Code 610.1, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
  • 4Planetary Geodynamics Laboratory, Code 698 Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA

Abstract. A one dimensional non-linear magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) system has been introduced to test a sequential optimal interpolation assimilation technique that uses a Monte-Carlo method to calculate the forecast error covariance. An ensemble of 100 model runs with perturbed initial conditions are used to construct the covariance, and the assimilation algorithm is tested using Observation Simulation Experiments (OSE's). The system is run with a variety of observation types (magnetic and/or velocity fields) and a range of observation densities. The impact of cross covariances between velocity and magnetic fields is investigated by running the assimilation with and without these terms. Sets of twin experiments show that while observing both velocity and magnetic fields has the greatest positive impact on the system, observing the magnetic field alone can also effectively constrain the system. Observations of the velocity field are ineffective as a constraint on the magnetic field, even when observations are made at every point. The implications for geomagnetic data assimilation are discussed.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation