Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2024-6
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2024-6
02 Feb 2024
 | 02 Feb 2024
Status: a revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal NPG and is expected to appear here in due course.

Part 2: Joint multifractal analysis of available wind power and rain intensity from an operational wind farm

Jerry Jose, Auguste Gires, Ernani Schnorenberger, Yelva Roustan, Daniel Schertzer, and Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia

Abstract. Wind power production plays an important role in achieving UN’s (United nations) Sustainable development goal (SDG) 7 – affordable and clean energy for all; and in the increasing global transition towards renewable and carbon neutral energy, understanding the uncertainties associated with wind and turbulence is extremely important. Characterization of wind is not straightforward due to its intrinsic intermittency: activity of the field becomes increasingly concentrated at smaller and smaller supports as the scale decreases. When it comes to power production by wind turbines, another complexity arises from the influence of rainfall, which only a limited number of studies have addressed so far suggesting short term as well as long-term effects. To understand this, the project RWTurb (https://hmco.enpc.fr/portfolio-archive/rw-turb/; supported by the French National Research Agency, ANR-19-CE05-0022) employs multiple 3D sonic anemometers (manufactured by Thies), mini meteorological stations (manufactured by Thies), and disdrometers (Parsivel2, manufactured by OTT) on a meteorological mast in the wind farm of Pays d’Othe (110 km south-east of Paris, France; operated by Boralex). With this simultaneously measured data, it is possible to study wind power and associated atmospheric fields under various rain conditions.

Variations of wind velocity, power available at the wind farm, power produced by wind turbines and air density are examined here during rain and dry conditions using the framework of Universal Multifractals (UM). UM is a widely used, physically based, scale invariant framework for characterizing and simulating geophysical fields over wide range of scales which accounts for the intermittency in the field. Since rated power acts like an upper threshold in statistical analysis of empirical wind power, efforts were made to use the theoretical available power as a proxy to see the difference. From an event based analysis, differences in UM parameters were observed between rain and dry conditions for the fields illustrating the influence of rain. This is further explored using joint multifractal analysis and an increase in correlation exponent was observed between various fields with an increase in rain rate. Here we also examine the possibility of differences in power production according to type of rain (convective or stratiform) as well as various regimes of wind velocity. While examining time steps according to wind velocity, power curves showed different regions of departure from state curve according to the rain rate.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Jerry Jose, Auguste Gires, Ernani Schnorenberger, Yelva Roustan, Daniel Schertzer, and Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on npg-2024-6', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Mar 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jerry Jose, 09 May 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on npg-2024-6', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Mar 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jerry Jose, 09 May 2024

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on npg-2024-6', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Mar 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jerry Jose, 09 May 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on npg-2024-6', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Mar 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jerry Jose, 09 May 2024
Jerry Jose, Auguste Gires, Ernani Schnorenberger, Yelva Roustan, Daniel Schertzer, and Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia
Jerry Jose, Auguste Gires, Ernani Schnorenberger, Yelva Roustan, Daniel Schertzer, and Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia

Viewed

Total article views: 554 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
448 80 26 554 20 17
  • HTML: 448
  • PDF: 80
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 554
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 17
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 519 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 519 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
To understand the influence of rainfall on wind power production, turbine power and rainfall were simultaneously measured in an operational wind farm and subjected to analysis. The correlation between wind, wind power, air density and other fields was obtained across various temporal scales during rain and dry conditions. An increase in correlation was observed with an increase in rain; rain also influenced the correspondence between actual and expected values of power at various velocities.