the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Statistical and neural network assessment of climatological features of fog and mist at Pula airport in Croatia: from local to synoptic scale
Abstract. A study was conducted on the climatological characteristics of fog and mist at Pula Airport in the northeastern Adriatic, using statistical and machine learning approaches. The study utilized meteorological data from Pula Airport, along with satellite sea surface temperature (SST) data from two coastal areas west and east of the airport, to gain insights into the influence of sea temperature on fog formation. To identify weather patterns associated with the occurrence of fog and mist, wind and mean sea-level pressure (MSLP) data from the ERA5 reanalysis were analyzed using Growing Neural Gas (GNG), a machine learning method. A notable finding was a declining trend in the frequency of fog and mist at the airport, which can be linked to the results of the GNG analysis of the ERA5 data. This analysis showed a decrease in synoptic patterns favorable for fog and mist. Fog occurs mainly between October and March and is primarily associated with weak easterly and northeasterly winds. Additionally, fog is more likely to occur when the sea surface temperature is higher than the air temperature. Mist has similar characteristics to fog, although it is more likely to occur with easterly winds.
- Preprint
(2728 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(24164 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 14 Oct 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on npg-2024-18', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Sep 2024
reply
Line 143
Remove the ‘24’
Figure 2b
The legends are overlapped.
Line 212
‘Summarizing the data ‘ should be ‘A summary of the data’
Figure 5
Explain what ‘VRB’ is in the caption.
Figure 9
Use a dot to indicate where the airport is.
The coastal line is not clear. Should use bold line
In the caption, say that you only plot the wind vectors and shadings for the sea
indicate the contour lines are the MSP
The wind vectors are not visible near the airport. It is better to plot additional panels (e, f, g, h) focusing on the region near the airport. This smaller region can be the one in Figure 1b. Same for figure 10-13.
Figure 10-13.
The captions can be simplified to ‘similar to Figure 9 but in March’, and so on.
Line 433-540
The Discussion and summary section is too long. It is difficult to understand the main point.
Many contents should be integrated into section 3.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-2024-18-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
124 | 22 | 9 | 155 | 12 | 7 | 6 |
- HTML: 124
- PDF: 22
- XML: 9
- Total: 155
- Supplement: 12
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1