<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" specific-use="SMUR" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPGD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPGD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2198-5634</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name></publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-2018-21</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Sensitivity of forecast skill to the parameterisation of moist convection in a limited-area ensemble forecast system</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vasconi</surname>
<given-names>Matteo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Montani</surname>
<given-names>Andrea</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-8028</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Paccagnella</surname>
<given-names>Tiziana</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Italy</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Arpae-SIMC, HydroMeteoClimate Service of the Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>27</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2018</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>14</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2018 Matteo Vasconi et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/preprints/npg-2018-21/">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/preprints/npg-2018-21/</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/preprints/npg-2018-21/npg-2018-21.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/preprints/npg-2018-21/npg-2018-21.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>The parameterisation of convection in limited-area models is an important source of
uncertainty as regards the spatio-temporal forecast of precipitation. As for the limited-area
model COSMO, hitherto, only the Tiedtke convection scheme was available for the
operational runs of the model in convection-parameterised mode. In addition to this the
Bechtold scheme, implemented in ECMWF global model, has recently been adapted for
COSMO applications. The development and implementation of ensemble systems in which
different convection schemes are used, provides an opportunity to upgrade state-of-the-art probabilistic systems at the convection-parameterised scale.
The sensitivity of the COSMO model forecast skill to the use of either the Tietdke or the
Bechtold schemes is assessed by performing different sets of experiments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The performance of COSMO model run with the different schemes is investigated in ensemble mode with particular attention to the types of forecast errors (e.g. location, timing, intensity) provided by the different convection schemes in terms of total precipitation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
A 10-member ensemble has been run for approximately 2 months with the Bechtold scheme, using the same initial and boundary conditions as members 1&amp;ndash;10 of the operational COSMO-LEPS ensemble system (which has 20 members, all run with the Tiedtke scheme). The performance of these members is assessed and compared to that of the system made of members 1&amp;ndash;10 of COSMO-LEPS in terms of total precipitation prediction. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, the performance of an experimental 20-member ensemble system (which has 10 members run with the Bechtold plus 10 members run with the Tiedtke scheme) is compared to that of operational COSMO-LEPS over the 2-month period. The new system turned out to have higher skill in terms of precipitation forecast with respect to COSMO-LEPS over the period. In this approach the use of the Bechtold scheme is proposed as a perturbation for the COSMO-LEPS ensemble, relatively to how uncertainties in the model representation of the cumulus convection can be described and quantified.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="14"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>