<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\sloppy}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPGD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPGD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2198-5634</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npgd-1-1905-2014</article-id><title-group><article-title>Transient behavior in the Lorenz model</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Transient behavior in the Lorenz model}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~Kravtsov et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kravtsov</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-9596</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sugiyama</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tsonis</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name>
          <email>aatsonis@uwm.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Mathematical Sciences, Atmospheric Science Group, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201–0413, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">A. A. Tsonis (aatsonis@uwm.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1905</fpage><lpage>1917</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>

      <self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
    <p>Dynamical systems like the one described by the three-variable
Lorenz model may serve as metaphors for complexity in nature. When
natural systems are perturbed by external forcing factors, they tend
to relax back to their equilibrium conditions after the forcing has
shut off. Here we investigate the behavior of such transients in the
Lorenz model by studying its trajectories initialized far away from
the asymptotic attractor. Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, these
transient trajectories exhibit complex routes and, among other
things, sensitivity to initial conditions akin to that of the
asymptotic behavior on the attractor. Thus, similar extreme events
may lead to widely different variations before the perturbed system
returns back to its statistical equilibrium.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The by now famous Lorenz system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.1"/>, which arises via
a truncation of Saltzman's equations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.2"/> for convective motion
– a paramount feature in climate – is described by the following
system of ordinary differential equations:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Here the dot denotes a time derivative, while the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> correspond to Rayleigh and Prandtl numbers, respectively. The
choice of parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
results in asymptotic (statistically equilibrated) aperiodic behavior
on a strange attractor, with smooth trajectories alternating
irregularly between loops around one of the two nontrivial unstable
equilibrium points. The topological structure and properties of this
attractor have been investigated and reported in a plethora of papers
and books since the mid 1970s <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">see, for example,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>Because of the great interest in the structural details of this – and
other – chaotic attractors, their numerical simulations are usually
initialized near the attractor itself. In this case the transients,
defined as phase-space trajectories connecting the initial condition
and the attractor, are short and uninteresting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.4"/>. Little
attention thus far was, however, paid to the transient behavior in
situations when the system is numerically integrated from the states
located far from its asymptotic attractor. Investigating such
transients is important because extreme far-from-equilibrium events do
occur in nature due to either external forcing factors or due to
self-amplifying interactions between various subcomponents of complex
natural systems. Examples of the two types of phenomena in climate
include the response of the climate system to forcing associated with
volcanic aerosols and climate adjustment to particularly strong ENSO
events, respectively; see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.5"/> for a topical account of other
important climatic interactions. The purpose of this note is to point
out some interesting properties of post-extreme-event transients in
the Lorenz model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Duration of transients and its relationship to trajectory-averaged local \hack{\\} Lyapunov exponents}?><title>Duration of transients and its relationship to trajectory-averaged local <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Lyapunov exponents</title>
      <p>Asymptotically, as time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, trajectories of the model
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) are confined within a bounded region <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
model's (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) phase space <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.6"/>. Here we objectively
defined region <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> numerically, as a rectangular cuboid with
<italic>x</italic>-, <italic>y</italic>-, and <italic>z</italic>-ranges based on maximum and
minimum values of the corresponding variables from a long model
simulation initialized on the attractor; these ranges are (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19, 19),
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25, 25) and (4, 46), respectively. We also defined the approximate
center of the attractor as the long-term time mean of (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
from the same simulation: the point (0, 0, 24). We then performed
numerical simulations of transient behavior in the Lorenz system
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) using a set of extreme initial conditions equidistant
from the attractor center so computed and thus located on a sphere <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
with the radius <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; these initial conditions are all well beyond
the attractor region <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The transients were defined as trajectories
emanating from the sphere <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and followed until their first entry
into the region <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The first characteristic of the Lorenz-system transients we looked at
was their duration (Fig. 1). A typical time scale associated with
a single revolution of the long-term trajectory around either lobe of
the butterfly-shaped asymptotic attractor for our choice of model
parameters is on the order of unity (not shown). This also happens to
be the duration of the longest transients for initial conditions on
the sphere <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; the fastest transients take as short as 0.2 time units
to reach the attractor region <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the mean duration of
transients is around 0.6 time units. The most striking property of the
transient times distribution is, however, its non-uniformity and, in
particular, the presence of two “blue” regions of initial conditions
leading to extremely short-duration transient trajectories, as well as
the presence of a relatively narrow “red” spiral belt of the initial
conditions corresponding to the trajectories with the longest
transient-period durations.</p>
      <p>We will see later that longer-duration transient trajectories are also
the ones that exhibit the most interesting evolution. A useful
diagnostic for a potentially complex behavior is the
trajectory-averaged maximum local Lyapunov exponents. The local
Lyapunov exponents are defined as the eigenvalues of the dynamical
operator <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the tangent-linear model that describes the local
spread of trajectories of our original model (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) in the
close neighborhood of an arbitrary point (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in the system's phase space:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="2em"/><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center center center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        We computed the maximum (in its real part) of the three local Lyapunov
exponents for all points along each transient trajectory between the
sphere <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the asymptotic attractor region <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and took an average
of these values to characterize a given trajectory
(Fig. 2). Interestingly, the absolute majority of initial conditions
on the sphere <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are characterized by the positive average Lyapunov
exponents so obtained, thereby indicating potential sensitivity to
initial conditions, which we will indeed confirm in Sect. 3
below. Furthermore, there is a clear correspondence between the
pattern of trajectory-averaged maximum local Lyapunov exponents in
Fig. 2 and that of the transient duration in Fig. 1. In particular,
the “blue” regions on the sphere <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that initialize the transients
with fastest decay toward the asymptotic attractor are also the
regions with negative average Lyapunov exponents, while the “red”
ribbon of initial states corresponding to the longest transients is
also the region of the maximum positive trajectory-averaged Lyapunov
exponents. Thus, the longest transients are naturally associated with
trajectories that tend to “travel sideways” along the dynamical
slopes of the Lorenz-system landscape, rather than go straight
downhill toward the asymptotic attractor.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Types of transient behavior</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Sensitivity of transients to initial conditions</title>
      <p>A typical example of transient behavior for initial states chosen near
the ribbon of longest transient times (Fig. 1) or, equivalently, that
of largest trajectory-averaged Lyapunov exponents (Fig. 2), is shown
in Fig. 3. Here a bunch of trajectories that emanate from close-by
initial conditions splits in two diverging sets of trajectories, which
follow very different routes prior to reuniting near the asymptotic
attractor location; the latter attractor region is evident as a small
butterfly-shaped cluster of trajectories close to the origin. The
immediate consequence of such transient behavior in the Lorenz system
is that it can apparently be as unpredictable as the asymptotic
behavior in the sense that similar extreme perturbations may result in
completely unrelated transients as the system relaxes back to the
state of its statistical equilibrium.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Geometric complexity of transients</title>
      <p>Another interesting observation is that transient approach to the
asymptotic attractor may be characterized by fairly complex
trajectories, which appear, in some cases, to emulate the attractor
itself (Fig. 4a and b). In particular, the trajectories here exhibit
larger-scale butterfly-shaped excursions prior to ending up on the
similarly shaped asymptotic attractor near the origin. We will refer
to this phenomenon as to the “ghost” transient attractor.</p>
      <p>Qualitatively, this behavior can be understood in the following
way. We saw previously that some transients are able to stay away from
the attractor for longer time periods than others (Fig. 1). For such
longer transient trajectories, the variables in the model
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) can be locally rescaled in space and time to focus on
their relatively persistent (large) local phase-space distances from
the origin and fast phase speeds. Effectively, this rescaling will
produce the system of equations completely analogous to the
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), but with different set of parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<italic>r</italic>, <italic>h</italic>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). If so, it may not seem improbable that
for some regions of the phase space, this “transient” Lorenz model
will exhibit dynamical structures and trajectory shapes akin to those
known to arise for other parameter sets in the asymptotic limit of
statistically equilibrated behavior.</p>
      <p>To present a concrete example of the rescaling mentioned above, we
introduce the following change of variables

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Note that for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) corresponds to
squishing the spatial coordinates and stretching the time so that the
large values of the non-transformed variables on the order of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will correspond to the transformed variable values
on the order of one, while the order-of-one changes in the stretched
time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will span the short interval on the order of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> when measured in original time units <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This rescaling
is thus appropriate, in principle, for the trajectories in the region
situated far from the origin and during relatively short transient
period before returning to the asymptotic attractor behavior.</p>
      <p>Substituting the transformation (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) into the system
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and introducing the new set of parameters

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          results, for this case, in the <italic>same</italic> system of equations as
the original system (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), but for the primed
variables. This implies that topological behavior of the trajectories
that are somehow <italic>able to persist</italic> in a far-away-from-attractor
region of the phase space in which Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) is valid can be
qualitatively described by the asymptotic behavior of the Lorenz
system with a different set of parameters rescaled by
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the ratio of
the radius-vector of defining the far-away location of the persistence
region to the typical value of the trajectories' radius-vector in the
original Lorenz system. Indeed, the topology of the Lorenz system
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameters rescaled in this
way using the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4c and d) looks
qualitatively similar to the transient trajectories in Fig. 4a and b.</p>
      <p>Note that in the rescaling example Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>), the
notion of the single parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> controlling the
stretching of all three phase-space variables, as well as time, is
completely arbitrary. Furthermore, and more importantly, the local
stretching (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) tells nothing about where in the phase
space the transient trajectories must be for the stretched regime to
be persistent; the latter persistence is essential for these
trajectories to have sufficient time to reveal the structure of the
stretched-system attractor during transient evolution. For these
reasons, a qualitative demonstration above should be regarded as
nothing more as an empirical one-parameter fit to illustrate the
concept of the “ghost” transient attractor.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and discussion</title>
      <p>We studied transient behavior in numerical simulations of the
three-variable Lorenz model (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) initialized far away from
the region of its asymptotic chaotic attractor. These transients were
shown to have a range of durations, with the longest transients
corresponding to the trajectories having largest average Lyapunov
exponents and complex routes emulating sensitivity to initial
conditions, as well as exhibiting the “ghost” attractors akin to
their asymptotic siblings.</p>
      <p>Persistent chaotic transients in the Lorenz system have been studied
before in the particular case when the Rayleigh number was chosen to
be just below the critical value required for chaotic
behavior <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.7"/>. With this choice of parameters, the model
trajectories initially evolved along the attractor that was close to
the asymptotic chaotic attractor of the system with a slightly higher
Rayleigh number, but slowly decayed from chaos to the final state of
a steady flow. This situation is very different from the one
considered in the present paper, where the parameters of the Lorenz
model were set to correspond to the chaotic regime; the non-trivial
transients arise here due to the dynamical properties of the system
considered in the phase space regions situated far from the asymptotic
attractor.</p>
      <p>Transient behavior of dynamical systems recently drew a lot of
attention in the ecological literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references
therein</named-content></xref>. The discussion in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.9"/> evolved around recognizing
the fact that the transient behavior is closely associated with the
inherently multi-scale character of natural systems, including the
timescale asymmetries stemming from the presence of the stable and
unstable manifolds in these systems' dynamics; incidentally, this
presence is the root of the strange chaotic attractor in the Lorenz
model. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.10"/> described laboratory experiments and numerical
simulations of the transient behavior in an underlying population
model, which depended on the choice of the initial conditions near the
stable or, alternatively, unstable manifold of an equilibrium point of
this model. This sensitivity of the transient evolution to initial
conditions is qualitatively similar to the behavior we report here,
but involves completely different dynamics, which lack, for example,
the “ghost-attractor” behavior.</p>
      <p>The properties of the transient behavior in the Lorenz model discussed
here – which are likely to be typical for arbitrary equations
exhibiting chaos – are not just beautiful, but may also have
important implications in understanding the evolution of complex
nonlinear systems such as climate, economy, ecosystems, sociological
networks and so on, if these systems are somehow taken far from their
equilibrium states. In particular, similar extreme perturbations in
such systems may exhibit widely different variations before relaxing
back to the statistical equilibrium.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was supported by the NSF grant 1243158 (SK) and 2013
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Research Growth Initiative grant
101X286 (AAT).</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Cushing et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Cushing, J. M., Dennis, B., Desharnais, R. A., and Constantino, R. F.: Moving toward an unstable
equilibrium: saddle nodes in population systems, J. Anim. Ecol., 67, 298–306, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Ghil and Childress(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Ghil, M. and Childress, S.: Topics in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Atmospheric Dynamics, Dynamo Theory, and Climate Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Hastings(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Hastings, A.: Transients: the key to long-term ecological understanding?, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 39–46, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Lorenz(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E. N.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Saltzman(1962)</label><mixed-citation>
Saltzman, B.: Finite amplitude free convection as an initial value problem – I, J. Atmos. Sci., 19, 329–341, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Shimizu and Morioka(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Shimizu, T. and Morioka, N.: Transient behaviour in periodic regions of the Lorenz model, Phys. Lett. A, 69, 148–150, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Sparrow(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Sparrow, C.: The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcation, Chaos, and Strange Attractors,. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Tsonis(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Tsonis, A. A.: Chaos: from Theory to Applications, Springer, New York, 274 pp., 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Yorke and Yorke(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Yorke, J. A. and Yorke, E. D.: The transition to sustained chaotic behaviour in the Lorenz model, J. Stat. Phys. 21, 263–277, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Distribution of transient times (color shading) to the Lorenz
attractor for initial conditions on the sphere <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with the radius
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> centered at the point (0, 0, 24); the center of this sphere
was chosen to be close to the asymptotic time mean of trajectories
simulated by the Lorenz model (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The trajectory initialized on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was
considered transient until its first entry into the rectangular
cuboid region <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> bounded by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-ranges of (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19,
19), (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25, 25) and (4, 46), respectively. The Lorenz attractor for
the model parameters considered is located within this region. The
four figure panels display the same quantity, but from different
view angles. <italic>Comment</italic>: note non-uniformity of the
transient-time distribution, with a spiraling belt of relatively
long durations.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/preprints/1/1905/2014/npgd-1-1905-2014-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Distribution of the averaged maximum local Lyapunov exponents
computed over the transient portion of trajectories (before first
entry into the attractor region <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) initialized on the same sphere
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as in Fig. 1. The same four orientations as in Fig. 1 are
shown. <italic>Comments</italic>: most of the trajectories exhibit positive
Lyapunov-exponent averages. There is a clear correspondence between
the spiraling belt of largest averaged Lyapunov exponents and that
of longest transient duration times in Fig. 1.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/preprints/1/1905/2014/npgd-1-1905-2014-f02.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F3"><caption><p>An example of transient trajectories sensitive to initial
conditions. <italic>Comment</italic>: this is a typical situation for
initial conditions taken in and around the spiraling belts of
longest transient times (Fig. 1) and highest averaged Lyapunov
exponents (Fig. 2).</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/preprints/1/1905/2014/npgd-1-1905-2014-f03.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F4"><caption><p>(<bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>) An example of a “ghost”
transient attractor in the simulation of the Lorenz model
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
(<bold>c</bold> and <bold>d</bold>) a trajectory of the Lorenz system with
parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) stretched by
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. See text for details. <italic>Comments</italic>: the
transient trajectory in (<bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>) is not a mere
spiraling toward the attractor, but exhibits a complex path
reminiscent of that on asymptotic attractor. The path of rescaled
Lorenz system in (<bold>c</bold> and <bold>d</bold>) shares geometrical
similarity with the transient path in (<bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>).</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/preprints/1/1905/2014/npgd-1-1905-2014-f04.png"/>

    </fig>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
