<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7946</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-28-167-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Size distribution law of earthquake-triggered landslides in different seismic intensity zones</article-title><alt-title>Size distribution law of earthquake-triggered landslides</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Size distribution law of earthquake-triggered landslides}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. Huang and L. Yao}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Yidan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8367-6652</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Lingkan</given-names></name>
          <email>yaolk@swjtu.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>MOE Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering, Chengdu 610031, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>National Engineering Laboratory for Technology of Geological Disaster Prevention in Land Transportation,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Chengdu 610031, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Lingkan Yao (yaolk@swjtu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>28</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>167</fpage><lpage>179</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>September</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>September</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Yidan Huang</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021.html">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e105">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake in 2008 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.0 Lushan earthquake in 2013 produced thousands of landslides in the southern region of the Longmen Mountains in China. We conducted field investigations and analyzed remote sensing data to determine the distribution law of earthquake-triggered landslides. The results show a strong negative power law relationship between the size and frequency of landslides in VII, VIII, and IX seismic intensity zones, a weak power law in the X seismic intensity zone, and a lognormal distribution in the XI seismic intensity zone. Landslide density increases with increasing seismic intensity. A sandpile cellular automata model was built under the conceptual framework of self-organized criticality theory to simulate earthquake-induced landslides. Data from the simulations demonstrate that, with increasing disturbance intensity, the dynamical mechanism of the sandpile model changes from a strong power law to a weak power law and then to a lognormal distribution. Results from shaking table experiments of a one-sided slope sandpile show that, for peak ground acceleration (PGA) in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.075</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> g, the relation between the amount and frequency of sand follows a negative power law. For PGA between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> g, the relation obeys a lognormal distribution. This verifies that the abovementioned distribution of earthquake-induced landslides should be a universal law from a physical viewpoint and may apply to other areas. This new perspective may be used to guide the development of an inventory of earthquake-triggered landslides and provide a scientific basis for their prediction.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e168">Earthquakes have triggered numerous landslides. The 1994 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.7 Northridge earthquake in the USA triggered more than 11 000 landslides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.1"/>. The 2008 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake in China triggered 197 481 landslides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.2"/>. The 2014 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.0 Port-au-Prince earthquake in Haiti triggered 30 828 landslides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.3"/>. Landslides are one of the most common and dangerous coseismic disasters. In particular, landslides triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake induced about one-third of the total deaths and disappearances <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.4"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page168?><p id="d1e217">An inventory map of earthquake-induced landslides shows many correlations between landslides and seismic factors (e.g., distance from the epicenter and major surface rupture, seismic intensity, peak ground acceleration, and slope gradient) and slope characteristic factors (e.g., gradient, aspect, elevation, and lithology) and has been analyzed using statistical methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.5"/>. Many significant laws, such as the effects of slope aspect, faults, hanging wall, and topography, have been reported <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.6"/>. Most studies address the relationship between landslide frequency and magnitude associated with a trigger (e.g., earthquake) or historical landslide inventory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.7"/>. These studies used statistical models, including the Pareto probability model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.8"/>, double Pareto probability model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.9"/>, and gamma function probability model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.10"/>. The frequency–magnitude distribution of landslides is typically expressed in a noncumulative <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.11"/> and cumulative form <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.12"/>. Landslide magnitude is often expressed in terms of area <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.13"/> or volume <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.14"/>, both of which are representative of landslide magnitude and have a certain correlation. Area is widely used because it is easier to obtain than volume.</p>
      <p id="d1e251">Several studies have shown that the frequency–magnitude distribution of landslides follows a power law distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.15"/>. Most studies, however, focused on phenomena rather than causes. The size distribution law of landslides and its physical mechanism remain poorly understood. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.16"/> compared observed landslide size distributions with models of self-organized criticality (SOC) and suggested that landsliding in combination with its driving processes may be considered a SOC phenomenon. Unfortunately, no further work was undertaken owing to the lack of available field data.</p>
      <p id="d1e260">SOC theory belongs to the field of nonlinear physics field and is a new concept to explain the behavior of composite systems developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx4" id="text.17"/>. This kind of system or composite system contains an exceedingly large number of elements that interact over a short range, naturally evolve toward a critical state, and are locked in this state over a given period of time or permanently. In the critical state, a minor event can initiate a chain reaction that affects a large number of elements in the system and even lead to a catastrophe. Although systems produce more minor events than catastrophes, chain reactions of all sizes are an integral part of the dynamics. According to theory, the mechanism that leads to minor events is the same as the one that leads to major events.</p>
      <p id="d1e267">A sandpile is a deceptively simple system that serves as a paradigm for SOC. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.18"/> devised a precision apparatus that slowly and uniformly pours sand, grain by grain, onto a flat, circular surface. The sandpile stops growing when the amount of sand added is balanced, on average, by the amount of sand that falls off the edge, at which point the system has reached a critical state. When a grain of sand is added to a pile in the critical state, it can initiate an avalanche of any size, including a catastrophic event, and the size and the frequency are related by a power law. SOC has explained the dynamics of many catastrophes, such as earthquakes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.19"/>, forest fires <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.20"/>, mountain and rock slides, snow avalanches <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.21"/>, solar and stellar flares <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.22"/>, and stock market crashes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.23"/>. This paper investigates SOC's application to landslides triggered by earthquakes.</p>
      <p id="d1e289">A total of two great earthquakes struck the Longmen Mountains in 2008 and 2013 and triggered numerous landslides. The Longmen Mountains, on the eastern edge of the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau in Sichuan Province, China, have the greatest gradient change in the surrounding mountain system. At least 5–10 km of material in the Longmen Mountains has been eroded away since the Miocene, rising at a rate of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> mm per year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.24"/>. The continuous effects of uplifting and denudation formed a deep and steep valley landscape with an average slope in the southern and Minjiang River areas above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to Davis's (1899) theory of erosion cycles, the Longmen Mountains are in the early maturity of geomorphologic evolution, and their slopes have evolved to a critical stage. A common characteristic of slope disasters includes dilapidation of natural terrain or cut slope, rock avalanches, debris flows, landslides, rock piles, and snowslides, all of which are mainly composed of granular mixtures and associated with energy dissipation owing to material instability and slipping during slope accumulation. The sandpile model is ideal for reflecting the energy dissipation process within slope accumulation, and its dynamic characteristics should therefore be explainable under the conceptual framework of SOC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.25"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e317">In this study, we aim to better understand the universal behavior of slope disasters from the point of view of SOC. We studied the distribution of landslides induced by two earthquakes in the Longmen Mountains by field investigations and remote sensing interpretation. A sandpile cellular automata model was also built under the conceptual framework of SOC to simulate earthquake-induced landslides. Shaking table experiments of a one-sided slope sandpile under seismic excitations were conducted. The results of this study provide a physical explanation of the general distribution of earthquake-induced landslides.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Analysis of landslide inventory data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d1e335">The 2008 Wenchuan earthquake triggered the largest number of landslides observed in human history. On 20 April 2013, the Lushan earthquake also triggered a large number of landslides (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Both events were caused by thrust faulting in the Longmen Mountains of China in areas under similar geographical, geological, and geomorphological conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e342">Landslides triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan and 2013 Lushan earthquakes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Data and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Landslide field investigation</title>
      <p id="d1e366">The majority of our fieldwork was accessed by car; landslides were recorded that were visible along the road and then followed on foot for detailed investigation. The<?pagebreak page169?> landslide investigation of the Wenchuan earthquake began in the rescue time from 31 May 2008, soon after the main shock, until 5 June 2008. We collected preliminary survey data by recording the location of the landslide deposits that covered the road, estimating the landslide volume, and asking the highway department staff for the amount of cleaned landslide deposits. We chose to limit the survey to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> landslides that blocked roads.</p>
      <p id="d1e386">A relatively detailed reconnaissance field study was conducted from 2 to 27 August 2009. After two rainy seasons, the loose material on the slope was nearly washed away, revealing a complete sliding bed or collapsed back wall. We measured the spatial position coordinates of the sliding bed and compared this with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> topographic map along the highway from Dujiangyan to Yingxiu, which is a section of Chinese national highway 213. A three-dimensional digital figure of the landslide was generated to obtain the landslide volume and depth. According to the slope engineering design scheme of the highway, the landslide depth can be estimated more accurately by measuring the length of exposed anchors after the earthquake.</p>
      <p id="d1e401">After the Lushan earthquake, we conducted landslide field surveys along the road from 26 April to 26 August 2013. We accumulated survey routes exceeding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km in length, including the China national highway 318, provincial highways 210 and 211, and country town roads from Leyin to Rongjin, Longmen to Taiping, Renjia to Shuangshi, Shuangshi to Linguan, and Taiping to Dachuan. We focus on landslide volume, which is mainly obtained from field measurements and the amount of cleaned landslide deposits by the highway department during the rescue time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Landslide inventory mapping</title>
      <p id="d1e419">Landslides triggered by earthquake are usually large in number and widespread in distribution, and detailed coseismic landslide data cannot be based on field investigations alone. At present, the visual interpretation of high-resolution remote sensing images is the primary method for obtaining large-area earthquake-induced landslide data.</p>
      <p id="d1e422">We collected pre- and post-earthquake high-resolution remote sensing data to facilitate the landslide analysis. The Wenchuan earthquake data included Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite images (pre-earthquake), Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) satellite images (10 m spatial resolution; taken on 4 June 2008), and QuickBird satellite images (0.61 m spatial resolution; taken on 30 May 2008). The Lushan earthquake data included LANDSAT-5, SPOT4, and SPOT4 satellite images (pre-earthquake), aerial photographs (0.4 and 2 m spatial resolution; taken on 20 and 21 April 2013) provided by the Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, aerial photographs (Baoshen, Longmen, and Taipin towns; 0.16 m spatial resolution; taken on 20 April 2013) provided by the State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping, and ZiYuan-3 (ZY-3) satellite images (2.1 m spatial resolution; taken on 13 May 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e425">The color and shape characteristics of landslides (e.g., morphology, hue, shadow, and texture) of the optical remote sensing images is clearly distinguishable from the surrounding area, especially shortly after the earthquake. Following the criteria proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.26"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.27"/>, we manually mapped the earthquake-triggered landslides using the geographic information system (GIS) platform.</p>
      <p id="d1e434">Coseismic landslides are easily detected on high-resolutions images (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10 m or higher). Many coseismic landslides may overlap in areas of high landslide density, which makes them difficult to uniquely distinguish, and they are subject to the interpreter's discretion. The higher the resolution of the images used, the easier individual landslides are separated and the more objective landslide inventory maps are prepared. Densely vegetated areas also pose a problem because vegetation is often destroyed during<?pagebreak page170?> landsliding, and “tadpole” traces appear on the image. Special care must be taken to distinguish the landslide from the vegetation damage range, and the identified landslide inventory map must be validated to improve the interpretation accuracy. To address these problems, first of all, the landslides of the study area were mapped using visual interpretation of high-resolution satellite images and aerial photographs. Second, we removed landslides in areas with slopes less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because landslide events require certain terrain conditions. Because some farmland, bare land, quarries, sand and gravel yards, old landslides, and other traces of human activities are difficult to distinguish from coseismic landslides on the images, we performed detailed field investigations and combined pre-earthquake satellite images to exclude inaccurate assessments. Finally, we converted the projected landslide area identified in the remote sensing image with the slope gradient to obtain the final landslide area.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e468">Although the distribution of earthquake-induced landslides is controlled by a variety of factors (e.g., slope aspect, faulting, topography, zinc lithology) that have been discussed in several studies, we believe that the most important control factor is seismic intensity. Therefore, in this study, we analyze landslide distribution according to seismic intensity zone. The range of seismic intensity zones is based on official seismic intensity distribution maps published by the China Earthquake Administration.</p>
      <p id="d1e471">Frequency area (or volume) distribution of a landslide event often exhibits power law scaling over a limited scale range <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.28"/>.  The relationship can be represented by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M17" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are constants, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the exponent power that describes the statistical features of the landslide distribution. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
landslide size, characterized by area and volume, even depth. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of landslides beyond a given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Landslide volume (depth)–frequency distributions in different seismic intensity zones</title>
      <p id="d1e564">We performed detailed field investigations of 105 landslides triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake and 261 landslides triggered by the Lushan earthquake. The data were fitted by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is landslide volume, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of landslides beyond a given volume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is landslide depth, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of landslides beyond a given depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The power law formula is fitted by a least-squares regression, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the goodness of fit (i.e., larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflects a
better fit). The results of field survey are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e653">Landslide volume (depth)–frequency distributions in different seismic intensity zones.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Seismic intensity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No. of landslides</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Volume–frequency fitting</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(Depth)–frequency fitting</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Lushan earthquake </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VII</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">108</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">485.69</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.529</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9647</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VIII</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">108</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">413.97</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.518</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9864</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">214.58</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.611</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9465</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Wenchuan earthquake </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">223.14</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.483</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9639</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.38</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.037</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9871</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">260.76</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.565</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8940</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.18</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.243</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8963</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">XI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1067">In the VII, VIII, and IX seismic intensity zones of the Lushan earthquake, the landslides volume–frequency distribution follows a strong power law relationship. In the IX seismic intensity zone of the Wenchuan earthquake, the volume–frequency distribution and depth–frequency distribution all follow a power law relationship. The X seismic intensity zone of the Wenchuan earthquake shows similar yet weak power law characteristics, even though the number of landslides is small (29 sites). A substantial number of large landslides are observed in the XI seismic intensity zone of the Wenchuan earthquake and are connected in a single mass, which is not easy to distinguish into individual sites. Almost two-thirds of the mountains show evidence of mountain peeling. Of the 15 landslides surveyed, the minimum volume is 20 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the maximum is 16 800 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The minimum depth is 0.3 m, and the maximum is 5 m. Although the number of samples is insufficient to draw statistical conclusions, large landslide events appear to dominate. A power law relationship is not observed between the volume (or depth) and frequency in the XI seismic intensity zone.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Landslide frequency–area distributions in different seismic intensity zones</title>
      <p id="d1e1096">We identified 20 236 coseismic landslides of the Wenchuan earthquake and 1608 coseismic landslides of Lushan earthquake by manual image interpretation, as shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, respectively. The statistics of the landslide area were fitted by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is landslide area and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of landslides beyond a given area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. To eliminate the influence of map resolution and undersampling of smaller landslides, we statistically analyze landslides over 1000 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The power law formula is fitted by a least-squares regression. We also test the lognormal relationship of the data by the chi-square test method. The results of remote sensing interpretation are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1147">Distribution map of landslides triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1158">Distribution map of landslides triggered by the Lushan earthquake.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1171">Landslide frequency–area distributions in different seismic intensity zones.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="8cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Seismic intensity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No. of landslides</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fitting formula</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hypothesis test result</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Lushan earthquake </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VII</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">706</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.051</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.901</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VIII</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">477</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.993</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">425</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.955</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.916</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Wenchuan earthquake </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3775</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.543</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.913</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9615</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.304</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.873</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">XI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6846</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.02</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Accept the lognormal distribution  hypothesis at the  significance level of 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1598">In the VII, VIII, and IX seismic intensity zones of the Lushan earthquake, the landslides area–frequency distribution follows
a power law relationship <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, although none pass the lognormal distribution test. The landslide area–frequency
distribution follows a power law relationship <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the IX seismic intensity zone of the Wenchuan earthquake, a
weak power law in the X seismic intensity zone <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.873</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while a lognormal distribution in the XI seismic intensity zone.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Landslide density in different seismic intensity zones</title>
      <p id="d1e1661">We define landslide density as the number of landslides per square kilometer. The landslide numbers and calculated densities in the different seismic intensity zones of the two earthquakes are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1669">Landslide concentrations in different seismic intensity zones.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Seismic intensity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No. of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Total area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Landslide concentration</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">landslides</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(landslides per km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Lushan earthquake </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VII</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">706</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2068</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VIII</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">477</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1161</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">425</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">189</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Wenchuan earthquake </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3775</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1645</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">X</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9615</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1627</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">XI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6846</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1074</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1842">Landslide density clearly increases with seismic intensity, in agreement with previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.29"/>. To test if the statistical results obtained from landslides generated by the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes may also<?pagebreak page171?> apply to landslides in other areas, we combine cellular automaton simulations with laboratory experiments under the conceptual framework of SOC to interpret the distribution mechanism of earthquake-triggered landslides from a physical viewpoint.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Computer simulation</title>
      <p id="d1e1858">Computer models are an integral component of SOC research, mostly from numerical simulations of a sandpile cellular automaton. The Bak–Tang–Wiesenfeld (BTW) model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.30"/> is the earliest and most classic model of sandpile cellular automata, and many other models have been developed based on the BTW model for different physical systems that display SOC (e.g., earthquakes, forest fires, magnetic vortex motion, interface growth, and biological evolution). In this study, we introduce a sandpile cellular automata model to simulate earthquake-induced landslides.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>The model</title>
      <p id="d1e1871">According to the physical features of earthquake-induced landslides, the model has the following aspects:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1876">The BTW model is used to study the avalanche size distribution over time of a sandpile under disturbances. Because earthquake-induced landslides occur simultaneously, the avalanche size distribution of many sandpiles must be studied when they are disturbed by a single event.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1880">In the BTW model, a system may be partially disturbed and remain strictly energetically conservative. During earthquake-induced landslides, the slope is disturbed as a whole, and its instability must overcome its self-stabilization ability, which requires input energy. The disturbed disseminate is therefore energetically nonconservative.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1884">The BTW model is used to study the dynamic behavior of a system under the same perturbation conditions. For earthquake-induced landslides, the disturbance force on the slope is sensitive to the seismic intensity zone and may exceed the perturbation level. We must, therefore, modify the disturbance intensity to simulate this physical process.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e1887">According to the above characteristics, we constructed a sandpile cellular automata model to simulate earthquake-induced landslides. The model is defined on a two-dimensional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lattice. The sites were numbered with a pair of subindexes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and each site has four nearest neighbors located in the upper, lower, left, and right directions. The state of each site is characterized by a nonnegative integer variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is a state value that reflects the stability of the site <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (equivalent to the site energy), and each site has a threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We introduce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the disturbed transmission parameter for the four neighbors, which are not larger than 0.25 owing to nonconservative factors. The model is described by the following algorithm.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <?pagebreak page173?><p id="d1e1990"><italic>Step 1.</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sandpiles of equal size are built simultaneously but with different initial states. For each sandpile, all sites are initialized to a random value between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximum value of all sites in the sandpile.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2032"><italic>Step 2.</italic> The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sandpiles are simultaneously disturbed. The state value of all sites increases uniformly by the disturbance intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.<disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2092"><italic>Step 3.</italic> The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sandpiles are investigated individually. If all sites in a given sandpile remain less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nothing happens. Conversely, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the site <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes unstable and relaxes according to the following rule:<disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M84" display="block"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>The relaxation may cause some of the neighbors to become unstable. If so, step 3 is repeated until all sites are less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By changing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we can determine the relationship between avalanche magnitude and occurrence frequency.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e2321">It should be noted that when a disturbance is applied, some sandpiles will react while others will not, depending on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at least one sandpile will react. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is small, sometimes only a few sites will be triggered. But as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases, a batch of sites may be triggered, each of which may trigger chain reactions that may ultimately cross paths in space. Parallel processing is therefore adopted in the algorithm, and all disturbed sites react  simultaneously in a parallel-updating manner. We measured avalanche size in terms of the number of sites participating in the relaxation. This property is called cluster size and is as a measure of the area affected by the avalanche.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e2390">In a nondimensional formalism, the model parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the lattice size is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A total of 1 million sandpiles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were generated. Each sandpile was continuously reacted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times, with a disturbance intensity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in succession, to ensure that each sandpile evolves to a critical state before the formal experiment. A total of eight groups of simulation
experiments were then carried out by increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.00001 to 0.01, with each group reacting only once. Let the number of avalanches be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the frequency of the avalanche size be equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The avalanche density is equal to the number of sandpiles with avalanche events divided by the total number of sandpiles. The statistical results are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2523">Results of cellular automata simulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="6cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Disturbance</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No. of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sandpile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Avalanche</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fitting formula</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Hypothesis test result</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">sandpiles with</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">numbers</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">avalanche event</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000 01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80049</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0. 08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.229</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.949</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000 05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">286511</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.576</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.964</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">468255</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.168</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.965</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">936746</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.327</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.964</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.267</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.969</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">117.41</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.901</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law distribution  hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.88</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Accept the lognormal distribution hypothesis at the significance level of 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.68</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Accept the lognormal distribution hypothesis at  the significance level of 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3307">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> shows that the disturbance intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be divided into two intervals, and the dynamic characteristics of
the sandpile model exhibit different properties. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the avalanche scale and occurrence frequency basically obey the same power law distribution, but the avalanche density increases monotonously with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).
When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the dynamics of the sandpile model exhibit a strong to weak power law relationship and then to a
lognormal distribution with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3405">The relation between avalanche density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and disturbance intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3433">The relation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The different curves refer to different disturbance intensity.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Physical experiment</title>
      <p id="d1e3472">Although cellular automata numerical simulations are the primary way to obtain the properties of a SOC system, physical experiments are necessary to verify the validity of its application to earthquake-trigged landslides. A sandpile is a classic example of SOC. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.31"/> designed a physical experiment to show that a sandpile is indeed a SOC<?pagebreak page174?> system, and subsequent studies have been carried out on various types of sandpile experiments to determine the mechanism of certain physical systems that show SOC. To better understand the physical phenomena of earthquake-induced landslides, we performed shaking table tests to study the dynamic behavior of a sandpile under different earthquake forces.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Experimental procedure</title>
      <p id="d1e3485">A landslide triggered by an earthquake is a natural phenomenon that occurs over a tremendously large size range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The purpose of the experiment is to study the dynamic behavior of a sandpile and its evolution trend. The model sandpiles need not simulate a certain prototype. Previous sandpile experiments have shown that the gradation of model material, physical and mechanical parameters, and model size may influence the collapse size, but there is no influence on the
relationship between collapse size and its occurrence frequency. We, therefore, did not consider similarity relations in the tests.
Large-scale shaking table experiments were conducted in the Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering at Southwest Jiaotong University in China (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The shaking table is a single-direction table with a size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, capacity of 25 000 kg, and loading frequency range of 0.4–15 Hz. In the absence of an applied load, the maximum acceleration is 1.2 g, and the displacement ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 100 mm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3550">Schematic diagram of the shaking table experimental setup.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3559">The one-sided slope sandpile was built in a steel model box with a 3.75 m length, 1.75 m width, and 2.75 m height placed on
the shaking table. The sandpile material was a dried natural sand gravel collected from earthquake-triggered landslides in
the Longmen Mountains. Particles larger than 50 mm were removed, and the gradation was measured (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). When the sandpile reaches its natural angle (e.g., soil angle of internal friction), it is in a critical stable state. The sandpile has a length of 2.58 m, width of 1.5 m, height of 1.95 m, and total weight of 6800 kg (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3569">Gradation curve of the sand sample.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3580">Photo of the sandpile model.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021-f08.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3589">Slope responses under the excitation of field seismic waves were recorded at the Wolong (WL) seismic station of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake (WL wave; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). The input WL wave was proportionally scaled to its peak value.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3596">Acceleration history of the WL wave.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/167/2021/npg-28-167-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3605">To study the variation in sandpile dynamic characteristics with increasing disturbance intensity, we designed five sets of tests with input peak accelerations of 0.075 to 0.250 g. After inputting the excitation, the weight of the sand gravel collapse was measured as a test value. After each test, sand gravel was added from the top of the slope to ensure that the slope remained in a critical stable state. Each set of tests was run no fewer than 60 times.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3616">Let the collapse weight be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the collapse weight frequency equal to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The analysis results are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>. The collapse density is equal to the number of tests with collapse events divided by the total number of tests.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3645">Statistical results of sandpile tests.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="6cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Peak</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">No. of tests</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Collapse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fitting formula</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Hypothesis test result</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ground</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">of tests</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">with collapse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">density</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">acceleration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">event</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.075 g</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500.2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.774</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.901</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law  distribution hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.100 g</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">579.3</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.783</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.917</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law  distribution hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.125 g</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">150</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3887.6</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.059</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.963</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accept the power law  distribution hypothesis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.150 g</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.36</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Accept the lognormal distribution hypothesis at the significance level of 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.250 g</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.33</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Accept the lognormal distribution hypothesis at the significance level of 0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3648">Note: when the PGA is 0.075, 0.1, and 0.125 g, some tests occurred without collapse events, and the number of tests was increased. The other groups were repeated 60 times.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4105">When the peak ground acceleration (PGA) input was between 0.075 and 0.125 g, some tests occurred without collapses. When collapses did occur, small collapses were significantly more common than large collapses, and the<?pagebreak page175?> results obey a power law distribution. When the PGA was between 0.15 and 0.25 g, no tests occurred with zero collapses, the power law
relationship was weakened, and the results followed a lognormal distribution. The collapse density increases with increasing peak ground acceleration.</p>
      <p id="d1e4109">Studying the dynamic response of a sandpile with seismic waves as disturbance sources is a unique experimental method for studying SOC characteristics. Previous results have shown that the disturbance mode does not affect the sandpile dynamics characteristics, but it does influence the power law relationship parameters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.32"/>. The shaking table sandpile model tests show that changes in disturbance intensity lead to a shift in system dynamics. The physical process of the shaking table sandpile test is close to the prototype problem of earthquake-induced landslides, even though the number of experiments remains limited and<?pagebreak page176?> provides good support for the universality of earthquake-triggered landslides in different intensity zones.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e4125"><list list-type="order">
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e4130">We analyzed data from landslides triggered by the 2013 Lushan and 2008 Wenchuan earthquakes. The results show a negative power law relationship between landslide size and frequency in the VII, VIII, and IX seismic intensity zones. The relationship becomes a weak power law in the X seismic intensity zone and changes into a lognormal distribution in the XI seismic intensity zone. Landslide density increases gradually with increasing seismic intensity. Cellular automaton simulations reveal that, with increasing disturbance intensity, the dynamical mechanism of the sandpile model changes from a strong power law to a weak power law and then to a lognormal distribution, and the avalanche density increases. The results of the shaking table sandpile model tests verify these findings. The overall landslide distribution law is therefore constrained, even though these landslides are complex and very random, and the evolution mechanism of the distribution law in different intensity zones is clarified. Although there are some possible limitations of samples size in this study, the distribution probability model of earthquake-triggered landslides and evolution model with increasing seismic intensity presented here exceed the statistical relation level of a typical sample, which is the significance of this study.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e4136">SOC was founded in 1987 as a branch of nonequilibrium thermodynamics, and the study of its phenomenology and precise definition continues. SOC has highlighted that thresholds, metastability, and large-scale fluctuations play a decisive role in the spatiotemporal behavior of a large class of multibody systems. However, the influence of disturbance intensity on the system dynamics behavior of SOC has not received much attention. The disturbance intensity range of a catastrophic event may span several orders of magnitude (e.g., the energy difference between a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 earthquake is 32 768 times more powerful than a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 earthquake). In the case of the 2008 Wenchuan and 2013 Lushan earthquakes, the dynamic characteristics of the SOC system undergo a strong power law, weak power law, and lognormal distribution evolution process with increasing disturbance intensity. This constraint on the evolution pattern of a SOC system behavior goes beyond the traditional field of SOC and makes a strong impetus to further develop basic SOC theory.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <?pagebreak page177?><p id="d1e4164">Compared with chaos theory, SOC does not greatly emphasize the initial conditions and system details which facilitate the experimental and analytical procedures. The sandpile example tends to explain nearly everything from mountain formation to stock market volatility. But if many of the unique details of mountain systems can be understood by simple cellular automata numerical simulations, it may not be realistic for most geographers and requires further validation. For example, slope structures (e.g., joints and fracture surfaces) in nature are nonuniformly distributed and natural granular materials often exhibit a wide gradation. The nonuniformity of components is one of the important characteristics of a mountain system, however, the influence of nonuniform components on the dynamics is not considered here. We briefly discuss the effect of nonuniformity on dynamics in a previous study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.33"/>. However, the heterogeneity of cell geometry, arrangement randomness, and interaction anisotropy can be considered to investigate the unique details of how nonuniformity property affects system dynamics. Further research will therefore aim to determine the deep-seated law of earthquake-induced landslides.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e4173">In the IX seismic intensity zone, the cumulative number–area distribution of landslides triggered by the earthquakes exhibits a negative power law relationship but with different power exponents, i.e., 1.543 for the Wenchuan earthquake and 0.955 for the Lushan earthquake. The difference in different seismic characteristics and the earthquake-affected area, such as geological and topographical conditions, may affect the power law exponents, which should be investigated in future studies.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4182">The code of this study is available from the authors upon reasonable request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4188">The data of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4194">LY designed this study, YH and LY carried out the study, and YH and LY analyzed the results and wrote the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4200">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4206">We would like to express our gratitude to Chenwen Guo and Haiqiang Guo for their helpful contributions to this article. We thank Esther Posner, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China, for editing the English text of a draft of this paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4211">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 41902302), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program of China (grant no. 2020YFH0056), the International S&amp;T Cooperation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. 131551KYSB20180042), and the Project of China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd. (grant no. KYY2020054(20-22)).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4217">This paper was edited by Behzad Ghanbarian and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Aschwanden(2011)}}?><label>Aschwanden(2011)</label><?label aschwanden2011self?><mixed-citation>Aschwanden, M.: Self-organized criticality in astrophysics: The statistics of
nonlinear processes in the universe, Springer-Praxis, New York, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15001-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-15001-2</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Aschwanden et~al.(2016)Aschwanden, Crosby, Dimitropoulou, Georgoulis,
Hergarten, McAteer, Milovanov, Mineshige, Morales, Nishizuka
et~al.}}?><label>Aschwanden et al.(2016)Aschwanden, Crosby, Dimitropoulou, Georgoulis,
Hergarten, McAteer, Milovanov, Mineshige, Morales, Nishizuka
et al.</label><?label aschwanden201625?><mixed-citation>Aschwanden, M. J., Crosby, N. B., Dimitropoulou, M., Georgoulis, M. K.,
Hergarten, S., McAteer, J., Milovanov, A. V., Mineshige, S., Morales, L.,
Nishizuka, N., Pruessner, G., Sanchez, R., Sharma, A. S., Strugarek, A., and Uritsky, V.: 25 years of self-organized criticality: solar and
astrophysics, Space Sci. Rev., 198, 47–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0054-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-014-0054-6</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bak et~al.(1987)}}?><label>Bak et al.(1987)</label><?label bak1987?><mixed-citation>Bak P., Tang C., and Wiesenfeld K.: Self-organized criticality: An explanation of 1/f noise. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bak et~al.(1988)}}?><label>Bak et al.(1988)</label><?label bak1988?><mixed-citation>Bak P., Tang C., and Wiesenfeld K.: Self-organized criticality, Phy. Rev. A, 38, 364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevA.38.364</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brunetti et~al.(2009)Brunetti, Guzzetti, and
Rossi}}?><label>Brunetti et al.(2009)Brunetti, Guzzetti, and
Rossi</label><?label brunetti2009probability?><mixed-citation>Brunetti, M. T., Guzzetti, F., and Rossi, M.: Probability distributions of landslide volumes, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 16, 179–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-16-179-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-16-179-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Carrara et~al.(2003)Carrara, Crosta, and
Frattini}}?><label>Carrara et al.(2003)Carrara, Crosta, and
Frattini</label><?label carrara2003geomorphological?><mixed-citation>Carrara, A., Crosta, G., and Frattini, P.: Geomorphological and historical data
in assessing landslide hazard, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 28,
1125–1142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.545</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Catani et~al.(2005)Catani, Casagli, Ermini, Righini, and
Menduni}}?><label>Catani et al.(2005)Catani, Casagli, Ermini, Righini, and
Menduni</label><?label catani2005landslide?><mixed-citation>Catani, F., Casagli, N., Ermini, L., Righini, G., and Menduni, G.: Landslide
hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin,
Landslides, 2, 329–342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-005-0021-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10346-005-0021-0</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chen et~al.(2007)Chen, Yu, and Lin}}?><label>Chen et al.(2007)Chen, Yu, and Lin</label><?label chien2007discussion?><mixed-citation>Chen, C.-Y., Yu, F.-C., Lin, S.-C., and Cheung, K.-W.: Discussion of
landslide self-organized criticality and the initiation of debris flow, Earth
Surf. Proc. Land., 32, 197–209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1400" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.1400</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dahl et~al.(2013)Dahl, Mortensen, Jensen, and
Veihe}}?><label>Dahl et al.(2013)Dahl, Mortensen, Jensen, and
Veihe</label><?label dahl2013magnitude?><mixed-citation>Dahl, M.-P. J., Mortensen, L. E., Jensen, N. H., and Veihe, A.:
Magnitude–frequency characteristics and preparatory factors for spatial
debris-slide distribution in the northern Faroe Islands, Geomorphology, 188,
3–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.015</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dai et~al.(2011)Dai, Xu, Yao, Xu, Tu, and Gong}}?><label>Dai et al.(2011)Dai, Xu, Yao, Xu, Tu, and Gong</label><?label dai2011spatial?><mixed-citation>Dai, F., Xu, C., Yao, X., Xu, L., Tu, X., and Gong, Q.: Spatial distribution of
landslides triggered by the 2008 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, China, J. Asian
Earth Sci., 40, 883–895, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.04.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.04.010</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Davis(1899)}}?><label>Davis(1899)</label><?label davis1899geographical?><mixed-citation>Davis, W. M.: The geographical cycle, Geogr. J., 14, 481–504,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1774538" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/1774538</ext-link>, 1899.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Drossel and Schwabl(1992)}}?><label>Drossel and Schwabl(1992)</label><?label drossel1992self?><mixed-citation>Drossel, B. and Schwabl, F.: Self-organized critical forest-fire model, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 69, 1629–1632, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1629" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1629</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Frattini and Crosta(2013)}}?><label>Frattini and Crosta(2013)</label><?label frattini2013role?><mixed-citation>Frattini, P. and Crosta, G. B.: The role of material properties and landscape
morphology on landslide size distributions, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 361,
310–319, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.10.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2012.10.029</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Guo et~al.(2017)Guo, Huang, Yao, and Alradi}}?><label>Guo et al.(2017)Guo, Huang, Yao, and Alradi</label><?label guo2017size?><mixed-citation>Guo, C., Huang, Y., Yao, L., and Alradi, H.: Size and spatial distribution of
landslides induced by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in the Bhote Koshi river
watershed, J. Mt. Sci., 14, 1938–1950, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4140-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11629-016-4140-y</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Guthrie and Evans(2004{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>Guthrie and Evans(2004a)</label><?label guthrie2004analysis?><mixed-citation>Guthrie, R. H. and Evans, S.: Analysis of landslide frequencies and
characteristics in a natural system, coastal British Columbia, Earth Surf.
Proc. Land., 29, 1321–1339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.1095</ext-link>,
2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Guthrie and Evans(2004{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>Guthrie and Evans(2004b)</label><?label guthrie2004magnitude?><mixed-citation>Guthrie, R. H. and Evans, S. G.: Magnitude <?pagebreak page178?>and frequency of landslides triggered by a storm event, Loughborough Inlet, British Columbia, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 475–483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-475-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-4-475-2004</ext-link>, 2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Guzzetti et~al.(2002)Guzzetti, Malamud, Turcotte, and
Reichenbach}}?><label>Guzzetti et al.(2002)Guzzetti, Malamud, Turcotte, and
Reichenbach</label><?label guzzetti2002power?><mixed-citation>Guzzetti, F., Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., and Reichenbach, P.: Power-law
correlations of landslide areas in central Italy, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.,
195, 169–183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00589-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00589-1</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Harp and Jibson(1995)}}?><label>Harp and Jibson(1995)</label><?label harp1995inventory?><mixed-citation>Harp, E. L. and Jibson, R. W.: Inventory of landslides triggered by the 1994
Northridge, California earthquake, Tech. rep., US Geological Survey,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr95213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3133/ofr95213</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Harp and Jibson(1996)}}?><label>Harp and Jibson(1996)</label><?label harp1996landslides?><mixed-citation>
Harp, E. L. and Jibson, R. W.: Landslides triggered by the 1994 Northridge,
California, earthquake, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, S319–S332, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Harp et~al.(2011)Harp, Keefer, Sato, and Yagi}}?><label>Harp et al.(2011)Harp, Keefer, Sato, and Yagi</label><?label harp2011landslide?><mixed-citation>Harp, E. L., Keefer, D. K., Sato, H. P., and Yagi, H.: Landslide inventories:
the essential part of seismic landslide hazard analyses, Eng. Geol., 122,
9–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.06.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.06.013</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Havenith et~al.(2006)Havenith, Torgoev, Meleshko, Alioshin, Torgoev,
and Danneels}}?><label>Havenith et al.(2006)Havenith, Torgoev, Meleshko, Alioshin, Torgoev,
and Danneels</label><?label havenith2006landslides?><mixed-citation>Havenith, H.-B., Torgoev, I., Meleshko, A., Alioshin, Y., Torgoev, A., and
Danneels, G.: Landslides in the Mailuu-Suu Valley, Kyrgyzstan – hazards and
impacts, Landslides, 3, 137–147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0035-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10346-006-0035-2</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Held et al.(1990)}}?><label>Held et al.(1990)</label><?label held1990?><mixed-citation>Held, G. A., Solina, D. H., Solina, H., Keane, D. T., Haag, W. J., Horn, P. M., and Grinstein, G.: Experimental study of critical mass fluctuations in an evolving sand pile, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 1120–1123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1120</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hergarten(2002)}}?><label>Hergarten(2002)</label><?label hergarten2002self?><mixed-citation>Hergarten, S.: Self organized criticality in earth systems, vol. 2, Springer, New York, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04390-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-662-04390-5</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hergarten(2003)}}?><label>Hergarten(2003)</label><?label hergarten2003landslides?><mixed-citation>Hergarten, S.: Landslides, sandpiles, and self-organized criticality, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 3, 505–514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-505-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-3-505-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hergarten and Neugebauer(1998)}}?><label>Hergarten and Neugebauer(1998)</label><?label hergarten1998?><mixed-citation>Hergarten, S. and Neugebauer, H. J.:Self-organized criticality in a landslide mode, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 801–804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL50419" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98GL50419</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hovius et~al.(1997)Hovius, Stark, and Allen}}?><label>Hovius et al.(1997)Hovius, Stark, and Allen</label><?label hovius1997sediment?><mixed-citation>Hovius, N., Stark, C. P., and Allen, P. A.: Sediment flux from a mountain belt
derived by landslide mapping, Geology, 25, 231–234,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025&lt;0231:SFFAMB&gt;2.3.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025&lt;0231:SFFAMB&gt;2.3.CO;2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Huang(2009)}}?><label>Huang(2009)</label><?label runqiu2009mechanism?><mixed-citation>Huang, R.: Mechanism and geomechanical modes of landslide hazards
triggered by Wenchuan 8.0 earthquake, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and
Engineering, 28, 1239–1249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.06.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.06.021</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Huang and Li(2009)}}?><label>Huang and Li(2009)</label><?label huang2009analysis?><mixed-citation>Huang, R. and Li, W.: Analysis of the geo-hazards triggered by the 12 May 2008
Wenchuan Earthquake, China, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 68, 363–371,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0207-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10064-009-0207-0</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Iwahashi et~al.(2003)Iwahashi, Watanabe, and
Furuya}}?><label>Iwahashi et al.(2003)Iwahashi, Watanabe, and
Furuya</label><?label iwahashi2003mean?><mixed-citation>Iwahashi, J., Watanabe, S., and Furuya, T.: Mean slope-angle frequency
distribution and size frequency distribution of landslide masses in
Higashikubiki area, Japan, Geomorphology, 50, 349–364,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00222-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00222-2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jaiswal and van Westen(2012)}}?><label>Jaiswal and van Westen(2012)</label><?label jaiswal2012frequency?><mixed-citation>Jaiswal, P. and van Westen, C. J.: Frequency–size relation of shallow debris
slides on cut slopes along a railroad corridor: A case study from Nilgiri
hills, Southern India, Natural Hazards, 61, 1263–1275,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9978-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-011-9978-2</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Keefer(2000)}}?><label>Keefer(2000)</label><?label keefer2000statistical?><mixed-citation>Keefer, D. K.: Statistical analysis of an earthquake-induced landslide
distribution – the 1989 Loma Prieta, California event, Eng. Geol., 58,
231–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00037-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00037-5</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Li et~al.(2009)Li, Rongjun, Densmore, Ellis, Yongzhao, Allen,
Steffen, Bing, Yi, Richardson et~al.}}?><label>Li et al.(2009)Li, Rongjun, Densmore, Ellis, Yongzhao, Allen,
Steffen, Bing, Yi, Richardson et al.</label><?label yong2006continental?><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Huang, R. Q., Densmore, A. L., Zhou, R. J., and Cao, S. Y.: Basic features and research progresses of Wenchuan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.0 earthquake, Journal of Sichuan University (Engneering Science Edition), 41, 7–25, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu(1993)}}?><label>Liu(1993)</label><?label liu1993117?><mixed-citation>
Liu, S.: Formation and evolution of the Longmenshan thrust belt and the western
Sichuan foreland basin, Chengdu University of Science and Technology Press, Chengdu, China,
1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Malamud and Turcotte(1999)}}?><label>Malamud and Turcotte(1999)</label><?label malamud1999self?><mixed-citation>Malamud, B. D. and Turcotte, D. L.: Self-organized criticality applied to
natural hazards, Nat. Hazards, 20, 93–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008014000515" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1008014000515</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Malamud et~al.(1998)Malamud, Morein, and
Turcotte}}?><label>Malamud et al.(1998)Malamud, Morein, and
Turcotte</label><?label malamud1998forest?><mixed-citation>Malamud, B. D., Morein, G., and Turcotte, D. L.: Forest fires: an example of
self-organized critical behavior, Science, 281, 1840–1842,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5384.1840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.281.5384.1840</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Malamud et~al.(2004)Malamud, Turcotte, Guzzetti, and
Reichenbach}}?><label>Malamud et al.(2004)Malamud, Turcotte, Guzzetti, and
Reichenbach</label><?label malamud2004landslide?><mixed-citation>Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., Guzzetti, F., and Reichenbach, P.: Landslide
inventories and their statistical properties, Earth Surf. Proc.
Land., 29, 687–711, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.1064</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Meunier et~al.(2007)Meunier, Hovius, and
Haines}}?><label>Meunier et al.(2007)Meunier, Hovius, and
Haines</label><?label meunier2007regional?><mixed-citation>Meunier, P., Hovius, N., and Haines, A. J.: Regional patterns of
earthquake-triggered landslides and their relation to ground motion, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L20408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031337</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Meunier et~al.(2008)Meunier, Hovius, and
Haines}}?><label>Meunier et al.(2008)Meunier, Hovius, and
Haines</label><?label meunier2008topographic?><mixed-citation>Meunier, P., Hovius, N., and Haines, J. A.: Topographic site effects and the
location of earthquake induced landslides, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 275,
221–232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.020</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Olami et~al.(1992)Olami, Feder, and Christensen}}?><label>Olami et al.(1992)Olami, Feder, and Christensen</label><?label olami1992self?><mixed-citation>Olami, Z., Feder, H. J. S., and Christensen, K.: Self-organized criticality in
a continuous, nonconservative cellular automaton modeling earthquakes, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 68, 1244–1247, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1244</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Papadopoulos and Plessa(2000)}}?><label>Papadopoulos and Plessa(2000)</label><?label papadopoulos2000magnitude?><mixed-citation>Papadopoulos, G. A. and Plessa, A.: Magnitude–distance relations for
earthquake-induced landslides in Greece, Eng. Geol., 58, 377–386,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00043-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00043-0</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Parise and Jibson(2000)}}?><label>Parise and Jibson(2000)</label><?label parise2000seismic?><mixed-citation>Parise, M. and Jibson, R. W.: A seismic landslide susceptibility rating of
geologic units based on analysis of characteristics of landslides triggered
by the 17 January, 1994 Northridge, California earthquake, Eng. Geol., 58,
251–270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00038-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00038-7</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pelletier et~al.(1997)Pelletier, Malamud, Blodgett, and
Turcotte}}?><label>Pelletier et al.(1997)Pelletier, Malamud, Blodgett, and
Turcotte</label><?label pelletier1997scale?><mixed-citation>Pelletier, J. D., Malamud, B. D., Blodgett, T., and Turcotte, D. L.:
Scale-invariance of soil moisture variability and its implications for the
frequency-size distribution of landslides, Eng. Geol., 48, 255–268,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)00041-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0013-7952(97)00041-0</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Qi et al.(2010)}}?><label>Qi et al.(2010)</label><?label Qi2010?><mixed-citation>Qi, S., Xu, Q., Lan, H., Zhang, B., and Liu, J.: Spatial distribution analysis of landslides triggered by 2008.5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake, China, Eng. Geol., 116, 95–108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.07.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.07.011</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rodr{\i}guez et~al.(1999)Rodr{\i}guez, Bommer, and
Chandler}}?><label>Rodrıguez et al.(1999)Rodrıguez, Bommer, and
Chandler</label><?label rodriguez1999earthquake?><mixed-citation>Rodrıguez, C. E., Bommer, J. J., and Chandler, R. J.: Earthquake-induced landslides:
1980–1997, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 18, 325–346,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(99)00012-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0267-7261(99)00012-3</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sornette(2003)}}?><label>Sornette(2003)</label><?label sornette2017stock?><mixed-citation>Sornette, D.: Why stock markets crash: critical events in complex financial
systems, vol. 49, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712506" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1712506</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stark and Hovius(2001)}}?><label>Stark and Hovius(2001)</label><?label stark2001characterization?><mixed-citation>Stark, C. P. and Hovius, N.: The characterization of landslide size
distributions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1091–1094,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL008527" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL008527</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Van Den~Eeckhaut et~al.(2007)Van Den~Eeckhaut, Poesen, Govers,
Verstraeten, and Demoulin}}?><label>Van Den Eeckhaut et al.(2007)Van Den Eeckhaut, Poesen, Govers,
Verstraeten, and Demoulin</label><?label van2007characteristics?><mixed-citation>Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Poesen, J., Govers, G., Verstraeten, G., and Demoulin,
A.: Characteristics of the size distribution of recent and historical
landslides in a populated hilly region, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 256,
588–603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.040</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page179?><ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Xu et~al.(2014)Xu, Xu, Yao, and Dai}}?><label>Xu et al.(2014)Xu, Xu, Yao, and Dai</label><?label xu2014three?><mixed-citation>Xu, C., Xu, X., Yao, X., and Dai, F.: Three (nearly) complete inventories of
landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 earthquake of China
and their spatial distribution statistical analysis, Landslides, 11,
441–461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Xu et~al.(2016)Xu, Su, and Liu}}?><label>Xu et al.(2016)Xu, Su, and Liu</label><?label xu2016spatial?><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Su, L., and Liu, C.: The spatial distribution characteristics of
shallow fissures of a landslide in the Wenchuan earthquake area, J. Mt. Sci.,
13, 1544–1557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3487-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11629-015-3487-9</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yang et~al.(2007)Yang, Yao, Qi, and Gao}}?><label>Yang et al.(2007)Yang, Yao, Qi, and Gao</label><?label yang2007analysis?><mixed-citation>Yang, Q., Yao, L., Qi, Y., and Gao, Z.-N.: Analysis of self-organized
criticality of centrifugal model tests on granular mixtures and earthquake
effect, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 29, 1630–1635,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.11.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.11.006</ext-link>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yao and Huang(2016)}}?><label>Yao and Huang(2016)</label><?label lingkan2016self?><mixed-citation>Yao, L. and Huang, Y.: Self-organized criticality of mountain system
catastrophic behaviors, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 51,
313–330, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.02.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.02.011</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yin et~al.(2009)Yin, Wang, and Sun}}?><label>Yin et al.(2009)Yin, Wang, and Sun</label><?label yin2009landslide?><mixed-citation>Yin, Y., Wang, F., and Sun, P.: Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008
Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China, Landslides, 6, 139–152,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0148-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10346-009-0148-5</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Size distribution law of earthquake-triggered landslides in different seismic intensity zones</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The <i>M</i><sub>s</sub> 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake in 2008 and <i>M</i><sub>s</sub> 7.0 Lushan earthquake in 2013 produced thousands of landslides in the southern region of the Longmen Mountains in China. We conducted field investigations and analyzed remote sensing data to determine the distribution law of earthquake-triggered landslides. The results show a strong negative power law relationship between the size and frequency of landslides in VII, VIII, and IX seismic intensity zones, a weak power law in the X seismic intensity zone, and a lognormal distribution in the XI seismic intensity zone. Landslide density increases with increasing seismic intensity. A sandpile cellular automata model was built under the conceptual framework of self-organized criticality theory to simulate earthquake-induced landslides. Data from the simulations demonstrate that, with increasing disturbance intensity, the dynamical mechanism of the sandpile model changes from a strong power law to a weak power law and then to a lognormal distribution. Results from shaking table experiments of a one-sided slope sandpile show that, for peak ground acceleration (PGA) in the range of 0.075–0.125&thinsp;g, the relation between the amount and frequency of sand follows a negative power law. For PGA between 0.15 and 0.25&thinsp;g, the relation obeys a lognormal distribution. This verifies that the abovementioned distribution of earthquake-induced landslides should be a universal law from a physical viewpoint and may apply to other areas. This new perspective may be used to guide the development of an inventory of earthquake-triggered landslides and provide a scientific basis for their prediction.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Aschwanden(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Aschwanden, M.: Self-organized criticality in astrophysics: The statistics of
nonlinear processes in the universe, Springer-Praxis, New York, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15001-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15001-2</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Aschwanden et al.(2016)Aschwanden, Crosby, Dimitropoulou, Georgoulis,
Hergarten, McAteer, Milovanov, Mineshige, Morales, Nishizuka
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Aschwanden, M. J., Crosby, N. B., Dimitropoulou, M., Georgoulis, M. K.,
Hergarten, S., McAteer, J., Milovanov, A. V., Mineshige, S., Morales, L.,
Nishizuka, N., Pruessner, G., Sanchez, R., Sharma, A. S., Strugarek, A., and Uritsky, V.: 25 years of self-organized criticality: solar and
astrophysics, Space Sci. Rev., 198, 47–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0054-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0054-6</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bak et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Bak P., Tang C., and Wiesenfeld K.: Self-organized criticality: An explanation of 1/f noise. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bak et al.(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Bak P., Tang C., and Wiesenfeld K.: Self-organized criticality, Phy. Rev. A, 38, 364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.364</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Brunetti et al.(2009)Brunetti, Guzzetti, and
Rossi</label><mixed-citation>
Brunetti, M. T., Guzzetti, F., and Rossi, M.: Probability distributions of landslide volumes, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 16, 179–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-16-179-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-16-179-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Carrara et al.(2003)Carrara, Crosta, and
Frattini</label><mixed-citation>
Carrara, A., Crosta, G., and Frattini, P.: Geomorphological and historical data
in assessing landslide hazard, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 28,
1125–1142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.545</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Catani et al.(2005)Catani, Casagli, Ermini, Righini, and
Menduni</label><mixed-citation>
Catani, F., Casagli, N., Ermini, L., Righini, G., and Menduni, G.: Landslide
hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin,
Landslides, 2, 329–342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-005-0021-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-005-0021-0</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chen et al.(2007)Chen, Yu, and Lin</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-Y., Yu, F.-C., Lin, S.-C., and Cheung, K.-W.: Discussion of
landslide self-organized criticality and the initiation of debris flow, Earth
Surf. Proc. Land., 32, 197–209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1400" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1400</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Dahl et al.(2013)Dahl, Mortensen, Jensen, and
Veihe</label><mixed-citation>
Dahl, M.-P. J., Mortensen, L. E., Jensen, N. H., and Veihe, A.:
Magnitude–frequency characteristics and preparatory factors for spatial
debris-slide distribution in the northern Faroe Islands, Geomorphology, 188,
3–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.015</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Dai et al.(2011)Dai, Xu, Yao, Xu, Tu, and Gong</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, F., Xu, C., Yao, X., Xu, L., Tu, X., and Gong, Q.: Spatial distribution of
landslides triggered by the 2008 <i>M</i><sub>s</sub> 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, China, J. Asian
Earth Sci., 40, 883–895, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.04.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.04.010</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Davis(1899)</label><mixed-citation>
Davis, W. M.: The geographical cycle, Geogr. J., 14, 481–504,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1774538" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/1774538</a>, 1899.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Drossel and Schwabl(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Drossel, B. and Schwabl, F.: Self-organized critical forest-fire model, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 69, 1629–1632, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1629" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1629</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Frattini and Crosta(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Frattini, P. and Crosta, G. B.: The role of material properties and landscape
morphology on landslide size distributions, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 361,
310–319, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.10.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.10.029</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Guo et al.(2017)Guo, Huang, Yao, and Alradi</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, C., Huang, Y., Yao, L., and Alradi, H.: Size and spatial distribution of
landslides induced by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in the Bhote Koshi river
watershed, J. Mt. Sci., 14, 1938–1950, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4140-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4140-y</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Guthrie and Evans(2004a)</label><mixed-citation>
Guthrie, R. H. and Evans, S.: Analysis of landslide frequencies and
characteristics in a natural system, coastal British Columbia, Earth Surf.
Proc. Land., 29, 1321–1339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1095</a>,
2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Guthrie and Evans(2004b)</label><mixed-citation>
Guthrie, R. H. and Evans, S. G.: Magnitude and frequency of landslides triggered by a storm event, Loughborough Inlet, British Columbia, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 475–483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-475-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-475-2004</a>, 2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Guzzetti et al.(2002)Guzzetti, Malamud, Turcotte, and
Reichenbach</label><mixed-citation>
Guzzetti, F., Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., and Reichenbach, P.: Power-law
correlations of landslide areas in central Italy, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.,
195, 169–183, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00589-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00589-1</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Harp and Jibson(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Harp, E. L. and Jibson, R. W.: Inventory of landslides triggered by the 1994
Northridge, California earthquake, Tech. rep., US Geological Survey,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr95213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr95213</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Harp and Jibson(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Harp, E. L. and Jibson, R. W.: Landslides triggered by the 1994 Northridge,
California, earthquake, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, S319–S332, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Harp et al.(2011)Harp, Keefer, Sato, and Yagi</label><mixed-citation>
Harp, E. L., Keefer, D. K., Sato, H. P., and Yagi, H.: Landslide inventories:
the essential part of seismic landslide hazard analyses, Eng. Geol., 122,
9–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.06.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.06.013</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Havenith et al.(2006)Havenith, Torgoev, Meleshko, Alioshin, Torgoev,
and Danneels</label><mixed-citation>
Havenith, H.-B., Torgoev, I., Meleshko, A., Alioshin, Y., Torgoev, A., and
Danneels, G.: Landslides in the Mailuu-Suu Valley, Kyrgyzstan – hazards and
impacts, Landslides, 3, 137–147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0035-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0035-2</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Held et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Held, G. A., Solina, D. H., Solina, H., Keane, D. T., Haag, W. J., Horn, P. M., and Grinstein, G.: Experimental study of critical mass fluctuations in an evolving sand pile, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 1120–1123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1120</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Hergarten(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Hergarten, S.: Self organized criticality in earth systems, vol. 2, Springer, New York, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04390-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04390-5</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Hergarten(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Hergarten, S.: Landslides, sandpiles, and self-organized criticality, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 3, 505–514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-505-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-505-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hergarten and Neugebauer(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Hergarten, S. and Neugebauer, H. J.:Self-organized criticality in a landslide mode, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 801–804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL50419" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL50419</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hovius et al.(1997)Hovius, Stark, and Allen</label><mixed-citation>
Hovius, N., Stark, C. P., and Allen, P. A.: Sediment flux from a mountain belt
derived by landslide mapping, Geology, 25, 231–234,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025&lt;0231:SFFAMB&gt;2.3.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025&lt;0231:SFFAMB&gt;2.3.CO;2</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Huang(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R.: Mechanism and geomechanical modes of landslide hazards
triggered by Wenchuan 8.0 earthquake, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and
Engineering, 28, 1239–1249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.06.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.06.021</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Huang and Li(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, R. and Li, W.: Analysis of the geo-hazards triggered by the 12 May 2008
Wenchuan Earthquake, China, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 68, 363–371,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0207-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0207-0</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Iwahashi et al.(2003)Iwahashi, Watanabe, and
Furuya</label><mixed-citation>
Iwahashi, J., Watanabe, S., and Furuya, T.: Mean slope-angle frequency
distribution and size frequency distribution of landslide masses in
Higashikubiki area, Japan, Geomorphology, 50, 349–364,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00222-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00222-2</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Jaiswal and van Westen(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Jaiswal, P. and van Westen, C. J.: Frequency–size relation of shallow debris
slides on cut slopes along a railroad corridor: A case study from Nilgiri
hills, Southern India, Natural Hazards, 61, 1263–1275,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9978-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9978-2</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Keefer(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Keefer, D. K.: Statistical analysis of an earthquake-induced landslide
distribution – the 1989 Loma Prieta, California event, Eng. Geol., 58,
231–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00037-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00037-5</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Li et al.(2009)Li, Rongjun, Densmore, Ellis, Yongzhao, Allen,
Steffen, Bing, Yi, Richardson et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Huang, R. Q., Densmore, A. L., Zhou, R. J., and Cao, S. Y.: Basic features and research progresses of Wenchuan <i>M</i><sub>s</sub> 8.0 earthquake, Journal of Sichuan University (Engneering Science Edition), 41, 7–25, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Liu(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, S.: Formation and evolution of the Longmenshan thrust belt and the western
Sichuan foreland basin, Chengdu University of Science and Technology Press, Chengdu, China,
1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Malamud and Turcotte(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Malamud, B. D. and Turcotte, D. L.: Self-organized criticality applied to
natural hazards, Nat. Hazards, 20, 93–116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008014000515" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008014000515</a>,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Malamud et al.(1998)Malamud, Morein, and
Turcotte</label><mixed-citation>
Malamud, B. D., Morein, G., and Turcotte, D. L.: Forest fires: an example of
self-organized critical behavior, Science, 281, 1840–1842,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5384.1840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5384.1840</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Malamud et al.(2004)Malamud, Turcotte, Guzzetti, and
Reichenbach</label><mixed-citation>
Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., Guzzetti, F., and Reichenbach, P.: Landslide
inventories and their statistical properties, Earth Surf. Proc.
Land., 29, 687–711, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1064</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Meunier et al.(2007)Meunier, Hovius, and
Haines</label><mixed-citation>
Meunier, P., Hovius, N., and Haines, A. J.: Regional patterns of
earthquake-triggered landslides and their relation to ground motion, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 34, L20408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031337" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031337</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Meunier et al.(2008)Meunier, Hovius, and
Haines</label><mixed-citation>
Meunier, P., Hovius, N., and Haines, J. A.: Topographic site effects and the
location of earthquake induced landslides, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 275,
221–232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.020</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Olami et al.(1992)Olami, Feder, and Christensen</label><mixed-citation>
Olami, Z., Feder, H. J. S., and Christensen, K.: Self-organized criticality in
a continuous, nonconservative cellular automaton modeling earthquakes, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 68, 1244–1247, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1244" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1244</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Papadopoulos and Plessa(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Papadopoulos, G. A. and Plessa, A.: Magnitude–distance relations for
earthquake-induced landslides in Greece, Eng. Geol., 58, 377–386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00043-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00043-0</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Parise and Jibson(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Parise, M. and Jibson, R. W.: A seismic landslide susceptibility rating of
geologic units based on analysis of characteristics of landslides triggered
by the 17 January, 1994 Northridge, California earthquake, Eng. Geol., 58,
251–270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00038-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00038-7</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Pelletier et al.(1997)Pelletier, Malamud, Blodgett, and
Turcotte</label><mixed-citation>
Pelletier, J. D., Malamud, B. D., Blodgett, T., and Turcotte, D. L.:
Scale-invariance of soil moisture variability and its implications for the
frequency-size distribution of landslides, Eng. Geol., 48, 255–268,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)00041-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)00041-0</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Qi et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Qi, S., Xu, Q., Lan, H., Zhang, B., and Liu, J.: Spatial distribution analysis of landslides triggered by 2008.5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake, China, Eng. Geol., 116, 95–108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.07.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.07.011</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Rodrıguez et al.(1999)Rodrıguez, Bommer, and
Chandler</label><mixed-citation>
Rodrıguez, C. E., Bommer, J. J., and Chandler, R. J.: Earthquake-induced landslides:
1980–1997, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 18, 325–346,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(99)00012-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(99)00012-3</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Sornette(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Sornette, D.: Why stock markets crash: critical events in complex financial
systems, vol. 49, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712506" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712506</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Stark and Hovius(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Stark, C. P. and Hovius, N.: The characterization of landslide size
distributions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1091–1094,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL008527" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL008527</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Van Den Eeckhaut et al.(2007)Van Den Eeckhaut, Poesen, Govers,
Verstraeten, and Demoulin</label><mixed-citation>
Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Poesen, J., Govers, G., Verstraeten, G., and Demoulin,
A.: Characteristics of the size distribution of recent and historical
landslides in a populated hilly region, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 256,
588–603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.040</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Xu et al.(2014)Xu, Xu, Yao, and Dai</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, C., Xu, X., Yao, X., and Dai, F.: Three (nearly) complete inventories of
landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan <i>M</i><sub>w</sub> 7.9 earthquake of China
and their spatial distribution statistical analysis, Landslides, 11,
441–461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Xu et al.(2016)Xu, Su, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, X., Su, L., and Liu, C.: The spatial distribution characteristics of
shallow fissures of a landslide in the Wenchuan earthquake area, J. Mt. Sci.,
13, 1544–1557, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3487-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3487-9</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Yang et al.(2007)Yang, Yao, Qi, and Gao</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Q., Yao, L., Qi, Y., and Gao, Z.-N.: Analysis of self-organized
criticality of centrifugal model tests on granular mixtures and earthquake
effect, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 29, 1630–1635,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.11.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2007.11.006</a>, 2007.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Yao and Huang(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Yao, L. and Huang, Y.: Self-organized criticality of mountain system
catastrophic behaviors, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 51,
313–330, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.02.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.02.011</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Yin et al.(2009)Yin, Wang, and Sun</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, Y., Wang, F., and Sun, P.: Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008
Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China, Landslides, 6, 139–152,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0148-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0148-5</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
