<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7946</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-28-153-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>An early warning sign of critical transition in the Antarctic ice sheet – a data-driven tool for a spatiotemporal tipping point</article-title><alt-title>A data-driven tool for a spatiotemporal tipping point</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{A data-driven tool for a spatiotemporal tipping point}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. A. AlMomani and E. Bollt}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>AlMomani</surname><given-names>Abd AlRahman</given-names></name>
          <email>aaalmoma@clarkson.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9362-7459</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Bollt</surname><given-names>Erik</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Clarkson Center for Complex Systems Science (C<sup>3</sup>S<sup>2</sup>), Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Abd AlRahman AlMomani (aaalmoma@clarkson.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>28</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>153</fpage><lpage>166</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Abd AlRahman AlMomani</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021.html">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e101">Our recently developed tool, called Directed Affinity Segmentation (DAS), was originally designed for the data-driven discovery of coherent sets in fluidic systems. Here we interpret that it can also be used to indicate early warning signs of critical transitions in ice shelves as seen from remote sensing data. We apply a directed spectral clustering methodology, including an asymmetric affinity matrix and the associated directed graph Laplacian, to reprocess the ice velocity data and remote sensing satellite images of the Larsen C ice shelf. Our tool has enabled the simulated prediction of historical events from historical data and fault lines responsible for the critical transitions leading to the breakup of the Larsen C ice shelf crack, which resulted in the A-68 iceberg. Such benchmarking of methods, using data from the past to forecast events that are now also in the past, is sometimes called post-casting, analogous to forecasting into the future. Our method indicated the coming crisis months before the actual occurrence.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e113">Warming associated with climate change causes the global sea level to rise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.1"/>. There are three primary reasons for this, namely ocean expansion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.2"/>, ice sheets losing ice faster than it forms from snowfall and glaciers at higher altitudes melting. During the 20th century, the sea level rise has been dominated by glacier retreat. This has started to change in the 21st century because of the increased iceberg calving <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.3"/>. Ice sheets store most of the land ice (99.5 %) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.4"/>, with a sea-level equivalent (SLE) of 7.4 m for Greenland and 58.3 m for Antarctica. Ice sheets form in areas where the snow that falls in winter does not melt entirely over the summer. Over the thousands of years of this effect, the layers have grown thicker and denser as the weight of new snow and ice layers compresses the older layers.
Ice sheets are always in motion, slowly flowing downhill under their weight. Much of the ice moves through relatively fast-moving outlets called ice streams, glaciers and ice shelves near the coast. When a marine ice sheet accumulates a mass of snow and ice at the same rate as it loses mass to the sea, it remains stable. Antarctica has already experienced dramatic warming,  especially the Antarctic Peninsula, jutting out into relatively warmer waters north of Antarctica, which has warmed by 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>F) since 1950 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e150">A large area of the western Antarctic Ice Sheet is also losing mass, which is attributed to warmer water upwelling from the deeper ocean near the Antarctic coast. In eastern Antarctica, no clear trend has emerged, although some stations report slight cooling. Overall, scientists believe that Antarctica is starting to lose ice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.6"/>, but so far, the process is not considered relatively fast, compared to the widespread changes in Greenland <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e159">Since 1957, the current record of the continent-wide average reveals a surface temperature trend in Antarctica that has been positive and significant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C/decade  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.8"/>. Western Antarctica has warmed by more than 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C/decade in the last 50 years, and this warming is most active during the winter and spring. Although this is partly offset by autumn cooling in eastern Antarctica, this effect was prevalent in the 1980s and 1990s <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.9"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page154?><p id="d1e196">Of particular interest to us in this presentation is the Larsen Ice Shelf, which extends like a ribbon down from the east coast of the Antarctic Peninsula, from James Ross Island to the Ronne Ice Shelf. It consists of several distinct ice shelves separated by headlands. The major Larsen C ice crack was already noted to have started in 2010 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.10"/>. Still, it was initially evolving very slowly, and there were no signs of radical changes according to interferometry studies of the remote sensing imagery <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.11"/>. However, since October 2015, the major ice crack of Larsen C had been growing more quickly, to the point where recently it finally failed, resulting in the calving of the massive A-68 iceberg. See Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>; this is the largest known iceberg, with an area of more than 2000 square miles (5180 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) or nearly the size of Delaware. In summary, A-68 detached from one of the largest floating ice shelves in Antarctica and floated off into the Weddell Sea.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e219">The A-68 iceberg. The fractured berg and shelf are visible in these images, acquired on 21 July 2017, by the thermal infrared sensor (TIRS) on the Landsat 8 satellite. Credit: NASA Earth Observatory images by Jesse Allen, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e228">In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.12"/>, the authors presented a structural glaciological description of the system and a subsequent analysis of the surface morphological features of the Larsen C ice shelf, as seen from satellite images spanning the period 1963–2007. Their research results and conclusions stated that<disp-quote>
  <p id="d1e235">Surface velocity data integrated from the grounding line to the calving front along a central flow line of the ice shelf indicate that the residence time of ice (ignoring basal melt and surface accumulation) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">560</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years. Based on the distribution of ice shelf structures and their change over time, we infer that the ice shelf is likely to be a relatively stable feature, and that it has existed in its present configuration for at least this length of time.</p>
</disp-quote></p>
      <p id="d1e249">In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.13"/>, the authors modeled the flow of the Larsen C and northernmost Larsen D ice shelves using a model of continuum mechanics of the ice flow. They applied a fracture criterion to the simulated velocities to investigate the ice shelf's stability. The conclusion of that analysis shows that the Larsen C ice shelf is inferred to be stable in its current dynamic regime. This work was published in 2010. According to analytic studies, the Larsen C ice crack already existed at that time but was considered to be growing slowly. There was no expectation, at that time, that the crack growth would proceed quickly, and that the collapse of the Larsen C was imminent.</p>
      <p id="d1e255">Interferometry has traditionally been the primary technique for analyzing and predicting ice cracks based on remote sensing. Interferometry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.14"/> constitutes a family of techniques in which waves, usually electromagnetic waves, are superimposed, causing the phenomenon of interference patterns which, in turn, are used to extract information concerning the viewed materials. Interferometers are widely used across science and industry to measure small displacements, refractive index changes and surface irregularities. So, it is considered a robust and familiar tool that is successful in the macroscale application of monitoring the structural health of the ice shelves.
Here we will instead take a data-driven approach, directly from the remote sensing imagery, to infer structural changes indicating the impending tipping point toward Larsen C's critical transition and eventual breakup.</p>
      <p id="d1e261">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F9"/> shows the interferometry image as of 20 April 2017. Although it clearly shows the crack that already existed at that time, apparently it provided no information concerning forecasting the breakup that soon followed. Just a couple of weeks after the image shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F9"/>, the Larsen C ice crack changed significantly and presented a different dynamic that quickly divided into two branches, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F10"/>. Interferometry is a powerful tool for detecting spatial variations in the ice surface velocity. However, when it comes to inferring the early stages of future critical transitions, it did not provide useful indications portending the important event that soon followed. Therefore, there is clearly a need for other methods that may be capable of performing this task. As we will show, our method achieves a<?pagebreak page155?> very useful and successful data-driven early indicator of this important outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Directed partitioning</title>
      <p id="d1e278">In our previous work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.15"/>, we developed the method of Directed Affinity Segmentation (DAS), and we showed that our method  is a data-driven analogue to the transfer operator formalism designed. DAS was originally designed to characterize coherent structures in fluidic systems, such as ocean flows or atmospheric storms. Furthermore, DAS is truly a data-driven method in that it is suitable even when these systems are observed only from film data and, specifically, without either an exact differential equation or the need for the intermediate stage of modeling the vector field <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.16"/> responsible for the underlying advection. In the current work, we apply this concept of seeking coherent structures under the hypothesis that a large ice sheet that begins to move in mass appears a great deal like a mass of material in a fluid that holds together in what is often called a coherent set.</p>
      <p id="d1e287">The two most commonly used and successful image segmentation methods are based on (1)  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> means <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.17"/>, and (2) spectral segmentation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.18"/>, respectively. However, while these were developed successfully for static images, they require major adjustments for successful application to sequences of images, i.e., films. The spatiotemporal problem of motion segmentation is associated with coherence, despite the fact that, traditionally, they are considered well suited to static images <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.19"/>. The key difference between the image segmentation of static images and coherence, as related to motion segmentation, is what underlies a notion of coherent observations, since we must also consider the directionality of the arrow of time.</p>
      <p id="d1e306">Defining a loss function of some kind is often the starting point when specifying an algorithm in machine learning. An affinity measure is the phrase used to describe a comparison, or cost, between states. In this case, a state may be the measured attributes at a given location in an image scene.   However, when there is an underlying arrow of time, the loss functions that most naturally arise to track coherence will not be inherently symmetric.  Correspondingly, affinity matrices associate the affinity measure for each pairwise comparison across a finite data set. A graph is associated with the affinity matrix where there is an edge between each state for which there is a nonzero affinity. Generally, in the symmetric case, these graphs are undirected. Now consider that if the affinity matrices are not symmetric, then these are associated with directed graphs, which describes the arrow of time. This is a theoretical complication of standard methodology since many of the theoretical underpinnings of the standard spectral partitioning assume a symmetric matrix corresponding to an undirected graph and then consider the spectrum of eigenvalues of the corresponding symmetric graph Laplacian matrix that follows. This new case can be accommodated by the spectral graph theory, as there is a graph Laplacian for weighted directed graphs built upon the theoretical work of Fan Chung <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.20"/>. Our own work in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.21"/> specialized this concept of the directed spectral graph theory to the scenario of image sequences derived from an assumed underlying evolution operator.</p>
      <p id="d1e315">To proceed with our directed partitioning method, we  formulate the (film) imagery sequences data set as the following matrices:

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M9" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th image (or the image at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th time step) and describes a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixelated image reshaped as a column vector, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).  This describes a grayscale image, but in the likely scenario of multiple attributes or color bands at each pixel, then these data structures likewise include the corresponding tensor depth. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time delay and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the images sequences stacked as column vectors with a time delay at the current and future times, respectively. Choosing the value of the time delay <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can result in significant differences in the segmentation process. Consider that, in the case of a relatively slowly evolving dynamical system where the change between two consecutive images is not significantly distinguishable, choosing a large value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> may be better suited. In our work, we considered the mean image over a period of 1 month as a moving window generating our images, which implies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be 1 month.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e559">Directed partitioning method. We see the image sequence to the left, and to the right, we reshape each image as a single column vector. Following the resultant trajectories, we see that the pairwise distance between the two matrices will result in an asymmetric matrix. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.22"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e571">Note that the rows of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the change in the color of the pixel at a fixed spatial location <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is crucial to keep in mind that we chose the color as the evolving quantity for a designated spatial location for clarity and consistency with our primary application and approach described in this paper. However, we can select the evolving quantity to be the magnitude of the pixels obtained from spectral imaging or experimental measures obtained from the field such as pressure, density or velocity. Section 3 introduces examples where the ice surface velocity was used instead of the color to highlight how the results may vary based on the selected measure.</p>
      <?pagebreak page156?><p id="d1e623">We introduced <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.23"/> an affinity matrix in terms of a pairwise distance function between the pixels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M26" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where the function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>↦</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to define the spatial distance between pixels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> describing physical locations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>↦</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a distance function describing the color distance between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th color channels. The parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> regularizes, balancing these two effects. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be seen as a degree of importance of the function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the spatial change. Large values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> will make the color variability dominate the distance in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), and it would  classify very close (spatially) regions as different coherent sets when they have small color differences. On the other hand, small values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> may classify spatially neighboring regions as one coherent set, even when they have a significant color difference. In our work, the color is quantified as a grayscale color of the images (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). So, we scaled the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then we choose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to emphasize spatial change, where we choose the functions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> each to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distance functions, as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M47" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        and
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M48" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1056">We see that the spatial distance matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is symmetric. However, the color distance matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is asymmetric for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While the matrix generated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the symmetric case of spectral clustering approaches, we see that the matrix given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies an asymmetric cost naturally due to the directionality of the arrow of time. Thus, we require that an asymmetric clustering approach must be adopted.</p>
      <p id="d1e1162">First, we define our affinity matrix from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M55" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        This has the effect that both the spatial and measured (color) effects almost have Markov properties, as far-field effects are almost forgotten in the sense that they are almost zero. Likewise, near-field values are the largest.
Notice that we have suppressed including all the parameters in writing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, including time parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that describes sampling  history and the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that serve to balance the spatial scale and resolution of color histories.</p>
      <p id="d1e1252">We proceed to cluster the spatiotemporal regions of the system, in terms of the directed affinity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, by interpreting the problem as random walks through the weighted directed graph, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, designed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a weighted adjacency matrix. In the following, let:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M63" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M64" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="" open="{"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        is the degree matrix, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a row stochastic matrix representing the probabilities of a Markov chain through the directed graph <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is row stochastic, this implies that it row sums to one. This is equivalently stated that the right eigenvector is the one vector, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the left eigenvector corresponding to left eigenvalue, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, represents the steady state row vector of the long-term distribution, as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        Consider that, for example, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is irreducible, then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has all positive entries, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or, as said for simplicity of notation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is interpreted componentwise. Let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> be the corresponding diagonal matrix, as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M77" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diag</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        and likewise,
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M78" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diag</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diag</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pq</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        which is well defined for either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sign branch when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page157?><p id="d1e1663">Then, we may cluster the directed graph using the spectral graph theory methods specialized for directed graphs, following the weighted directed graph Laplacian described by Fan Chung <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.24"/>. A similar computation has been used for transfer operators in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx12" id="text.25"/> and as reviewed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.26"/>, including in oceanographic applications.
The Laplacian of the directed graph <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.27"/> as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1759">The first, smallest eigenvalue larger than zero, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is such that, in the following:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M84" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        allows a bipartition by the sign structure of the following:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M85" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        Analogously to the Ng–Jordan–Weiss symmetric spectral image partition method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.28"/>, the first <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> eigenvalues larger than zero, and their eigenvectors, can be used to associate a multipart partition, by the assistance of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering of these eigenvectors. By defining the matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that has the eigenvectors associated with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th most significant eigenvalues on its columns, we then use the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering to multi-partition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distance between the rows of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since each row in the matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is associated with a specific spatial location (pixel), by reshaping the labels vector that results from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering, we obtain our labeled image.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1950">We apply DAS to satellite images of the Larsen C ice shelf and ice surface velocity data. Here we show that the DAS of spatiotemporal changes can work as an early warning sign tool for critical transitions in marine ice sheets. We applied our post-casting experiments on Larsen C images before the splitting of the A-68 iceberg, and then we compared our forecasting, based on segmentation, to the actual unfolding of the event.</p>
      <p id="d1e1953">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, we see different snapshots of the ice surface velocity data set <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.29"/>, which are part of the NASA Making Earth System Data Records for Use in the Research Environments (MEaSUREs) program. It provides the first comprehensive <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.30"/>, high-resolution, digital mosaics of ice motion in Antarctica assembled from multiple satellite interferometric synthetic aperture radar systems. We apply our directed affinity partitioning algorithm to these available data sets, and the results are shown as a labeled image in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1968">Ice surface velocity. The figure shows the data set for 3 different years around the beginning of the Larsen C ice crack in 2010. The data from the years 2007, 2008 and 2010 are corrupted on the region of interest, and they are excluded. The color scale indicates the magnitude of the velocity from light red (low velocity) to dark red (high velocity), and the arrow points to the starting tip of the crack. The result of the directed partitioning is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. Data sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.31"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1985">Directed affinity result. The directed partitioning (left) results for the ice surface velocity of 2006, 2009, 2011 and 2012. Note that the ice shelf crack started in 2010. A narrow field magnifying the region of interest (right) shows large variations in ice surface velocity within a small area to give a clearer focused view of the differences in speeds. In Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F11"/> shows the surface plot for the same result.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1998">As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, we note the following:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2005">The data were collected from eight different sources <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.32"/>, with different coverage and various error ranges, and interpolating the data from these different sources explains the smooth curves in segmentation around the region of interest.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2012">The directed partitioning shows the Larsen C ice shelf as a nested set of coherent structures that are contained successively within each other.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2016">The magnified view shown in the inset of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> highlights the region where the Larsen C ice crack starts. Furthermore, we see a significant change in velocity within a narrow spatial distance (4 miles; 6.44 km).   More precisely, the outer boundaries of the coherent sets become spatially very close (considering the margin of error in the measurements; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.33"/>).  We conclude  that, likely, these have contact.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e2024">Directed partitioning gives us informative clustering, meaning that each cluster has homogeneous properties, such as the magnitude and the direction of the velocity. Consider the nested coherent sets, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⊂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⊂</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. Each set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maintains its coherence within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because of a set of properties (i.e., chemical or mechanical properties) that rules the interaction between them. However, observe that the contact between the boundaries of the sets <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can mean a direct interaction between dissimilar domains. These later sets may significantly differ in their properties, such as a significant difference of velocity, which<?pagebreak page158?> may require different analysis under different assumptions than the gradual increase in the velocity.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2115">The dynamic of two coherent sets. As the inner set contacts the boundary of the outer one, it gives the chance for new reactions that may cause a critical transition.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2124">However, since the boundaries of the sets are not entirely contacted, the directions of the velocities reveal no critical changes;  we believe this results implicitly from the data preprocessing that includes interpolation and smoothing of the measurements. We believe that the interpolation and smoothing of the measurements cause loss in data informativity about critical transitions. Our method, using the ice surface velocity data, was able to detect more details. However, it still cannot detect critical transitions such as the crack branching, as discussed in the introduction and as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F10"/>. Based on our results using the ice velocity data, we state nothing more than such close interaction between coherent set boundaries. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, an early warning sign should be considered and investigated by applying the potential hypothesis (what-if assumptions) and analyzing the consequences from any change or any error in the measured data.</p>
      <p id="d1e2132">It is interesting to contrast our directed partitioning results, which give early indications of impending fracture changes using the remote sensing satellite images, to classical interferometry analysis methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.34"/>. To reduce the obscuration effects of noise (clouds and images of variable intensity), we used the averaged images, over 1 month, as a single snapshot for the directed affinity constructions. We excluded some images that have high noise and a lack of clarity in the region of interest (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F18"/>). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, the directed affinity partitioning for two time windows, starts from December 2015. Notice that the directed partitioning begins to detect the Larsen C ice shelf's significant change in July 2016. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, we see that, by September 2016, we detect a structure very close in shape to the eventual and actual iceberg A-68, which calved from Larsen C in July 2017. Moreover, by November 2016 (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F12"/>), the boundaries of the detected partitions match the crack dividing into two branches that happened later in May 2017 (shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F10"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2151">For two time windows (top and bottom), we see the mean image (left) of the images included in the window, the DAS labeled clusters (middle) and the overlay of the DAS boundaries (right) over the mean image of the window. We took these two time windows from February and July 2016 as a detailed example, and more time window results are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. During 2016, there was no significant change in the Larsen C crack at the beginning of the year. However, in July 2016,  based solely on data up to that point in time, the DAS proposed a large change in the crack dynamics, and this change continued faster, as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.35"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2169">Complementing Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, this figure shows the DAS boundaries (right) for different time windows, starting from July 2016 to April 2017. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.36"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2185">The 2012 prediction based on ice surface velocity data, and the 2016 prediction based only on satellite images, compared to the actual crack (white curve between the two prediction curves) on July 2017, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Raw image sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.37"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f08.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e2207">We have shown that our data-driven approach, originally developed for detecting coherent sets in fluidic systems, shows promise for predicting possible critical transitions in spatiotemporal systems, specifically for marine ice sheets, based on remote sensing satellite imagery. Our approach shows reliability in detecting coherent structures when the object of concern is a quasi-rigid body such as ice sheets. The main idea is that observing a significant and perhaps topological form change of a coherent structure may indicate an essential underlying critical structural change in the ice over time. The computational approach is based on spectral graph theory in terms of the directed graph Laplacian. We have shown here that carefully designing a directed affinity matrix, which accounts for balancing spatial distance and measurements at spatial sites, for application of spectral graph theory is relevant in our applied setting of remote sensing imagery. In the case of the Larsen C ice shelf, we have carried forward this data-driven program. We successfully observe the<?pagebreak page160?> calving event of the A-68 iceberg and some critical transitions months before their actual occurrence. This transition in the coherent structure can indicate, by directed affinity partitioning, a possible fracture. We see that the directed affinity partitioning can be a useful early warning sign that indicates the possibility of critical spatiotemporal transitions, and it may help to bring the attention to specific regions in order to investigate different possible scenarios in the analytic study, whether these are further computational analyses or possibly even supporting further field studies and deployed aerial remote sensing missions. We have demonstrated that, in the case of the Larsen C ice shelf event, with the evidence in  Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F11"/>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F17"/>, potentially important events may be observable months ahead of the final outcome.</p>
      <p id="d1e2218">In our future work, we plan to pursue the idea of connecting our data-driven approach to computing boundaries by directed partitioning with the computational science approach in terms of stress/strain analysis of rigid bodies and an understanding of the underlying physics.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page161?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Figures</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e2236">Interferometry (20 April 2017) in which  two Sentinel-1 radar images from 7 and 14 April 2017 were combined to create an interferogram showing the growing crack in Antarctica's Larsen C ice shelf. Polar scientist Anna Hogg said, “We can measure the iceberg crack propagation much more accurately when using the precise surface deformation information from an interferogram like this rather from than the amplitude (or black and white image) alone, where the crack may not always be visible.” Sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.38"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d1e2251">The Larsen C crack development (new branch) as of 1 May 2017. Labels highlight significant jumps, and the tip positions are derived from Landsat (USGS) and Sentinel-1 InSAR (ESA) data. The background image blends Bedmap2 elevation (BAS) with a MODIS MOA2009 Image Map (NSIDC). Other data are from the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research Antarctic Digital Database (SCAR ADD) and OpenStreetMap (OSM). Credit: Project MIDAS (Impact of Melt on Ice Shelf Dynamics And Stability); Adrian John Luckman, Swansea University.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f10.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page162?><app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{B}?><label>Appendix B</label><title>More numerical results</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d1e2272">Directed affinity partitions, with the mean velocity (speed) of the partition assigned for each label entry. The spatial distance between the arrow tips is less than 2 miles (3.22 km), while the difference in the speed is more than 200 m/yr.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B2</label><caption><p id="d1e2285">The mean image and the directed affinity partitioning as of November 2016. The results show a similar structure to the crack branching that occurred on May 2017 (shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F10"/>) and a similar structure to the final iceberg that calved from Larsen C on July 2017. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.39"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B3</label><caption><p id="d1e2304">The mean image and the directed affinity partitioning as of February 2016. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.40"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B4</label><caption><p id="d1e2321">The mean image and the directed affinity partitioning as of July 2016. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.41"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f14.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F15"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B5</label><caption><p id="d1e2337">The mean image and the directed affinity partitioning as of September 2016. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.42"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B6</label><caption><p id="d1e2353">The mean image and the directed affinity partitioning as of November 2016. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.43"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f16.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F17"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B7</label><caption><p id="d1e2371">The mean image and the directed affinity partitioning as of April 2017. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.44"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f17.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F18"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure B8</label><caption><p id="d1e2387">Example of noisy images that have been excluded when computing the average image. Raw images sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.45"/></p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/28/153/2021/npg-28-153-2021-f18.jpg"/>

        <p id="d1e2399">.</p>
      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2409">The data of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2415">Each author contributed approximately 50 %, in terms of time and effort, to this project. EB developed conceived the background theory, was involved in the design of experiments and wrote much of the paper. AAA implemented theory, developed the specific experimental design, codes and analysis and also wrote much of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2421">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2427">This work was funded in part by the Army Research Office, the Naval Research Office and also the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2432">This research has been supported by the Army Research Office (grant no. N68164-EG) and the Office of Naval Research (grant no. N00014-15-1-2093).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2438">This paper was edited by Juan Restrepo and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Agency(2017)}}?><label>Agency(2017)</label><?label InterferometryImage?><mixed-citation>Agency, E. S.: ESR: Larsen C Crack Interferogram. Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2017), processed by A. Hogg/CPOM/Priestly Centre,
available at: <uri>https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2017/04/Larsen-C_crack_interferogram</uri>,
(last access: 28 April 2020), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{AlMomani and Bollt(2018)}}?><label>AlMomani and Bollt(2018)</label><?label Almomani2018?><mixed-citation>AlMomani, A. and Bollt, E.: Go With the Flow, on Jupiter and Snow. Coherence
from Model-Free Video Data Without Trajectories, J. Nonlinear
Sci., 30, 2375–2404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-018-9470-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00332-018-9470-1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Al~Momani(2017)}}?><label>Al Momani(2017)</label><?label al2017coherence?><mixed-citation>
Al Momani, A. A. R. R.: Coherence from Video Data Without Trajectories: A
Thesis, PhD thesis, Clarkson University, USA, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bassan(2014)}}?><label>Bassan(2014)</label><?label bassan2014advanced?><mixed-citation>
Bassan, M.: Advanced interferometers and the search for gravitational waves,
Astrophys. Space Sc. L., 404, 275–290, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bollt and Santitissadeekorn(2013)}}?><label>Bollt and Santitissadeekorn(2013)</label><?label bolltbook?><mixed-citation>Bollt, E. and Santitissadeekorn, N.: Applied and Computational Measurable
Dynamics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, ISBN 978-1-611972-63-4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972641" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1137/1.9781611972641</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bollt et~al.(2012)Bollt, Luttman, Kramer, and
Basnayake}}?><label>Bollt et al.(2012)Bollt, Luttman, Kramer, and
Basnayake</label><?label bollt2012measurable?><mixed-citation>Bollt, E. M., Luttman, A., Kramer, S., and Basnayake, R.: Measurable dynamics
analysis of transport in the Gulf of Mexico during the oil spill,
Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 22, 1230012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127412300121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S0218127412300121</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chung(2005)}}?><label>Chung(2005)</label><?label fanchung?><mixed-citation>
Chung, F.: Laplacians and the Cheeger inequality for directed graphs, Ann. Comb., 9, 1–19, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chung and Oden(2000)}}?><label>Chung and Oden(2000)</label><?label Chung2000?><mixed-citation>Chung, F. and Oden, K.: Weighted graph Laplacians and isoperimetric
inequalities, Pac. J. Math., 192, 257–273,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2000.192.257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2140/pjm.2000.192.257</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Froyland and Padberg(2009)}}?><label>Froyland and Padberg(2009)</label><?label Froyland2?><mixed-citation>Froyland, G. and Padberg, K.: Almost-invariant sets and invariant manifolds – Connecting probabilistic and geometric descriptions of coherent structures in flows, Physica D, 238, 1507–1523,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2009.03.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.physd.2009.03.002</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gagne et~al.(2015)Gagne, Gillett, and Fyfe}}?><label>Gagne et al.(2015)Gagne, Gillett, and Fyfe</label><?label gagne2015observed?><mixed-citation>
Gagne, M., Gillett, N., and Fyfe, J.: Observed and simulated changes in
Antarctic sea ice extent over the past 50 years, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 90–95, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Glasser et~al.(2009)Glasser, Kulessa, Luckman, Jansen, King,
Sammonds, Scambos, and Jezek}}?><label>Glasser et al.(2009)Glasser, Kulessa, Luckman, Jansen, King,
Sammonds, Scambos, and Jezek</label><?label Glasser2009?><mixed-citation>Glasser, N. F., Kulessa, B., Luckman, A., Jansen, D., King, E. C., Sammonds,
P. R., Scambos, T. A., and Jezek, K. C.: Surface structure and stability of  the Larsen C ice shelf, Antarctic Peninsula, J. Glaciol., 55, 400–410,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309788816597" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/002214309788816597</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hadjighasem et~al.(2016)Hadjighasem, Karrasch, Teramoto, and
Haller}}?><label>Hadjighasem et al.(2016)Hadjighasem, Karrasch, Teramoto, and
Haller</label><?label HallerC?><mixed-citation>Hadjighasem, A., Karrasch, D., Teramoto, H., and Haller, G.:
Spectral-clustering approach to Lagrangian vortex detection, Phys.
Rev. E, 93, 063107,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.063107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.93.063107</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jansen et~al.(2010)Jansen, Kulessa, Sammonds, Luckman,
King, and Glasser}}?><label>Jansen et al.(2010)Jansen, Kulessa, Sammonds, Luckman,
King, and Glasser</label><?label Jansen2010?><mixed-citation>Jansen, D., Kulessa, B., Sammonds, P. R., Luckman, A., King, E. C., and
Glasser, N. F.: Present stability of the Larsen C ice shelf, Antarctic
Peninsula, J. Glaciol., 56, 593–600, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310793146223" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/002214310793146223</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jansen et~al.(2015)Jansen, Luckman, Cook, Bevan, Kulessa, Hubbard,
and Holland}}?><label>Jansen et al.(2015)Jansen, Luckman, Cook, Bevan, Kulessa, Hubbard,
and Holland</label><?label jansen2015brief?><mixed-citation>Jansen, D., Luckman, A. J., Cook, A., Bevan, S., Kulessa, B., Hubbard, B., and Holland, P. R.: Brief Communication: Newly developing rift in Larsen C Ice Shelf presents significant risk to stability, The Cryosphere, 9, 1223–1227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1223-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-9-1223-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kanungo et~al.(2002)Kanungo, Mount, Netanyahu, Piatko, Silverman, and
Wu}}?><label>Kanungo et al.(2002)Kanungo, Mount, Netanyahu, Piatko, Silverman, and
Wu</label><?label k-means?><mixed-citation>Kanungo, T., Mount, D., Netanyahu, N., Piatko, C., Silverman, R., and Wu, A.:
An efficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation,
IEEE T. Pattern Anal., 24, 881–892, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017616</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{L{\"{a}}mmerzahl et~al.(2001)L{\"{a}}mmerzahl, Everitt, and
Hehl}}?><label>Lämmerzahl et al.(2001)Lämmerzahl, Everitt, and
Hehl</label><?label lammerzahl2001gyros?><mixed-citation>
Lämmerzahl, C., Everitt, C. F., and Hehl, F. W.: Gyros, Clocks,
Interferometers...: Testing Relativistic Gravity in Space, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-540-41236-6, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Luttman et~al.(2013)Luttman, Bollt, Basnayake, Kramer, and
Tufillaro}}?><label>Luttman et al.(2013)Luttman, Bollt, Basnayake, Kramer, and
Tufillaro</label><?label luttman2013framework?><mixed-citation>Luttman, A., Bollt, E. M., Basnayake, R., Kramer, S., and Tufillaro, N. B.: A
framework for estimating potential fluid flow from digital imagery, Chaos: J. Nonlinear Sci., 23, 033134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4821188</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{McKay et~al.(2011)McKay, Overpeck, and Otto-Bliesner}}?><label>McKay et al.(2011)McKay, Overpeck, and Otto-Bliesner</label><?label mckay2011role?><mixed-citation>McKay, N. P., Overpeck, J. T., and Otto-Bliesner, B. L.: The role of ocean
thermal expansion in Last Interglacial sea level rise, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL048280</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mengel et~al.(2016)Mengel, Levermann, Frieler, Robinson, Marzeion,
and Winkelmann}}?><label>Mengel et al.(2016)Mengel, Levermann, Frieler, Robinson, Marzeion,
and Winkelmann</label><?label Mengel2015?><mixed-citation>Mengel, M., Levermann, A., Frieler, K., Robinson, A., Marzeion, B., and
Winkelmann, R.: Future sea level rise constrained by observations and
long-term commitment, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 2597–2602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500515113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1500515113</ext-link>,  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mouginot et~al.(2012)Mouginot, Scheuchl, and Rignot}}?><label>Mouginot et al.(2012)Mouginot, Scheuchl, and Rignot</label><?label icevelocity02?><mixed-citation>Mouginot, J., Scheuchl, B., and Rignot, E.: Mapping of Ice Motion in Antarctica Using Synthetic-Aperture Radar Data, Remote Sens., 4, 2753–2767,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4092753" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs4092753</ext-link>,   2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{NASA(2017)}}?><label>NASA(2017)</label><?label NSIDC?><mixed-citation>NASA: NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed
Active Archive Center., available at:  <uri>https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/quickfacts/icesheets.html</uri> (last access:
17 April 2020), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ng et~al.(2002)Ng, Jordan, and Weiss}}?><label>Ng et al.(2002)Ng, Jordan, and Weiss</label><?label NgJordanWeiss?><mixed-citation>Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M. I., and Weiss, Y.: On spectral clustering: Analysis and
an algorithm, Adv. Neur. In., 2, 849–856, available at: <uri>https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2980539.2980649</uri> (last access: 2 March 2021), 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page166?><ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rignot et~al.(2011)Rignot, Mouginot, and Scheuchl}}?><label>Rignot et al.(2011)Rignot, Mouginot, and Scheuchl</label><?label icevelocity01?><mixed-citation>Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: Ice Flow of the Antarctic Ice
Sheet, Science, 333, 1427–1430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1208336" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1208336</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rignot et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Rignot et al.(2017)</label><?label icevelocityDataset?><mixed-citation>Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: MEaSUREs InSAR-Based
Antarctica Ice Velocity Map, Version 2, [subset:2006-2011], Boulder, Colorado USA, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, available at: <uri>https://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0484/versions/2</uri> (last access: 17 September 2018), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Santitissadeekorn and Bollt(2007)}}?><label>Santitissadeekorn and Bollt(2007)</label><?label santitissadeekorn2007identifying?><mixed-citation>
Santitissadeekorn, N. and Bollt, E.: Identifying stochastic basin hopping by
partitioning with graph modularity, Physica D, 231,
95–107, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Scambos et~al.(1996)Scambos, Bohlander, and Raup.}}?><label>Scambos et al.(1996)Scambos, Bohlander, and Raup.</label><?label iceImages?><mixed-citation>Scambos, T., Bohlander, J., and Raup., B.: Images of Antarctic Ice Shelves,
MODIS Antarctic Ice Shelf Image Archive, available at:
<uri>http://nsidc.org/data/iceshelves_images/index_modis.html</uri> (last  access: 17 September 2018-09-17) 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Seroussi et~al.(2020)Seroussi, Nowicki, Payne, Goelzer, Lipscomb,
Abe-Ouchi, Agosta, Albrecht, Asay-Davis, Barthel et~al.}}?><label>Seroussi et al.(2020)Seroussi, Nowicki, Payne, Goelzer, Lipscomb,
Abe-Ouchi, Agosta, Albrecht, Asay-Davis, Barthel et al.</label><?label seroussi2020ismip6?><mixed-citation>Seroussi, H., Nowicki, S., Payne, A. J., Goelzer, H., Lipscomb, W. H., Abe-Ouchi, A., Agosta, C., Albrecht, T., Asay-Davis, X., Barthel, A., Calov, R., Cullather, R., Dumas, C., Galton-Fenzi, B. K., Gladstone, R., Golledge, N. R., Gregory, J. M., Greve, R., Hattermann, T., Hoffman, M. J., Humbert, A., Huybrechts, P., Jourdain, N. C., Kleiner, T., Larour, E., Leguy, G. R., Lowry, D. P., Little, C. M., Morlighem, M., Pattyn, F., Pelle, T., Price, S. F., Quiquet, A., Reese, R., Schlegel, N.-J., Shepherd, A., Simon, E., Smith, R. S., Straneo, F., Sun, S., Trusel, L. D., Van Breedam, J., van de Wal, R. S. W., Winkelmann, R., Zhao, C., Zhang, T., and Zwinger, T.: ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century, The Cryosphere, 14, 3033–3070, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020</ext-link>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shi and Malik(2000)}}?><label>Shi and Malik(2000)</label><?label Shi-Malik?><mixed-citation>Shi, J. and Malik, J.: Normalized cuts and image segmentation, IEEE
T. Pattern Anal., 22, 888–905,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/34.868688" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/34.868688</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Steig et~al.(2009)Steig, Schneider, Rutherford, Mann, Comiso, and
Shindell}}?><label>Steig et al.(2009)Steig, Schneider, Rutherford, Mann, Comiso, and
Shindell</label><?label steig2009warming?><mixed-citation>
Steig, E. J., Schneider, D. P., Rutherford, S. D., Mann, M. E., Comiso, J. C., and Shindell, D. T.: Warming of the Antarctic ice-sheet surface since the 1957 International Geophysical Year, Nature, 457, 459–462, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>An early warning sign of critical transition in the Antarctic ice sheet – a data-driven tool for a spatiotemporal tipping point</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Our recently developed tool, called Directed Affinity Segmentation (DAS), was originally designed for the data-driven discovery of coherent sets in fluidic systems. Here we interpret that it can also be used to indicate early warning signs of critical transitions in ice shelves as seen from remote sensing data. We apply a directed spectral clustering methodology, including an asymmetric affinity matrix and the associated directed graph Laplacian, to reprocess the ice velocity data and remote sensing satellite images of the Larsen C ice shelf. Our tool has enabled the simulated prediction of historical events from historical data and fault lines responsible for the critical transitions leading to the breakup of the Larsen C ice shelf crack, which resulted in the A-68 iceberg. Such benchmarking of methods, using data from the past to forecast events that are now also in the past, is sometimes called post-casting, analogous to forecasting into the future. Our method indicated the coming crisis months before the actual occurrence.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Agency(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Agency, E. S.: ESR: Larsen C Crack Interferogram. Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2017), processed by A. Hogg/CPOM/Priestly Centre,
available at: <a href="https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2017/04/Larsen-C_crack_interferogram" target="_blank"/>,
(last access: 28 April 2020), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>AlMomani and Bollt(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
AlMomani, A. and Bollt, E.: Go With the Flow, on Jupiter and Snow. Coherence
from Model-Free Video Data Without Trajectories, J. Nonlinear
Sci., 30, 2375–2404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-018-9470-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-018-9470-1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Al Momani(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Al Momani, A. A. R. R.: Coherence from Video Data Without Trajectories: A
Thesis, PhD thesis, Clarkson University, USA, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bassan(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Bassan, M.: Advanced interferometers and the search for gravitational waves,
Astrophys. Space Sc. L., 404, 275–290, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bollt and Santitissadeekorn(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Bollt, E. and Santitissadeekorn, N.: Applied and Computational Measurable
Dynamics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, ISBN 978-1-611972-63-4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972641" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972641</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bollt et al.(2012)Bollt, Luttman, Kramer, and
Basnayake</label><mixed-citation>
Bollt, E. M., Luttman, A., Kramer, S., and Basnayake, R.: Measurable dynamics
analysis of transport in the Gulf of Mexico during the oil spill,
Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 22, 1230012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127412300121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127412300121</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Chung(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Chung, F.: Laplacians and the Cheeger inequality for directed graphs, Ann. Comb., 9, 1–19, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chung and Oden(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Chung, F. and Oden, K.: Weighted graph Laplacians and isoperimetric
inequalities, Pac. J. Math., 192, 257–273,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2000.192.257" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2000.192.257</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Froyland and Padberg(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Froyland, G. and Padberg, K.: Almost-invariant sets and invariant manifolds – Connecting probabilistic and geometric descriptions of coherent structures in flows, Physica D, 238, 1507–1523,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2009.03.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2009.03.002</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Gagne et al.(2015)Gagne, Gillett, and Fyfe</label><mixed-citation>
Gagne, M., Gillett, N., and Fyfe, J.: Observed and simulated changes in
Antarctic sea ice extent over the past 50 years, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 90–95, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Glasser et al.(2009)Glasser, Kulessa, Luckman, Jansen, King,
Sammonds, Scambos, and Jezek</label><mixed-citation>
Glasser, N. F., Kulessa, B., Luckman, A., Jansen, D., King, E. C., Sammonds,
P. R., Scambos, T. A., and Jezek, K. C.: Surface structure and stability of  the Larsen C ice shelf, Antarctic Peninsula, J. Glaciol., 55, 400–410,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309788816597" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309788816597</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Hadjighasem et al.(2016)Hadjighasem, Karrasch, Teramoto, and
Haller</label><mixed-citation>
Hadjighasem, A., Karrasch, D., Teramoto, H., and Haller, G.:
Spectral-clustering approach to Lagrangian vortex detection, Phys.
Rev. E, 93, 063107,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.063107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.063107</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Jansen et al.(2010)Jansen, Kulessa, Sammonds, Luckman,
King, and Glasser</label><mixed-citation>
Jansen, D., Kulessa, B., Sammonds, P. R., Luckman, A., King, E. C., and
Glasser, N. F.: Present stability of the Larsen C ice shelf, Antarctic
Peninsula, J. Glaciol., 56, 593–600, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310793146223" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310793146223</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Jansen et al.(2015)Jansen, Luckman, Cook, Bevan, Kulessa, Hubbard,
and Holland</label><mixed-citation>
Jansen, D., Luckman, A. J., Cook, A., Bevan, S., Kulessa, B., Hubbard, B., and Holland, P. R.: Brief Communication: Newly developing rift in Larsen C Ice Shelf presents significant risk to stability, The Cryosphere, 9, 1223–1227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1223-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1223-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Kanungo et al.(2002)Kanungo, Mount, Netanyahu, Piatko, Silverman, and
Wu</label><mixed-citation>
Kanungo, T., Mount, D., Netanyahu, N., Piatko, C., Silverman, R., and Wu, A.:
An efficient <i>k</i>-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation,
IEEE T. Pattern Anal., 24, 881–892, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017616</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Lämmerzahl et al.(2001)Lämmerzahl, Everitt, and
Hehl</label><mixed-citation>
Lämmerzahl, C., Everitt, C. F., and Hehl, F. W.: Gyros, Clocks,
Interferometers...: Testing Relativistic Gravity in Space, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-540-41236-6, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Luttman et al.(2013)Luttman, Bollt, Basnayake, Kramer, and
Tufillaro</label><mixed-citation>
Luttman, A., Bollt, E. M., Basnayake, R., Kramer, S., and Tufillaro, N. B.: A
framework for estimating potential fluid flow from digital imagery, Chaos: J. Nonlinear Sci., 23, 033134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821188</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>McKay et al.(2011)McKay, Overpeck, and Otto-Bliesner</label><mixed-citation>
McKay, N. P., Overpeck, J. T., and Otto-Bliesner, B. L.: The role of ocean
thermal expansion in Last Interglacial sea level rise, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048280" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048280</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Mengel et al.(2016)Mengel, Levermann, Frieler, Robinson, Marzeion,
and Winkelmann</label><mixed-citation>
Mengel, M., Levermann, A., Frieler, K., Robinson, A., Marzeion, B., and
Winkelmann, R.: Future sea level rise constrained by observations and
long-term commitment, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 2597–2602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500515113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500515113</a>,  2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Mouginot et al.(2012)Mouginot, Scheuchl, and Rignot</label><mixed-citation>
Mouginot, J., Scheuchl, B., and Rignot, E.: Mapping of Ice Motion in Antarctica Using Synthetic-Aperture Radar Data, Remote Sens., 4, 2753–2767,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4092753" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4092753</a>,   2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>NASA(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
NASA: NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed
Active Archive Center., available at:  <a href="https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/quickfacts/icesheets.html" target="_blank"/> (last access:
17 April 2020), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Ng et al.(2002)Ng, Jordan, and Weiss</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M. I., and Weiss, Y.: On spectral clustering: Analysis and
an algorithm, Adv. Neur. In., 2, 849–856, available at: <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2980539.2980649" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 March 2021), 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Rignot et al.(2011)Rignot, Mouginot, and Scheuchl</label><mixed-citation>
Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: Ice Flow of the Antarctic Ice
Sheet, Science, 333, 1427–1430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1208336" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1208336</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Rignot et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., and Scheuchl, B.: MEaSUREs InSAR-Based
Antarctica Ice Velocity Map, Version 2, [subset:2006-2011], Boulder, Colorado USA, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, available at: <a href="https://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0484/versions/2" target="_blank"/> (last access: 17 September 2018), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Santitissadeekorn and Bollt(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Santitissadeekorn, N. and Bollt, E.: Identifying stochastic basin hopping by
partitioning with graph modularity, Physica D, 231,
95–107, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Scambos et al.(1996)Scambos, Bohlander, and Raup.</label><mixed-citation>
Scambos, T., Bohlander, J., and Raup., B.: Images of Antarctic Ice Shelves,
MODIS Antarctic Ice Shelf Image Archive, available at:
<a href="http://nsidc.org/data/iceshelves_images/index_modis.html" target="_blank"/> (last  access: 17 September 2018-09-17) 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Seroussi et al.(2020)Seroussi, Nowicki, Payne, Goelzer, Lipscomb,
Abe-Ouchi, Agosta, Albrecht, Asay-Davis, Barthel et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Seroussi, H., Nowicki, S., Payne, A. J., Goelzer, H., Lipscomb, W. H., Abe-Ouchi, A., Agosta, C., Albrecht, T., Asay-Davis, X., Barthel, A., Calov, R., Cullather, R., Dumas, C., Galton-Fenzi, B. K., Gladstone, R., Golledge, N. R., Gregory, J. M., Greve, R., Hattermann, T., Hoffman, M. J., Humbert, A., Huybrechts, P., Jourdain, N. C., Kleiner, T., Larour, E., Leguy, G. R., Lowry, D. P., Little, C. M., Morlighem, M., Pattyn, F., Pelle, T., Price, S. F., Quiquet, A., Reese, R., Schlegel, N.-J., Shepherd, A., Simon, E., Smith, R. S., Straneo, F., Sun, S., Trusel, L. D., Van Breedam, J., van de Wal, R. S. W., Winkelmann, R., Zhao, C., Zhang, T., and Zwinger, T.: ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century, The Cryosphere, 14, 3033–3070, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020</a>, 2020.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Shi and Malik(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, J. and Malik, J.: Normalized cuts and image segmentation, IEEE
T. Pattern Anal., 22, 888–905,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/34.868688" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/34.868688</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Steig et al.(2009)Steig, Schneider, Rutherford, Mann, Comiso, and
Shindell</label><mixed-citation>
Steig, E. J., Schneider, D. P., Rutherford, S. D., Mann, M. E., Comiso, J. C., and Shindell, D. T.: Warming of the Antarctic ice-sheet surface since the 1957 International Geophysical Year, Nature, 457, 459–462, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
