<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7946</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-25-301-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Wave propagation in the Lorenz-96 model</article-title><alt-title>Wave propagation in the Lorenz-96 model</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Wave propagation in the Lorenz-96 model}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D.~L. van Kekem and A.~E. Sterk}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>van Kekem</surname><given-names>Dirk L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sterk</surname><given-names>Alef E.</given-names></name>
          <email>a.e.sterk@rug.nl</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4127-1598</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science,
University of Groningen, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>P.O. Box 407, 9700 AK Groningen, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Alef E. Sterk (a.e.sterk@rug.nl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>301</fpage><lpage>314</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>October</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018.html">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e88">In this paper we study the spatiotemporal properties of waves in the
Lorenz-96 model and their dependence on the dimension parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the forcing parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the first bifurcation is
either a supercritical Hopf or a double-Hopf bifurcation and the
periodic attractor born at these bifurcations represents a traveling
wave. Its spatial wave number increases linearly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but its
period tends to a finite limit as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and odd
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the first bifurcation is again a supercritical Hopf bifurcation,
but in this case the period of the traveling wave also grows
linearly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and even <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, however, a Hopf
bifurcation is preceded by either one or two pitchfork bifurcations,
where the number of the latter bifurcations depends on whether <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
has remainder 2 or 0 upon division by 4. This bifurcation sequence
leads to stationary waves and their spatiotemporal properties also
depend on the remainder after dividing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by 4. Finally, we explain
how the double-Hopf bifurcation can generate two or more stable
waves with different spatiotemporal properties that coexist for the
same parameter values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e218">In this paper we study the Lorenz-96 model which is defined by the equations

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M15" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        together with the periodic “boundary condition” implied by taking
the indices <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> modulo <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
forcing parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are free
parameters. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.1"/> interpreted the variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
values of some atmospheric quantity in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> equispaced sectors of
a latitude circle, where the index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plays the role of
“longitude”. Hence, a larger value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be interpreted as
a finer latitude grid. Lorenz also remarked that the vectors
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be interpreted as wave profiles, and he
observed that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sufficiently large these waves slowly
propagate “westward”, i.e., in the direction of decreasing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows a Hovmöller diagram
illustrating two traveling waves with wave number 5 for dimension
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the parameter values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in the periodic regime)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in the chaotic regime).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e484">Recent papers with applications of the Lorenz-96 model and the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that were used.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Application</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.2"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Forecast improvement</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">960</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.3"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Forecasting in chaotic systems</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.4"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Computing Lyapunov exponents</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.5"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Non-equilibrium ensembles</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.6"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bred vectors</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1024</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.7"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Operational constraints</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.8"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Predictability</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.9"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Chaos</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.10"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Data assimilation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.11"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Predictability</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.12"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Designing chaotic models</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.13"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Data assimilation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.14"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ruelle linear response theory</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.15"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Model error</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.16"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Metric in forecast error growth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.17"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Spectral bifurcation diagrams</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.18"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Data assimilation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.19"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Spatiotemporal chaos</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">128</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.20"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Adjoint modeling</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.21"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Predictability of extremes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.22"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Predictability of extremes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.23"/>
                </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Data assimilation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1021">The Lorenz-96 model was introduced as a tool for numerical
experiments in predictability studies, rather than as a physically
realistic model. Indeed, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.24"/> wrote that “the physics
of the atmosphere is present only to the extent that there are
external forcing and internal dissipation, simulated by the
constant and linear terms, while the quadratic terms, simulating
advection, together conserve the total energy […]”. The
value of the Lorenz-96 model primarily lies in the fact that it has
a very simple implementation in numerical codes while at the same
time it can exhibit very complex dynamics for suitable choices of
the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The famous Lorenz-63 model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.25"/>, which does have a clear physical
interpretation (namely, as the Galerkin projection of a fluid
dynamical model describing Rayleigh–Bénard convection), has two
disadvantages. Firstly, it consists of only three ordinary
differential equations. Secondly, for the classical parameter
values the model has a Lyapunov spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
makes the model very dissipative. Such properties are not typical
for atmospheric models. In contrast, the dimension of the Lorenz-96
model can be chosen to be arbitrarily large, and for suitable values of
the parameters the Lyapunov spectrum is similar to those observed
in models obtained from discretizing partial differential
equations. For those reasons the<?pagebreak page302?> Lorenz-96 model has become a test
model for a wide range of geophysical applications.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e1069">Hovmöller diagrams of a periodic attractor (<bold>a</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
a chaotic attractor (<bold>b</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Lorenz-96 model for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is plotted as a function of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For visualization purposes linear interpolation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been applied in order to make the diagram continuous in the
variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1188">Power spectra of the attractors of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Note
that the maximum spectral power (indicated by a circle) is attained at nearly
the same period.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1199">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> lists some recent papers with applications of
the Lorenz-96 model. In most studies the dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is chosen ad
hoc, but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appear to be popular choices. Many
applications are related to geophysical problems, but the model has
also attracted the attention of mathematicians working in the area
of dynamical systems for phenomenological studies in
high-dimensional chaos. Note that Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) is in
fact a family of models parameterized by means of the discrete
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. An important question is to what extent both the
qualitative and quantitative dynamical properties of
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) depend on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, the dimension
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has a strong effect on the predictability of large amplitudes
of traveling waves in weakly chaotic regimes of the Lorenz-96 model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.26"/>. In general, the statistics of extreme events in
dynamical systems strongly depend on topological properties and
recurrence properties of the system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.27"/>. Therefore, a coherent overview of the dependence of
spatiotemporal properties on the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is useful
to assess the robustness of results when using the Lorenz-96 model
in predictability studies.</p>
      <?pagebreak page303?><p id="d1e1282">In this paper we address the question of how the spatiotemporal
properties of waves, such as their period and wave number, in the
Lorenz-96 model depend on the dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and whether these
properties tend to a finite limit as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We will
approach this question by studying waves represented by periodic
attractors that arise through a Hopf bifurcation of a stable
equilibrium. Along various routes to chaos these periodic
attractors can bifurcate into chaotic attractors representing
irregular waves which “inherit” their spatiotemporal properties
from the periodic attractor. For example, the wave shown in the
left panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> bifurcates into a three-torus
attractor which breaks down and gives rise to the wave in the right
panel. Note that both waves have the same wave
number. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows power spectra of these
waves, and clearly their dominant peaks are located at roughly the
same period. Inheritance of spatiotemporal properties also
manifests itself in a shallow water model studied by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.28"/> in which a Hopf bifurcation (related to
baroclinic instability) explains the observed timescales of
atmospheric low-frequency variability. The Hopf bifurcation plays
a key role in explaining the physics of low-frequency variability
in many geophysical contexts. Examples are the Atlantic
Multidecadal Oscillation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.29"/>, the
wind-driven ocean circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.30"/>,
and laboratory experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.31"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1321">In addition to <italic>traveling</italic> waves, such as illustrated in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, we will also show the existence of
<italic>stationary</italic> waves. In a recent paper by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.32"/>
stationary waves have also been discovered in specific regions of
the multi-scale Lorenz-96 model. Their paper uses
dynamical indicators such as the Lyapunov dimension to identify the
parameter regimes with stationary waves. Moreover, we will explain
two bifurcation scenarios by which waves with different
spatiotemporal properties coexist. This paper complements the
results of our previous work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.33"/>, which considers only
the case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; these two papers together give a comprehensive
picture of wave propagation in the Lorenz-96 model.</p>
      <p id="d1e1352">The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> we explain how to obtain an approximation of
the periodic attractor born at a Hopf bifurcation, which enables us
to derive spatiotemporal properties of waves in the Lorenz-96
model. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/> we show that, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, periodic
attractors indeed represent traveling waves as suggested by
Lorenz. Also for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and odd values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, periodic attractors
represent traveling waves, as is demonstrated in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>, however, we show
analytically that, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, stationary waves
occur. By means of numerical experiments we show in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/> that stationary waves occur in general for
even <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> we discuss the
bifurcation scenarios by which stable waves with different
spatiotemporal properties can coexist for the same values of the
parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Hopf bifurcations</title>
      <p id="d1e1463">In this section we consider a general geophysical model in the form
of a system of ordinary differential equations:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="2em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        In this equation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a parameter modeling
external circumstances such as forcing. Assume that for the
parameter value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the system has an equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
this means that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a time-independent solution of
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). In the context of geophysics <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents a steady flow, and its linear stability is determined by
the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. An equilibrium becomes unstable when
eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix cross the imaginary axis upon
variation of the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.34"/> provides an
extensive discussion of the physical interpretation of bifurcation
behavior.</p>
      <p id="d1e1637">Assume that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has two eigenvalues <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the imaginary axis. This indicates the occurrence of
a Hopf bifurcation, i.e., the birth of a periodic solution from an
equilibrium that changes stability. If the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is stable for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and unstable for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then
under suitable non-degeneracy conditions the Hopf bifurcation is
supercritical, which means that a stable periodic orbit exists for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.35"/>. For small values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the periodic orbit that is born at
the Hopf bifurcation can be approximated by

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">[</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.36"/>. Without loss of generality we may assume that
the corresponding complex eigenvectors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have unit length. In the<?pagebreak page304?> context
of geophysical applications this first-order approximation of the
periodic orbit can be interpreted as a wave-like perturbation
imposed on a steady mean flow. The spatiotemporal properties of this
wave can now be determined by the vectors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Waves in the Lorenz-96 model</title>
      <p id="d1e1907">In this section we study waves in the Lorenz-96 model and how their
spatiotemporal characteristics depend on the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Traveling waves for $n\geq 4$ and $F>0$}?><title>Traveling waves for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e1955">Graphs of the functions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as defined in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>). The eigenvalues of the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The shapes of the graphs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> imply that the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can only lose stability through either a Hopf or a double-Hopf bifurcation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see main text).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2130">For all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the point
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an equilibrium solution of
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). This equilibrium represents a steady flow,
and since all components are equal the flow is spatially
uniform. The stability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined by the
eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). Note
that the Lorenz-96 model is invariant under the symmetry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while taking into account the periodic boundary
condition. As a consequence the Jacobian matrix evaluated at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is circulant, which means that each row is a right
cyclic shift of the previous row, and so the matrix is completely
determined by its first row. If we denote this row by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then it follows from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.37"/> that the
eigenvalues of the circulant matrix can be expressed in terms of
roots of unity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M128" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="2em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          An eigenvector corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M130" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center center center center center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⊤</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In particular, for the Lorenz-96 model in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>)
the Jacobian matrix at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has only three nonzero elements
on its first row, viz. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence, the eigenvalues <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed in terms
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M138" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the functions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M141" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is stable as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The real part of the
eigenvalue <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes sign if the equation

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M147" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          is satisfied. The graph of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows
that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) can have at most four
solutions. Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is symmetric around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it follows that if
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a solution of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) then so is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
means that the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes unstable for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
when either a pair or a double pair of eigenvalues becomes purely
imaginary. The main result is summarized in the following theorem.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?></p>
      <p id="d1e2913"><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?><bold>Theorem 1.</bold>
Assume that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> satisfies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th eigenvalue pair <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the trivial equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> crosses the imaginary axis at the parameter value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>:=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bifurcates through either a Hopf or a double-Hopf bifurcation.
A double-Hopf bifurcation, with two pairs of eigenvalues crossing the imaginary axis, occurs if and only if there exist <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> such that

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M165" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Otherwise, a Hopf bifurcation occurs. Moreover, the first Hopf
bifurcation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always supercritical.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?></p>
      <p id="d1e3173">The proof of Theorem 1 can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.38"/>, in which
also an expression for the first Lyapunov coefficient is derived
which determines for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the Hopf bifurcation is sub- or
supercritical. Observe that Theorem 1 implies that a double-Hopf
bifurcation occurs for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>
we will explain how double-Hopf bifurcations lead to the
coexistence of two or more stable traveling waves with different
wave numbers.</p>
      <?pagebreak page305?><p id="d1e3300">From the eigenvalues that cross the imaginary axis and the
corresponding eigenvectors we can deduce the physical
characteristics of the periodic orbit that arises after a Hopf
bifurcation. When the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th eigenvalue pair <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> crosses the imaginary axis we can write

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex4"><mml:math id="M176" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>cot⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>cot⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          If we set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>cot⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then according to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) an approximation of the periodic orbit is
given by

                <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M178" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            This is indeed the expression for a traveling wave in
which the spatial wave number and the period are given by
respectively <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus
the index of the eigenpair that crosses the imaginary axis
determines the propagation characteristics of the wave.</p>
      <p id="d1e3672">Note that Hopf bifurcations of an <italic>unstable</italic> equilibrium
will result in an unstable periodic orbit. Therefore, not all waves
that are guaranteed to exist by Theorem 1 will be visible in
numerical experiments. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) implies that for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the first Hopf bifurcation occurs for the eigenpair
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with index

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M183" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mtext>arg max</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1"/> it is shown that, except for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the integer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> satisfies the bounds

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M186" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which means that the wave number increases linearly with the
dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since the function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has a maximum at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>arccos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we have

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex7"><mml:math id="M190" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>arccos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which is consistent with Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>). As
a corollary we find that the period of this wave tends to a finite
limit as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M192" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>arccos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.867</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows a graph of the period and
the wave number as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that the period settles
down on the value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4074">As the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loses stability through
a (double-)Hopf bifurcation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a periodic attractor is born which represents
a traveling wave. The spatial wave number increases linearly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas
the period tends to a finite limit.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Traveling waves for odd $n\geq 4$ and $F<0$}?><title>Traveling waves for odd <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e4159">Now assume that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is odd. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) has
precisely two solutions which implies that the first bifurcation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a supercritical Hopf bifurcation. The index of the
first bifurcating eigenpair <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows by
minimizing the value of the function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex10"><mml:math id="M205" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Again, the wave number increases linearly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but at a faster
rate than in the case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Now the period of the wave is given by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex11"><mml:math id="M208" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the last equality follows from the computations in Appendix
<xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2"/>. This implies that contrary to the case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
period increases monotonically with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and does not tend to
a limiting value as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4375">Note that for even <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the first bifurcation is
not a Hopf bifurcation since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
a real<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> eigenvalue that changes sign at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Surprisingly, the case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not analytically
tractable. The case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be studied analytically in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/> we will
numerically study the bifurcations for other values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Stationary waves for $n=6$ and $F<0$}?><title>Stationary waves for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e4521">We now consider the dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
eigenvalue <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes sign. Note that the equilibrium
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cannot exhibit a saddle-node bifurcation since
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> continues to exist for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Instead, at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> there must be a branching point which is either
a pitchfork or a transcritical bifurcation. If we try for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> an equilibrium solution of the form
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> then it follows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> must satisfy
the equations

                <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M233" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Of course <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a solution to these equations, but this
would lead to the already known equilibrium
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. There is an additional pair of solutions
which is given by

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M236" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            With these values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> we obtain two new equilibria
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that exist for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in addition to the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
means that a pitchfork bifurcation occurs at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e5056">As Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, but for two periodic attractors for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These attractors are born at Hopf bifurcations of the equilibria
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that the waves do not
travel “eastward” or “westward”. The pitchfork bifurcation changed the
mean flow which in turn changes the propagation of the wave.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page307?><p id="d1e5150">As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases, each of the new equilibria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may
bifurcate again. We first consider the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
which the Jacobian matrix is given by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex15"><mml:math id="M252" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center center center center center center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is no longer circulant: in addition to shifting each
row in a cyclic manner, the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> also need to be
interchanged. In particular, this means that the eigenvalues can no
longer be determined by means of
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>). Symbolic manipulations with the computer
algebra package Mathematica <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.39"/> show that an
eigenvalue crossing occurs for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in which case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> so
that the characteristic polynomial of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by

                <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M260" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>det</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">468</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">219</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">246</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            This expression shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has two purely imaginary eigenvalues
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the remaining four complex eigenvalues have
a negative real part. Therefore the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> undergoes
a Hopf bifurcation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Numerical experiments
with Mathematica show that the matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a null
vector of the form

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex19"><mml:math id="M266" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center center center center center center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⊤</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where we can take

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex20"><mml:math id="M267" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mtext>and</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Hence, using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) the periodic orbit can be approximated as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M268" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Note that if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is sufficiently
small, then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always positive (resp. negative) for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (resp. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This implies that the periodic orbit
represents a stationary wave rather than a traveling
wave. The period of the wave is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the spatial
wave number is 3. These spatiotemporal properties are clearly
visible in the left panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6574">Bifurcation diagrams obtained by continuation of the equilibrium
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the dimensions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Stable
(unstable) branches are marked by solid (dashed) lines. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> two
pitchforks in a row occur before the Hopf bifurcation, whereas for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> only
one pitchfork occurs before the Hopf bifurcation.
The bifurcation diagram for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (resp. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
is qualitatively similar to the bifurcation diagram for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (resp. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
see the main text).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6741">Parameter values of the first Hopf bifurcation <bold>(a)</bold> and the periods of the
periodic attractor <bold>(b)</bold> that appears after the Hopf bifurcation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and even
values of the dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For clarity the cases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been
marked with different symbols in order to emphasize the differences between the two cases.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6808">The computations for the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are similar and show
that another Hopf bifurcation takes place at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This means that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> there exists
a second stable periodic orbit which coexists with the
stable periodic orbit born at the Hopf bifurcation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Its first-order approximation is almost identical to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>): only the numerators <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> need to be interchanged and therefore the complete
expression will be omitted. Hence, the two coexisting stable waves
that arise from the two Hopf bifurcations of the equilibria
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have the same spatiotemporal properties,
but they differ in the spatial phase which is indeed visible in the
Hovmöller diagrams in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. These results show
how the pitchfork bifurcation changes the mean flow and hence also
the propagation characteristics of the wave. In the next section we
will explore spatiotemporal properties of waves for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and other
even values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Stationary waves for even $n\geq 4$ and $F<0$}?><title>Stationary waves for even <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e6993">The case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> turns out to be more complicated than the case
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
undergoes a pitchfork bifurcation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Just as in the case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> two new branches of
equilibria appear which are given by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex26"><mml:math id="M308" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are again given by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>). The Jacobian
matrix at the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex27"><mml:math id="M311" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtable class="matrix" columnalign="center center center center" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in which case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the characteristic polynomial of the matrix
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex28"><mml:math id="M316" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>det</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which implies that a real eigenvalue of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes zero at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we obtain the same
result. Since the equilibria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> continue to
exist for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a saddle-node bifurcation is ruled
out. Numerical continuation using the software package AUTO-07p
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.40"/> shows that again a pitchfork bifurcation takes
place at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is not feasible to derive analytic expressions
for the new branches of equilibria as in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>). Continuation of the four branches while
monitoring their stability indicates that at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.853</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
total four Hopf bifurcations occur (one at each
branch). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows the bifurcation diagrams
for the cases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e7601">The question is whether the results described above persist for
even dimensions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To that end we conducted the following
numerical experiment. For all even dimensions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we
used the software package AUTO-07p to numerically continue the
equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while monitoring
the eigenvalues to detect bifurcations. At each pitchfork
bifurcation we performed a branch switch in order to follow the new
branches of equilibria and detect their bifurcations. Once a Hopf
bifurcation is detected we can compute the period of the wave as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the eigenvalue pair <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results
of this experiment reveal that the cases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
different both qualitatively and quantitatively.</p>
      <p id="d1e7734">If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for some <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then one pitchfork
bifurcation occurs at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This follows directly from
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) for the eigenvalues of the equilibrium
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: for even <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> we have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which
changes sign at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. From the pitchfork bifurcation
two new branches of stable equilibria emanate. Each of these
equilibria is of the form

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M342" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the other equilibrium just follows by
interchanging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Each of the two equilibria undergoes
a Hopf bifurcation, which leads to the coexistence of two stable
waves. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a suggests that the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
which this bifurcation occurs is not constant, but tends to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The period of the periodic attractor that is born at
the Hopf bifurcation increases almost linearly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: fitting
the function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the numerically computed
periods gives <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b).</p>
      <p id="d1e8017">If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for some <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then two Pitchfork
bifurcations in a row occur at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. After the
second pitchfork bifurcation there are four branches of
equilibria. Each of these equilibria is of the form

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M358" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> alternate in sign; the other
equilibria are obtained by applying a circulant shift. Each of the
four stable equilibria undergoes a Hopf bifurcation at the same
value of the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which leads to the coexistence of four
stable waves. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a suggests that the value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at which this bifurcation occurs is not constant, but tends to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Contrary to the case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the period
of the periodic attractor that appears after the Hopf bifurcation
settles down and tends to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.92</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page308?><p id="d1e8229">In spite of the aforementioned quantitative differences between the
cases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the wave numbers depend in the same way
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in both cases. Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>)
show that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> components of the equilibrium that undergoes the
Hopf bifurcation alternate in sign. Therefore, sufficiently close
to the Hopf bifurcation the components <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
the periodic orbit will also alternate in sign. Hence, the
resulting stationary waves consists of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> “troughs” and
“ridges”, which means that their wave number equals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Multi-stability: coexistence of waves</title>
      <p id="d1e8353">The results of Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/> show that for even <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> either two or four stable periodic orbits coexist for the
same parameter values. This phenomenon is referred to as
multi-stability in the dynamical systems literature. An
overview of the wide range of applications of multi-stability in
different disciplines of science is given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.41"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8380">Multi-stability also occurs when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but for a very different
reason. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Theorem 1 implies that the first bifurcation of
the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not
a Hopf bifurcation, but a double-Hopf bifurcation. Indeed, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
we have two pairs of purely imaginary eigenvalues, namely
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that the double-Hopf
bifurcation is a codimension-2 bifurcation which means that
generically two parameters must be varied in order for the
bifurcation to occur <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.42"/>. However, symmetries such
as those in the Lorenz-96 model can reduce the codimension of
a bifurcation.</p>
      <p id="d1e8542">In previous work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.43"/> we have introduced an embedding of
the Lorenz-96 model in a<?pagebreak page309?> two-parameter family by adding
a diffusion-like term multiplied by an additional parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M387" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Note that by setting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we retrieve the original Lorenz-96 model
in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). Since the Jacobian matrix of
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>) is again a circulant matrix we can use
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) to determine its eigenvalues:

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M389" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E15"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Also note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains an equilibrium
solution of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>) for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Hopf
bifurcations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> described in Theorem 1 now occur along
the lines

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M393" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        and the intersection of two such lines leads to a double-Hopf
bifurcation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e8963">Bifurcation diagram of the two-parameter system (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>) in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A double-Hopf bifurcation point is located at the point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the intersection of two Hopf bifurcation lines. From
this codimension-2 point two Neĭmark-Sacker bifurcation curves emanate
which bound a lobe-shaped region in which two periodic attractors coexist.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f08.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e9033"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coordinates of double-Hopf points as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Only those double-Hopf points which destabilize the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown. For large values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the double-Hopf bifurcations are close to
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane, which means that these points are likely to affect the dynamics of the Lorenz-96 model for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f09.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e9109">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> shows a local bifurcation diagram of the
two-parameter Lorenz-96 model in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which
was numerically computed using MATCONT
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.44"/>. A double-Hopf point is located at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is indeed implied by Theorem 1. The normal form of
a double-Hopf bifurcation depends on the values of two
coefficients which determine the unfolding of the bifurcation. In
total, there are 11 different bifurcation scenarios to
consider. The normal form computation of the double-Hopf
bifurcation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.45"/> shows
that the unfolding of this particular case is of “type I in the
simple case” as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.46"/>. This means that
from the double-Hopf point only two curves of
Neĭmark-Sacker
bifurcations emanate. In discrete-time dynamical systems,
a Neĭmark-Sacker bifurcation is the birth of a closed
invariant curve when a fixed point changes stability through
a pair of complex eigenvalues crossing the unit circle in the
complex plane. From a continuous-time system, such as
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>), we can construct a discrete-time
dynamical system by defining a Poincaré return map of a periodic
orbit, in which case a Neĭmark-Sacker bifurcation refers to
the birth of an invariant two-dimensional torus when the periodic
orbit changes stability by a pair of Floquet multipliers crossing
the unit circle in the complex plane.</p>
      <p id="d1e9222">In order to explain the dynamics in a neighborhood around the
double-Hopf point, we now use Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> to describe the
successive bifurcations that occur for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixed and
increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes
unstable through a supercritical Hopf bifurcation (the blue line
given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a stable periodic orbit with wave number 2
is born. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the now unstable equilibrium undergoes
a second Hopf bifurcation (the red line given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and an unstable periodic orbit with wave number
3 is born. The latter periodic orbit becomes stable at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through a subcritical Neĭmark-Sacker
bifurcation (orange curve) and an unstable two-dimensional invariant
torus is born. Hence, for parameter values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> two stable
waves with wave numbers 2 and 3 coexist until one of these waves
becomes unstable in a bifurcation. For all fixed values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the same bifurcation scenario occurs, but the values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are different. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the roles of the two Hopf
bifurcations and periodic orbits have to be interchanged.</p>
      <p id="d1e9390">The scenario described above shows how the presence of two
subcritical Neĭmark-Sacker bifurcations emanating from
a double-Hopf bifurcation determines a region of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane
in which two stable periodic orbits coexist with an unstable
two-dimensional invariant torus. We will refer to this region as the
“multi-stability lobe”. The scenario described above is not
limited to the special case of the Lorenz-96 model, but occurs
near a double-Hopf bifurcation of type I in any dynamical system
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.47"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page310?><p id="d1e9412">Double-Hopf bifurcations are abundant in the two-parameter Lorenz-96
model of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>). The lines described in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E16"/>) have a different slope for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and hence they mutually intersect each
other. This implies that the number of double-Hopf points in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane grows quadratically with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, see Appendix
<xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.SS3"/>. However, not all these points will have an
influence on the dynamics: if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is already unstable,
then any dynamical object born through the double-Hopf bifurcation
will also be unstable. In what follows, we only consider the
double-Hopf bifurcations through which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can change from
stable to unstable. We can find such points as follows. Starting
from the line in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E16"/>) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
defined by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>), we first compute double-Hopf
points by computing the intersections with all other lines. From
these intersections we select those that satisfy the condition
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e9577">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coordinates of these
double-Hopf points as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Clearly, for large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
there exist double-Hopf points which are very close to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, which suggests that the multi-stability lobe that
emanates from such points can intersect the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis and hence
influence the dynamics of the original Lorenz-96 model for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows that for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
there are always two double-Hopf points by which
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can change from stable to unstable. It is then
possible that two multi-stability lobes intersect each other, which
leads to a region in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane in which at least three
stable waves coexist.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p id="d1e9674">Continuation of periodic orbits for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The period of the orbit is plotted as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Stable (resp. unstable) orbits are indicated by solid (resp. dashed) lines. Circles denote Neĭmark-Sacker bifurcations and triangles denote period doubling bifurcations.
The Hopf bifurcations generating the waves with wave numbers 8, 9, and 7 occur at respectively <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.894</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.902</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.959</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Clearly, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> three stable periodic orbits coexist.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f10.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p id="d1e9769">As Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> three stable periodic orbits coexist.
The Hopf bifurcations generating the waves with wave numbers 13, 12, and 14 occur at respectively <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.891</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.894</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.923</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f11.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p id="d1e9847">As Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> three stable periodic orbits coexist.
The Hopf bifurcations generating the waves with wave numbers 17, 16, and 18 occur at respectively <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.889</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.894</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.902</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/301/2018/npg-25-301-2018-f12.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e9923">Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> show bifurcation
diagrams of three periodic orbits as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For each periodic orbit the continuation is
started from a Hopf bifurcation of the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is unstable, then so will be the periodic
orbit. However, when the boundary of a multi-stability lobe is
crossed, a Neĭmark-Sacker bifurcation occurs, by which
a periodic orbit can gain stability. For specific intervals of the
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, three stable periodic orbits coexist. Since
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows that for large values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the
double-Hopf bifurcations are close to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, we expect that
the coexistence of three or more stable waves is typical for the
Lorenz-96 model.</p>
      <p id="d1e10015">The double-Hopf bifurcation has been reported in many works on
fluid dynamical models. A few examples are baroclinic flows
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.48"/>, rotating cylinder flows
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.49"/>, Poiseuille flows
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.50"/>, rotating annulus flows
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.51"/>, and quasi-geostrophic flows
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.52"/>. In all of these examples, the coexistence
of multiple waves is reported, where the nature of these waves
depends on the specific model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <?pagebreak page311?><p id="d1e10040">In this paper we have studied spatiotemporal properties of
waves in the Lorenz-96 model and their dependence on the
dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the first bifurcation of the
equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is either a supercritical
Hopf or a double-Hopf bifurcation and the periodic attractor
born at the Hopf bifurcation represents a traveling wave. The
spatial wave number is determined by the index of the
eigenpair that crosses the imaginary axis and increases
linearly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the period tends to a finite limit as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> odd, the first
bifurcation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always a supercritical Hopf
bifurcation and the periodic attractor that appears after the
bifurcation is again a traveling wave. In this case the wave
number equals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the period is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e10175">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> even and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the first bifurcation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a pitchfork bifurcation which occurs at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and leads to two stable equilibria. If
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for some <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then each of these
equilibria undergoes a Hopf bifurcation which leads to the
coexistence of two stationary waves. The role of the pitchfork
bifurcation is to change the mean flow which in turn changes
the propagation of the wave. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for some
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then two pitchfork bifurcations
take place at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before a Hopf
bifurcation occurs, which leads to the coexistence of four
stationary waves.</p>
      <p id="d1e10315">The occurrence of pitchfork bifurcations before the Hopf
bifurcation leads to multi-stability, i.e., the coexistence of
different waves for the same parameter settings. A second
scenario that leads to multi-stability is via the double-Hopf
bifurcation. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loses
stability through a double-Hopf bifurcation. By adding
a second parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the Lorenz-96 model we have studied
the unfolding of this codimension-2 bifurcation. Two
Neĭmark-Sacker bifurcation curves emanating from the
double-Hopf point bound a lobe-shaped region in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane in which two stable traveling waves with
different wave numbers coexist. For dimensions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we find
double-Hopf bifurcations near the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, which can
create two multi-stability lobes intersecting each other, and
in turn this can lead to the coexistence of three
stable waves coexisting for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a range of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Hence, adding a parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the Lorenz-96
model helps to explain the dynamics, which is observed in the
original model for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e10422">Our results provide a coherent overview of the spatiotemporal
properties of the Lorenz-96 model for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since the Lorenz-96 model is often used as
a model for testing purposes, our results can be used to
select the most appropriate values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for
a particular application. The periodic attractors representing
traveling or stationary waves can bifurcate into chaotic
attractors representing irregular versions of these waves, and
their spatiotemporal properties are inherited from the
periodic attractor (see for example Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) and
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. This means that our results on the
spatiotemporal properties of waves apply to broader parameter
ranges of the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> than just in a small neighborhood
of the Hopf bifurcation.</p>
      <p id="d1e10476">The results presented in this paper also illustrate another
important point: both qualitative and quantitative aspects of
the dynamics of the Lorenz-96 model depend on the parity of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This phenomenon also manifests itself in discretized
partial differential equations. For example, for
discretizations of Burgers' equation, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.53"/> observed
that for odd degrees of freedom the dynamics were confined to
an invariant subspace, whereas for even degrees of freedom
this was not the case. For the Lorenz-96 model the parity of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> also determines the possible symmetries of the model. We
will investigate these symmetries and their consequences on
bifurcation sequences using techniques from equivariant
bifurcation theory in forthcoming work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.54"/>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability">

      <p id="d1e10503">The scripts used for continuation with AUTO-07p are available upon request from Alef Sterk.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<?pagebreak page312?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title/>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Bounds on the wave number for $F>0$}?><title>Bounds on the wave number for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e10531">First note that for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the exception of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
there exists at least one integer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Indeed, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> this follows by simply
taking <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> this follows by taking
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it follows from the fact that the interval
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a width larger than 1 and hence
must contain an integer. We now claim that these observations also
imply that
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M511" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mtext>arg max</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∪</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
maximized for some integer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Asymptotic period for odd $n$ and $F<0$}?><title>Asymptotic period for odd <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e11032">Using L'Hospital's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rule gives

                <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M523" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Writing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies

                <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex6"><mml:math id="M525" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">lim⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which in particular implies that

                <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex7"><mml:math id="M526" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <title>The number of Hopf and double-Hopf bifurcations</title>
      <p id="d1e11373">The number of Hopf bifurcations of the equilibrium
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a given dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is exactly equal
to the number of conjugate eigenvalue pairs which satisfy
Theorem 1:

                <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M529" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⌈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⌉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⌈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⌉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where we need the ceiling function if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is odd. Note that if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is a multiple of 3, then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which does give a proper complex conjugate pair crossing the
imaginary axis and hence the number of Hopf bifurcations has to be
decreased by 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e11552">For the two-parameter system we can count the number of double-Hopf
bifurcations by counting the intersections of the lines in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E16"/>). Since all the lines have a different
slope, the number of such intersections is given by

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M533" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HH</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="cases" columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>⌈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⌉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>⌈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⌉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>⌈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⌉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>⌈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⌉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            which shows that the number of double-Hopf points grows quadratically with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e11747">DvK performed the research on traveling waves and investigated the dynamics near the double-Hopf bifurcations.
AS performed the research on stationary waves and prepared the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e11753">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e11759">The authors would like to thank the
reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions that have helped to improve this paper.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Amit Apte<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Jochen Broecker and one anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Avila et al.(2006)Avila, Meseguer, and Marqués</label><mixed-citation>Avila, M., Meseguer, A., and Marqués, F.: Double Hopf bifurcation in corotating spiral Poiseuille flow, Phys. Fluids, 18, 064101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2204967" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.2204967</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Basnarkov and Kocarev(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Basnarkov, L. and Kocarev, L.: Forecast improvement in Lorenz 96 system, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 19, 569–575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-19-569-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-19-569-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Basto et al.(2006)Basto, Semiao, and Calheiros</label><mixed-citation>
Basto, M., Semiao, V., and Calheiros, F.: Dynamics in spectral solutions of Burgers equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 205, 296–304, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Beyn et al.(2002)Beyn, Champneys, Doedel, Kuznetsov, Govaerts, and Sandstede</label><mixed-citation>
Beyn, W., Champneys, A., Doedel, E., Kuznetsov, Y., Govaerts, W., and
Sandstede, B.: Numerical continuation, and computation of normal
forms, in: Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Volume 2, edited by:
Fiedler, B., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 149–219, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Danforth and Yorke(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Danforth, C. and Yorke, J.: Making Forecasts for Chaotic Physical Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 144102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.144102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.144102</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>De Leeuw et al.(2017)De Leeuw, Dubinkina, Frank, Steyer, Tu, and Van Vleck</label><mixed-citation>
De Leeuw, B., Dubinkina, S., Frank, J., Steyer, A., Tu, X., and Van Vleck, E.: Projected shadowing-based data assimilation, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1707.09264, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Dhooge et al.(2011)Dhooge, Govaerts, Kuznetsov, Meijer, Mestrom, Riet, and Sautois</label><mixed-citation>
Dhooge, A., Govaerts, W., Kuznetsov, Y., Meijer, H., Mestrom, W.,
Riet, A., and Sautois, B.: MATCONT and CL_MATCONT: Continuation
toolboxes in MATLAB, Gent University and Utrecht University,
Gent, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Dieci et al.(2011)Dieci, Jolly, and Van Vleck</label><mixed-citation>Dieci, L., Jolly, M., and Van Vleck, E.: Numerical techniques for approximating Lyapunov exponents and their implementation,
J. Comput. Nonlin. Dyn., 6, 011003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1115/1.4002088</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Dijkstra(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Dijkstra, H.: Nonlinear physical oceanography: a dynamical systems
approach to the large scale ocean circulation and El Niño, 2nd
Edn. Springer, Dordrecht, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Dijkstra et al.(2008)Dijkstra, Frankcombe, and Von der Heydt</label><mixed-citation>
Dijkstra, H., Frankcombe, L., and Von der Heydt, A.: A stochastic dynamical systems view of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 366, 2545–2560, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Doedel and Oldeman(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Doedel, E. and Oldeman, B.: AUTO–07p: continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Feudel(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Feudel, U.: Complex dynamics in multistable systems, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 18, 1607–1626, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Frank et al.(2014)Frank, Mitchell, Dodds, and Danforth</label><mixed-citation>Frank, M., Mitchell, L., Dodds, P., and Danforth, C.: Standing swells surveyed showing surprisingly stable solutions for the Lorenz '96 model,
Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 24, 1430027, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127414300274" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S0218127414300274</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Frankcombe et al.(2009)Frankcombe, Dijkstra, and Von der Heydt</label><mixed-citation>
Frankcombe, L., Dijkstra, H., and Von der Heydt, A.: Noise induced multidecadal variability in the North Atlantic: excitation of normal modes, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 220–233, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Gallavotti and Lucarini(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Gallavotti, G. and Lucarini, V.: Equivalence of non-equilibrium ensembles and representation of friction in turbulent flows: the Lorenz 96 model, J. Stat. Phys., 156, 1027–1065, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Gray(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Gray, R.: Toeplitz and circulant matrices: a review, Foundations and Trends
in Communications and Information Theory, 2, 155–239, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Hallerberg et al.(2010)Hallerberg, Pazó, López, and Rodríguez</label><mixed-citation>Hallerberg, S., Pazó, D., López, J., and Rodríguez, M.:
Logarithmic bred vectors in spatiotemporal chaos: structure and
growth, Phys. Rev. E, 81, 066204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.066204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.81.066204</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Hansen and Smith(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, J. and Smith, L.: The role of operational constraints in selecting supplementary observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2859–2871, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Haven et al.(2005)Haven, Majda, and Abramov</label><mixed-citation>
Haven, K., Majda, A., and Abramov, R.: Quantifying predictability through information theory: small sample estimation in a non-Gaussian framework, J. Comput. Phys., 206, 334–362, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Holland et al.(2012)Holland, Vitolo, Rabassa, Sterk, and Broer</label><mixed-citation>
Holland, M., Vitolo, R., Rabassa, P., Sterk, A., and Broer, H.: Extreme value laws in dynamical systems under physical observables, Physica D, 241, 497–513, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Holland et al.(2016)Holland, Rabassa, and Sterk</label><mixed-citation>
Holland, M., Rabassa, P., and Sterk, A.: Quantitative recurrence statistics and convergence to an extreme value distribution for non-uniformly hyperbolic dynamical systems, Nonlinearity, 29, 2355–2394, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Karimi and Paul(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Karimi, A. and Paul, M.: Extensive chaos in the Lorenz-96 model, Chaos, 20, 043105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3496397" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.3496397</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Kuznetsov(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Kuznetsov, Y.: Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, vol. 112 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, 3rd edn., Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Lewis(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, G.: Mixed-mode solutions in an air-filled differentially heated rotating annulus, Physica D, 239, 1843–1854, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Lewis and Nagata(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, G. and Nagata, W.: Double Hopf bifurcations in the differentially heated rotating annulus, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63, 1029–1055, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Lewis and Nagata(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, G. and Nagata, W.: Double Hopf bifurcations in the quasigeostrophic potential vorticity equations, Dynam. Cont. Dis. Ser. B, 12, 783–807, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Lorenz(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Lorenz(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E.: Designing chaotic models, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1574–1587, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Lorenz and Emanuel(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E. and Emanuel, K.: Optimal sites for supplementary weather observations: simulations with a small model, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 399–414, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Lorenz(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E. N.: Predictability – A problem partly solved, in:
Predictability of Weather and Climate, edited by: Palmer, T. N. and
Hagedorn, R., Cambridge University Press,  Cambridge, 40–58,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Lucarini and Sarno(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Lucarini, V. and Sarno, S.: A statistical mechanical approach for the computation of the climatic response to general forcings, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 18, 7–28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-7-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-18-7-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page314?><ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Marqués et al.(2002)Marqués, Lopez, and Shen</label><mixed-citation>
Marqués, F., Lopez, J., and Shen, J.: Mode interactions in an enclosed swirling flow: a double Hopf bifurcation between azimuthal wavenumbers 0 and 2, J. Fluid Mech., 455, 263–281, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Marqués et al.(2003)Marqués, Gelfgat, and López</label><mixed-citation>Marqués, F., Gelfgat, A., and López, J.: Tangent double Hopf bifurcation in a differentially rotating cylinder flow,
Phys. Rev. E, 68, 016310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.016310" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.68.016310</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Moroz and Holmes(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Moroz, I. and Holmes, P.: Double Hopf bifurcation and quasi-periodic flow in a model for baroclinic instability, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 3147–3160, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Orrell(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Orrell, D.: Role of the metric in forecast error growth: how chaotic is the weather?, Tellus A, 54, 350–362, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Orrell and Smith(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Orrell, D. and Smith, L.: Visualising bifurcations in high dimensional systems: The spectral bifurcation diagram, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 13, 3015–3027, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Orrell et al.(2001)Orrell, Smith, Barkmeijer, and Palmer</label><mixed-citation>Orrell, D., Smith, L., Barkmeijer, J., and Palmer, T. N.: Model error in weather forecasting, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 8, 357–371, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-8-357-2001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-8-357-2001</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Ott et al.(2004)Ott, Hunt, Szunyogh, Zimin, Kostelich, Corazza, Kalnay, Patil, and Yorke</label><mixed-citation>
Ott, E., Hunt, B., Szunyogh, I., Zimin, A., Kostelich, E., Corazza, M., Kalnay, E., Patil, D., and Yorke, J.: A local ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation, Tellus A, 56, 415–428, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Pazó et al.(2008)Pazó, Szendro, López, and Rodríguez</label><mixed-citation>
Pazó, D., Szendro, I., López, J., and Rodríguez, M.: Structure
of characteristic Lyapunov vectors in spatiotemporal chaos,
Phys. Rev. E, 78, 016209, 1–9, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Read et al.(1992)Read, Bel, Johnson, and Small</label><mixed-citation>
Read, P., Bel, M., Johnson, D., and Small, R.: Quasi-periodic and chaotic flow regimes in a thermally driven, rotating fluid annulus, J. Fluid Mech., 238, 599–632, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Simonnet et al.(2003a)Simonnet, Ghil, Ide, Temam, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Simonnet, E., Ghil, M., Ide, K., Temam, R., and Wang, S.: Low-frequency variability in shallow-water models of the wind-driven ocean circulation. Part I: steady-state solution, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 712–728, 2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Simonnet et al.(2003b)Simonnet, Ghil, Ide, Temam, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Simonnet, E., Ghil, M., Ide, K., Temam, R., and Wang, S.: Low-frequency variability in shallow-water models of the wind-driven ocean circulation. Part II: time-dependent solutions, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 729–752, 2003b.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Stappers and Barkmeijer(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Stappers, R. and Barkmeijer, J.: Optimal linearization trajectories for tangent linear models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 170–184, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Sterk and Van Kekem(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Sterk, A. and Van Kekem, D.: Predictability of extreme waves in the Lorenz-96 model near intermittency and quasi-periodicity,
Complexity, 2017, 9419024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9419024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2017/9419024</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Sterk et al.(2010)Sterk, Vitolo, Broer, Simó, and Dijkstra</label><mixed-citation>
Sterk, A., Vitolo, R., Broer, H., Simó, C., and Dijkstra, H.: New nonlinear mechanisms of midlatitude atmospheric low-frequency variability, Physica D, 239, 702–718, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Sterk et al.(2012)Sterk, Holland, Rabassa, Broer, and Vitolo</label><mixed-citation>Sterk, A. E., Holland, M. P., Rabassa, P., Broer, H. W., and Vitolo, R.: Predictability of extreme values in geophysical models, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 19, 529–539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-19-529-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-19-529-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Te Raa and Dijkstra(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Te Raa, L. and Dijkstra, H.: Instability of the thermohaline ocean circulation on interdecadal timescales, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 138–160, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Tian et al.(2001)Tian, Weeks, Ide, Urbach, Baroud, Ghil, and Swinney</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, Y., Weeks, E., Ide, K., Urbach, J., Baroud, C., Ghil, M., and Swinney, H.: Experimental and numerical studies of an eastward jet over topography, J. Fluid Mech., 438, 129–157, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Trevisan and Palatella(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Trevisan, A. and Palatella, L.: On the Kalman Filter error covariance collapse into the unstable subspace, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 18, 243–250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-243-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-18-243-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Van Kekem and Sterk(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Kekem, D. and Sterk, A.: Symmetries in the Lorenz-96 model, arXiv:1712.05730, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Van Kekem and Sterk(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Kekem, D. and Sterk, A.: Travelling waves and their bifurcations in the Lorenz-96 model, Physica D, 367, 38–60, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Wolfram Research, Inc.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Wolfram Research, Inc.: Mathematica, Version 11.0.1.0, Champaign, IL, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Wave propagation in the Lorenz-96 model</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>In this paper we study the spatiotemporal properties of waves in the
Lorenz-96 model and their dependence on the dimension parameter <i>n</i>
and the forcing parameter <i>F</i>. For <i>F</i> &gt; 0 the first bifurcation is
either a supercritical Hopf or a double-Hopf bifurcation and the
periodic attractor born at these bifurcations represents a traveling
wave. Its spatial wave number increases linearly with <i>n</i>, but its
period tends to a finite limit as <i>n</i> → ∞. For <i>F</i> &lt; 0 and odd
<i>n</i>, the first bifurcation is again a supercritical Hopf bifurcation,
but in this case the period of the traveling wave also grows
linearly with <i>n</i>. For <i>F</i> &lt; 0 and even <i>n</i>, however, a Hopf
bifurcation is preceded by either one or two pitchfork bifurcations,
where the number of the latter bifurcations depends on whether <i>n</i>
has remainder 2 or 0 upon division by 4. This bifurcation sequence
leads to stationary waves and their spatiotemporal properties also
depend on the remainder after dividing <i>n</i> by 4. Finally, we explain
how the double-Hopf bifurcation can generate two or more stable
waves with different spatiotemporal properties that coexist for the
same parameter values <i>n</i> and <i>F</i>.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Avila et al.(2006)Avila, Meseguer, and Marqués</label><mixed-citation>
Avila, M., Meseguer, A., and Marqués, F.: Double Hopf bifurcation in corotating spiral Poiseuille flow, Phys. Fluids, 18, 064101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2204967" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2204967</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Basnarkov and Kocarev(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Basnarkov, L. and Kocarev, L.: Forecast improvement in Lorenz 96 system, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 19, 569–575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-19-569-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-19-569-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Basto et al.(2006)Basto, Semiao, and Calheiros</label><mixed-citation>
Basto, M., Semiao, V., and Calheiros, F.: Dynamics in spectral solutions of Burgers equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 205, 296–304, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Beyn et al.(2002)Beyn, Champneys, Doedel, Kuznetsov, Govaerts, and Sandstede</label><mixed-citation>
Beyn, W., Champneys, A., Doedel, E., Kuznetsov, Y., Govaerts, W., and
Sandstede, B.: Numerical continuation, and computation of normal
forms, in: Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Volume 2, edited by:
Fiedler, B., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 149–219, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Danforth and Yorke(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Danforth, C. and Yorke, J.: Making Forecasts for Chaotic Physical Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 144102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.144102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.144102</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>De Leeuw et al.(2017)De Leeuw, Dubinkina, Frank, Steyer, Tu, and Van Vleck</label><mixed-citation>
De Leeuw, B., Dubinkina, S., Frank, J., Steyer, A., Tu, X., and Van Vleck, E.: Projected shadowing-based data assimilation, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1707.09264, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Dhooge et al.(2011)Dhooge, Govaerts, Kuznetsov, Meijer, Mestrom, Riet, and Sautois</label><mixed-citation>
Dhooge, A., Govaerts, W., Kuznetsov, Y., Meijer, H., Mestrom, W.,
Riet, A., and Sautois, B.: MATCONT and CL_MATCONT: Continuation
toolboxes in MATLAB, Gent University and Utrecht University,
Gent, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Dieci et al.(2011)Dieci, Jolly, and Van Vleck</label><mixed-citation>
Dieci, L., Jolly, M., and Van Vleck, E.: Numerical techniques for approximating Lyapunov exponents and their implementation,
J. Comput. Nonlin. Dyn., 6, 011003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002088" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002088</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Dijkstra(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Dijkstra, H.: Nonlinear physical oceanography: a dynamical systems
approach to the large scale ocean circulation and El Niño, 2nd
Edn. Springer, Dordrecht, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Dijkstra et al.(2008)Dijkstra, Frankcombe, and Von der Heydt</label><mixed-citation>
Dijkstra, H., Frankcombe, L., and Von der Heydt, A.: A stochastic dynamical systems view of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 366, 2545–2560, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Doedel and Oldeman(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Doedel, E. and Oldeman, B.: AUTO–07p: continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Feudel(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Feudel, U.: Complex dynamics in multistable systems, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 18, 1607–1626, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Frank et al.(2014)Frank, Mitchell, Dodds, and Danforth</label><mixed-citation>
Frank, M., Mitchell, L., Dodds, P., and Danforth, C.: Standing swells surveyed showing surprisingly stable solutions for the Lorenz '96 model,
Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 24, 1430027, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127414300274" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127414300274</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Frankcombe et al.(2009)Frankcombe, Dijkstra, and Von der Heydt</label><mixed-citation>
Frankcombe, L., Dijkstra, H., and Von der Heydt, A.: Noise induced multidecadal variability in the North Atlantic: excitation of normal modes, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 220–233, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Gallavotti and Lucarini(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Gallavotti, G. and Lucarini, V.: Equivalence of non-equilibrium ensembles and representation of friction in turbulent flows: the Lorenz 96 model, J. Stat. Phys., 156, 1027–1065, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Gray(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Gray, R.: Toeplitz and circulant matrices: a review, Foundations and Trends
in Communications and Information Theory, 2, 155–239, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Hallerberg et al.(2010)Hallerberg, Pazó, López, and Rodríguez</label><mixed-citation>
Hallerberg, S., Pazó, D., López, J., and Rodríguez, M.:
Logarithmic bred vectors in spatiotemporal chaos: structure and
growth, Phys. Rev. E, 81, 066204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.066204" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.066204</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Hansen and Smith(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, J. and Smith, L.: The role of operational constraints in selecting supplementary observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2859–2871, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Haven et al.(2005)Haven, Majda, and Abramov</label><mixed-citation>
Haven, K., Majda, A., and Abramov, R.: Quantifying predictability through information theory: small sample estimation in a non-Gaussian framework, J. Comput. Phys., 206, 334–362, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Holland et al.(2012)Holland, Vitolo, Rabassa, Sterk, and Broer</label><mixed-citation>
Holland, M., Vitolo, R., Rabassa, P., Sterk, A., and Broer, H.: Extreme value laws in dynamical systems under physical observables, Physica D, 241, 497–513, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Holland et al.(2016)Holland, Rabassa, and Sterk</label><mixed-citation>
Holland, M., Rabassa, P., and Sterk, A.: Quantitative recurrence statistics and convergence to an extreme value distribution for non-uniformly hyperbolic dynamical systems, Nonlinearity, 29, 2355–2394, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Karimi and Paul(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Karimi, A. and Paul, M.: Extensive chaos in the Lorenz-96 model, Chaos, 20, 043105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3496397" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3496397</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Kuznetsov(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Kuznetsov, Y.: Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, vol. 112 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, 3rd edn., Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Lewis(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, G.: Mixed-mode solutions in an air-filled differentially heated rotating annulus, Physica D, 239, 1843–1854, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Lewis and Nagata(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, G. and Nagata, W.: Double Hopf bifurcations in the differentially heated rotating annulus, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63, 1029–1055, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Lewis and Nagata(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, G. and Nagata, W.: Double Hopf bifurcations in the quasigeostrophic potential vorticity equations, Dynam. Cont. Dis. Ser. B, 12, 783–807, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Lorenz(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Lorenz(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E.: Designing chaotic models, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1574–1587, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Lorenz and Emanuel(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E. and Emanuel, K.: Optimal sites for supplementary weather observations: simulations with a small model, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 399–414, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Lorenz(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E. N.: Predictability – A problem partly solved, in:
Predictability of Weather and Climate, edited by: Palmer, T. N. and
Hagedorn, R., Cambridge University Press,  Cambridge, 40–58,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Lucarini and Sarno(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lucarini, V. and Sarno, S.: A statistical mechanical approach for the computation of the climatic response to general forcings, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 18, 7–28, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-7-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-7-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Marqués et al.(2002)Marqués, Lopez, and Shen</label><mixed-citation>
Marqués, F., Lopez, J., and Shen, J.: Mode interactions in an enclosed swirling flow: a double Hopf bifurcation between azimuthal wavenumbers 0 and 2, J. Fluid Mech., 455, 263–281, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Marqués et al.(2003)Marqués, Gelfgat, and López</label><mixed-citation>
Marqués, F., Gelfgat, A., and López, J.: Tangent double Hopf bifurcation in a differentially rotating cylinder flow,
Phys. Rev. E, 68, 016310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.016310" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.016310</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Moroz and Holmes(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Moroz, I. and Holmes, P.: Double Hopf bifurcation and quasi-periodic flow in a model for baroclinic instability, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 3147–3160, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Orrell(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Orrell, D.: Role of the metric in forecast error growth: how chaotic is the weather?, Tellus A, 54, 350–362, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Orrell and Smith(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Orrell, D. and Smith, L.: Visualising bifurcations in high dimensional systems: The spectral bifurcation diagram, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 13, 3015–3027, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Orrell et al.(2001)Orrell, Smith, Barkmeijer, and Palmer</label><mixed-citation>
Orrell, D., Smith, L., Barkmeijer, J., and Palmer, T. N.: Model error in weather forecasting, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 8, 357–371, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-8-357-2001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-8-357-2001</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Ott et al.(2004)Ott, Hunt, Szunyogh, Zimin, Kostelich, Corazza, Kalnay, Patil, and Yorke</label><mixed-citation>
Ott, E., Hunt, B., Szunyogh, I., Zimin, A., Kostelich, E., Corazza, M., Kalnay, E., Patil, D., and Yorke, J.: A local ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation, Tellus A, 56, 415–428, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Pazó et al.(2008)Pazó, Szendro, López, and Rodríguez</label><mixed-citation>
Pazó, D., Szendro, I., López, J., and Rodríguez, M.: Structure
of characteristic Lyapunov vectors in spatiotemporal chaos,
Phys. Rev. E, 78, 016209, 1–9, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Read et al.(1992)Read, Bel, Johnson, and Small</label><mixed-citation>
Read, P., Bel, M., Johnson, D., and Small, R.: Quasi-periodic and chaotic flow regimes in a thermally driven, rotating fluid annulus, J. Fluid Mech., 238, 599–632, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Simonnet et al.(2003a)Simonnet, Ghil, Ide, Temam, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Simonnet, E., Ghil, M., Ide, K., Temam, R., and Wang, S.: Low-frequency variability in shallow-water models of the wind-driven ocean circulation. Part I: steady-state solution, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 712–728, 2003a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Simonnet et al.(2003b)Simonnet, Ghil, Ide, Temam, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Simonnet, E., Ghil, M., Ide, K., Temam, R., and Wang, S.: Low-frequency variability in shallow-water models of the wind-driven ocean circulation. Part II: time-dependent solutions, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 729–752, 2003b.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Stappers and Barkmeijer(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Stappers, R. and Barkmeijer, J.: Optimal linearization trajectories for tangent linear models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 170–184, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Sterk and Van Kekem(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Sterk, A. and Van Kekem, D.: Predictability of extreme waves in the Lorenz-96 model near intermittency and quasi-periodicity,
Complexity, 2017, 9419024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9419024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9419024</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Sterk et al.(2010)Sterk, Vitolo, Broer, Simó, and Dijkstra</label><mixed-citation>
Sterk, A., Vitolo, R., Broer, H., Simó, C., and Dijkstra, H.: New nonlinear mechanisms of midlatitude atmospheric low-frequency variability, Physica D, 239, 702–718, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Sterk et al.(2012)Sterk, Holland, Rabassa, Broer, and Vitolo</label><mixed-citation>
Sterk, A. E., Holland, M. P., Rabassa, P., Broer, H. W., and Vitolo, R.: Predictability of extreme values in geophysical models, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 19, 529–539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-19-529-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-19-529-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Te Raa and Dijkstra(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Te Raa, L. and Dijkstra, H.: Instability of the thermohaline ocean circulation on interdecadal timescales, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 138–160, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Tian et al.(2001)Tian, Weeks, Ide, Urbach, Baroud, Ghil, and Swinney</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, Y., Weeks, E., Ide, K., Urbach, J., Baroud, C., Ghil, M., and Swinney, H.: Experimental and numerical studies of an eastward jet over topography, J. Fluid Mech., 438, 129–157, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Trevisan and Palatella(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Trevisan, A. and Palatella, L.: On the Kalman Filter error covariance collapse into the unstable subspace, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 18, 243–250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-243-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-243-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Van Kekem and Sterk(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Kekem, D. and Sterk, A.: Symmetries in the Lorenz-96 model, arXiv:1712.05730, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Van Kekem and Sterk(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Kekem, D. and Sterk, A.: Travelling waves and their bifurcations in the Lorenz-96 model, Physica D, 367, 38–60, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Wolfram Research, Inc.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Wolfram Research, Inc.: Mathematica, Version 11.0.1.0, Champaign, IL, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
