<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?><?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7946</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-25-19-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>On the intrinsic timescales of temporal variability in measurements of the surface solar radiation</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Intrinsic timescales of surface solar radiation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Bengulescu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bengulescu</surname><given-names>Marc</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Blanc</surname><given-names>Philippe</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6345-0004</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wald</surname><given-names>Lucien</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2916-2391</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, Centre for Observation,
Impacts,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Energy CS 10207 – 06904 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">P. Blanc (philippe.blanc@mines-paristech.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>26</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>19</fpage><lpage>37</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>October</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018.html">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e97">This study is concerned with the intrinsic temporal scales of
the variability in the surface solar irradiance (SSI). The data consist of
decennial time series of daily means of the SSI obtained from high-quality
measurements of the broadband solar radiation impinging on a horizontal plane
at ground level, issued from different Baseline Surface Radiation Network
(BSRN) ground stations around the world. First, embedded oscillations sorted
in terms of increasing timescales of the data are extracted by empirical mode
decomposition (EMD). Next, Hilbert spectral analysis is applied to obtain an
amplitude-modulation–frequency-modulation (AM–FM) representation of the
data. The time-varying nature of the characteristic timescales of
variability, along with the variations in the signal intensity, are thus
revealed. A novel, adaptive null hypothesis based on the general statistical
characteristics of noise is employed in order to discriminate between the
different features of the data, those that have a deterministic origin and
those being realizations of various stochastic processes. The data have a
significant spectral peak corresponding to the yearly variability cycle and
feature quasi-stochastic high-frequency variability components, irrespective
of the geographical location or of the local climate. Moreover, the amplitude
of this latter feature is shown to be modulated by variations in the yearly
cycle, which is indicative of nonlinear multiplicative cross-scale couplings.
The study has possible implications on the modeling and the forecast of the
surface solar radiation, by clearly discriminating the deterministic from the
quasi-stochastic character of the data, at different local timescales.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e109">The power of the electromagnetic radiation from the Sun that
reaches the surface of the Earth is estimated at around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W. Thus,
solar irradiance is the main driver behind the weather and climate systems on
the planet. As such, the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) program has
identified the surface solar irradiance (SSI) as an Essential Climate
Variable that helps understand climate evolution and guides adaptation and
mitigation efforts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.1"/>. Long-term time series of the SSI are
instrumental in engineering and finance by enabling, for example, the optimal
determination of geographical sites for solar power plants and guiding
investment decisions, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.2"/>. Thus,
better knowledge of the SSI and of its temporal variability, as recorded in
long-term time series, is one of the intents of this work.</p>
      <p id="d1e129">Temporally, the SSI exhibits a very wide dynamic range. Its short-term
timescales of variability, such as clouds briefly obscuring the Sun, are
observed over seconds. At the opposite scale, thousands or even millions of
years are to be used, as related to the change of the orbital parameters of
the Earth–Sun system or to stellar evolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.3"/>. In spite of
this large span of characteristic scales of temporal variability, most of the
studies dealing with this physical quantity have focused primarily on a few
selected timescales of interest. As such, reports have either dealt with
global averages and long-term trends
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.4"/>, have only scrutinized
the short-term, high-frequency variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.5"/>,
or have focused exclusively on a few intermediate scales
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.6"/>. Although considerably differing in methods,
taken together the previously cited studies add valuable contributions to our
knowledge of the SSI. But is it possible to analyze the variability in the
SSI across multiple timescales in a unitary way?</p>
      <p id="d1e144">To do so, first a decomposition of the time series into uncorrelated
sub-constituents with distinct characteristic timescales should be
preferred. Analysis would then ensue in a like manner for each scale. The
timescales, or characteristic periods of a time series, can be identified
with the inverse of the frequency at which the processes that generate the
data occur. It then follows that methods portraying the changes of the
spectral content of a time series with respect to time are potentially good
candidates. This would enable both the identification of the periodicities
and of the dynamic evolution of the processes generating the data. A general
class of useful signal processing techniques can thus be identified in the
so-called time-frequency distributions that depict the intensity (or energy)
of a signal in the time and the frequency domains simultaneously
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.7"/>. Such methods are commonly employed for geophysical signal
processing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.8"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e153">Another factor to be taken into account is the nonlinear and non-stationary
characteristics of the measured solar radiation data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.9"/>.
Handling such data issued from the nonlinear interaction of physical
processes, often also found under the influence of non-stationary external
forcings, calls for an adaptive data analysis approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.10"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e163">The study at hand will make use of the Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT), an
adaptive, data-driven analysis technique designed specifically for
investigating nonlinear and non-stationary data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.11"/>. The HHT
adaptively decomposes any dataset into basis functions that are derived
solely from the local properties of the time series. A time-frequency-energy
representation of the data is then constructed from these basis functions.
The HHT has seen extensive use in geophysical signal analysis and spectral
estimation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.12"/>.
The HHT has also been previously employed on SSI datasets
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.13"/>. A similar
technique has been independently proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.14"/> for the
analysis of the nonlinear, non-stationary, long-range solar activity. In
this light, the use of the HHT for the study of the temporal variability in
the SSI appears to be appropriate. The inner workings of this data processing
method are detailed in a dedicated subsection.</p>
      <p id="d1e178">Regardless of the methods used, when analyzing data there is always the need
to discriminate between deterministic signals and what are assumed to be
background stochastic realizations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.15"/>. The classical way to
solve this when employing the HHT on geophysical signals, such as the SSI, is
to presume some model for the background power spectrum, against which the
identified features are then compared
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.16"/>. In contrast, the present study
parts with the traditional approach, by adopting a novel, adaptive null
hypothesis introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.17"/> that requires no a priori knowledge of the nature of the
background processes; further discussion thereof will be
presented in due course. A somewhat similar objective can be found in the
work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.18"/>, though their method of discrimination between
stochastic and deterministic components is fundamentally different.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.19"/> also propose a method for discriminating
frequency-dependent stochastic components by empirically estimating their
power law spectral energy distribution and respective confidence bounds.
Approaches for discriminating high-frequency fluctuations from large
timescale modulations are also described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.20"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.21"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e203">At this point, the general outline of our study can be summarized as follows.
We analyze measurements of daily means of SSI at different geographical
locations. We focus on identifying and analyzing the intrinsic modes of the
temporal variability in the SSI, as revealed by the HHT. We also investigate
the physical and statistical significance of these modes. We show that the
HHT is able to discriminate between a deterministic yearly cycle and multiple
high-frequency (quasi-)stochastic components. We also find a non-null,
statistically significant rank correlation between the amplitude envelopes of
the high-frequency scales and the yearly cycle. We then discuss the possible
implications of our findings on the modeling and forecast of the SSI.</p>
      <p id="d1e206">The study is organized as follows. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> discusses
the data sources and the preprocessing. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> the adaptive
data analysis approach is described. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> will present
the results obtained, with the discussion thereof being deferred to
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>. Conclusions and outlook are presented in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>. Code and data availabilities are indicated in the
Code and Data availability sections, respectively. Lastly, acknowledgements
and a bibliographical list conclude the study.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e222">Ground measurement stations listing.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.9}[.9]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Code</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Location<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Latitude<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Longitude<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Climate<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BOU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Boulder</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(US)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.0500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>105.0070</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">BSk</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Carpentras</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(FR)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">44.0830</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.0590</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Csa</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAY</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Payerne</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(CH)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.8150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.9440</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cfb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TAT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tateno</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(JP)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36.0581</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">140.1258</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cfa</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.9}[.9]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e225"><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{2mm}}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Country codes according to ISO 3166-1
alpha-2.<?xmltex \hack{\\ }?>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Positive north for latitude and positive east for longitude, following ISO 19115.<?xmltex \hack{\\ }?>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Köppen–Geiger climate classification according to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.22"/>.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data sources and preprocessing</title>
      <p id="d1e440">The data under scrutiny in this study consist of 10-year time series of daily
means of SSI obtained from high-quality measurements performed at four
different locations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).
The measurement stations are part of the Baseline Surface Radiation Network
(BSRN), a worldwide radiometric network providing accurate readings of the
SSI at 1 min temporal resolution and with an uncertainty requirement at
5 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.23"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e464">The four decennial SSI time series investigated in this study,
spanning 2001 through 2010. From top to bottom: BOU, CAR, PAY, and TAT. Each
point corresponds to a daily mean of SSI. Time markers on the abscissa
indicate the start of the corresponding year.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e473">The four time series for the period 2001–2010 have been quality checked
according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.24"/>. Next, daily means of SSI were then
calculated from these raw time series only if more than 80 % of the data
during daylight were valid. Lastly, any isolated missing daily means were
completed by linear interpolation applied to the daily clearness index,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the ratio between the daily mean of SSI and the
daily mean of the total solar irradiance (TSI) received on a horizontal surface at
the top of atmosphere for the same geographical coordinates.</p>
      <p id="d1e490">Two measuring stations are located in Europe, one in Japan, and one in North
America in order to capture various climatic conditions. Boulder (hereafter
abbreviated as BOU) experiences a midlatitude steppe, cool type of climate
(Köppen–Geiger: BSk), while at Carpentras (abbreviated as CAR) the
climate is a humid subtropical, Mediterranean one (Köppen–Geiger: Csa).
Both sites experience many sunny days during the year. As a rule of thumb,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equal to 0.2–0.3 denotes cloudy, overcast conditions, while
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around 0.7 indicates sunny conditions.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> exhibits the histograms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
four stations. One may observe the high frequencies of the greatest values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BOU and CAR. The median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
equal to 0.63 for both BOU and CAR, which means that half of the days exhibit
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 0.63. The climate in Payerne (PAY) is classified
as a marine west coast, mild climate (Köppen–Geiger: Cfb), and Tateno (TAT) has a
humid subtropical, east coast climate (Köppen–Geiger: Cfa). Compared to
BOU and CAR, PAY and TAT exhibit more uniform histograms, with less days with
cloud-free conditions, and experience more overcast and broken clouds
conditions. The median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is equal to 0.47 for PAY
and 0.51 for TAT. Except for TAT, which is embedded in an urban setting, the
stations are located in rural environments; the local topography for BOU and
TAT is flat with grassy surfaces, while for CAR and PAY the area is hilly
with cultivated surfaces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.25"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e583">Any further reference to seasons and seasonal phenomena shall be understood
as occurring in the Northern Hemisphere since the stations are situated
at boreal latitudes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e588">Histograms of the daily clearness index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
decennial time span in percent frequency. From top to bottom: BOU, CAR,
PAY, and TAT.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Adaptive data analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e614">Ideally, data analysis methods should require that no assumptions be made
about the nature of the scrutinized time series, i.e., neither linearity nor
stationarity should be presumed. This is because the true character of the
underlying processes that have generated the data is usually not known
beforehand. Adaptivity to the analyzed data would also be a sought-after
feature, in the sense of not imposing a set of patterns against which data
would be decomposed, but rather letting the data themselves drive the
decomposition. This latter criterion ensures both that the extracted
components carry physical meaning and that the influence of the mathematical artifacts inherent to the method on the
rendered picture of temporal variability is kept to a minimum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.26"/>.
Since such a decomposition is only determined by the local characteristic
timescales of the data, its appropriateness to nonlinear and non-stationary
time-series analysis is immediate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.27"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>The Hilbert–Huang transform</title>
      <p id="d1e628">The Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT) is an adaptive data analysis technique
built with the previous consideration in mind. It involves two distinct steps –
the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) followed by Hilbert spectral analysis.
In-depth discussion of each step is carried out within the dedicated
subsections that follow.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>The empirical mode decomposition</title>
      <p id="d1e636">The first step of the HHT is the empirical mode decomposition (EMD), an
algorithmic procedure in essence, by which oscillations that present a common
local timescale are iteratively extracted from the data. These oscillatory
components of the data are called intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). An IMF is
any function that satisfies two criteria: (1) its number of extrema and zero
crossings differs at most by one and (2) at any data point the mean value of
its upper and lower envelopes is zero. These two properties ensure that IMFs
have a well-behaved Hilbert transform <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.28"/>. Owing to the
adaptive nature of the EMD, the IMFs represent the basis functions onto which
the data are projected during decomposition. This is in contrast with the
Fourier or wavelet transforms where the basis functions are fixed in advance
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.29"/>. Once all the IMFs have been extracted, all that is left of
the time series is a residue, or trend, which cannot be mathematically
thought of as an oscillation at the span of the data. A sketch of the EMD
algorithm is provided in Algorithm 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e645">Lines 6–12 of the EMD algorithm represent the so-called “sifting loop”
which has a two-fold purpose – to discard any riding waves and to render the
IMFs more symmetric. The stoppage criterion for the sifting loop is closely
related to how the latter controls the filter character of the EMD. On the
one hand, an infinite number of sifting iterations would asymptotically
approach the result of the Fourier decomposition (i.e., constant amplitude
envelopes) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.30"/>. On the other hand, several studies performed on
time series of pure noise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.31"/> have
shown the decomposition behaves like an adaptive “wavelet-like” dyadic
filter if the number of sifting iterations is kept small, around 10, which
also assures maximum component separation and minimum leakage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.32"/>.
This stoppage criterion of 10 sifting iterations is currently the recommended
one for practical applications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.33"/> and is also the one
employed in the study.</p>
      <p id="d1e660"><?xmltex \hack{\protect}?><?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-g01.pdf"/></p>
      <p id="d1e667">It also worth noting that the preferred interpolation method in the EMD,
i.e., lines 8 and 9 of Algorithm 1, are cubic splines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.34"/>.
Because of oscillations of these interpolating splines edge effects may appear in the EMD but are
usually contained within a half-period of a component at data boundaries
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.35"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e679">The eight IMFs obtained by decomposing the BOU time series; from top
to bottom: IMF1–IMF8. The panels plot SSI (ordinate) versus time
(abscissa). Time markers on the horizontal axes indicate 1 January of the
corresponding year. The zero-centered oscillatory nature of the modes can be
clearly seen. Also apparent is the local timescale increase with mode
number.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f03.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e688">One of the drawbacks of the original EMD is that it may introduce a
phenomenon known as “mode mixing”. This is the manifestation of
oscillations with dissimilar timescales in the same IMF or the presence of
oscillations with similar timescales in different IMFs. A workaround was
proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.36"/> with ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD).
The idea was to run the decomposition over an ensemble of copies of the
original signal to which white Gaussian noise has been added, with the final
result obtained by averaging. Although the EEMD improved the mode-mixing
problem, the different sums of signal and noise produced different numbers of
modes, making the final averaging somewhat difficult. Added to this, the
reconstructed signal still contained some residual noise and thus was not
identical to the original. To overcome this situation, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.37"/>
have proposed another iteration of the EMD, the complete EEMD with adaptive
noise (CEEMDAN). This method also decomposes the white noise into modes,
along with the signal, such that at each stage of the decomposition a
particular noise is added and a unique residue is computed to obtain each
mode. However, the modes of CEEMDAN still contain some residual noise and
sometimes spurious modes appear in the early stages of the decomposition. The
next iteration of the method, the improved complete ensemble EMD (ICEEMD or
ICEEMDAN), overcomes these issues by fixing the signal-to-noise ratio for all
stages of the decomposition process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.38"/>. The ICEEMD method
is that used in this study. In addition, a fast EMD routine provided by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.39"/> has been used to decrease the computation time.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e705">The power spectral density (PSD) of the eight IMFs for BOU (solid
line) on a logarithmic scale normalized with respect to the power of the
highest spectral peak. The period, or inverse frequency, runs on the abscissa
in a base-2 logarithm. The individual spectra are shown in the same colors
as the IMFs from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>; from left to right:
IMF1–IMF8. The Fourier estimates of the median periods, marked along
the dash-dotted lines, are seen to increase with mode number. Notable
features are the prominent spectral peak of IMF6 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 365 days
corresponding to the yearly cycle and the apparent dyadic repartition of the
timescales for IMF1–IMF5.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f04.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e723">To illustrate the workings of the EMD, the eight IMFs of the BOU time series
are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> in the order they were obtained,
from top to bottom. As EMD operates in the time domain, the IMFs have the same
temporal support as the original data and, by construction, upper and lower
amplitude envelopes that are symmetrical with respect to zero. It can be
observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> that, as the decomposition progresses, the
timescale of the IMFs increases; i.e., the intrinsic oscillations are getting
further spaced apart with increasing IMF number. Another view of this is
brought by Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, where the power spectral density (PSD) and
a Fourier estimate of the mean period of each IMF are plotted. To aid the
reader, the colors used to portray the individual IMF spectra are the same
as for the time-domain representation from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. The
spectral shapes of the IMF1–IMF5 are similar in form, i.e., bell
curves, and their median periods roughly follow a dyadic scale, i.e., doubling
with increasing IMF number as 3.1 days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3 days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
13.9 days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30.5 days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 54.0 days. This doubling of
the timescale for these first five IMFs is the hallmark output of an
efficient dyadic filter. Subsequently, it is shown that this dyadic
repartition is pertinent to identifying deterministic signals from random
realizations of quasi-stochastic background processes. This finding is even
more interesting, since the median periods have been estimated with a
Fourier-based method, which measures the period globally over the whole
time range of the IMFs. In contrast, a measure of the local period in
the Hilbert sense is a much better estimate, since it has an accuracy as low
as a quarter wavelength of temporal resolution with respect to the average
timescale of the IMF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.40"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Hilbert spectral analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e772">Once the empirical mode decomposition is completed, the second and last step
of the HHT consists in the Hilbert spectral analysis of the previously
obtained IMFs. Each IMF and its Hilbert transform are used to construct a
complex analytic signal, described by an amplitude-modulation–frequency-modulation (AM–FM) model. This decomposition into two time-varying parts
corresponding, respectively, to instantaneous amplitude and instantaneous
frequency is very useful for the purpose of this study. It enables the
identification, in a time-varying sense, of how much power (i.e., the square
of amplitude) occurs at which timescale (i.e., the inverse of frequency).</p>
      <p id="d1e775">The Hilbert transform of each real-valued IMF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be written as

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M26" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">H</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where subscript <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> designates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th IMF and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the Cauchy
principal value. From each IMF and its Hilbert-transformed version, a unique
complex-valued analytic signal can be obtained <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.41"/>:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M30" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            in which

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M31" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            is the instantaneous amplitude and

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M32" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            is the instantaneous phase. The instantaneous frequency is the first time
derivative of the instantaneous phase:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M33" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e1142">Hilbert spectral analysis of the fifth IMF of the BOU time series.
The intrinsic mode function (IMF5 panel) is the product of its constituent
slowly varying amplitude-modulation part (AM panel) and of its
rapidly changing frequency-modulation component (FM panel). The time-varying
local timescale, extracted from the FM component, is also depicted
(timescale panel). Time markers on the abscissa denote the beginning of the
corresponding year.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1151">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> provides a visual guide to this concept by
illustrating the AM–FM decomposition of IMF5 for the BOU time series. The
top panel (IMF5) of the figure reproduces the mode function, which is also
the real part of the analytic signal from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). The
amplitude of the latter (AM), given in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), which is the
envelope of the original signal, is then extracted and plotted in the second
panel. This amplitude is not a constant, but rather a time-dependent
function. Next, by removing the AM component from the signal through simple
division, the frequency modulation component is obtained, i.e., the complex
exponential in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>); the real part of this component
(FM) is plotted in the third panel. The FM is a trigonometric function with a
phase argument that is a time-dependent function, as seen from
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>). The local frequency is then just the first
temporal derivative of this phase, as defined in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>).
The inverse of the local frequency, i.e., the local timescale of the signal,
is depicted in the bottom panel (timescale), where its temporal variability
can be clearly distinguished. Owing to their time-varying character, the
amplitude and frequency are usually encountered in the literature under the
terms instantaneous amplitude and instantaneous frequency, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1170">The Hilbert spectrum <bold>(a)</bold> of the 10-year time series of SSI
for BOU, spanning 2001 through 2010. Pixel color encodes power (logarithmic-scale color bar on top)
at each instant (abscissa) and each scale
(ordinate). Time markers on the horizontal axis denote the start of the
corresponding year. The whited-out area indicates the regions where edge
effects become significant. The Hilbert marginal spectrum in the
panel <bold>(b)</bold> is the time-integrated version, i.e., line-by-line sum, of
the Hilbert spectrum and indicates the amount of power at each
scale.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1185">The original time-series <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can then be expressed as a sum of AM–FM
signals riding onto the EMD trend, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as follows:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M36" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1296">The square of the instantaneous amplitude and the instantaneous frequency of
the IMFs can then be used to represent the data as an energy density
distribution overlaid on the time-frequency space, as in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>). This representation, called the Hilbert
energy spectrum, is defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.42"/> as “the energy density
distribution in a time-frequency space divided into equal-sized bins of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the value in each bin summed and
designated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the proper time, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and proper instantaneous
frequency, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>”.</p>
      <p id="d1e1352"><disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M41" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1420">The time-integrated version of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>), the Hilbert
marginal spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is similar, but not identical, to
the traditional Fourier spectrum:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1488">An example of Hilbert spectral representation is given in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a
where the BOU time series is shown as an energy density distribution
over-imposed on a time-frequency space as in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>).
Each pixel in the Hilbert spectrum is identified by three attributes –
color, abscissa, and ordinate – through which it denotes the local power
(color, log scale) of the corresponding time series, at a certain time
(abscissa) and at a certain timescale (ordinate, log scale). For the sake
of readability, the spectrum is binned in time, scale, and color space
and has been smoothed. Hence, some aliasing may occur. Some features may be
represented as continuous lines while others are rendered as point-like,
especially where rapid frequency modulation takes place, such as in the
high-frequency bands.</p>
      <p id="d1e1496">Interpretation of Hilbert spectral features at data boundaries must be done
with care due to possible oscillations of the spline interpolants used in the
EMD (see Algorithm 1). This effect is similar to the “cone of influence” in
the popular wavelet transform <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.43"/>. With the EMD, edge effects
are usually contained within a half-period of a component at data boundaries
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.44"/>. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> this region has been whited out.</p>
      <p id="d1e1507">The plot in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b is the Hilbert marginal spectrum, or the
time-integrated variant of the image at its left, indicating the amount of
power at each timescale. This time-agnostic representation is comparable,
but not identical, to the Fourier spectrum of the same time series. It should
be once again emphasized that the Hilbert marginal spectrum is obtained from
local features of the data, with its components having instantaneous
amplitude and instantaneous frequency, as opposed to the global
outlook of the Fourier spectrum whose constituents have constant amplitude
and constant frequency throughout the whole domain.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Adaptive background null hypothesis</title>
      <p id="d1e1519">Which confidence can be attributed to the information extracted by the EMD?
More specifically, how can one ascertain that a certain IMF is the result of
a real physical process as opposed to it possibly being a stochastic
manifestation of background processes?</p>
      <p id="d1e1522">In the past, several investigations have been carried out in order to
identify the effects of the EMD when applied to time series issued from
various models, such as white, red, or fractional Gaussian noise,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.45"/>.
As a result, it has been consistently shown that, irrespective of the assumed
noise model, the EMD acts as an efficient wavelet-like dyadic filter,
decomposing the stochastic inputs into IMFs having the same spectral shape
but that are shifted in the frequency domain.</p>
      <p id="d1e1528">Nevertheless, the rejection of a null hypothesis based on an a priori assumed
model of the background does not preclude the probability that the now
statistically significant deemed signals originate from a stochastic process
of a different kind. Furthermore, as the EMD is an adaptive, data-driven
decomposition, it would be desirable to also employ a null hypothesis that
shares the same characteristics, making no beforehand assumptions about the
character of the background processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e1531">Following P. Flandrin (personal communication, 2015) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.46"/>
this study will make use of the robust statistical properties of the EMD with
respect to a wide class of background models in order to adaptively contrast
potential signals against presumed stochastic realizations, as detailed
hereafter. Owing to its dyadic filter character, the EMD decomposes noise
time series into IMFs having similar spectral shape but that are translated
to roughly the next lower octave in the spectral domain. When the sampling
step is increased, i.e., the sampling frequency is reduced by fractionally
resampling the input, these components cannot preserve their original
locations in the spectral domain and are instead shifted towards lower
frequencies. Hence, significance testing of IMFs is done by verifying if the
IMF remains unchanged in the time-frequency representation of the signal
during fractional resampling of the latter.</p>
      <p id="d1e1538">A Hilbert marginal spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is first constructed
for each IMF from its instantaneous amplitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and instantaneous
frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Next the spectrum-weighted mean frequency (SWMF)
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of each IMF is computed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.47"/>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M48" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Then, the time series is fractionally resampled by making the original
sampling rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> progressively larger, i.e., the time spacing of the
data points becomes

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M50" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          For each sampling rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and for each IMF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the SWMFs are then
recomputed, obtaining a set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To enhance the
visibility of the evolution of frequency as a function of the resampling
rate, normalization is performed as in

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the SWMFs of the modes of the data
having the original sampling rate. Therefore, the normalized SWMFs for the
IMFs of the original data will be unity, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1879">Since the EMD is an efficient dyadic filter, frequency deviation from the
unity line will occur for IMFs generated by stochastic processes. It follows
that when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the null hypothesis
that mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the realization of stochastic processes can be rejected.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1920">Box plot of the instantaneous timescales of the IMFs for the four
stations. The top and the bottom edges of the boxes represent the first (Q1)
and, respectively, the third (Q3) quartiles. The bars inside boxes denote the
second quartile (Q2), i.e., the median. The whisker length is set at at most
1.5 times the interquartile range, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Q3</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Q1</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
hence, the whiskers roughly correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 standard deviations, or
equivalently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">∽</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 99 % of the data, assuming normal distribution.
The median for each box is expressed numerically above the lower whiskers.
Outliers are omitted. Numeric values for all the statistical descriptors are
shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1973">The IMFs obtained from the BOU time series from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> have
already served as an illustrative example on the operation of the EMD. The
IMFs for the other datasets (not shown) are very similar and are
discussed in the following. It must be noted that, like BOU, the CAR time series
is decomposed into 8 IMFs, while the PAY data have 9, and 10 IMFs are obtained
for TAT. Besides the IMFs, for each time series the decomposition also yields
a residual, or trend (also not shown). With respect to the decennial time
span of the analysis (10 years), the trend can be thought of as a low-pass
approximation of the data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.48"/>, but not as an oscillation.
Since this work focuses mostly on the characteristic scales of temporal
variability, the EMD trends along with their statistical significance and
physical meaning do not fall within the scope of the study; for such
discussion, see for example <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.49"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1984">From the Fourier spectra of the IMFs in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> it can be seen
that, owing to its median period of 364.8 days, IMF6 can be unambiguously
associated with the yearly cycle, as dictated by the orbital parameters of
the Earth–Sun system. IMF6 also accounts for the most prominent visual
feature in the original data (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a: BOU), with its maxima
and minima denoting summer and winter, respectively. Further evidence is
brought by the spectral shape of IMF6, distinguished by a sharp peak that has
the largest power in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. Also noteworthy is that IMF6
seems to modulate the previous five IMFs, as these latter seem to exhibit
amplitude excursions that are approximately in phase with the amplitude of
IMF6, a phenomenon that is most visually distinguishable in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for the first three IMFs during the year 2005.</p>
      <p id="d1e1995">Finally, the last two components, IMF7 and IMF8, having median periods of
783.3 and 1457.4 days (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), respectively, are seen to
exhibit only slight amplitude deviation from zero in their temporal
representation. Moreover, these fluctuations in amplitude occur at the end of
the signal for IMF7 and at the front edge for IMF8. Interpretation of these
components should, thus, be done with care, since edge effects for the EMD
are known to be usually contained within a half-period of a component at data
boundaries <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.50"/>, i.e., approximately 1 year for IMF7 and 2 years for
IMF8.</p>
      <p id="d1e2003">With the FM components obtained, it becomes possible to illustrate the
frequency contents of each time series in terms of its individual IMFs, as
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, where by means of box plots the
distribution of the local timescale of each mode is conveyed. This box plot
representation is somehow incomplete, as it only accounts for the period
distribution of the modes and does not take into account either the amplitude
or the temporal localization of the events. For readability, the
characteristic period of each IMF with its range of variability is also shown
numerically in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. The box plots of the instantaneous
amplitude of each IMF are given in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2016">Statistical descriptors of the instantaneous timescales of the
IMFs, expressed in days.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Descriptor<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IMF1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">IMF2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IMF3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IMF4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">IMF5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IMF6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">IMF7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">IMF8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">IMF9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">IMF10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BOU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lower whisker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">288.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">319.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1435.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">First quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">42.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">342.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">405.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1476.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Second quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">51.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">368.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">724.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1531.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Third quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">36.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">68.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">393.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">807.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1611.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Upper whisker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">57.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">106.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">469.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1192.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1710.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lower whisker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">299.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">328.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">916.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">First quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">46.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">337.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">367.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1165.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Second quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">55.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">364.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">469.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1305.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Third quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">69.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">388.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">716.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2062.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Upper whisker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">51.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">104.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">443.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1031.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2212.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PAY</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lower whisker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">28.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">328.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">573.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1493.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">First quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">44.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">231.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">378.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">658.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1637.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Second quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">53.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">356.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">413.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">707.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1668.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Third quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">36.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">67.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">447.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">477.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">772.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1733.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Upper whisker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">57.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">101.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">755.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">625.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">918.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1757.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TAT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lower whisker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">215.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">378.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">742.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1908.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">First quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">48.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">105.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">328.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">522.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1196.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2169.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Second quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">61.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">143.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">366.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">609.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1440.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2402.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Third quartile</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">34.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">81.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">181.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">404.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">795.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1687.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2831.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Upper whisker</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">51.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">129.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">294.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">513.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1145.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1837.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3029.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2019"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> A box plot illustration of the statistical descriptors is
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2900">For all time series, IMF1–IMF5 have very similar median periods
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) that approximate the dyadic sequence:
3.5 days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28 days <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56 days.
This dyadic repartition of their median timescales is worthy of attention
since, as it is apparent in Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>
and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS1"/>, it plays a major role in discriminating
which IMFs can be attributed to deterministic phenomena as opposed to being
the output of random realizations of background processes. Moreover, besides
the notable similarity among the medians of these modes, for all the datasets
both the interquartile ranges and the total ranges of these first five modes
exhibit approximately the same variability. Added to this, IMF6 for BOU, CAR,
and PAY, as well as IMF7 for TAT, whose median periods are, respectively,
368.2, 364.3, and 356.6, as well as 366.6 days, can clearly be associated
with the yearly cycle given by the revolution of the Earth around the Sun.
This yearly component is very similar for BOU, CAR, and to a lesser extent
TAT, with an interquartile range that is concentrated around almost the same
median value and with the only minor difference being the slightly extended
range for TAT of 300 days as opposed to 200 days for the other two. The PAY
yearly mode differs from those of the other stations, with its interquartile
range and foremost its range being much larger, the latter even overlapping
the interquartile ranges of IMF5 and IMF4. This is a result of the
mode-mixing phenomenon described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/> that may arise
with the EMD, i.e., the coexistence or mixing of different timescales in the
same IMF, mainly related to the intermittence of signal and to contamination
with noise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.51"/>. Nevertheless, the spectral part of IMF6 which
overlaps IMF5 and IMF4 has very low power <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.52"/>; thus, this
phenomenon does not influence the validity of the analysis. With this in
mind, one notes that for BOU and CAR no spectral components are present in
the 100- to 300-day band. Furthermore, TAT is the only dataset that has a
transitional mode of 143.2 days, with the median period in between the first
five IMFs common to all stations and the yearly cycle.</p>
      <p id="d1e2946">At this point, the Hilbert frequency distribution of the IMFs for BOU may be
compared to the Fourier one from the PSD in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. As
previously mentioned, the Hilbert estimates are based on local
features of the data and thus are more accurate than the Fourier ones when
applied to non-stationary signals. This can be seen especially when comparing
the range of the first five high-frequency IMFs, which is upper bounded to
about 100 days in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, whereas in the PSD from
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> the spectra of the same components are seen to span the
whole timescale range. This also holds for IMF6, which has very narrow
Hilbert period range, whose Fourier analogue is the sharp peak in the PSD of
the same mode. Similar statements can be made for IMF7 and IMF8. To sum up,
it is found that, while the Hilbert period distributions of the modes have
compact supports, the Fourier representations of the same components span the
whole frequency range. Nevertheless, most of the power in the Fourier PSD is
assigned to a frequency band that closely corresponds to the Hilbert range.
Owing to the global nature of the Fourier transform, however, additional
spectral coefficients are needed to provide a complete mathematical
description of the data.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2957">Box plot of the instantaneous amplitudes of the IMFs for the four
stations. The bottom and the top edges of the boxes represent the first (Q1)
and, respectively, the third (Q3) quartiles. The bars inside boxes denote the
second quartile (Q2), i.e., the median. The whisker length is set at at most
1.5 times the interquartile range, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Q3</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Q1</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
hence, the whiskers roughly correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 standard deviations, or
equivalently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">∽</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 99 % of the data, assuming normal distribution.
The median for each box is expressed numerically below the lower whiskers.
Outliers are omitted.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f08.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3001">Resuming the discussion of the IMF timescales from
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, it can be observed that the low-frequency, i.e.,
greater than 1 year, variability in the data, trend notwithstanding, is
assigned into slightly overlapping (within the same time series) IMFs that
span the spectrum starting from the 1-year mark. For BOU and CAR time series,
there are only two modes extending beyond 1 year. First, IMF7 can be seen to
span approximately the same range for both these stations, from about 1 year
to slightly more than 3 years. For BOU, however, the interquartile range and
especially the median period is shifted towards higher periods, i.e.,
724.7 days vs. 469.5 days for CAR. The last modes of IMF8 of these stations are
very different, with a very narrow range around the median of 1531.5 days for
BOU, as well as a range of 900 to over 2000 days and a median of 1305.1 days for CAR.
For the PAY data, the low-frequency components have narrower spectral
support, with two IMFs (IMF7 and 8) that cover the band from 1 to 2.5 years
and median periods of 413.6 and 707.5 days, as well as the IMF9 around 4.5 years
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">∽</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 1668 days) with a very narrow range. It must also be noted that
IMF7 for BOU, CAR, and PAY has the same lower-end support, and that the
couple (IMF7, IMF8) of PAY taken together somehow emulates IMF7 for BOU and
CAR. Lastly, TAT is the only dataset whose the low-frequency variability is
expressed by three components, IMF8–IMF10, with mean periods of 609,
1440.3, and 2402.6 days. While the first quartile of IMF9 coincides with the
upper range of IMF8, the upper range of IMF9 is slightly below the lower
range of IMF10; hence, the last two modes do not overlap at all. By its range,
IMF8 of TAT approximates IMF7 for BOU and CAR, but there is no proximity in
terms of median or interquartile range. Similarly, the IMF9 of TAT resembles the IMF8
of CAR in terms of range, but their medians are not in close agreement and
their interquartile ranges even less so.</p>
      <p id="d1e3014">With the scrutiny of these low-frequency components, the discussion of the timescale distribution of the
IMFs from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> can now be concluded. However, as
previously mentioned, this particular illustration, although instructive, is
incomplete. First, the box plot representation does not take the
instantaneous variations in frequency into account, but renders global
aggregates instead – much like the traditional Fourier methods, with the
interquartile range spread in addition. This is done on purpose, with the
intent of making it easier for the readership not accustomed to the HHT to
create analogies with the more familiar methods (e.g., Fourier analysis,
wavelets). Second and last, this particular representation is totally devoid
of any information pertaining to the local amplitude, or power, or variance,
of the data. With these considerations in mind, the Hilbert spectrum, a true
time-frequency representation for nonlinear and non-stationary data, is
discussed next. Since the goal of this exercise is to lay the groundwork for
the forthcoming discussion, only the spectrum for the BOU data is provided as
an example.</p>
      <p id="d1e3019">The BOU Hilbert spectrum from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> exhibits a high-frequency
feature between 2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">∽</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 days, which corresponds to first five
IMFs of the time series. The instantaneous timescales of these modes overlap
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>), hence the appearance on the Hilbert spectrum
of a continuum instead of distinct bands. This spectral feature has
relatively low power, which decreases with increasing period, as can be
inferred from the sloped dent in the marginal Hilbert spectrum corresponding
to this region. In the 2- to 32-day band, amplitude modulation by the yearly
cycle can be inferred from the periodic change in color, with yellow–green
tones, occurring mostly during the high irradiance regime of summer, that
turn blue during the winterly minima. Next, in the band between 100 and
300 days, a gap in the spectrum is apparent, as can also be inferred from the
lack of support in this region for any of the BOU IMFs in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. The yellow trace, corresponding to IMF6,
exhibits frequency modulation around the 1-year period, seen as oscillations
in the range of 300 to 450 days, which is also the support of this mode in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. The color of
this IMF indicates that it has the highest power of all the components, as
can also be inferred from the large peak on the marginal spectrum. The
corresponding timescale fluctuations are centered in 365 days, and frequency
modulation is greatest during 2003 through 2005. From 2006 onwards, however,
frequency modulation is less pronounced – perhaps capturing the low solar
activity around the 2008 minimum in the 11-year cycle solar cycle
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.53"/>. The final two low-frequency, blue–green traces on the
spectrum correspond to IMF7 and IMF8. For IMF7, mode mixing is apparent
through the occasional sharing of the yearly timescale band with IMF6,
between mid-2003 and 2005. IMF7 has such low power that it fails to leave an
imprint on the marginal spectrum and it seems to suddenly spring into
existence during summer 2003, which is in perfect agreement with its temporal
representation from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> (panel IMF7), whence it can be
seen to have negligible amplitude during the first 2.5 years. Also in
agreement with its temporal depiction from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> (panel
IMF8), IMF8 starts out in light-green hues and slowly vanishes during
mid-2007. Although this last BOU mode manages to register on the marginal
spectrum through two very slight indentations around 1500 days (which is
about the median period of this mode from Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>
and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>), most of its power lies within edge effect
territory, hence interpretation of these slight bumps is ambiguous at best.</p>
      <p id="d1e3049">Thus far, all time series have been shown to share a high-frequency
constituent between 2 and 100 days composed of five IMFs with mean periods
following a dyadic sequence, and an IMF around 365 days that captures the
yearly variability. For BOU, CAR, and PAY, a low-power region can be found in
the 100- to 300-day band. Beyond the 1 year timescale, the low-frequency
variability in the 1.5- to 6-year band is captured by another two (BOU and
CAR) or three (PAY and TAT) components. The TAT data are the only time series
that has an IMF in the low-power band between the high-frequency feature and
the yearly cycle (median period 143.2 days).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3058">The previously identified features of the SSI time series will now be
discussed in terms of their intrinsic temporal scales of variability and
physical statistical meaning.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Discriminating deterministic signals from stochastic components in the IMFs</title>
      <p id="d1e3066">At this point, having identified the spectral characteristics of the SSI
time series by means of the HHT, a question arises with regard to their
physical and statistical significance, namely how can one ascertain which
features represent the expression of real, deterministic physical phenomena
and which ones can be attributed to random realizations of background
processes. Such a method, proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.54"/>, is described in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>. The procedure was applied to the first eight
IMFs of all the time series and the results are presented in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> (from top to bottom: BOU, CAR, PAY, and TAT). First,
each time series was resampled with a fractional sampling rate up to a
factor of 2; i.e., the original uniform time spacing of the data,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was progressively made larger and larger, as described in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the resampling rate and runs
along the horizontal axis. Next, the HHT was used to decompose the resulting
time series into IMFs and to compute their spectrum-weighted mean
frequencies, following Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>). In order to emphasize the effects
of the fractional resampling on the spectral contents of the IMFs, these
latter frequencies were then normalized by the SWMF of the original, non-resampled data as per Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>). For each dataset, this ratio
is indicated on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicating the IMF number. It then becomes possible
to follow the evolution of the normalized SWMF of each individual IMF as a
function of the fractional resampling rate (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). As
the EMD is an efficient wavelet-like dyadic filter, it follows that the
IMFs of time series of random processes undergo a translation towards lower
frequencies under fractional resampling. Therefore, for those IMFs whose
SWMFs are not downshifted during resampling, the null hypothesis that they
are purely stochastic can be rejected, i.e., they represent meaningful
signals. Stated otherwise, an IMF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is deemed not to be stochastic in
nature if its normalized SWMFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stay close to the
unity line for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. From Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> it can be observed that
for all the stations the only component that maintains a quasi-constant
frequency under fractional resampling is the mode representative of the
yearly variability, i.e., IMF6 for BOU, CAR, and PAY, as well as IMF7 for TAT. All the
other IMFs experience the previously described frequency downshifting; hence,
for them the null hypothesis that they are purely stochastic in nature cannot
be rejected. Since the normalized SWMFs of the yearly components clearly
stray from the black dashed line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>, the result that
they are not stochastic in nature is unambiguous. This also indicates that
the signal-to-noise ratio of these components is well above the minimum value of
0.2–0.3 required to reveal potential signals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.55"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e3233">The drift of normalized SWMF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ordinate)
of IMF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a function of the
resampling rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (abscissa) for the four time series. From top to bottom:
BOU, CAR, PAY, and TAT. The black dashed diagonal depicts the behavior of a
pure noise time series under an ideal dyadic filter. For all datasets, the
only mode that maintains a quasi-constant frequency under fractional
resampling is the IMF associated with the yearly cycle, i.e., IMF6 for
BOU, CAR, and PAY and IMF7 for TAT. In all the other IMFs quasi-stochastic
behavior is apparent through frequency downshifting towards the next lower
octave, approximately following the dashed line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3293">At this point, several precautionary notes are compulsory. First, the rule of
inference used here is <italic>modus tollens</italic>; i.e., the results from
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> do not imply that the modes which experience
downshift in their SWMFs are made up of pure noise. It is subsequently shown
that, for the first five IMFs at least, this is indeed the case; although
(quasi-)stochastic in nature, they are not completely devoid of information.
Second, the result is mostly qualitative, since it is difficult to define a
confidence interval owing to the adaptive nature of the null hypothesis that
can account for different types of models of the stochastic background. Third
and last, the approach is best applied only to the high-frequency modes, with
respect to the data length and sampling, since by resampling spurious
low-frequency oscillation may inadvertently be introduced <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.56"/>.
This is further supported by the fact that, as the IMF number progresses, the
region where the influence of edge effects becomes important gets larger and
larger, hence only adding uncertainty to the interpretation of the results.
This is also the reason why this type of analysis was only carried out on the
first eight IMFs of each dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Amplitude modulation through nonlinear cross-scale coupling</title>
      <p id="d1e3310">This section investigates whether the first five IMFs can be modeled as
purely uncorrelated, random noise or whether they also contain any other form of
information. To test this, the rank correlation between the yearly and
sub-yearly IMFs and their envelopes, e.g., the AM part in the middle panel of
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, has been computed for each SSI time series.
Kendall's rank correlation coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, a statistical measure of
ordinal association describing how similar the orderings of the data are when
ranked <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.57"/>, is employed here to establish whether each pair
of the two variables, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>AM</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>IMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, may be regarded or not as independent. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
indicates perfect agreement between rankings, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 denotes
perfect disagreement – i.e., one ranking is the reverse of the other; for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the two variables are statistically independent.</p>
      <p id="d1e3408">The resulting rank correlation coefficients and the associated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values,
are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>. For each panel, the
columns denote the EMD modes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>IMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the rows the amplitudes of their envelopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>AM</mml:mtext><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The background color of each cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>AM</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the rank correlation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>IMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the AM part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>IMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the same dataset. The
legend of the color encoding is found on the color bar at the bottom of the
figure. The associated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are presented numerically in each cell for
the sake of completeness and transparency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.58"/>. For BOU,
CAR, and PAY, IMF6 accounts for the yearly variability in the time series;
hence, the correlation matrices are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in size. For TAT, the yearly
mode is IMF7; thus, in this case the correlation matrix has a size of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Two conclusions can be drawn from
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3522">Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> significantly different from zero, shown in red, are
recorded in the last column for all stations. These demonstrate a modulation
of the amplitude of the components having sub-year timescales, i.e.,
AM1 to AM5 (and AM6 for TAT), by the yearly IMF, at a statistically
significant level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The effect is
most pronounced for PAY, as inferred from the darker red shades (larger rank
correlation coefficients).</p>
      <p id="d1e3544">For the BOU and CAR datasets the first row (AM1) exhibits blue and dark blue
cells for IMF3–IMF5 at the statistically significant level. This
indicates a negative rank correlation. Similar, but lighter, amplitude
modulation is observed on the second row (AM2), but only by IMF4 and IMF5.
For the PAY series, this negative rank correlation is greatly reduced for the
first row (light blue tones) and is absent in the second row. For TAT no such
correlation can be observed. At this point it is interesting to note that, in
a similar way to the discussion from Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS4"/>, the
different features of the datasets from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>
also enable a classification of the local climate experienced by the
measuring stations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3552">It should be mentioned that the amplitude modulation of high-frequency
components by lower frequency ones is also found in the sunspots number time
series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.59"/> and in multiple solar proxies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.60"/>.
The short-term intrinsic periodicities in the solar proxies appear to be
indicative of “randomly distributed dynamical processes in the solar
atmosphere” that are closely related to the 11-year solar activity and
therefore, unsurprisingly, the high-frequency modes are found to be modulated
by this latter cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.61"/>. But this phenomenon is not limited
to solar activity signals and has also been identified in surface air
temperature records <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.62"/>, and time series of the sea level
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.63"/>, and may indicate cross-scale nonlinear couplings
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.64"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>The intrinsic timescales of variability in the SSI</title>
      <p id="d1e3580">Firstly, the median periods of the IMFs composing the high-frequency band are
revisited. It is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> that they follow a
dyadic repartition that approximates the series dyadic sequence: 3.5, 7, 14,
28, and 56 days. Such a doubling in frequency in IMFs has been previously
reported in astrophysical and geophysical signals. When investigating three
independent datasets of satellite observations of the (extraterrestrial)
total solar irradiance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.65"/> consistently find a similar
dyadic-scale progression of modes at 13.5, 27, and 54 days, statistically
significant within the 95 % level, that correspond to the 27-day solar
rotation period and its (sub-)harmonics. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.66"/> find intrinsic
periodicities having an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days in
five different solar proxy signals. The mean periods and the associated error
bars in (sub-)superscript, estimated at the half-level width of the
corresponding probability histogram, were obtained by analyzing the sunspot
area for the whole Sun, and for the northern and southern solar hemispheres
taken separately, the 10.7 cm radio flux intensity, and the helioseismic
frequency shift. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.67"/> also find periodicities of 5, 7, 9, 13.5,
and 27 days in different radiation belt, solar wind, geomagnetic, and auroral
parameters. Compelling as it may seem, nevertheless, the imprint of a solar
rotation signature on ground measurements of the SSI is highly unlikely, as
it would imply the existence of hitherto unknown physical mechanisms in
Earth's atmosphere (Gerard Thuiller, personal communication, 2015). The
amplitudes of the IMFs of the TSI time series and those of the IMFs in the
SSI data differ at times by 2 orders of magnitude (e.g., compare
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> with Fig. 1 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="altparen.68"/>). If the solar
rotation signature were to be seen in the IMFs of the SSI this would require
the existence of amplifying processes. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.69"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.70"/> have studied the possibility of such a mechanism and
have concluded that, irrespective of the mechanisms invoked and of the
amplification of the solar variability, for the past decades solar forcing is
only a minor contributor and thus not able to account for most of the global
warming observed in the second half of the 20th century, which could be
better explained by an increase in greenhouse gases. Further proof is
provided subsequently, this time from a signal theoretical point of view, in
support of the view that it is unlikely that the solar rotation signature is
captured in measurements of the SSI.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3646">Rank correlations between IMFs and their AM components for
BOU <bold>(a)</bold>, CAR <bold>(b)</bold>, PAY <bold>(c)</bold>, and TAT <bold>(d)</bold>.
Kendall's rank correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is color-coded according to
the color bar on the bottom. IMFs run vertically, along the columns, and
their AM components run horizontally, along the rows. The numeric values
within the cells are the associated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/25/19/2018/npg-25-19-2018-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3682">Secondly, in the 100- to 300-day band, two of the stations, BOU and CAR, do
not exhibit any variability. For PAY, the support of yearly IMF6 protrudes in
this region, although its first quartile rests well below the 200-day mark.
As mentioned before, the power of the portion of this IMF that extends into
the high-frequency range is very small (not shown). Hence, while not totally
devoid of spectral features, this band contains negligible power. A distinct
mode is present at TAT in this band, whose median period of 143.2 days
somehow seems to continue the dyadic sequence of the previous five modes.
Since a similar transitional mode has also been found for two locations in
Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.71"/>, presently no explanation in terms of physical
processes, such as monsoon rainy seasonality, can be proposed for IMF6 of
TAT. These findings are important for the modeling and forecasting of the
SSI, as follows. On the one hand, models for BOU and CAR should not contain
any power in this band, or should at least filter it out. For TAT, on the
other hand, any model attempting to reconstruct the SSI should ensure that
the 100- to 300-day region is not a spectral void. In
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS1"/>, evidence is
presented that the spectral band spanning from 2 to 300 days seems to be
composed mostly of random realizations of stochastic background processes,
which can be modeled following, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.72"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.73"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.74"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.75"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3703">Thirdly, the median periods detected around the 1-year mark in all the
datasets can be explained by the revolution of the Earth around the Sun and the
associated orbital parameters. The interpretation of these components is
unambiguous, with one notable exception for the PAY time series, whose IMF6
exhibits mode mixing; i.e., it has a total range that overlaps some of the
modes in the high-frequency band. Nevertheless, it will be subsequently shown
that it is indeed these components that account for variability at the 1-year
timescale.</p>
      <p id="d1e3707">Lastly, the components indicative of low-frequency variability on timescales
greater than 1 year are discussed. The intrinsic timescales found in these
IMFs seem to match once more those pertaining to the so-called quasi-biennial
oscillations (QBOs) that have been
observed in solar activities and proxies with periodicities between 0.6 and
4 years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.76"/>, as well as in
meteorological data like <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.77"/> who identifies a 1.68-year peak
in cloud cover or high-latitude stratospheric temperatures and geopotential
heights <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.78"/>. Nevertheless, within the scope of the current
analysis, the interpretation of these low-frequency variability components as
a real, possibly QBO-like, signal is uncertain.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <title>The local climate imprint in the IMFs</title>
      <p id="d1e3726">It is shown in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> that the four measuring
stations experience different climates and exhibit differences in terms of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows that the high-frequency
band composed of the first five IMFs is very much alike for all stations.
This section investigates the possible relationship between local climate and
dissimilarities in terms of the repartition of the IMFs with mode number 6
and higher.</p>
      <p id="d1e3744">It can be noted that the IMF6 for both BOU and CAR has a well-defined period
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>), with a median of, respectively, 368.2 and
364.3 days and very narrow interquartile range. In addition, for both
stations, the IMF6 is the mode having the greatest amplitude, and by far,
compared to the other modes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>). The IMFs 7 and
8 for CAR have less marked periods, i.e., the interquartile ranges are greater
than for IMF6, and the amplitude of each IMF is very small. These
observations may be related to the high frequency of cloud-free days seen in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> because, in absence of clouds, the variability in the
daily mean of SSI is predominantly driven by the variability in the solar
irradiance received at the top of the atmosphere during the year.</p>
      <p id="d1e3753">PAY and TAT need four IMFs to account for the low-frequency variability,
i.e., one IMF more than BOU and CAR. IMF6 in PAY has a median period of 356.6 days,
close to 1 year (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) with a large interquartile
range. The median amplitude of the IMF6 is approximately half of that of BOU
or CAR (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>) and the amplitude exhibits large
variations. The median amplitude of the IMF7 is similar to that of IMF6 while
the period of the IMF7 is well marked with a narrow interquartile range. This
may be related to the abundance of the presence of broken clouds that render
the SSI signal highly intermittent. This intermittence of the signal could,
in turn, explain the mode mixing observed in IMF6 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.79"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3763">Similar to PAY, TAT also has a low median clearness index
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TAT</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which helps explain the
presence of a sixth IMF (median period: 143.2 days) between the
high-frequency components and the yearly IMF7 (median period: 366.6 days). In
other words, the amplitudes of the stochastic components in the sub-year band
are higher at TAT than at PAY, or, conversely, there is a lower
signal-to-noise ratio of the yearly cycle. Hence, this high power of the
background drives the EMD to assign a dedicated intrinsic mode for this
region, as opposed to PAY, where the signal in this spectral band is assigned
to the yearly IMF through mode mixing.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion and outlook</title>
      <p id="d1e3793">To sum up, the HHT
analysis of decennial time series of daily means of measurements of the SSI
from distinct BSRN stations has revealed the following: the presence of a
high-frequency band (2–100 days) consisting of quasi-stochastic IMFs that
have been shown to be amplitude modulated by the yearly cycle; a low-power
spectral band in the 100- to 300-day region; a well-defined spectral
peak at the 1 year mark accounting for the yearly variability; and multiple
QBO-like components whose character has been, inconclusively, attributed to
quasi-stochastic random processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e3796">This separation of the (quasi-)periodic components of the signal from the
apparently random realizations of a stochastic background has been shown to
significantly augment accuracy in time-series modeling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.80"/>. Our
findings can be thus directly used to improve models for estimating SSI from
satellite images or forecasts of the SSI.</p>
      <p id="d1e3802">We have shown that the adaptive Hilbert–Huang transform is a versatile
tool in analyzing SSI datasets, exhibiting significant nonlinearity and
non-stationarity. First, we have employed it to extract the intrinsic modes
of variability in the SSI at distinct timescales. Second, the HHT has been
used to discriminate between the deterministic yearly cycle and the
quasi-stochastic high-frequency components. The same methodology could also
be employed on different geophysical signals, such as wind speed time series and
river discharge datasets.</p>
      <p id="d1e3805">When modeling climate processes as dynamical systems with low-frequency
oscillations and noise effects, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.81"/> have shown that “even
the `approximately right' noise can help, rather than hinder”. Here, we have
provided a recipe not only for extracting, but also for characterizing the
stochastic high-frequency constituents of long-term time series of the SSI.
Indications with respect to modeling these quasi-stochastic components have
also been provided. With respect to SSI forecast models, it is exactly this
spectral region that is the focus of attention
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.82"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.83"/> venture as far as
stating that “the accuracy of the solar irradiance forecasting models
depends almost exclusively on the ability to forecast the stochastic
component”. In this light, the recipe for discriminating the realizations of
random background processes that we have put forth can be seen as one of the
more significant contributions of our paper.</p>
      <p id="d1e3818">We have also proposed that a classification of the measuring stations
according to climate and/or solar insolation conditions may be possible,
based on the Hilbert spectral features of the data. Thus, one future research
pathway could consist in creating a catalogue of the variability in the solar
resource, at different timescales, on a global scale via satellite estimates
of the SSI. Current meteorological reanalyses are too noisy in their
estimates of the SSI to form the basis for such a catalogue
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.84"/>. In terms of solar power production, the low-frequency
variability data would aid with policy and investment decisions, while
short-term variability would be of interest from a monitoring, operations, and
engineering perspective.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability">

      <p id="d1e3828">The software used for this study, comprising general EMD
and Hilbert spectral analysis routines, is publicly available online.</p>

      <p id="d1e3831"><list list-type="bullet">
        <list-item>
          <p id="d1e3836">The fast EMD routine used in this study is provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.85"/>
and can be downloaded at<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><uri>http://rcada.ncu.edu.tw/FEEMD.rar</uri>.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p id="d1e3849">Methods pertaining to Hilbert spectral analysis are part of a general HHT
toolkit provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.86"/> and can be downloaded at<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><uri>http://rcada.ncu.edu.tw/Matlab%20runcode.zip</uri>.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p id="d1e3862">The code for the ICEEMD(AN) algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.87"/> is provided
by María Eugenia Torres on her personal web page and can be downloaded
at<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><uri>http://bioingenieria.edu.ar/grupos/ldnlys/metorres/metorres_files/ceemdan_v2014.m</uri>.</p>
        </list-item>
      </list></p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e3877">The raw BSRN datasets employed in this study are made
available by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.88"/>. Zip archives containing the data can
be found at <uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.852720</uri>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e3889">All authors contributed equally to this work.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e3895">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3901">The authors wish to thank Patrick Flandrin from École Normale
Supérieure de Lyon, France, and Gerard Thuiller from Laboratoire
Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales in Guyancourt, France, for
the fruitful conversations and their insightful comments that sparked the
development of this study. Dmitrii Kolotkov from the University of Warwick,
United Kingdom, is also acknowledged for the personal communications
pertaining to the stochastic nature of the high-frequency variability band.
The authors thank all ground station operators of the BSRN network for their
valuable measurements and the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) for hosting the
BSRN website.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia  <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Alberti et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Alberti, T., Lepreti, F., Vecchio, A., Bevacqua, E., Capparelli, V., and
Carbone, V.: Natural periodicities and Northern Hemisphere–Southern
Hemisphere connection of fast temperature changes during the last glacial
period: EPICA and NGRIP revisited, Clim. Past, 10, 1751–1762,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1751-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-1751-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Alberti et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Alberti, T., Piersanti, M., Vecchio, A., De Michelis, P., Lepreti, F.,
Carbone, V., and Primavera, L.: Identification of the different magnetic
field contributions during a geomagnetic storm in magnetospheric and ground
observations, Ann. Geophys., 34, 1069–1084,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1069-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-34-1069-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bazilevskaya et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Bazilevskaya, G., Broomhall, A.-M., Elsworth, Y., and Nakariakov, V.: A
combined analysis of the observational aspects of the quasi-biennial
oscillation in solar magnetic activity, in: The Solar Activity Cycle,
Springer, 186, 359–386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2584-1_12" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-1-4939-2584-1_12</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Beer et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Beer, J., Vonmoos, M., and Muscheler, R.: Solar variability over the past
several millennia, Space Sci. Rev., 125, 67–79,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9047-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-006-9047-4</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bengulescu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Bengulescu, M., Blanc, P., Boilley, A., and Wald, L.: Do modelled or
satellite-based estimates of surface solar irradiance accurately describe its
temporal variability?, Adv. Sci. Res., 14, 35–48,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-14-35-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/asr-14-35-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bengulescu et al.(2016a)</label><mixed-citation>Bengulescu, M., Blanc, P., and Wald, L.: On the temporal variability of the
surface solar radiation by means of spectral representations, Adv. Sci. Res.,
13, 121–127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-13-121-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/asr-13-121-2016</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bengulescu et al.(2016b)</label><mixed-citation>Bengulescu, M., Blanc, P., and Wald, L.: Characterizing temporal variability
in measurements of surface solar radiation and its dependence on climate,
Energy Procedia, 97, 164–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.045</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Blanc et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Blanc, P., Coulaud, C., and Wald, L.: Yearly changes in surface solar
radiation in New Caledonia, Adv. Sci. Res., 12, 1–4,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-12-1-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/asr-12-1-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Boilley and Wald(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Boilley, A. and Wald, L.: Comparison between meteorological re-analyses from
ERA-Interim and MERRA and measurements of daily solar irradiation at surface,
Renew. Energ., 75, 135–143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.042</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bojinski et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Bojinski, S., Verstraete, M., Peterson, T. C., Richter, C., Simmons, A., and
Zemp, M.: The concept of Essential Climate Variables in support of climate
research, applications, and policy, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 1431–1443,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00047.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00047.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>BSRN(2015)</label><mixed-citation>BSRN station listing, available at:
<uri>https://www.pangaea.de/ddi?request=bsrn/BSRNEvent&amp;format=html&amp;title=BSRN+Stations</uri>,
last access: 9 December 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Calif et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Calif, R., Schmitt, F. G., Huang, Y., and Soubdhan, T.: Intermittency study
of high frequency global solar radiation sequences under a tropical climate,
Sol. Energy, 98, 349–365, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.09.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.solener.2013.09.018</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Chekroun et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Chekroun, M. D., Kondrashov, D., and Ghil, M.: Predicting stochastic systems
by noise sampling, and application to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 11766–11771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015753108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1015753108</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., Feng, Y., Wu, Z., and Huang, N. E.: Detecting
signals from data with noise: theory and applications, J. Atmos. Sci., 70,
1489–1504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0213.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-12-0213.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Cohen(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Cohen, L.: Time-frequency distributions-a review, Proceedings of the IEEE,
77, 941–981, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/5.30749" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/5.30749</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Colominas et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Colominas, M. A., Schlotthauer, G., Torres, M. E., and Flandrin, P.:
Noise-assisted EMD methods in action, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 4,
1250025, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536912500252" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S1793536912500252</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Colominas et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Colominas, M. A., Schlotthauer, G., and Torres, M. E.: Improved complete
ensemble EMD: A suitable tool for biomedical signal processing, Biomed.
Signal Proces., 14, 19–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2014.06.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.bspc.2014.06.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Coskun et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Coskun, C., Oktay, Z., and Dincer, I.: Estimation of monthly solar radiation
distribution for solar energy system analysis, Energy, 36, 1319–1323,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.11.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.energy.2010.11.009</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Duffy(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Duffy, D. G.: The application of Hilbert-Huang transforms to meteorological
datasets, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 21, 599–611,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021&lt;0599:TAOHTT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021&lt;0599:TAOHTT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Ehnberg and Bollen(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Ehnberg, J. S. and Bollen, M. H.: Simulation of global solar radiation based
on cloud observations, Sol. Energy, 78, 157–162,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.08.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.solener.2004.08.016</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Emery et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Emery, B. A., Richardson, I. G., Evans, D. S., Rich, F. J., and Wilson,
G. R.: Solar rotational periodicities and the semiannual variation in the
solar wind, radiation belt, and aurora, Sol. Phys., 274, 399–425,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9758-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11207-011-9758-x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Flandrin and Gonçalvès(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Flandrin, P. and Gonçalvès, P.: Empirical mode decompositions as
data-driven wavelet-like expansions, Int. J. Wavelets Multi., 2, 477–496,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219691304000561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S0219691304000561</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Flandrin et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Flandrin, P., Gonçalvès, P., and Rilling, G.: EMD equivalent filter
banks, from interpretation to applications, in: Hilbert–Huang Transform and
Its Applications, World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt, 57–74,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812703347_0003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/9789812703347_0003</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Flandrin et al.(2004a)</label><mixed-citation>Flandrin, P., Rilling, G., and Gonçalvès, P.: Empirical mode
decomposition as a filter bank, IEEE Signal Proc. Let., 11, 112–114,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2003.821662" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/LSP.2003.821662</ext-link>, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Flandrin et al.(2004b)</label><mixed-citation>
Flandrin, P., Gonçalvès, P., and Rilling, G.: Detrending and
denoising with empirical mode decompositions, in: 2004 12th European Signal
Processing Conference, 6–10 September 2004, Vienna, Austria, 1581–1584,
2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Franzke(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Franzke, C.: Multi-scale analysis of teleconnection indices: climate noise
and nonlinear trend analysis, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 16, 65–76,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-16-65-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-16-65-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Franzke(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Franzke, C.: Nonlinear trends, long-range dependence, and climate noise
properties of surface temperature, J. Climate, 25, 4172–4183,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00293.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00293.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Gabor(1946)</label><mixed-citation>Gabor, D.: Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information,
Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers – Part III: Radio and
Communication Engineering, 93, 429–441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1049/ji-3-2.1946.0074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1049/ji-3-2.1946.0074</ext-link>,
1946.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Harrison(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Harrison, R. G.: Discrimination between cosmic ray and solar irradiance
effects on clouds, and evidence for geophysical modulation of cloud
thickness, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 464, 2575–2590,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2008.0081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.2008.0081</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Hathaway(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Hathaway, D. H.: The solar cycle, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 12, 1–87,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/lrsp-2015-4</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Hoff and Perez(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Hoff, T. E. and Perez, R.: Quantifying PV power output variability, Sol.
Energy, 84, 1782–1793, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.07.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.solener.2010.07.003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Huang and Shen(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, N. E. and Shen, S. S. P.: Hilbert–Huang Transform and Its
Applications, 2nd Edn., World Scientific,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814508247_fmatter" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/9789814508247_fmatter</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Huang and Wu(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, N. E. and Wu, Z.: A review on Hilbert-Huang transform: Method and its
applications to geophysical studies, Rev. Geophys., 46, RG2006,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000228" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007RG000228</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Huang et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., Wu, M. C., Shih, H. H., Zheng, Q., Yen,
N.-C., Tung, C. C., and Liu, H. H.: The empirical mode decomposition and the
Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis,
P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 454, 903–995, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.1998.0193</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Huang et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, N. E., Wu, M.-L. C., Long, S. R., Shen, S. S. P., Qu, W., Gloersen,
P., and Fan, K. L.: A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition
and Hilbert spectral analysis, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 459, 2317–2345,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.2003.1123</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Huang et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, N. E., Wu, Z., Long, S. R., Arnold, K. C., Chen, X., and Blank, K.: On
instantaneous frequency, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 1, 177–229,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000096" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S1793536909000096</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Huang et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, N. E., Chen, X., Lo, M.-T., and Wu, Z.: On Hilbert spectral
representation: a true time-frequency representation for nonlinear and
nonstationary data, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 3, 63–93,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536911000659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S1793536911000659</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Huang et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, N. E., Hu, K., Yang, A. C., Chang, H.-C., Jia, D., Liang, W.-K., Yeh,
J. R., Kao, C.-L., Juan, C.-H., Peng, C. K., Meijer, J. H., Wang, Y.-H.,
Long, S. R., and Wu, Z.: On Holo-Hilbert spectral analysis: a full
informational spectral representation for nonlinear and non-stationary data,
Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 374, 20150206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0206" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2015.0206</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Inman et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Inman, R. H., Pedro, H. T., and Coimbra, C. F.: Solar forecasting methods for
renewable energy integration, Prog. Energ. Combust., 39, 535–576,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2013.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pecs.2013.06.002</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Kendall(1938)</label><mixed-citation>Kendall, M. G.: A new measure of rank correlation, BIOMETRIKA, 30, 81–93,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81</ext-link>, 1938.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Kolotkov et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Kolotkov, D., Broomhall, A.-M., and Nakariakov, V.: Hilbert–Huang transform
analysis of periodicities in the last two solar activity cycles, Mon. Not.
R. Astron. Soc., 451, 4360–4367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1253" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/mnras/stv1253</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Kolotkov et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Kolotkov, D., Anfinogentov, S. A., and Nakariakov, V. M.: Empirical mode
decomposition analysis of random processes in the solar atmosphere, Astron.
Astrophys., 592, A153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/0004-6361/201628306</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>König-Langlo et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>König-Langlo, G., Driemel, A., Raffel, B., and Sieger, R.: BSRN snapshot
2015-09, links to zip archives, PANGAEA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.852720" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.852720</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Kottek et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., and Rubel, F.: World map of
the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated, Meteorol. Z., 15,
259–263, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Labitzke and Loon(1988)</label><mixed-citation>Labitzke, K. and Loon, H. V.: Associations between the 11-year solar cycle,
the QBO and the atmosphere. Part I: the troposphere and stratosphere in the
northern hemisphere in winter, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 50, 197–206,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(88)90068-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9169(88)90068-2</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Lauret et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Lauret, P., Perez, R., Aguiar, L. M., Tapachès, E., Diagne, H. M., and
David, M.: Characterization of the intraday variability regime of solar
irradiation of climatically distinct locations, Sol. Energy, 125, 99–110,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.032</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Lee et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Lee, J. N., Cahalan, R. F., and Wu, D. L.: The 27-day rotational variations
in total solar irradiance observations: From SORCE/TIM, ACRIMSAT/ACRIM III,
and SOHO/VIRGO, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 132, 64–73,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.07.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2015.07.001</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Lee and Ouarda(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Lee, T. and Ouarda, T. B. M. J.: Prediction of climate nonstationary
oscillation processes with empirical mode decomposition, J. Geophys. Res.,
116, D06107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD015142</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Liu et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., San Liang, X., and Weisberg, R. H.: Rectification of the bias in the
wavelet power spectrum, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 2093–2102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHO511.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JTECHO511.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Lockwood and Fröhlich(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Lockwood, M. and Fröhlich, C.: Recent oppositely directed trends in solar
climate forcings and the global mean surface air temperature, P. Roy. Soc.
Lond. A Mat., 463, 2447–2460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2007.1880 " ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.2007.1880 </ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Marquez and Coimbra(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Marquez, R. and Coimbra, C. F.: Proposed metric for evaluation of solar
forecasting models, J. Sol. Energ.-T. ASME, 135, 011016,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007496" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1115/1.4007496</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Medvigy and Beaulieu(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Medvigy, D. and Beaulieu, C.: Trends in daily solar radiation and
precipitation coefficients of variation since 1984, J. Climate, 25,
1330–1339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4115.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2011JCLI4115.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Moghtaderi et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Moghtaderi, A., Flandrin, P., and Borgnat, P.: Trend filtering via empirical
mode decompositions, Comput. Stat. Data An., 58, 114–126,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2011.05.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csda.2011.05.015</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Nagovitsyn(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Nagovitsyn, Y. A.: A nonlinear mathematical model for the solar cyclicity and
prospects for reconstructing the solar activity in the past, Astron. Lett.+,
23, 742–748, <uri>http://tinyurl.com/gm6c4u9</uri>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Ohmura et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Ohmura, A., Gilgen, H., Hegner, H., Müller, G., Wild, M., Dutton, E. G.,
Forgan, B., Fröhlich, C., Philipona, R., Heimo, A., König-Langlo, G.,
McArthur, B., Pinker, R., Whitlock, C. H., and Dehne, K.: Baseline surface
radiation network (BSRN/WCRP): new precision radiometry for climate research,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 2115–2136,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2115:BSRNBW&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2115:BSRNBW&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Pachauri et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M., Barros, V., et al.: Climate Change 2014:
Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited
by: Pachauri, R. and Meyer, L., Geneva, Switzerland, IPCC, 151 pp., available
at: <uri>http://epic.awi.de/37530/</uri> (last access: 22 January 2018), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Paluš(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Paluš, M.: Multiscale atmospheric dynamics: cross-frequency
phase-amplitude coupling in the air temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett., 112,
078702, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.078702" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.078702</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Rilling et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Rilling, G., Flandrin, P., and Gonçalvès, P.: On empirical mode
decomposition and its algorithms, in: Proceedings of IEEE-EURASIP Workshop on
Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing NSIP-03, Grado (Italy), 3, 8–11,
available at: <uri>http://tinyurl.com/k3z2yv3</uri> (last access: 22 January
2018), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Rilling et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Rilling, G., Flandrin, P., and Gonçalves, P.: Empirical mode
decomposition, fractional Gaussian noise and Hurst exponent estimation, in:
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05).
IEEE International Conference on, 23–23 March 2005, Philadelphia, PA, USA,
IEEE, 4, iv/489–iv/492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2005.1416052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/ICASSP.2005.1416052</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Rios and de Mello(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Rios, R. A. and de Mello, R. F.: Improving time series modeling by
decomposing and analyzing stochastic and deterministic influences, Signal
Process., 93, 3001–3013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.04.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.04.017</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Rios and de Mello(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Rios, R. A. and de Mello, R. F.: Applying Empirical Mode Decomposition and
mutual information to separate stochastic and deterministic influences Signal
Processingembedded in signals, Signal Process., 118, 159–176,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.07.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.07.003</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Rios et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Rios, R. A., Parrott, L., Lange, H., and de Mello, R. F.: Estimating
determinism rates to detect patterns in geospatial datasets, Remote Sens.
Environ., 156, 11–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.019</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Roesch et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Roesch, A., Wild, M., Ohmura, A., Dutton, E. G., Long, C. N., and Zhang, T.:
Assessment of BSRN radiation records for the computation of monthly means,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 339–354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-339-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-339-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Schlotthauer et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Schlotthauer, G., Torres, M. E., Rufiner, H. L., and Flandrin, P.: EMD of
Gaussian white noise: effects of signal length and sifting number on the
statistical properties of intrinsic mode functions, Advances in Adaptive Data
Analysis, 1, 517–527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000217" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S1793536909000217</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Schroedter-Homscheidt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Schroedter-Homscheidt, M., Delamare, C., Heilscher, G., Heinemann, D., Hoyer,
C., Meyer, R., Toggweiler, P., Wald, L., and Zelenka, A.: The ESA-ENVISOLAR
project: experience on the commercial use of Earth observation based solar
surface irradiance measurements for energy business purposes, in: Solar
Energy Resources Management for Electricity Generation, edited by: Dunlop,
E. D., Wald, L., and Šúri, M., Nova Science Publishers, 111–124,
<uri>http://tinyurl.com/hpf8d5g</uri>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Solé et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Solé, J., Turiel, A., and Llebot, J. E.: Using empirical mode
decomposition to correlate paleoclimatic time-series, Nat. Hazards Earth
Syst. Sci., 7, 299–307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-299-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-7-299-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Stott et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Stott, P. A., Jones, G. S., and Mitchell, J. F.: Do models underestimate the
solar contribution to recent climate change?, J. Climate, 16, 4079–4093,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;4079:DMUTSC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;4079:DMUTSC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Tary et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Tary, J. B., Herrera, R. H., Han, J., and van der Baan, M.: Spectral
estimation – What is new? What is next?, Rev. Geophys., 52, 723–749,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014RG000461</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Torrence and Compo(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Torrence, C. and Compo, G. P.: A practical guide to wavelet analysis, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 79, 61–78,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0061:APGTWA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0061:APGTWA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Torres et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Torres, M. E., Colominas, M. A., Schlotthauer, G., and Flandrin, P.: A
complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise, in:
Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2011 IEEE International
Conference on, 22–27 May 2011, Prague, Czech Republic, IEEE, 4144–4147,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Trenberth et al.(2009)Trenberth, Fasullo, and Kiehl</label><mixed-citation>Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., and Kiehl, J.: Earth's global energy
budget, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 311–323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Vecchio et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Vecchio, A., Capparelli, V., and Carbone, V.: The complex dynamics of the
seasonal component of USA's surface temperature, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
9657–9665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9657-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-9657-2010</ext-link>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Vecchio et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Vecchio, A., Laurenza, M., Meduri, D., Carbone, V., and Storini, M.: The
dynamics of the solar magnetic field: polarity reversals, butterfly diagram,
and quasi-biennial oscillations, Astrophys. J., 749, 27,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/27" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/27</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Wahab et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Wahab, M. A., El-Metwally, M., Hassan, R., Lefevre, M., Oumbe, A., and Wald,
L.: Assessing surface solar irradiance and its long-term variations in the
northern Africa desert climate using Meteosat images, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
31, 261–280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160902882645" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431160902882645</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Wang et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Chen, X.-Y., Qiao, F.-L., Wu, Z., and Huang, N. E.: On intrinsic
mode function, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 2, 277–293,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536910000549" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S1793536910000549</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Wang et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y.-H., Yeh, C.-H., Young, H.-W. V., Hu, K., and Lo, M.-T.: On the
computational complexity of the empirical mode decomposition algorithm,
Physica A, 400, 159–167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.01.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.physa.2014.01.020</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Wasserstein and Lazar(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Wasserstein, R. L. and Lazar, N. A.: The ASA's statement on
<italic>p</italic>-values: context, process, and purpose, Am. Stat., 70, 129–133,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Welter and Esquef(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Welter, G. S. and Esquef, P. A. A.: Multifractal analysis based on amplitude
extrema of intrinsic mode functions, Phys. Rev. E, 87, 032916,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.032916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.87.032916</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Wu and Huang(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. and Huang, N. E.: A study of the characteristics of white noise using
the empirical mode decomposition method, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 460,
1597–1611, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.2003.1221</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Wu and Huang(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. and Huang, N. E.: Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a
noise-assisted data analysis method, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 01,
1–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S1793536909000047</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Wu and Huang(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z. and Huang, N. E.: On the filtering properties of the empirical mode
decomposition, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 2, 397–414,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536910000604" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S1793536910000604</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Wu et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Z., Huang, N. E., and Chen, X.: Some considerations on physical analysis
of data, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 3, 95–113,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536911000660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S1793536911000660</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Yordanov et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Yordanov, G. H., Saetre, T. O., and Midtgard, O.-M.: 100-millisecond
resolution for accurate overirradiance measurements, IEEE J. Photovolt., 3,
1354–1360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2264621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2264621</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Zeng et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Zeng, Z., Yang, H., Zhao, R., and Meng, J.: Nonlinear characteristics of
observed solar radiation data, Sol. Energy, 87, 204–218,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.10.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.solener.2012.10.019</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>On the intrinsic timescales of temporal variability in measurements of the surface solar radiation</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">This study is concerned with the intrinsic temporal scales of
the variability in the surface solar irradiance (SSI). The data consist of
decennial time series of daily means of the SSI obtained from high-quality
measurements of the broadband solar radiation impinging on a horizontal plane
at ground level, issued from different Baseline Surface Radiation Network
(BSRN) ground stations around the world. First, embedded oscillations sorted
in terms of increasing timescales of the data are extracted by empirical mode
decomposition (EMD). Next, Hilbert spectral analysis is applied to obtain an
amplitude-modulation–frequency-modulation (AM–FM) representation of the
data. The time-varying nature of the characteristic timescales of
variability, along with the variations in the signal intensity, are thus
revealed. A novel, adaptive null hypothesis based on the general statistical
characteristics of noise is employed in order to discriminate between the
different features of the data, those that have a deterministic origin and
those being realizations of various stochastic processes. The data have a
significant spectral peak corresponding to the yearly variability cycle and
feature quasi-stochastic high-frequency variability components, irrespective
of the geographical location or of the local climate. Moreover, the amplitude
of this latter feature is shown to be modulated by variations in the yearly
cycle, which is indicative of nonlinear multiplicative cross-scale couplings.
The study has possible implications on the modeling and the forecast of the
surface solar radiation, by clearly discriminating the deterministic from the
quasi-stochastic character of the data, at different local timescales.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Alberti et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Alberti, T., Lepreti, F., Vecchio, A., Bevacqua, E., Capparelli, V., and
Carbone, V.: Natural periodicities and Northern Hemisphere–Southern
Hemisphere connection of fast temperature changes during the last glacial
period: EPICA and NGRIP revisited, Clim. Past, 10, 1751–1762,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1751-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1751-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Alberti et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Alberti, T., Piersanti, M., Vecchio, A., De Michelis, P., Lepreti, F.,
Carbone, V., and Primavera, L.: Identification of the different magnetic
field contributions during a geomagnetic storm in magnetospheric and ground
observations, Ann. Geophys., 34, 1069–1084,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1069-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1069-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bazilevskaya et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Bazilevskaya, G., Broomhall, A.-M., Elsworth, Y., and Nakariakov, V.: A
combined analysis of the observational aspects of the quasi-biennial
oscillation in solar magnetic activity, in: The Solar Activity Cycle,
Springer, 186, 359–386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2584-1_12" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2584-1_12</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Beer et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Beer, J., Vonmoos, M., and Muscheler, R.: Solar variability over the past
several millennia, Space Sci. Rev., 125, 67–79,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9047-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9047-4</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bengulescu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Bengulescu, M., Blanc, P., Boilley, A., and Wald, L.: Do modelled or
satellite-based estimates of surface solar irradiance accurately describe its
temporal variability?, Adv. Sci. Res., 14, 35–48,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-14-35-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-14-35-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bengulescu et al.(2016a)</label><mixed-citation>
Bengulescu, M., Blanc, P., and Wald, L.: On the temporal variability of the
surface solar radiation by means of spectral representations, Adv. Sci. Res.,
13, 121–127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-13-121-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-13-121-2016</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bengulescu et al.(2016b)</label><mixed-citation>
Bengulescu, M., Blanc, P., and Wald, L.: Characterizing temporal variability
in measurements of surface solar radiation and its dependence on climate,
Energy Procedia, 97, 164–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.045</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Blanc et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Blanc, P., Coulaud, C., and Wald, L.: Yearly changes in surface solar
radiation in New Caledonia, Adv. Sci. Res., 12, 1–4,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-12-1-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-12-1-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Boilley and Wald(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Boilley, A. and Wald, L.: Comparison between meteorological re-analyses from
ERA-Interim and MERRA and measurements of daily solar irradiation at surface,
Renew. Energ., 75, 135–143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.042</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bojinski et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Bojinski, S., Verstraete, M., Peterson, T. C., Richter, C., Simmons, A., and
Zemp, M.: The concept of Essential Climate Variables in support of climate
research, applications, and policy, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 1431–1443,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00047.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00047.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>BSRN(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
BSRN station listing, available at:
<a href="https://www.pangaea.de/ddi?request=bsrn/BSRNEvent&amp;format=html&amp;title=BSRN+Stations" target="_blank">https://www.pangaea.de/ddi?request=bsrn/BSRNEvent&amp;format=html&amp;title=BSRN+Stations</a>,
last access: 9 December 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Calif et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Calif, R., Schmitt, F. G., Huang, Y., and Soubdhan, T.: Intermittency study
of high frequency global solar radiation sequences under a tropical climate,
Sol. Energy, 98, 349–365, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.09.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.09.018</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Chekroun et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Chekroun, M. D., Kondrashov, D., and Ghil, M.: Predicting stochastic systems
by noise sampling, and application to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 11766–11771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015753108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015753108</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, X., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., Feng, Y., Wu, Z., and Huang, N. E.: Detecting
signals from data with noise: theory and applications, J. Atmos. Sci., 70,
1489–1504, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0213.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0213.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Cohen(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Cohen, L.: Time-frequency distributions-a review, Proceedings of the IEEE,
77, 941–981, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/5.30749" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/5.30749</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Colominas et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Colominas, M. A., Schlotthauer, G., Torres, M. E., and Flandrin, P.:
Noise-assisted EMD methods in action, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 4,
1250025, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536912500252" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536912500252</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Colominas et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Colominas, M. A., Schlotthauer, G., and Torres, M. E.: Improved complete
ensemble EMD: A suitable tool for biomedical signal processing, Biomed.
Signal Proces., 14, 19–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2014.06.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2014.06.009</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Coskun et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Coskun, C., Oktay, Z., and Dincer, I.: Estimation of monthly solar radiation
distribution for solar energy system analysis, Energy, 36, 1319–1323,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.11.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.11.009</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Duffy(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Duffy, D. G.: The application of Hilbert-Huang transforms to meteorological
datasets, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 21, 599–611,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021&lt;0599:TAOHTT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021&lt;0599:TAOHTT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Ehnberg and Bollen(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Ehnberg, J. S. and Bollen, M. H.: Simulation of global solar radiation based
on cloud observations, Sol. Energy, 78, 157–162,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.08.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.08.016</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Emery et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Emery, B. A., Richardson, I. G., Evans, D. S., Rich, F. J., and Wilson,
G. R.: Solar rotational periodicities and the semiannual variation in the
solar wind, radiation belt, and aurora, Sol. Phys., 274, 399–425,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9758-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9758-x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Flandrin and Gonçalvès(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Flandrin, P. and Gonçalvès, P.: Empirical mode decompositions as
data-driven wavelet-like expansions, Int. J. Wavelets Multi., 2, 477–496,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219691304000561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219691304000561</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Flandrin et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Flandrin, P., Gonçalvès, P., and Rilling, G.: EMD equivalent filter
banks, from interpretation to applications, in: Hilbert–Huang Transform and
Its Applications, World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt, 57–74,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812703347_0003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812703347_0003</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Flandrin et al.(2004a)</label><mixed-citation>
Flandrin, P., Rilling, G., and Gonçalvès, P.: Empirical mode
decomposition as a filter bank, IEEE Signal Proc. Let., 11, 112–114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2003.821662" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2003.821662</a>, 2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Flandrin et al.(2004b)</label><mixed-citation>
Flandrin, P., Gonçalvès, P., and Rilling, G.: Detrending and
denoising with empirical mode decompositions, in: 2004 12th European Signal
Processing Conference, 6–10 September 2004, Vienna, Austria, 1581–1584,
2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Franzke(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Franzke, C.: Multi-scale analysis of teleconnection indices: climate noise
and nonlinear trend analysis, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 16, 65–76,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-16-65-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-16-65-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Franzke(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Franzke, C.: Nonlinear trends, long-range dependence, and climate noise
properties of surface temperature, J. Climate, 25, 4172–4183,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00293.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00293.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Gabor(1946)</label><mixed-citation>
Gabor, D.: Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information,
Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers – Part III: Radio and
Communication Engineering, 93, 429–441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1049/ji-3-2.1946.0074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1049/ji-3-2.1946.0074</a>,
1946.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Harrison(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, R. G.: Discrimination between cosmic ray and solar irradiance
effects on clouds, and evidence for geophysical modulation of cloud
thickness, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 464, 2575–2590,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2008.0081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2008.0081</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Hathaway(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Hathaway, D. H.: The solar cycle, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 12, 1–87,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Hoff and Perez(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoff, T. E. and Perez, R.: Quantifying PV power output variability, Sol.
Energy, 84, 1782–1793, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.07.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.07.003</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Huang and Shen(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, N. E. and Shen, S. S. P.: Hilbert–Huang Transform and Its
Applications, 2nd Edn., World Scientific,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814508247_fmatter" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814508247_fmatter</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Huang and Wu(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, N. E. and Wu, Z.: A review on Hilbert-Huang transform: Method and its
applications to geophysical studies, Rev. Geophys., 46, RG2006,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000228" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000228</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Huang et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., Wu, M. C., Shih, H. H., Zheng, Q., Yen,
N.-C., Tung, C. C., and Liu, H. H.: The empirical mode decomposition and the
Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis,
P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 454, 903–995, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Huang et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, N. E., Wu, M.-L. C., Long, S. R., Shen, S. S. P., Qu, W., Gloersen,
P., and Fan, K. L.: A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition
and Hilbert spectral analysis, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 459, 2317–2345,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1123</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Huang et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, N. E., Wu, Z., Long, S. R., Arnold, K. C., Chen, X., and Blank, K.: On
instantaneous frequency, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 1, 177–229,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000096" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000096</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Huang et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, N. E., Chen, X., Lo, M.-T., and Wu, Z.: On Hilbert spectral
representation: a true time-frequency representation for nonlinear and
nonstationary data, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 3, 63–93,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536911000659" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536911000659</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Huang et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, N. E., Hu, K., Yang, A. C., Chang, H.-C., Jia, D., Liang, W.-K., Yeh,
J. R., Kao, C.-L., Juan, C.-H., Peng, C. K., Meijer, J. H., Wang, Y.-H.,
Long, S. R., and Wu, Z.: On Holo-Hilbert spectral analysis: a full
informational spectral representation for nonlinear and non-stationary data,
Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 374, 20150206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0206" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0206</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Inman et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Inman, R. H., Pedro, H. T., and Coimbra, C. F.: Solar forecasting methods for
renewable energy integration, Prog. Energ. Combust., 39, 535–576,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2013.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2013.06.002</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Kendall(1938)</label><mixed-citation>
Kendall, M. G.: A new measure of rank correlation, BIOMETRIKA, 30, 81–93,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81</a>, 1938.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Kolotkov et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Kolotkov, D., Broomhall, A.-M., and Nakariakov, V.: Hilbert–Huang transform
analysis of periodicities in the last two solar activity cycles, Mon. Not.
R. Astron. Soc., 451, 4360–4367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1253" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1253</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Kolotkov et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kolotkov, D., Anfinogentov, S. A., and Nakariakov, V. M.: Empirical mode
decomposition analysis of random processes in the solar atmosphere, Astron.
Astrophys., 592, A153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628306" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628306</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>König-Langlo et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
König-Langlo, G., Driemel, A., Raffel, B., and Sieger, R.: BSRN snapshot
2015-09, links to zip archives, PANGAEA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.852720" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.852720</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Kottek et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., and Rubel, F.: World map of
the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated, Meteorol. Z., 15,
259–263, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Labitzke and Loon(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Labitzke, K. and Loon, H. V.: Associations between the 11-year solar cycle,
the QBO and the atmosphere. Part I: the troposphere and stratosphere in the
northern hemisphere in winter, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 50, 197–206,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(88)90068-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(88)90068-2</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Lauret et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Lauret, P., Perez, R., Aguiar, L. M., Tapachès, E., Diagne, H. M., and
David, M.: Characterization of the intraday variability regime of solar
irradiation of climatically distinct locations, Sol. Energy, 125, 99–110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.032</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Lee et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J. N., Cahalan, R. F., and Wu, D. L.: The 27-day rotational variations
in total solar irradiance observations: From SORCE/TIM, ACRIMSAT/ACRIM III,
and SOHO/VIRGO, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 132, 64–73,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.07.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.07.001</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Lee and Ouarda(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, T. and Ouarda, T. B. M. J.: Prediction of climate nonstationary
oscillation processes with empirical mode decomposition, J. Geophys. Res.,
116, D06107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015142</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Liu et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., San Liang, X., and Weisberg, R. H.: Rectification of the bias in the
wavelet power spectrum, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 2093–2102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHO511.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHO511.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Lockwood and Fröhlich(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Lockwood, M. and Fröhlich, C.: Recent oppositely directed trends in solar
climate forcings and the global mean surface air temperature, P. Roy. Soc.
Lond. A Mat., 463, 2447–2460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2007.1880 " target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2007.1880 </a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Marquez and Coimbra(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Marquez, R. and Coimbra, C. F.: Proposed metric for evaluation of solar
forecasting models, J. Sol. Energ.-T. ASME, 135, 011016,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007496" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007496</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Medvigy and Beaulieu(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Medvigy, D. and Beaulieu, C.: Trends in daily solar radiation and
precipitation coefficients of variation since 1984, J. Climate, 25,
1330–1339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4115.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4115.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Moghtaderi et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Moghtaderi, A., Flandrin, P., and Borgnat, P.: Trend filtering via empirical
mode decompositions, Comput. Stat. Data An., 58, 114–126,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2011.05.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2011.05.015</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Nagovitsyn(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Nagovitsyn, Y. A.: A nonlinear mathematical model for the solar cyclicity and
prospects for reconstructing the solar activity in the past, Astron. Lett.+,
23, 742–748, <a href="http://tinyurl.com/gm6c4u9" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/gm6c4u9</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Ohmura et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Ohmura, A., Gilgen, H., Hegner, H., Müller, G., Wild, M., Dutton, E. G.,
Forgan, B., Fröhlich, C., Philipona, R., Heimo, A., König-Langlo, G.,
McArthur, B., Pinker, R., Whitlock, C. H., and Dehne, K.: Baseline surface
radiation network (BSRN/WCRP): new precision radiometry for climate research,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 2115–2136,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2115:BSRNBW&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;2115:BSRNBW&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Pachauri et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M., Barros, V., et al.: Climate Change 2014:
Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited
by: Pachauri, R. and Meyer, L., Geneva, Switzerland, IPCC, 151 pp., available
at: <a href="http://epic.awi.de/37530/" target="_blank">http://epic.awi.de/37530/</a> (last access: 22 January 2018), 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Paluš(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Paluš, M.: Multiscale atmospheric dynamics: cross-frequency
phase-amplitude coupling in the air temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett., 112,
078702, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.078702" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.078702</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Rilling et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Rilling, G., Flandrin, P., and Gonçalvès, P.: On empirical mode
decomposition and its algorithms, in: Proceedings of IEEE-EURASIP Workshop on
Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing NSIP-03, Grado (Italy), 3, 8–11,
available at: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/k3z2yv3" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/k3z2yv3</a> (last access: 22 January
2018), 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Rilling et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Rilling, G., Flandrin, P., and Gonçalves, P.: Empirical mode
decomposition, fractional Gaussian noise and Hurst exponent estimation, in:
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05).
IEEE International Conference on, 23–23 March 2005, Philadelphia, PA, USA,
IEEE, 4, iv/489–iv/492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2005.1416052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2005.1416052</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Rios and de Mello(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Rios, R. A. and de Mello, R. F.: Improving time series modeling by
decomposing and analyzing stochastic and deterministic influences, Signal
Process., 93, 3001–3013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.04.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.04.017</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Rios and de Mello(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Rios, R. A. and de Mello, R. F.: Applying Empirical Mode Decomposition and
mutual information to separate stochastic and deterministic influences Signal
Processingembedded in signals, Signal Process., 118, 159–176,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.07.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.07.003</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Rios et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Rios, R. A., Parrott, L., Lange, H., and de Mello, R. F.: Estimating
determinism rates to detect patterns in geospatial datasets, Remote Sens.
Environ., 156, 11–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.019</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Roesch et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Roesch, A., Wild, M., Ohmura, A., Dutton, E. G., Long, C. N., and Zhang, T.:
Assessment of BSRN radiation records for the computation of monthly means,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 339–354, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-339-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-339-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Schlotthauer et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Schlotthauer, G., Torres, M. E., Rufiner, H. L., and Flandrin, P.: EMD of
Gaussian white noise: effects of signal length and sifting number on the
statistical properties of intrinsic mode functions, Advances in Adaptive Data
Analysis, 1, 517–527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000217" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000217</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Schroedter-Homscheidt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Schroedter-Homscheidt, M., Delamare, C., Heilscher, G., Heinemann, D., Hoyer,
C., Meyer, R., Toggweiler, P., Wald, L., and Zelenka, A.: The ESA-ENVISOLAR
project: experience on the commercial use of Earth observation based solar
surface irradiance measurements for energy business purposes, in: Solar
Energy Resources Management for Electricity Generation, edited by: Dunlop,
E. D., Wald, L., and Šúri, M., Nova Science Publishers, 111–124,
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/hpf8d5g" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/hpf8d5g</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Solé et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Solé, J., Turiel, A., and Llebot, J. E.: Using empirical mode
decomposition to correlate paleoclimatic time-series, Nat. Hazards Earth
Syst. Sci., 7, 299–307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-299-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-299-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Stott et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Stott, P. A., Jones, G. S., and Mitchell, J. F.: Do models underestimate the
solar contribution to recent climate change?, J. Climate, 16, 4079–4093,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;4079:DMUTSC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;4079:DMUTSC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Tary et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Tary, J. B., Herrera, R. H., Han, J., and van der Baan, M.: Spectral
estimation – What is new? What is next?, Rev. Geophys., 52, 723–749,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000461</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Torrence and Compo(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Torrence, C. and Compo, G. P.: A practical guide to wavelet analysis, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 79, 61–78,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0061:APGTWA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0061:APGTWA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Torres et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Torres, M. E., Colominas, M. A., Schlotthauer, G., and Flandrin, P.: A
complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise, in:
Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2011 IEEE International
Conference on, 22–27 May 2011, Prague, Czech Republic, IEEE, 4144–4147,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Trenberth et al.(2009)Trenberth, Fasullo, and Kiehl</label><mixed-citation>
Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., and Kiehl, J.: Earth's global energy
budget, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 311–323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Vecchio et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Vecchio, A., Capparelli, V., and Carbone, V.: The complex dynamics of the
seasonal component of USA's surface temperature, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
9657–9665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9657-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9657-2010</a>, 2010.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Vecchio et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Vecchio, A., Laurenza, M., Meduri, D., Carbone, V., and Storini, M.: The
dynamics of the solar magnetic field: polarity reversals, butterfly diagram,
and quasi-biennial oscillations, Astrophys. J., 749, 27,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/27" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/27</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Wahab et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Wahab, M. A., El-Metwally, M., Hassan, R., Lefevre, M., Oumbe, A., and Wald,
L.: Assessing surface solar irradiance and its long-term variations in the
northern Africa desert climate using Meteosat images, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
31, 261–280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160902882645" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160902882645</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Wang et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, G., Chen, X.-Y., Qiao, F.-L., Wu, Z., and Huang, N. E.: On intrinsic
mode function, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 2, 277–293,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536910000549" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536910000549</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Wang et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y.-H., Yeh, C.-H., Young, H.-W. V., Hu, K., and Lo, M.-T.: On the
computational complexity of the empirical mode decomposition algorithm,
Physica A, 400, 159–167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.01.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.01.020</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Wasserstein and Lazar(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Wasserstein, R. L. and Lazar, N. A.: The ASA's statement on
<i>p</i>-values: context, process, and purpose, Am. Stat., 70, 129–133,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Welter and Esquef(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Welter, G. S. and Esquef, P. A. A.: Multifractal analysis based on amplitude
extrema of intrinsic mode functions, Phys. Rev. E, 87, 032916,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.032916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.032916</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Wu and Huang(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z. and Huang, N. E.: A study of the characteristics of white noise using
the empirical mode decomposition method, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 460,
1597–1611, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1221" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1221</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Wu and Huang(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z. and Huang, N. E.: Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a
noise-assisted data analysis method, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 01,
1–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000047</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Wu and Huang(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z. and Huang, N. E.: On the filtering properties of the empirical mode
decomposition, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 2, 397–414,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536910000604" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536910000604</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Wu et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Z., Huang, N. E., and Chen, X.: Some considerations on physical analysis
of data, Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, 3, 95–113,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536911000660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536911000660</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Yordanov et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Yordanov, G. H., Saetre, T. O., and Midtgard, O.-M.: 100-millisecond
resolution for accurate overirradiance measurements, IEEE J. Photovolt., 3,
1354–1360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2264621" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2264621</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Zeng et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Zeng, Z., Yang, H., Zhao, R., and Meng, J.: Nonlinear characteristics of
observed solar radiation data, Sol. Energy, 87, 204–218,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.10.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.10.019</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
