<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7946</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-23-407-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Influence of atmospheric stratification on the integral scale and fractal
dimension of turbulent flows</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Influence of stratification on integral scale and fractal dimension}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Tijera et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tijera</surname><given-names>Manuel</given-names></name>
          <email>mtijera@fis.ucm.es</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Maqueda</surname><given-names>Gregorio</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Yagüe</surname><given-names>Carlos</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-4877</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Applied Mathematics Dpt. (Biomathematics),  Complutense University of
Madrid, Madrid, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Astronomy, Astrophysics and Atmospheric Science Dpt.,  Complutense
University of Madrid, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Madrid, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Geophysics and Meteorology Dpt.,  Complutense University of Madrid,
Madrid, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Manuel Tijera (mtijera@fis.ucm.es)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>407</fpage><lpage>417</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>December</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016.html">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>In this work the relation between integral scale and
fractal dimension and the type of stratification in fully developed
turbulence is analyzed. The integral scale corresponds to that in which
energy from larger scales is incoming into a turbulent regime. One of the
aims of this study is the understanding of the relation between the integral
scale and the bulk Richardson number, which is one of the most widely used
indicators of stability close to the ground in atmospheric studies. This
parameter will allow us to verify the influence of the degree of
stratification over the integral scale of the turbulent flows in the
atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). The influence of the diurnal and night
cycles on the relationship between the fractal dimension and integral scale
is also analyzed. The fractal dimension of wind components is a turbulent
flow characteristic, as has been shown in previous works, where its relation
to stability was highlighted. Fractal dimension and integral scale of the
horizontal (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and vertical (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) velocity fluctuations have been
calculated using the mean wind direction as a framework. The scales are
obtained using sonic anemometer data
from three elevations 5.8, 13 and 32 m above the ground measured during the
SABLES 98 field campaign  (Cuxart et al., 2000). In order to estimate the integral scales, a method
that combines the normalized autocorrelation function and the best Gaussian
fit (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.70) has been developed. Finally, by comparing, at the
same height, the scales of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> velocity components, it is found
that the turbulent flows are almost always anisotropic.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The aim of this paper is to investigate the possible correlations between the
integral scale of the turbulent stratified flows in the atmospheric boundary
layer and parameters characterizing topological features of the wind velocity
field, such as fractal dimension and its stability properties, studied
through the bulk Richardson number. We are aware that there is a lack of
investigations between the integral scale and the fractal dimension. The size
of the integral scale of the horizontal and vertical components and fractal
dimension of wind velocity near the earth's surface in the boundary layer are
determined. Also, these magnitudes are compared between them and vs. other
parameters such as the bulk Richardson number. It is assumed that the
turbulence is the primary agent that causes changes in the boundary layer. In
turbulent flows it is observed that time series of meteorological variables
such as wind velocity, temperature, pressure and other atmospheric mechanical
magnitudes fluctuate in a disordered way, with peaks extremely sharp and
irregular in space and time variations. The complicated nature of these
series indicates that the motion of the air is turbulent. If we take a good
look at the variety of fluctuations of different periods and amplitudes
observed in them, we could explain the complicated structure of turbulence.
The irregularity of the time series obeys the existence of different sizes
and timescales and also the nonlinear transfer of energy that exists between
them in the turbulent flows (Monin and Yaglom, 1971).</p>
      <p>The irregular behavior of these flows is also due to waves and turbulence
that are often superimposed onto a mean wind (Stull, 1988). If we filter the mean
wind and waves in the appropriate range, we will only have turbulence. Some
previous works present results of this procedure (Tijera et al., 2008). In
this work, the series of wind velocities in the three directions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> recorded by the anemometer are divided into series of non-overlapping
5 min length. Each of these series applies the necessary rotations to get
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis in the mean wind direction (mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is zero) and zero mean
vertical velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical component) (Kaimal and
Finnigan, 1994). We filter horizontal and
vertical mean wind velocity, obtaining the time series of fluctuations of the
velocity in both directions (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>When we observe these time series such as wind velocity, they vary in an
irregular shape, and in spite of their complexity present a self-similarity
structure (Frisch, 1995). This is a common property of the fractals, so that
wind velocity could be considered a fractal magnitude. The modern physical
notion of fractals is largely known due to Mandelbrot (1977, 1985), but the
mathematical notion of curves lines or sets having noninteger dimensions is
much older (Hausdorff, 1918; Besicovitch, 1929). An analysis that compares
the Haussdorff dimension and Kolmogorov capacities of self-similar structures
with noninteger fractal dimensions (Kolmogorov capacity or box counting
dimension) was presented by Vassilicos (Vassilicos and Hunt, 1991). The wind
velocity vs. time are irregular curves of this type, with noninteger
dimensions. These values correspond to the fractal dimension. A way of
measuring the complexity of these series is by means of fractal dimensions.
The fractal dimension of wind components is a characteristic of turbulent
flow, as has been shown in previous works where its relation to stability was
highlighted (Tijera et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>In this paper the integral scales of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> components are compared.
The scales are calculated using sonic anemometer data from three elevations
5.8 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6), 13 and 32 m above the ground at the main tower site of the
SABLES 98 field campaign. Turbulent motion of the
atmospheric flows occurs through a broad range of scales, from the smallest
ones that are usually defined as the scales at which the motion dissipates
into heat due to the viscosity of the fluid, to the larger scales
corresponding to the integral scale. The integral scale can be defined in
several ways: the larger scale of the flow, or the scale above which the
Fourier transform has a slope inferior to a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slope, such as where the
turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) is maximum. Micrometeorological studies have
found integral scales varying in a huge range, from around 100 to
1000 m (Teunissen, 1980; Kaimal and Finnigan, 1994).</p>
      <p>We study the anisotropy of the turbulent atmospheric flows in these scales by
comparing the integral scale of fluctuations of the velocity component along
the mean wind direction and the vertical component at three different levels
above the ground (5.8, 13.5, 32 m).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Theoretical background</title>
      <p>The irregular behavior of the atmospheric turbulent fluxes in the boundary
layer at large Reynolds numbers leads us to be interested in calculating
their fractal dimension. Fractal dimension could help us to classify the
irregularity of these flows. The more irregular the flow, the greater its
fractal dimension. Turbulent flows are characterized by the formation of many
eddies of different length scales. Theses irregularities are due to the
superimposition of eddies of different sizes, and this is related to a broad
range of scales that exist in turbulence. These scales vary from the smallest
scales as dissipative scales to larger scales as integral scales. This paper
is concerned with the analysis of the relationship between the integral scale
and the fractal dimension, as well as with the relationship between the
integral scale with the bulk Richardson number, which provides a measure of
the degree of stability in the flow, and how this turbulent flow is prone to
developing instabilities. It is also used as a criterion for the existence or
non-existence of turbulence in a stably stratified environment (a large
positive value over a critical threshold is indicative of a decaying
turbulence or a complete non-turbulence) (Arya, 2001).</p>
      <p>In this section we describe the methodology applied to calculate the fractal
dimension and the integral scale. The estimation of the fractal dimension of
time series has been the most commonly used criterion to measure their
chaotic structure; there exist different works in that direction (Grassberger
and Procaccia, 1983; Shirer et al., 1997). One of the methods most commonly used to
estimate the fractal dimension of atmospheric flows has been the mean slope
method through the box-counting dimension using mean slopes of the graph of
ln <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. ln (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for small ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number
of boxes of side <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> necessary to cover the different points that have been
registered in the physical space (velocity–time) (Falconer, 2000; Peitgen et
al., 2004). As <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> meets the following
relation:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≅</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the box-counting dimension that is an approximation of the
Hausdorff dimension and is calculated approximately by means of least-square
fitting of the representation of log <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. log <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, obtaining the
straight line regression given by the following equation:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The fractal dimension <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> will be given by the slope of this equation as
shown in Fig. 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Example of linear regression between the number of non-empty boxes
and the length side of the box. The slope (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fractal dimension of
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for an example of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component
of the wind velocity.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In this paper we focus on calculating the integral scales for horizontal and
vertical component fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and we studied their
variations with respect to the fractal dimension and the bulk Richardson
number, a turbulent parameter of stability.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Gaussian fit for a data series of wind velocities <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component
that allows us to calculate the integral scale.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>These integral scales have been estimated using the normalized
autocorrelation function and a Gaussian fit. The velocity autocorrelation
function as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (lag number) for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component is

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The integral timescale is

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The integral timescale provides a measure of the scales of eddies in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
direction of a flow field. In Eq. (2) we observed that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the
last lag in the data series. In boundary layer observations this timescale
can be related to a length by multiplying the mean wind velocity by the
timescale. This requires the assumption of frozen turbulence known as
Taylor's hypothesis (Panofsky and Dutton, 1984). The integral length scale
can be defined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The used method is based on a Gaussian fit of the normalized autocorrelation
function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and we calculated the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that verifies the
following equation:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Fig. 2 shows the Gaussian fit for an example of a data series of wind
velocities with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that verifies Eq. (6). This value allows us to
calculate the integral timescale by multiplying it by the time interval
between each lag.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Description of data</title>
      <p>The data set was recorded at the Research Centre for the lower
Atmosphere (CIBA in the Spanish acronym), located in Valladolid
province (Spain), and was measured in the SABLES 98 experimental campaign.
This research center was set up primarily
to study the atmospheric boundary layer. The campaign took place from 10 to
27 September 1998 (Cuxart et al., 2000). This experimental site is a quite
flat and homogeneous one that forms a high plain of nearly 200 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
surrounded by crop fields and some small bushes strewn over the ground. The
Duero River flows along the southeastern border of the high plain. The
synoptic conditions during the period of study of 8 consecutive days (from 14
to 21 September) were controlled by a high-pressure terrain system that
produces thermal convection during the diurnal hours and moderate to strong
stable stratification during the nights.</p>
      <p>In this work, data from sonic anemometers measured at a sampling rate of
20 Hz installed at 5.8 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6), 13 and 32 m are analyzed; 5 min
non-overlapping series are used to evaluate the different parameters. At a
rate of 20 data points per second, sonic anemometers can resolve integral
scales between about 10 and 2000 m of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal component and
between 1 and 1000 m of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical component, depending on the height
at which the sonic anemometer is positioned and at the wind speeds typically
measured in the SABLES 98 experiment. We detect vertical scales over a broad
range of scales from 1 to 1000 m. The integral scales here are calculated
based on the autocorrelation function, the mean wind velocity and integral
timescale, and each of them can be expected to vary significantly. As the
integral scales are the larger scales of turbulent flows, it is possible to
detect vertical scales larger than heights at which the sonic anemometer is
located.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Fractal dimension, integral scale and stability of
stratification.</title>
      <p>In this paper we analyze the influence of stability of stratification on
fractal dimension and integral scale. Different atmospheric surface-layer
data are separated into thermal and dynamics stability classes based on a
dimensionless parameter such as the bulk Richardson number
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ri</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This parameter represents
the ratio of the production or destruction of turbulence by buoyancy and by
wind shear strain that is caused by mechanical forces in the atmosphere:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ri</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gravity acceleration and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> the average
potential temperature at the reference level; the term <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is known as the buoyancy parameter. Ri<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is positive for
stable stratification, negative for unstable stratification and approximately
zero for neutral stratification (Arya, 2001). The way to calculate this
number is described next.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p>Calculation of the mean potential temperatures at height <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, and
close to the surface at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, namely <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn>5.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, since <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn>5.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The potential
temperature has been estimated as relative to ground level by using the
following formula: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0098</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Arya, 2001).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>Obtaining of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> by the mean wind velocity module at
heights <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, denoted by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>5.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn>5.8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list>
Once the values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been obtained by means of Eq. (7), we calculate the bulk
Richardson number in the layer between 32 and 5.8 m.</p>
      <p>In Fig. 3 we present the variation of the fractal dimension of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
horizontal component of the velocity fluctuations along time at the three
considered heights: 5.8, 13 and 32 m. The behavior of these variations is
similar at the three heights. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component fluctuation presents an
analogous behavior. The fractal dimension values are in a range between 1.30
and nearly 1.00. We have found that during the diurnal hours the fractal
dimension is bigger than at night (Tijera, 2012). We have no theoretical
reason to explain this result, but a possible explanation of why this happens
could be that fractal dimension is related to atmospheric stability and to
the intensity of turbulence. It is well known that the intensity of
turbulence grows as solar radiation increases, producing instability close to
the ground, mainly in the noon hours. Therefore, one of the possible reasons
for the increase in fractal dimension (FD) is the instability of the turbulent flow. On the
other hand, during the nights a strong atmospheric stability usually exists,
so the fractal dimension is usually smaller than during the diurnal hours.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Variation of the fractal dimension vs. time for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
component fluctuation at the three heights, showing the influence of the
diurnal cycle.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Variation of the integral length scale of horizontal and vertical
components vs. time at the three heights.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Variations of the integral scale vs. the fractal dimension of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component of the wind velocity at 5.8 m. <bold>(a)</bold> Diurnal hours
06:00–18:00; <bold>(b)</bold> night hours 18:00–06:00. On the top left of each
graph is indicated the linear regression of the
average values <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(5.8 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  DF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(5.8 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(5.8 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(5.8 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
DF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> being the integral scale and fractal dimension for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
component, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Variations of the integral scale vs. the fractal dimension of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component at 13 and 32 m. <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> diurnal
hours, <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> night hours. In the same manner as in
Fig. 5, the linear fits are <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(13 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(13 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(13 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
DF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(13 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(32 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
DF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(32 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In Fig. 4 it can be seen how the integral scale varies vs. time at the three
heights. There are some questions that have not been clarified yet in the
literature. For example: how do the diurnal and night cycles influence the
integral scale? Which is the mechanism responsible for the growth of this
integral scale? It has been observed in previous works that under certain
conditions the turbulent flows self-organize and develop large-scale
structures that take place through an inverse cascade that occurs in stably
stratified anisotropic flows (with or without rotation) (Smith and Waleffe,
2002; Marino et al., 2014). The inverse cascade mechanism might also be
responsible for the growth of the integral scale in the stratified
atmosphere. It is a fundamental issue that should be clarified in future
research. As is indicated in Fig. 4, the integral scale for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
component varies between around 100 m on their smaller scales and above
1500 m for their larger scales. The integral scales
for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component are slightly lower than for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component. It is
shown that these vertical scales can reach sizes of between a few tens of
meters and 1000 m on some occasions. It is observed, for each of them, that
the greater the height at which the sonic is located, the greater the
integral scale in the turbulent flow. Usually, at 32 m, these scales are, on
average, greater than those of 13 m and the latter higher than at 5.8 m
height.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Variations of the integral scale vs. the fractal dimension of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component at 5.8, 13 and 32 m. <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold>
and <bold>(e)</bold> diurnal hours; <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>
and <bold>(f)</bold> night hours. The fits to a quadratic function of the average
values appear on the top left of each graph: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> variable <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> variable DF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Although the conceptual model of turbulence as eddies of various sizes is
useful, it is difficult to obtain a correlation between the integral scale
and fractal dimension in the atmosphere if we consider values throughout the
whole day. However, it is much easier to find a relationship between the
integral scale and fractal dimension of horizontal and vertical components of
the wind velocity if we separate the hours of the day and night, and hence
analyze the influence of the diurnal and night cycles on these parameters.
Daylight hours are from 06:00 to 18:00 UTC and in the night from 18:00 to
06:00 UTC. These data sets are analyzed at the three studied heights.
Figure 5 shows the variations of the integral scale vs. fractal dimension at
the level of 5.8 m for the horizontal component. As can be appreciated in
Fig. 5, in the diurnal hours the average values of the integral scale vs. the
fractal dimension can be adjusted to the straight regression line given by
the linear equation that appears on the top left of the graph. During those
hours these values of the integral scale increase from a few tens of meters
to 400 m, with increasing values of the fractal dimension to 1.25. During
the nights the average values of the integral scale decrease with the
increase in the fractal dimension. These values also fit a straight
regression line as is indicated in Fig. 5. One of the possible explanations
for this behavior is that during the diurnal hours the average values of the
integral scale increase due to the unstable stratification. During the
nights, the existence of the stable stratification decreases the integral
scale, with an increase in fractal dimension to the approximate value of 1.2.
This tendency also appears at the other two heights, at 13 m and at 32 m as
shown in Fig. 6. Although during the diurnal cycle at 32 m the linear fit is
not so evident, the maximum scales are in the 1.15–1.20 range of the fractal
dimension, as is illustrated in Fig. 6c.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Integral length scales of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component plotted against the
bulk Richardson number at 5.8, 13 and
32 m. <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold> diurnal
hours; <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> night hours.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Integral length scales of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component plotted against the
bulk Richardson number at 5.8, 13 and
32 m. <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold> diurnal
hours; <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> night hours.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>For the vertical component in the three studied levels, the
behavior is slightly different. The average
values have fit a quadratic function as is indicated in Fig. 7. During the
diurnal hours the average values of the integral scale reach maximum scales
around the value of the fractal dimension of 1.15 at the three heights. From
this value the integral scale decreases when fractal dimension increases.
These maximum integral scales depend on the height. At the level of 5.8 m
their sizes reach 50 m on average and the scattering of the values shows
higher values that could reach 100 m. At the level of 13 m the values are
about 100 m, the dispersion of these scales can reach sizes of 200 m and at
the height of 32 m their larger average scales are approximately around
200 m, and due to the variances of the data set could reach sizes of 400 m.
From the value of the fractal dimension value of 1.15, the scales decrease to
a few meters.</p>
      <p>Throughout the night the average values of the integral scales decrease with
the increase in the fractal dimension in a parabolic way, as is indicated in
Fig. 7. This happens due to the stable stratification that occurs at night.
This behavior during the diurnal and night hours for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component of
the integral scale is similar to the results obtained for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component,
although the fits of average values are parabolic and not linear. In all
these cases our <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and confidence levels are high, as is
indicated in Fig. 7.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of integral scales of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
component <bold>(a)</bold> at 5.8 m, <bold>(b)</bold> at 13 m and <bold>(c)</bold> at
32 m, showing that the average values of theses scales fit to the linear
regression indicated on the top left each graph. The data set appears as a
cluster around the straight line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/407/2016/npg-23-407-2016-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Relationship between the integral scale and bulk Richardson number</title>
      <p>Among the numerous parameters existing to characterize the degree of
stratification in the atmosphere, we will use the bulk Richardson number. The
interpretation of this number has already been mentioned in the previous
section. Here, we analyze how the integral scale of each one of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
horizontal and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical components varies with the bulk Richardson
number in diurnal and night cycles in the studied period. These results are
shown in Fig. 8 for horizontal components and in Fig. 9 for vertical
components. During the daylight hours appear the three kinds of
stratification: unstable, neutral and stable, as is shown in the three graphs
on the left side of Figs. 8 and 9, each one corresponding to the different
heights. In the unstable and neutral stratifications, the integral scales are
higher than the integral scales under the influence of the stable
stratification. At 5.8 m for the horizontal component these scales vary
between 200 m and values slightly higher than 400 m, and in the case of
neutral stratification could increase to 600 m. This same behavior occurs at
the other two studied heights, 13 and 32 m, although their scales are
slightly higher as illustrated in Fig. 8. During the nights the biggest
stability due to positive values of the bulk Richardson number is observed.</p>
      <p>The same results are obtained for the integral scales of the vertical
component, although their sizes are smaller. At 5.8 m during the diurnal
hours the average values reach about 50 m and during the night hours their
values are below 50 m. At 13 and 32 m in the diurnal hours the average
values could reach about 150 and 200 m and at the night hours are below 100
and 200 m, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Analysis of the anisotropy with the integral scale</title>
      <p>In the last section we study the relationship between the integral scales of
the horizontal and vertical components at different heights: 5.8, 13 and
32 m. In Fig. 10 we represent the integral scale of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component vs.
the integral scale of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component at three studied heights, and we
find linear relations to the average values of these scales. All integral
scales measured during the period of study from 14 to 21 September appear in
this figure. The linear fits obtained are acceptable, with high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values at 13 and 32 m, as is indicated in Fig. 10. The linear regression
appears on the top left of each graph: at 5.8 m
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(5.8 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(5.8 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 178, at
13 m <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(13 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.957
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(13 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 275.6 and at 32 m
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(32 m)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.646 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(32 m) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>370,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">intw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the average values of the
integral scale for the horizontal and vertical components, respectively.</p>
      <p>The data in Fig. 10 appear quite scattered and the average values could be
representative for finding relationships between these scales. This scatter
is due to the large number of uncontrolled variables, nonlocal disturbance,
the presence of waves, horizontal inhomogeneity, low-frequency disturbances,
etc. These graphs show that the scale measured at 32 m is nearly always
larger than the integral scale measured at 5.8 m. On the basis of the
results obtained, we find slight differences between these components; thus,
there is anisotropy in atmospheric turbulent flows. In isotropic turbulence
the integral scales of both components should be the same at the same height.
Only under certain conditions and over limited scales is isotropy a property
of turbulence in the stratified atmosphere (Thorpe, 2005).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We have calculated the fractal dimension and the integral scale of the
horizontal and vertical components using wind velocity data from sonic
anemometers at three different heights: 5.8, 13 and 32 m. The numerical
results show slight significant differences in the diurnal and night cycles when the
variation of the integral scale is analyzed vs. the fractal dimension.
Atmospheric stratification is analyzed for the three heights through the bulk
Richardson number, finding the three classical types of stratification along
the diurnal cycle. It would be interesting for future works to study the
growth of the integral scale in stratified flows and whether this could be
due to the inverse cascade on both the diurnal and nighttime cycles. The main
conclusions of this study are as follows.</p>
      <p>Although all data appear quite scattered in this work, the average values of
these magnitudes show interesting results. During the diurnal hours the
average values of the integral scale of the horizontal component increase
with the increase in fractal dimension to around 1.25 at 5.8 and 13 m
height. At these heights we have found linear fits between these magnitudes
with high coefficients of correlation. While at 32 m the linear fit is not
so evident, the maximum scales are in the 1.15–1.20 range of the fractal
dimension. One of the possible explanations for this behavior is that during
the diurnal hours the average values of the integral scale increase due to
the unstable stratification. During the night hours the average values of the
integral scale decrease with the increase in the fractal dimension. These
values also fit a straight regression line at the three analyzed heights.
During the nights the existence of the stable stratification decreases the
integral scale, with an increase in the fractal dimension to an approximate
value of 1.2.</p>
      <p>For the vertical component of the integral scale the results are similar,
even though with slight differences. The average values have
fit a quadratic function. During the diurnal hours
the average values of the integral scale reach a maximum around the value of
the fractal dimension of 1.15 at the three heights. From this value the
integral scale decreases with the increase in the fractal dimension to a few
meters. The different degree of stratification along diurnal hours will be
reflected in that different behavior from the value of 1.15. At nights when
stability is normally high, the integral scale decreases with increasing
fractal dimension in a parabolic way.</p>
      <p>In the unstable and neutral stratification the integral scales are higher
than the integral scales under the influence of the stable stratification.</p>
      <p>To characterize the anisotropy of turbulent flows we have used the comparison
of integral scales of horizontal and vertical components, showing that the
scale of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component is almost always larger than the scale of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component at the same height.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>Data are not available form a public data repository (they are raw data with 20 Hz sampling rate and
then huge files). However, all the information about them can be found in the
reference Cuxart et al. (2000). On the other hand, original data used in this
work can be provided upon request to author.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research has been funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and
Innovation (projects CGL2009-12797-C03-03). The GR35/10 program (supported by
Banco Santander and UCM) has also partially financed this work through the
Micrometeorology and Climate Variability research group (no. 910437). Thanks
to the participating teams in SABLES 98 for the facilities with the
data.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: J. Rees <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Arya, S. P.: Introduction to Micrometeorology, International Geophysics
Series, Academic Press, 420 pp., 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Besicovitch, A. S.: On linear sets of points of fractional dimension,
Math. Ann., 101, 161–193, 1929.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Cuxart, J.,  Yagüe, C.,   Morales, G.,   Terradellas, E.,     Orbe, J.,   Calvo, J.,
Fernández,  A.,   Soler, M. R.,  Infante, C.,   Buenestado, P.,   Espinalt, A.,
Joergensen,   H. E.,  Rees, J. M.,   Vilà,  J.,   Redondo, J. M.,  Cantalapiedra, I. R.,  and
Conangla, L.: Stable atmospheric boundary layer experiment in Spain (SABLES
98): A report, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 96, 337–370,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1002609509707" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1002609509707</ext-link>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Falconer, K. J.: Fractal Geometry Mathematical Foundations and Applications.
John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd., 288 pp., 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Frisch, U.: Turbulence, Cambridge Univesity Press, England, 296 pp., 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I.: Characterization of Strange Attractors,
Phys. Rev Lett., 50, 346–349, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Hausdorff, F.: Dimension und äußeres Mass. Mathemastische Annalen.,
79, 157–179, 1918.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows. Their
Structure and Measurement, Oxford University Press, 289 pp., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Mandelbrot, B. B.: Fractal: Form, Chance and Dimension, Freeman, San
Fracisco, 365 pp., 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Mandelbrot, B. B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, San Fracisco,
497 pp., 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Marino, R., Mininni, P. D., Rosenberg, D., and Pouquet, A.: Large-sale
anisotropy in stably stratified rotating flows, Phys. Rev. E, 90, 023018,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.023018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.90.023018</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M.: Statistical Fluid Mechanics Mechanics,  Vol. 1,
Dover Publications, 769 pp., 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Panofsky, H. A. and Dutton, J. A.: Atmospheric Turbulence, Wiley and Sons,
397 pp., 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Peitgen, H., Jürgens, H., and Saupe, D.: Chaos and Fractals,
Springer-Verlag, Springer-Science <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Business Media, LLC, 971 pp., 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Shirer, H. N., Fosmire, C. J., Wells, R., and Suciu, L.: Estimating the Correlation
Dimension of Atmospheric Time Series,  J. Atmos. Sci.,
54,   211–229, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, L. and Waleffe, F.: Generation of slow large scales in forced rotating
stratified turbulence,  J. Fluid Mech.,  451, 145–168, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Stull, R. B.: An introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 670 pp., 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Teunissen, H. W.: Structure of mean winds and turbulence in the planetary
boundary layer over rural terrain,  Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,  19, 187–221,
1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Thorpe, S. A.: The turbulent ocean, Cambridge Universe Press, New York,
439 pp., 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Tijera, M., Cano, J. L., Cano, D., Bolster, B., and Redondo, J. M.: Filtered
deterministic waves and analysis of the fractal dimension of the components
of the wind velocity, Nuovo Cimento C., 31, 653–667, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Tijera, M., Maqueda, G., Yaque, C., and Cano, J.: Analysis of fractal
dimension of the wind speed and its relations with turbulent and stability
parameters, Intech, Fractal Analisis and Chaos in Geosciences, 29–46, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Vassilicos, J. C. and Hunt, J. C. R.: Fractal dimensions and spectra of
interfaces with application to turbulence, Proceedings Mathematical and
Physical Sciences, 435, 505–534, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Influence of atmospheric stratification on the integral scale and fractal dimension of turbulent flows</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">In this work the relation between integral scale and
fractal dimension and the type of stratification in fully developed
turbulence is analyzed. The integral scale corresponds to that in which
energy from larger scales is incoming into a turbulent regime. One of the
aims of this study is the understanding of the relation between the integral
scale and the bulk Richardson number, which is one of the most widely used
indicators of stability close to the ground in atmospheric studies. This
parameter will allow us to verify the influence of the degree of
stratification over the integral scale of the turbulent flows in the
atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). The influence of the diurnal and night
cycles on the relationship between the fractal dimension and integral scale
is also analyzed. The fractal dimension of wind components is a turbulent
flow characteristic, as has been shown in previous works, where its relation
to stability was highlighted. Fractal dimension and integral scale of the
horizontal (<i>u</i>′) and vertical (<i>w</i>′) velocity fluctuations have been
calculated using the mean wind direction as a framework. The scales are
obtained using sonic anemometer data
from three elevations 5.8, 13 and 32 m above the ground measured during the
SABLES 98 field campaign  (Cuxart et al., 2000). In order to estimate the integral scales, a method
that combines the normalized autocorrelation function and the best Gaussian
fit (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≥  0.70) has been developed. Finally, by comparing, at the
same height, the scales of <i>u</i>′ and <i>w</i>′ velocity components, it is found
that the turbulent flows are almost always anisotropic.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Arya, S. P.: Introduction to Micrometeorology, International Geophysics
Series, Academic Press, 420 pp., 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Besicovitch, A. S.: On linear sets of points of fractional dimension,
Math. Ann., 101, 161–193, 1929.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Cuxart, J.,  Yagüe, C.,   Morales, G.,   Terradellas, E.,     Orbe, J.,   Calvo, J.,
Fernández,  A.,   Soler, M. R.,  Infante, C.,   Buenestado, P.,   Espinalt, A.,
Joergensen,   H. E.,  Rees, J. M.,   Vilà,  J.,   Redondo, J. M.,  Cantalapiedra, I. R.,  and
Conangla, L.: Stable atmospheric boundary layer experiment in Spain (SABLES
98): A report, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 96, 337–370,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1002609509707" target="_blank">doi:10.1023/A:1002609509707</a>, 2000.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Falconer, K. J.: Fractal Geometry Mathematical Foundations and Applications.
John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd., 288 pp., 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Frisch, U.: Turbulence, Cambridge Univesity Press, England, 296 pp., 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I.: Characterization of Strange Attractors,
Phys. Rev Lett., 50, 346–349, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Hausdorff, F.: Dimension und äußeres Mass. Mathemastische Annalen.,
79, 157–179, 1918.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows. Their
Structure and Measurement, Oxford University Press, 289 pp., 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Mandelbrot, B. B.: Fractal: Form, Chance and Dimension, Freeman, San
Fracisco, 365 pp., 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Mandelbrot, B. B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, San Fracisco,
497 pp., 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Marino, R., Mininni, P. D., Rosenberg, D., and Pouquet, A.: Large-sale
anisotropy in stably stratified rotating flows, Phys. Rev. E, 90, 023018,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.023018" target="_blank">doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.023018</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M.: Statistical Fluid Mechanics Mechanics,  Vol. 1,
Dover Publications, 769 pp., 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Panofsky, H. A. and Dutton, J. A.: Atmospheric Turbulence, Wiley and Sons,
397 pp., 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Peitgen, H., Jürgens, H., and Saupe, D.: Chaos and Fractals,
Springer-Verlag, Springer-Science + Business Media, LLC, 971 pp., 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Shirer, H. N., Fosmire, C. J., Wells, R., and Suciu, L.: Estimating the Correlation
Dimension of Atmospheric Time Series,  J. Atmos. Sci.,
54,   211–229, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, L. and Waleffe, F.: Generation of slow large scales in forced rotating
stratified turbulence,  J. Fluid Mech.,  451, 145–168, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Stull, R. B.: An introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 670 pp., 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Teunissen, H. W.: Structure of mean winds and turbulence in the planetary
boundary layer over rural terrain,  Bound.-Lay. Meteorol.,  19, 187–221,
1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Thorpe, S. A.: The turbulent ocean, Cambridge Universe Press, New York,
439 pp., 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Tijera, M., Cano, J. L., Cano, D., Bolster, B., and Redondo, J. M.: Filtered
deterministic waves and analysis of the fractal dimension of the components
of the wind velocity, Nuovo Cimento C., 31, 653–667, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Tijera, M., Maqueda, G., Yaque, C., and Cano, J.: Analysis of fractal
dimension of the wind speed and its relations with turbulent and stability
parameters, Intech, Fractal Analisis and Chaos in Geosciences, 29–46, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Vassilicos, J. C. and Hunt, J. C. R.: Fractal dimensions and spectra of
interfaces with application to turbulence, Proceedings Mathematical and
Physical Sciences, 435, 505–534, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
