<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7946</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-23-361-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Wavelet analysis of the singular spectral reconstructed time <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> series to study the imprints of solar–ENSO–geomagnetic <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> activity on Indian climate</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Study of the imprints of solar--ENSO--geomagnetic activity on
Indian climate}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~L.~Sunkara and R.~K.~Tiwari}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sunkara</surname><given-names>Sri Lakshmi</given-names></name>
          <email>srilakshmi.ucess@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Tiwari</surname><given-names>Rama Krishna</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>University Centre for Earth and Space Sciences, University of Hyderabad, 500 046 Hyderabad, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Uppal Road, 500 007 Hyderabad, India</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Sri Lakshmi Sunkara (srilakshmi.ucess@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>361</fpage><lpage>374</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016.html">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>To study the imprints of the solar–ENSO–geomagnetic activity on the Indian
subcontinent, we have applied singular spectral analysis (SSA) and wavelet
analysis to the tree-ring temperature variability record from the Western
Himalayas. Other data used in the present study are the solar sunspot
number (SSN), geomagnetic indices (aa index), and the Southern Oscillation
Index (SOI) for the common time period of 1876–2000. Both SSA and wavelet
spectral analyses reveal the presence of 5–7-year short-term ENSO variations
and the 11-year solar cycle, indicating the possible combined influences of
solar–geomagnetic activities and ENSO on the Indian temperature. Another
prominent signal corresponding to 33-year periodicity in the tree-ring record
suggests the Sun-temperature variability link probably induced by changes in
the basic state of the Earth's atmosphere. In order to complement the above
findings, we performed a wavelet analysis of SSA reconstructed time series,
which agrees well with our earlier results and increases the signal-to-noise
ratio, thereby showing the strong influence of solar–geomagnetic activity
and ENSO throughout the entire period. The solar flares are considered
responsible for causing the atmospheric circulation patterns. The net effect
of solar–geomagnetic processes on the temperature record might suggest
counteracting influences on shorter (about 5–6-year) and longer (about
11–12-year) timescales. The present analyses suggest that the influence of
solar activities on the Indian temperature variability operates in part
indirectly through coupling of ENSO on multilateral timescales. The analyses,
hence, provide credible evidence of teleconnections of tropical Pacific
climatic variability and Indian climate ranging from inter-annual to decadal
timescales and also suggest the possible role of exogenic triggering in
reorganizing the global Earth–ocean–atmospheric systems.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Several recent studies of solar–geomagnetic effects on climate have been
examined on both global as well as on regional scales (Lean and Rind, 2008;
Benestaed and Schmidt, 2009; Meehl et al., 2009; Kiladis and Diaz, 1989; Pant
and Rupa Kumar, 1997; Gray et al., 1992; Wiles et al., 1998; Friis and
Svensmark, 1997; Rigozo et al., 2005; Feng et al., 2003; Tiwari and
Srilakshmi, 2009; Chowdary et al., 2006, 2014; Appenzeller et al., 1998;
Proctor et al., 2002; Tsonis et al., 2005; De Freitas and Mclean, 2013). The
Sun's long-term magnetic variability caused by the sunspots is considered to
be one of the primary drivers of climatic changes. The short-term magnetic
variability is due to the disturbances in the Earth's magnetic fields caused
by the solar activities and is indicated by the geomagnetic indices. The
Sun's magnetic variability modulates the magnetic and particulate fluxes in
the heliosphere. This determines the interplanetary conditions and imposes
significant electromagnetic forces and effects upon the planetary atmosphere.
All these effects are due to the changing solar-magnetic fields, which are
relevant for planetary climates, including the climate of the Earth. The
Sun–Earth relationship varies on different timescales ranging from days to
years, bringing a drastic influence on the climatic patterns. The ultimate
cause of solar variability, on timescales from decadal to centennial to
millennial or even longer scales, has its origin in the solar dynamo
mechanism. During the solar maxima, huge amounts of solar energy particles
are released, thereby causing the geomagnetic disturbances. The 11-year solar
cycle acts as an important driving force for variations in the space weather,
ultimately giving rise to climatic changes. It is, therefore, imperative to
understand the origin of space climate by analyzing the different proxies of
solar-magnetic variabilities. Another important phenomenon is El
Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which is associated with droughts,
floods, and intense rainfall in different parts of the world. The strong
coupling and interactions between the tropical ocean and the atmosphere play
a major role in the development of the global climatic system. The El
Niño events generally recur approximately every 3–5 years, with large
events spaced around 3–7 years apart. The ENSO phenomena have shown a huge
impact on the Asian monsoon (Cole et al., 1993), Indian monsoon (Chowdary et
al., 2006, 2014), as well as globally (Horel and Wallance, 1981; Barnett,
1989; Yasunari, 1985; Nicolson, 1997). In particular, the El Niño, solar,
geomagnetic activities are the major affecting forces on the decadal and
interdecadal temperature variability on global and regional scales in a
direct/indirect way (El-Borie et al., 2010; Gray et al., 2010). Recent
studies (Frohlich and Lean, 2004; Steinhilber et al., 2009) indicate the
possible influence of solar activity on Earth's temperature/climate on
multi-decadal timescales. The 11-year solar cyclic variations observed from
the several temperature climate records also suggest the impact of solar
irradiance variability on terrestrial temperature (Budyko, 1969; Friis and
Lassen, 1991; Friis and Svensmark, 1997; Kasatkina et al., 2007). The
bi-decadal (22-year) cycle, called the Hale cycle, is related to the reversal
of the solar-magnetic field direction (Lean et al., 1995; Kasatkina et al.,
2007). The 33-year cycle (Bruckener cycle) is also caused by the solar
origin, but it is a very rare cycle (Kasatkina et al., 2007). The 2–7-year
ENSO cyclic pattern and its possible coupling process are the major driving
forces for the temperature variability (Gray et al., 1992; Wiles et al.,
1998; Mokhov et al., 2000; Rigozo et al., 2007, Kothawale et al., 2010).
El-Borie and Al-Thoyaib (2006) and El-Borie et al. (2007, 2010) have
indicated in their studies that the global temperature should lag the
geomagnetic activity with a maximum correlation when the temperature lags by
6 years. Mendoza et al. (1991) reported on possible connections between solar
activity and El Niños, while Reid and Gage (1988) and Reid (1991)
reported on the similarities between the 11-year running means of monthly
sunspot numbers and global sea surface temperature. These findings suggest
that there is a possibility of strong coupling between temperature–ENSO and
solar–geomagnetic signals.</p>
      <p>Several studies have been carried out to understand the climatic changes of
India in the past millennium using various proxy records, e.g., ice cores,
lake sediments, glacier fluctuations, and peat deposits. There is a lack of
high-precision and high-resolution palaeo-climatic information for longer
timescales from the Indian subcontinent. Tree-ring data are a promising proxy
to retrieve high-resolution past climatic changes from several geographical
regions of India (Bhattacharyya et al., 1988, 1992, 2006; Hughes, 1992;
Bhattacharyya and Yadav, 1996; Borgaonkar et al., 1996; Chaudhary et al.,
1999; Yadav et al., 1999; Bhattacharyya and Chaudhary, 2003; Shah et al.,
2007). It has been noted that tree-ring-based climatic reconstructions in
India generally do not exceed 400-year records except at some sites in the
northwestern Himalaya. Thus, a long record of tree-ring data is needed to
extend available climate reconstruction further back to determine climatic
variability on sub-decadal, decadal, and century scales. However,
non-availability of older living trees at most of the sites is hindering the
preparation of a long tree chronology. In a previous study (Tiwari and
Srilakshmi, 2009), we have studied the periodicities and non-stationary modes
in the tree-ring temperature data from the same region (AD 1200–2000). To
reveal significant connections among the solar–geomagnetic–ENSO “triad”
phenomena on tree-ring width in detail for the period from 1876 to 2000, we
have applied here singular spectral analysis (SSA) and the wavelet spectral
analysis for sunspot data, geomagnetic data (aa index), the Troup Southern
Oscillation Index (SOI), and the Western Himalayan tree-ring data. Here our
main objective is to employ wavelet-based analysis in SSA reconstructed time
series to find evidence of the possible linkages, if any, among
ENSO–solar–geomagnetic activity in the Indian temperature records.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Source and nature of data</title>
      <p>The data analyzed here include the time series of the (1) smoothed sunspot
number for solar activity, (2) geomagnetic activity data (aa indices),
(3) the Troup Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) for the study of the El
Niño–Southern Oscillation, called ENSO, and (4) the Western Himalayan
temperature variability record. All the data sets have been analyzed for the
common period of 125 years spanning over 1876–2000. The monthly sunspot
number data have been obtained from the Sunspot Index Data Center
(<uri>http://astro.oma.be/SIDC/</uri>). The Troup SOI data are obtained from the
Bureau of Meteorology of Australia (<uri>http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/</uri>).
The data for geomagnetic activity, the aa index, were provided by the
National Geophysical Data Center, NGDC
(<uri>http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/GEOMAG/aastar.shtml</uri>). The aa index is a
measure of the disturbance level of Earth's magnetic field based on
magnetometer observations at two, nearly antipodal, stations in Australia and
England. In recent studies, the tree-ring proxy climate indicators are being
used for extracting information regarding past seasonal temperature or
precipitation/drought based on the measurements of annual ring width. The
detailed description of the data has been presented elsewhere (Yadav et al.,
2004). A brief account of the data pertinent to the present analysis,
however, is summarized here. The tree-ring data being analyzed here are one
of the best temperature variability records (1876–2000) of the pre-monsoon
season in the Western Himalayas available. The mean temperature series is
obtained from nine weather stations including both from high- and
low-elevation areas in the Western Himalayas. Temperature variability history
is based on widely spread pure Himalayan cedar (Cedrus deodara (Roxb.)
G. Don) trees and characterizes all the sites with almost no ground
vegetation, thereby minimizing individual variation in tree-ring sequences
induced by inter-tree competition (Yadav et al., 2004). The mean
chronological structure is based on a total of 60 radii from 45 trees in
total, the statistical feature of which shows that the chronology is suitable
for dendro-climatic studies back to AD 1226 (Yadav et al., 2004).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods applied</title>
      <p>To analyze the temporal series and to find the climatic structure, we have
here three methods: principal component analysis (PCA), singular spectral
analysis (SSA), and wavelet analysis.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Principal component analysis (PCA)</title>
      <p>As a preliminary analysis, we have applied principal component analysis (PCA)
to the data sets for the reduction and extraction of dimensionality of the
data and to rate the amount of variation present in the original data set.
The purpose of applying PCA is to identify patterns in the given time series.
The new components thereby obtained by the PCA analysis are termed PC1, PC2,
PC3, and so on (for the first, second, and third principal components), and
are uncorrelated. The different PCs capture part of the variance and are
ranked depending on their corresponding percentage variance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Singular spectral analysis</title>
      <p>The singular spectrum analysis (SSA) method is designed to extract as much
information as possible from a short, noisy time series without any prior
knowledge about the dynamics underlying the series (Broomhead and King, 1986;
Vautard and Ghil, 1989; Alonso et al., 2005; Golyandina et al., 2001). The
method is a form of principal component analysis (PCA) applied to
lag-correlation structures of the time series. The basic SSA decomposes an
original time series into a new series that consists of trend, periodic or
quasi-periodic, and white noises according to singular value
decomposition (SVD), and provides the reconstructed components (RCs). The
basic steps involved in SSA are decomposition (involves embedding and
singular value decomposition, SVD) and reconstruction (involves grouping and
diagonal averaging). Embedding decomposes the original time series into the
trajectory matrix; SVD turns the trajectory matrix into the decomposed
trajectory matrices. The reconstruction stage involves grouping to make
subgroups of the decomposed trajectory matrices and diagonal averaging to
reconstruct the new time series from the subgroups.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Step 1: decomposition</title>
      <p><list list-type="custom">
              <list-item><label>a.</label>

      <p><italic>Embedding</italic>: the first step in the basic SSA algorithm is the
embedding step where the initial time series change into the trajectory
matrix. Let the time series be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, …, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
length <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> without any missing values. Here the window length <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is chosen
such that 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>/2 to embed the initial time series. We map
the time series <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lagged vectors, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
…, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 … <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1. The trajectory matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dimensions) is written as

                        <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item><label>b.</label>

      <p><italic>Singular value decomposition (SVD)</italic>: here we apply SVD to the
trajectory matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to decompose and obtain
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> called eigen triples, where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">U</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dimensions; 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is an
orthonormal matrix; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a diagonal
matrix of order <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dimensions;
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a square orthonormal matrix.</p>

      <p>The trajectory matrix is thus written as

                        <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">U</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

                  with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th eigen triple of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">U</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, 2, 3 …, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in which <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> max(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0).</p>
              </list-item>
            </list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Step 2: reconstruction</title>
      <p><list list-type="custom">
              <list-item><label>c.</label>

      <p><italic>Grouping</italic>: here the matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is decomposed into subgroups
according to the trend, periodic or quasi-periodic components, and white
noises. The grouping step of the reconstruction stage corresponds to the
splitting of the elementary matrices <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into several groups and
summing the matrices within each group. Let <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
…, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> be the group of indices <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, … <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then the
matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to the group <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>I</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> … <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The split of the set of indices <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, 2, …, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into the disjoint
subsets <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, … <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to Eq. (3):

                        <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

                  The sets <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, …, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are called the eigen triple grouping.</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item><label>d.</label>

      <p><italic>Diagonal averaging</italic>: the diagonal averaging transfers
each matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into a time series, which is an additive component
of the initial time series <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for a element
matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th term of the resulting series is obtained by
averaging <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> such that
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2. This is called diagonal averaging or the
Hankelization of the matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Hankel matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">HZ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the trajectory matrix corresponding to the series obtained by the result of
diagonal averaging.</p>

      <p>Considering Eq. (3), let <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) be a matrix with
elements <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here diagonal averaging transforms
matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into a series <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, …, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the
formula

                        <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.5}{8.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

                  This diagonal averaging by Eq. (4) applied to the resultant
matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, produces time series <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of length <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For
such signal characteristics, it is essential to examine the time–frequency
pattern so as to understand whether a particular frequency is temporally
consistent or inconsistent. Hence, for non-stationary signals, we need a
transform that will be useful to obtain the frequency content of the time
series/signal as a function of time.</p>

      <p>An alternative method for studying the non-stationarity of the time series is
wavelet transform. For non-stationary signals, wavelet decomposition would be
the most appropriate method because the analyzing functions (the wavelet
functions) are localized both in time and frequency.</p>
              </list-item>
            </list></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Wavelet spectral analysis</title>
      <p>During the past decades, wavelet analysis has become a popular method for the
analysis of aperiodic and quasi-periodic data (Grinsted et al., 2004;
Jevrejeva et al., 2003; Torrence and Compo, 1998; Torrence and Webster,
1999). In particular, it has become an important tool for studying localized
variations of power within a time series. By decomposing a time series into
time–frequency space, the dominant modes of variability and their variation
with respect to time can be identified. The wavelet transform has various
applications in geophysics, including tropical convection (Weng and Lau,
1994) and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (Gu and Philander, 1995). We
have applied the wavelet analysis to analyze the non-stationary signals,
which permits the identification of the main periodicities of
ENSO–sunspot–geomagnetic activity in the time series. The results give us
more insight information about the evolution of these variables in
frequency–time mode.</p>
      <p>A wavelet transform requires the choice of analyzing function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (called
“mother wavelet”) that has the specific property of time–frequency
localization. The continuous wavelet transform revolves around decomposing
the time series into scaling components for identifying oscillations
occurring on a fast (time)scale and others on slow scales. Mathematically,
the continuous wavelet transform of a time series <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be given as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents time series and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the base wavelet function
(here we have chosen the Morlet function), with a length that is much shorter
than the time series <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for wavelet coefficients. The
variable “<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” is called the scaling parameter that determines the
frequency (or scale) so that varying “<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” gives rise to the wavelet
spectrum. The factor “<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” is related to the shift of the analysis window
in time so that varying <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the sliding method of the wavelet
over <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>In several recent analyses, a complex Morlet wavelet has been found useful
for geophysical time series analysis. The Morlet is mostly used to find areas
where there is high amplitude at certain frequencies. The complex Morlet
wavelet can be represented by a periodic sinusoidal function with a Gaussian
envelope and is excellent for a Morlet wavelet that may be defined
mathematically, as follows:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a non-dimensional value. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is chosen to be 5
to make the highest and lowest values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> approximately equal to 0.5,
thus satisfying the admissibility condition. The complex-valued Morlet
transform enables us to extract information about the amplitude and phase of
the signal to be analyzed. Wavelet transform preserves the self-similarity
scaling property, which is the inherent characteristic feature of
deterministic chaos. The continuous wavelet transform has edge artifacts
because the wavelet is completely localized in time. The cone of
influence (COI) is the area in which the wavelet power caused by a
discontinuity at the edge has dropped to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the value to the edge.
The statistical significance of the wavelet power can be assessed relative to
the null hypotheses that the signal is generated by a stationary process with
a given background power spectrum (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the first-order
autoregressive (AR1) process (Grinsted et. al., 2004):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Fourier frequency index.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series data of <bold>(a)</bold> sunspot index, <bold>(b)</bold> the
mean pre-monsoon temperature anomalies of the Western Himalayas (Yadav et
al., 2004), <bold>(c)</bold> the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) and
<bold>(d)</bold> geomagnetic indices (aa indices) for the common
period 1876–2000.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The cross-wavelet transform is applied to two time series to identify the
similar patterns that are difficult to assess from a continuous wavelet map.
Cross-wavelet power reveals areas with high common power. The cross-wavelet
of two time series <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where “<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>” denotes the complex
conjugate. The cross-wavelet power of two time series with background power
spectra <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the confidence level associated with the probability <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
for a pdf defined by the square root of the product of the two
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions (Torrence and Compo, 1998). The wavelet power is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the complex argument of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
interpreted as the local phase. The cross-wavelet analysis gives the
correlation between the two time series as a function of the period of the
signal and its time evolution with a 95 % confidence level contour. The
statistical significance is estimated using a red noise model.</p>
      <p>Wavelet coherence is another important measure to assess how coherent the
cross-wavelet spectrum transform is in time–frequency space. The wavelet
coherence of two time series is defined as (Torrence and Webster, 1999)

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a smoothing operator. The smoothing operator is written as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>scale</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>time</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)), where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>scale</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes smoothing along the wavelet scale axis and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>time</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smoothing in time. Here, for the Morlet wavelet, the
smoothing operator is
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-8mm}}?>

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>time</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="|" open="."><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msubsup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>time</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="|" open="."><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="|" open="."><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are normalization constants and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
rectangle function. The factor of 0.6 is the empirically determined scale
decorrelation length of the Morlet wavelet (Torrence and Compo, 1998). The
statistical significance level of the wavelet coherence is estimated using
the Monte Carlo methods (Grinsted et al., 2004).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>First four principal components (PCs 1–4) for time series:
<bold>(a)</bold> sunspot numbers, <bold>(b)</bold> the mean pre-monsoon temperature
anomalies of the Western Himalayas, <bold>(c)</bold> SOI index and
<bold>(d)</bold> geomagnetic indices (aa indices) for the period 1876–2000.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>We analyzed the data sets spanning over the period of 1876–2000 using the
PCA, SSA, and wavelet spectral analyses. Figure 1 shows four time series:
(1) the smoothed sunspot number representing solar activities;
(2) geomagnetic (aa indices); (3) the Troup Southern Oscillation Index (SOI)
for the study of ENSO, and (4) the Western Himalayan temperature variability
record, which are analyzed in the present work. From visual inspection it is
apparent from Fig. 1 that both WH and SOI data show an irregular and random
pattern, while sunspot numbers have a quasi-cyclic character. Furthermore,
the WH tree-ring record also exhibits distinct temperature variability but
nonstationary behavior at different scales. This variability might be
suggestive of coupled global ocean–atmospheric dynamics or some other
factors, such as deforestation, anthropogenic, or a high latitudinal
influence (Yadav et al., 2004).</p>
      <p>Hence it is quite difficult to differentiate such a complex climate signal
visually, and difficult to infer any clear oscillation without the help of
powerful mathematical methods. For identification of any oscillatory
components and understanding of the climatic variations on regional and
global scales, we have applied PCA, SSA, and wavelet analysis. Figure 2 shows
the principal components (PCs) for the first four eigen triples (PC1, PC2,
PC3, PC4) for the given data sets. Figure 3 shows the power spectra of the
principal components (PCs) for the four data sets shown in Fig. 2. From
Fig. 3, it is observed that the power spectra of PCs 1–4 for the sunspot
data exhibit high power at 124, 11, and 4–2.8 years. The presence of a high
solar signal at 124 years indicates the quasi-stable oscillatory components
in the data. The power spectra of geomagnetic data also show the presence of
strong signals at 124, 10–11, and 4–2 years, suggesting a strong link of
solar–geomagnetic activity. The power spectra of WH temperature data show
strong high power at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 62, 32–35, 11, 5, and 2–3 years, suggesting a
strong combined influence of global ocean–atmospheric circulation, and
solar–geomagnetic and ENSO effects on the Indian climate system. Climate
cycles of 50–70 years have been widely reported in various ocean and
atmospheric phenomena (Ogurtsov et al., 2002; Tiwari, 2005). Schlesinger and
Ramankutti (1994) and Minobe (1997) have reported similar 55–70-year
inter-decadal oscillations in global mean temperature. Dominant amplitudes
corresponding to 62- and 32–35-year periodicities may, therefore, be linked
to the Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation (AMO) of ocean–atmospheric
circulations. The 11-year peak is a well-known solar signal, while the
2–5-year periods apparently fall in the ENSO frequency band. These results
could be better confirmed by applying the mathematical tools of SSA and
wavelet analyses.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Power spectra of the first four principal component (PCs) (PCs 1–4
shown in Fig. 2) for all the data sets with their significant periodicities
at 124, 11, 4 and 2.8 years indicated in bold letters.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Wavelet power spectrum of <bold>(a)</bold> sunspot number,
<bold>(b)</bold> Western Himalayan temperature data, <bold>(c)</bold> Southern
Oscillation Index (SOI) and <bold>(d)</bold> geomagnetic activity (aa indices)
with the cone of influence (lighter shaded smooth curve) and black lines
indicating significant power on the 95 % level compared to red noise based
on the first-order auto-regressive (AR(1)) coefficient. The legend on the
right indicates the cross-wavelet power.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Cross-wavelet spectrum between <bold>(a)</bold> sunspot number–Western
Himalayan data, <bold>(b)</bold> Western Himalayan–Southern Oscillation Index,
<bold>(c)</bold> sunspot number–Southern Oscillation Index, and
<bold>(d)</bold> geomagnetic aa indices–Western Himalayan data with the cone of
influence (lighter shaded smooth curve) and black lines indicating
significant power on a 95 % level compared to red noise based on the
AR(1) coefficient. The legend on the right indicates the cross-wavelet
power.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Singular spectra with their SSA decomposed components and their
reconstructed time series for <bold>(a)</bold> sunspot number and
<bold>(b)</bold> Western Himalayan temperature data.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>To explore the stationary characteristics of these peaks obtained by the PCA,
we have applied the Morlet-based wavelet transform approach (Holschneider,
1995; Foufoula-Georgiou and Kumar, 1995; Torrence and Compo, 1998; Grinsted
et al., 2004). The wavelet spectrum identifies the main periodicities in the
time series and helps to analyze the periodicities with respect to time.
Figure 4 shows the wavelet spectrum for the (a) smoothed sunspot number for
solar activity (SSN), the (b) Western Himalayan (WH) temperature variability
record, (c) geomagnetic activity, and the (d) Troup Southern Oscillation
Index (SOI). From the wavelet spectrum of sunspot time series (Fig. 4a), the
signal near 11 years is the strongest feature and is persistent during the
entire series, indicating the non-stationary behavior of the sunspot time
series. The wavelet spectrum of SOI (Fig. 4c) shows strong amplitudes.
However, due to the non-stationary (time-variant) character of the time
series, the observed spectral peaks (power) split in the interval of
2–8 years. The wavelet power spectrum of the Western Himalayan temperature
variability (Fig. 4b) reveals significant power concentration on inter-annual
timescales of 3–5 years and at an 11-year solar cycle. A dominant amplitude
mode is also seen in the low-frequency range at around 35–40 years (at
periods 1930–1980) corresponding to AMO cycles. Our result agrees well with
the results of other climate reconstructions (Mann et. al., 1995) from tree
rings and other proxies. The observed variability in AMO periodicity has also
been reported in other tree-ring records (Gray et al., 2004). The statistical
significance of the wavelet power spectrum is tested by a Monte Carlo method
(Torrence and Compo, 1998). The WH spectra depicting statistically
significant powers above the 95 % significance level at around 5, 11 and
33 years suggests the possible imprint of sunspot–geomagnetic and ENSO
phenomena on the tree-ring data. On shorter timescales, the wavelet power
spectrum of the geomagnetic record (Fig. 4d) also reveals statistically
significant power at around 2-, 4–8-, and 11-year periods.</p>
      <p>In order to have better visualization of similar periods in two time series
and for the interpretation of the results, the cross-wavelet spectrum has
been applied. Figure 5 shows the cross-wavelet spectrum of the (a) SSN–WH
temperature data, (b) WH data–SOI, and (c) SSN–SOI data. The contours (dark
black lines) are the enclosing regions where cross-wavelet power is
significantly higher, at 95 % confidence levels. The wavelet cross-spectra
of WH–SSN (Fig. 5a) show a statistically significant high power over a
period of 1895–1985 in a 8–16-year band. It is seen that in the WH–SOI
cross-spectra (Fig. 5b), the high power is observed at a 2–4-year band and
at 8–16 years as well. The SSN–SOI spectra (Fig. 5c) show a strong
correlation at an 11-year solar cycle, which is stronger during 1910–1950
and 1960–2000 (Rigozo et al., 2002, 2003), suggesting the strongest El
Niño and La Niña events, indicating solar modulation on ENSO (Kodera
and Kuroda, 2005; Kryjov and Park, 2007). These results show a good
correspondence in response to growth of the tree-ring time series during the
intense solar activity. Hence the results strongly support the possible
origin of these periodicities from solar and ENSO events. The interesting
conclusion from Fig. 5 is that WH–sunspot connections are strong at
11 years, and ENSO–sunspot connections also exhibit strong power around
11 years; the WH–ENSO connections are spread over three bands, 2–4, 4–8,
and 8–16 years, covering the solar cycle and its harmonics; the
WH–geomagnetic exhibits strong connections around 2–4, 4–6, 11, and
35–40 years, indicating the influence of solar–geomagnetic activity on
Indian temperature.</p>
      <p>Singular spectral analysis (SSA) is performed for all four data sets with a
window length of 40. The SSA spectra with 40 singular values and their
corresponding reconstructed series (varying from RCs 1 to 15 in some cases)
are plotted as shown in Figs. 6 and 7. The important insights from SSA
spectra are the identification of gaps in the eigenvalue spectra. As a rule,
the pure noise series produces a slowly decreasing sequence of singular
values. The explicit plateau in the spectra represents the ordinal numbers of
paired eigen triples. Eigen triples 2–3 for the sunspot data correspond to
the 11-year period; eigen triples for 1–2, 3–5, 6–10, and 11–14 for the
WH temperature data are related to harmonics with specific periods (periods
33–35, 11, 5, 2 years); eigen triples for 2–5, 6–9, and 10–13 for the
geomagnetic data are related to periods of 11, 5, and 2 years. The eigen
triples for the SOI data represent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5–7- and 2-year periods. In order
to assess periodicities, the periodogram and the wavelet power spectra are
plotted using the SSA reconstructed data (SSA-RC) (Fig. 8). From Fig. 8, the
periodogram of SSA-RC of SSN and geomagnetic data shows strong power at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 and 10–11 years; the SOI data show strong peaks at 6–9 and
3 years, and WH data show strong power at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–11, and
3–5 years. The wavelet spectra for all the SSA–RC data confirm the results,
except for the periods at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 years, which are beyond the maximum
scaling period chosen for the present wavelet. The coherency plot of the
SSA-RC data sets (Fig. 9) indicates a significant power at 33, 11, and
2–7 years in the WH temperature record, suggesting the possible influences
of sunspot–geomagnetic activity and ENSO through teleconnection and hence a
significant role of these remote internal oscillations of the
atmosphere–ocean system in the Indian climate system. Researchers have
attributed these phenomena to internal ocean dynamics and involve ocean
atmospheric coupling as well as variability in the strength of thermohaline
circulations (Knight et al., 2005; Delworth and Mann, 2000).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Singular spectra with their SSA decomposed components and their
reconstructed time series for <bold>(a)</bold> SOI and <bold>(b)</bold> geomagnetic activity (aa indices).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Power spectrum and wavelet power spectrum of SSA reconstructed
<bold>(a)</bold> sunspot data, <bold>(b)</bold> geomagnetic indices (aa index),
<bold>(c)</bold> SOI, and <bold>(d)</bold> the Western Himalayan temperature data,
with the cone of influence (lighter shaded smooth curve) and black lines
indicating significant power on the 95 % level compared to red noise based
on the AR(1) coefficient. The legend on the right indicates the cross-wavelet
power.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Squared wavelet coherence plotted for the SSA reconstructed time
series between <bold>(a)</bold> WH-SSN, <bold>(b)</bold> WH-SOI, and <bold>(c)</bold> the
WH-aa index, with the cone of influence (lighter shaded smooth curve) and
black lines indicating significant power on the 95 % level compared to the
red noise based on the AR(1) coefficient.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f09.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In general our result agrees well with earlier findings in the sense that
statistically significant global cycles of coupled effects of
sunspot–geomagnetic activity and ENSO are present in the land-based
temperature variability record. However, there are certain striking features
in the spectra that need to be emphasized regarding the Western Himalayan
temperature variability: (i) inter-annual cycles in a period range of
3–8 years corresponding to ENSO in the wavelet spectra exhibit intermittent
oscillatory characteristics throughout the large portion of the record
(Fig. 4); (ii) the 11-year solar cycle in the cross-wavelet spectrum of SSN
and SOI (Fig. 5) indicates the solar modulation in the ENSO phenomena (Kodera
and Kuroda, 2005; Kryjov and Park, 2007); and (iii) the high amplitude at
11 years in the time interval 1900–1995 with a strong intensity from 1900 to
1995 shows a good correspondence to the high temperature variability for the
interval of high solar–geomagnetic activity. The multi-decadal (30–40-year)
periodicity identified here in the Western Himalayan tree-ring temperature
record matches with North Atlantic sea surface temperature variability,
implying that the temperature variability in the Western Himalayas is not a
regional phenomenon but a globally teleconnected climate phenomenon
associated with the global ocean–atmospheric dynamics system (Tiwari and
Srilakshmi, 2009; Delworth et al., 1993; Stocker, 1994). The coupled
ocean–atmosphere system appears to transport energy from the hot equatorial
regions towards Himalayan territory in a cyclic manner. These results may
provide constraints for modeling of climatic variability over the Indian
region and ENSO phenomena associated with the redistribution of temperature
variability. The solar–geomagnetic effects play a major role in abnormal
heating of the land surface, thereby indirectly affecting the atmospheric
temperature gradient between the land–ocean coupled systems. In the present
work, the connections between solar–geomagnetic activity and ENSO on the WH
time series are found to be statistically significant, especially when they
are studied over contrasting epochs of, respectively, high and low solar
activity. The correlation plots for the SSA-RC data sets of WH-sunspot, WH-aa
index, WH-SOI, and sunspot-aa index are plotted in Fig. 10. One can notice
that there is a correlation plot for the geomagnetic–sunspot activity with a
maximum correlation value at a 1-year lag, suggesting the strong influence of
sunspot and geomagnetic forcing on one another. The cross-correlation plot
for the WH data and the SOI represents a maximum value at zero lag. The
correlation plot for the WH-sunspot and WH-geomagnetic indices exhibits
almost identical results, suggesting the possible impact of solar activities
on the Indian temperature variability.</p>
      <p>The net effect of solar activity on temperature record therefore appears to
be the result of cooperating or counteracting influences of Earth's magnetic
activity on the shorter and longer periods, depending on the indices used;
scale interactions, therefore, appear to be important. Nevertheless, the link
between Indian climate and solar–geomagnetic activity emerges as having
strong evidence; next is the ENSO–solar activity connection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In the present paper, we have studied and identified the periodic patterns
from the published Indian temperature variability records using the modern
spectral methods of singular spectral analysis (SSA) wavelet methods. The
application of wavelet analysis for the SSA reconstructed time series, along
with the removal of noise in the data, identifies the existence of
high-amplitude, recurrent, multi-decadal scale patterns that are present in
Indian temperature records. The power spectra of WH temperature data show a
strong high power at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 62, 32–35, 11, 5 and 2–3 years, suggesting a
strong influence of solar–geomagnetic–ENSO effects on the Indian climate
system. The presence of a dominant amplitude at 33-year cycle periodicity
corresponds to Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) cycles. It also
suggests the Sun-temperature variability, probably involving the induced
changes in the basic state of the atmosphere. The 30–40-year periodicity in
the Western Himalayan tree-ring temperature record matches with the global
signal of the coupled ocean–atmospheric oscillation (Delworth et al., 1993;
Stocker, 1994), implying that the temperature variability in the Himalayas is
not a regional phenomenon but seems to be teleconnected phenomena with the
global ocean–atmospheric climate system. The coherency plots of the SSA
reconstructed WH–sunspot, WH–geomagnetic, and WH–SOI data sets show strong
spectral signatures in the whole record, confirming the possible influences
of sunspot–geomagnetic activities and ENSO through teleconnection and hence
the significant role of these remote internal oscillations of the
atmosphere–ocean system in the Indian temperatures. We conclude that the
signature of solar–geomagnetic activity affects the surface air temperatures
of the Indian subcontinent. However, long data sets from the different sites
on the Indian subcontinent are necessary to identify the influences of the
120-year solar–geomagnetic cycles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Cross-correlation of SSA reconstructed time series of
<bold>(a)</bold> aa index–Western Himalayan (WH) temperature data,
<bold>(b)</bold> SOI–WH temperature data, <bold>(c)</bold> sunspot–WH data, and
<bold>(d)</bold> aa index–sunspot data.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/23/361/2016/npg-23-361-2016-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data on the Western Himalayan data was given to us by Dr. Ram Ratan Yadav
of Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, India. The data plot was given in
his publication (Yadav et al., 2004).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are extremely thankful to the Editor Stéphane Vannitsem and
the anonymous reviewers for their professional comments, meticulous reading
of the manuscript, and valuable suggestions to improve the manuscript. The
authors thank Dr. Ram Ratan Yadav, Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, India,
for providing the Western Himalayan data. The authors acknowledge
Prof. Francisco Javier Alonso of the University of Extremadura for using the SSA
routine in a MATLAB environment. We are thankful to Dr. Alask Grinsted and his
colleagues for providing the wavelet software package. The first author
acknowledges the Head, University Centre for Earth &amp; Space Sciences,
University of Hyderabad, for providing the facilities to carry out this work.
Rama Krishna Tiwari is grateful to DAE for a RRF (Rajaramanna Fellowship). <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: S. Vannitsem <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alonso, F. J., Castillo, J., and Pintado, P.: Application of Singular
Spectrum Analysisto the Smoothing of Raw Kinematic Signals, J. Biomech., 38,
1085–1092, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Appenzeller, C., Stocker, T. F., and Anklin, M.: North Atlantic Oscillation
Dynamics Record in Greenland Ice Cores, Science, 282, 446–449, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Barnett, T. P., Dumeil, L., Schlese, U., and Roeckner, L.: The effect of Eurasian
snow cover on regional and global climate variations, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 661–685, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Benestaed, R. E. and Schmidt, G. A.: Solar trends and global warming, J. Geophys.
Res., 114, D1401, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011639" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011639</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, A. and Chaudhary, V.: Late-summer temperature reconstruction of
the Eastern Himalayan Region based on tree-ring data of Abies densa, Arct.
Antarct. Alp. Res., 35, 196–202, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, A. and Yadav, R. R.: Dendrochronological reconnaissance of Pinus
wallichiana to study glacial behaviour in the western Himalaya, Current Science,
70, 739–744, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bhatacharyya, A., LaMarche, V. C., and Telewski, F. W.: Dendrochronological
reconnaissance of the conifers of Northwest India, Tree-Ring Bull., 48,
21–30, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, A., Yadav, R. R., Borgaonkar, H. P., and Pant, G. B.: Growth ring
analysis of Indian tropical trees: Dendroclimatic potential, Current Science,
62, 736–741, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, A., Shah, S. K., Santosh, K., and Chaudhary, V.: Would tree-ring data
of Betula utilis be potential for the analysis of Himalayan Glacial fluctuations?,
Current Science, 91, 754–761, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Borgaonkar, H. P., Pant, G. B., and Rupa Kumar, K.: Ring width variations in
Cedrus deodara and its climatic response over the Western Himalaya, Int. J.
Climatol., 16, 1409–1422, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Broomhead, D. S.  and King, G. P.: Extracting qualitative dynamics from
experimental data, Physica D, 20, 217–236, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Budyko, M. I.: The effect of solar radiation variations on the climate of the
Earth, Tellus, 21, 611–619, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chaudhary, V., Bhattacharyya, A., and Yadav, R. R.: Tree-ring studies in the
Eastern Himalayan region: Prospects and problems, IAWA – International Association
of Wood Anatomists, 20, 317–324, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Chowdary, J. S., Gnanseelan, C., Vaid, B. H., and Salvekar, P. S.: Changing
trends in the tropical Indian Ocean SST during La Nina years, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
33, L18610, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026707" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026707</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chowdary, J. S., John, N., and Gnanseelan, C.: Interannual variability of surface
air-temperature over India: impact of ENSO and Indian Ocean Sea surface temperature,
Int. J. Climatol., 34, 416–429, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. E., Fairbanks, R. G., and Shen, G. T.: Recent variability in the
Southern Oscillation: Isotopic results from a Tarawa Atoll coral, Science,
260, 1790–1793, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
De Freitas, C. and Mclean, J.: Update of the Chronology of Natural Signals in
the Near Surface Mean Global Temperature Record and the Southern Oscillation
Index, Int. J. Geosci., 4, 234–239, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Delworth, T. and Mann, M.: Observed and Stimulated multideacadl variability in
the Northern Hemisphere, Clim. Dynam., 16, 661–676, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Delworth, T., Manabe, S., and Stouffer, R. J.: Interdecadal variations of the
thermohaline circulation in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model, J. Climate, 6, 1991–2011, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
El-Borie, M. A. and Al-Thoyaib, S. S.: Can we use the aa geomagnetic activity
index to predict partially the variability in global mean temperature, J.
Phys. Sci., 1, 67–74, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
El-Borie, M. A., Al. Thoyaib, S. S, and Al-Sayed, N.: The possible role of solar
activity in variability of global mean temperature, in: The 2nd International
conference of Physics and Material Science, Vol. 1, 302–310, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
El-Borie, M. A., Shafik, E., Abdel-Halim, A. A., and El-Monier, S.: Spectral
analysis of solar variability and their possible role on the global warming
(1880–2008), J. Environ. Protect., 1, 111–120, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, S. H., Kaufman, D., Yoneji, S., Nelson, D., Shemesh, A., Huang, Y.,
Tian, J., Bond, G., Benjamin, C., and Brown, T.: Cyclic Variation and Solar
Forcing of Holocene Climate in the Alaskan Subarctic, Science, 301, 1890–1893, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Foufoula-Georgiou, E. and Kumar, P. (Eds.): Wavelets in Geophysics, Academic
San Diego, San Diego, California, 373 pp., 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Friis, C. E. and Lassen, K.: Length of the Solar Cycle: An Indicator of Solar
Activity Closely Associated with Climate, Science, 254, 698–700, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Friis, C. E. and Svensmark, H.: What do we really know about the sun–climate
connection?, Adv. Space Res., 20, 913–921, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Frohlich, C. and Lean, J.: Solar radiative output and its Variability: Evidence
and Mechanisms, Astron. Astropys. Rev., 12, 273–320, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Golyandina, N., Nekrutkin, V. V., and Zhigljavski, A. A.: Analysis of Time
Series Structure: SSA and Related Techniques, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Gray, L. J., Beer, J., Geller, M., Haigh, J. D., Lockwood, M., Matthes, K.,
Cubasch, U., Fleitmann, D., Harrison, G., Hood, L., Luterbacher, J., Meehl, G. A.,
Shindell, D., van Geel, B., and White, W.: Solar influences on climate, Rev.
Geophys., 48, RG4001, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000282" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009RG000282</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Gray, S. T., Graumlich, L. J., Betancourt, J. L., and Pederson, G. T.: A tree-ring
based reconstruction of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation since 1567 A.D.,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L12205, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019932" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL019932</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Gray, W. M., Sheaffer, J. D., and Knaff, J. A.: Hypothesized mechanism for
stratospheric QBO influence on ENSO variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 107–110, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., and Jevrejeva, S.: Application of the cross wavelet
transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series, Nonlin. Processes
Geophys., 11, 561–566, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-11-561-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Gu, D. and Philander, S. G. H.: Secular changes of annual and inter-annual
variability in the tropics during the past century, J. Climate, 8, 864–876,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00499-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00499-7</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Holschneider, M.: Wavelets: An Analysis Tool, Oxford University Press, New York, 1–455, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Horel, J. D. and Wallance, J. M.: Planetary-scale atmospheric Phenomena
associated with the Southern Oscillation, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 813–829, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, M. K.: Dendroclimatic evidence from the Western Himalaya, in: Climate
since AD 1500, edited by: Bradlay, R. S. and Jones, D., Routledge, London, 15–431, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Jevrejeva, S., Moore, J. C., and Grinsted, A.: Influence of the Arctic
Oscillation and El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on ice conditions in
the Baltic Sea: The wavelet approach, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4677, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003417</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kasatkina, E. A., Shumilov, O. I., and Krapiec, M.: On periodicities in long
term climatic variations near 68<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, Adv. Geosci.,
13, 25–29, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-13-25-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/adgeo-13-25-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kiladis, G. N. and Diaz, F. H.: Global Climatic Anomalies Associated with
Extremes in the Southern Oscillation, J. Climate, 2, 1069–1090, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Knight, J. R., Allan, R. J., Folland, C. K., Vellinga, M., and Mann, M. E.: A
signature of persistent natural thermohaline circulation cycles in observed
climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20708, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024233" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL024233</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kodera, K. and Kuroda, Y.: A possible mechanism of the spatial structure of the
North Atlantic Oscillation, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D02111, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005258" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005258</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Kothwale, D. R., Munot, A. A., and Krishna Kumar, K.: Surface air temperature
variability over India during 1901–2007 and its association with ENSO, Clim.
Res., 42, 89–104, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr00857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/cr00857</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Kryjov, V. N. and Park, C.-K.: Solar modulation of the El-Nino/Southern Oscillation
impact on the Northern Hemisphere annular mode, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L10701,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL028015</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lean, J., Beer, J., and Bradley, R.: Reconstruction of solar
irradiance since 1610: Implications for climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
22, 3195–3198, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Lean, J. L. and Rind, D. H.: How natural and anthropogenic influences alter
global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006, J. Geophys. Res.,
35, L18701, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034864" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034864</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, M. E., Park, J., and Bradley, R. S.: Global interdecdal and century-scale
climate oscillations during the past 5 centuries, Nature, 378, 266–270, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., Matthes, K., Sassi, F., and Van Loon, H.:
Amplifying the Pacific climate system response to a small 11-year solar cycle
forcing, Science, 325, 1114–1118, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Mendoza, B., Perez-Enriquez, R., and Alvarez-Madrigal, M.: Analysis of solar
activity conditions during periods of El Nino events, Ann. Geophys., 9, 50–54, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Minobe, S.: A 50–70 year climatic oscillation over the North Pacific and North
America, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 683–686, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Mokhov, I. I., Eliseev, A. V., Handorf, D., Petukhov, V. K., Dethloff, K.,
Weishiemer, A., and Khvorostyanov, D. V.: North Atlantic Oscillation: Diagnosis
and simulation of decadal variability and its long period evolution, Atmos.
Ocean Phys., 36, 555–565, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nicolson, S. E.: An analysis of the Enso signal in the tropical Atlantic and
western Indian oceans, Int. J. Climatol., 17, 345–375, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Ogurtsov, M. G., Nagovitsyn, Y. A., Kocharov, G. E., and Jungner, H.: Long-period
cycles of the Sun's activity recorded in direct solar data and proxies, Solar
Physics, 211, 371–394, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Pant, G. B. and Rupa Kumar, K.: Climates of South Asia, John Wiley and Sons,
Chichester, 320 pp., 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Proctor, C. J., Baker, A., and Barnes, W. L.: A three thousand year record of
North Atlantic Climate, Clim. Dynam., 19, 449–454, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, G. C.: Solar irradiance variations and global Ocean Temperature, J. Geomag.
Geoelectr., 43, 795–801, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, G. C. and Gage, K. S.: The climatic impact of secular variations in solar
irradiance, in: Secular Solar and geomagnetic Variations in the Last 10 000 years,
NATO AS Series, edited by: Stephenson, F. R. and Wplfendale, A. W., Kluwer,
Dordrecht, 225–243, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Rigozo, N. R., Noredmann, D. J. R., Echer, E., Zanandrea, A., Gonzalez, W. D.:
Solar variability effects studied by tree-ring data wavelet analysis, Adv. Space
Res., 29, 1985–1988, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Rigozo, N. R., Vieira, L., Echer, E., and Nordemann, D. J. R.: Wavelet analysis
of Solar-ENSO imprints in tree-ring data from Southern Brazil in the last century,
Climatic Change, 60, 329–340, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Rigozo, N. R., Nordeman, D. J. R., Echer, E., Vieira, L. E. A., Echer, M. P. S.,
and Prestes, A.: Tree-ring width wavelet and spectral analysis of solar variability
and climatic effects on a Chilean cypress during the last two and a half millennia,
Clim. Past Discuss., 1, 121–135, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/cpd-1-121-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cpd-1-121-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Rigozo, N. R., Nordeman, D. J. R., Silva, H. E., Echer, M. P. S., and Echer, E.:
Solar and climate signal records in tree ring width from Chile (AD1587–1994),
Planet. Space Sci., 55, 158–164, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Schlesinger, M. E. and Ramankutti, N.: An oscillation in the global climate
system of period 65–70 years, Nature, 367, 723–726, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Shah Santosh, K., Bhattacharyya, A., and Chaudhary, V.: Reconstruction of
June–September Precipitation based on tree-ring data of Teak (Tectona grandis L.)
from Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh, India, Dendrochronologia, 25, 57–64, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Steinhilber, F., Beer, J., and Frohlich, C.: Total solar irradiance during the
Holocene, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L19704, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL040142</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F.: The variable ocean, Nature, 367, 221–222, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Tiwari, R. K.: Geospectroscopy, Capital Publ. Co., New Delhi, p. 308, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tiwari, R. K. and Srilakshmi, S.: Periodicities and non-stationary modes in tree
ring temperature variability record of the Western Himlayas by multitaper and
wavelet spectral analyses, Current Science, 97, 705–709, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Torrence, C. and Compo, G. P.: A practical guide to wavelet analysis, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 79, 61–78, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Torrence, C. and Webster, P.: Interdecadal changes in the ESNO-Monsoon System,
J. Climate, 12, 2679–2690, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Tsonis, A. A., Elsner, J. B., Hunt, A. G., and Jagger, T. H.: Unfolding the
relation between global temperature and ENSO, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L09701,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022875/2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022875/2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Vautard, R. and Ghil, M.: Singular spectrum analysis in nonlinear dynamics,
with applications to paleoclimatic time series, Physica D, 35, 395–424, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Weng, H. and Lau, K.-M.: Wavelets, period doubling, and time-frequency
localization with application to organizationmof convection over the tropical
western Pacific, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2523–2541, 1994.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Wiles, G. C., D'Arrigo, R. D., and Jacoby, G. C.: Gulf of Alaska atmosphere-ocean
variability over recent centuries inferred from coastal tree-ring records,
Climatic Change, 38, 289–306, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005396027562" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1005396027562</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Yadav, R. R., Park, W. K., and Bhattacharyya, A.: Spring-temperature variations
in western Himalaya, India, as reconstructed from tree-rings: AD 1390–1987,
Holocene, 9, 85–90, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Yadav, R. R., Park, W. K., Singh, J., and Dubey, B.: Do the western Himalayas
defy global warming?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L17201, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL020201</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Yasunari, T.: Zonally propagating modes of the global east-west circulation
associated with the Southern Oscillation, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 63, 1013–1029, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Wavelet analysis of the singular spectral reconstructed time  series to study the imprints of solar–ENSO–geomagnetic  activity on Indian climate</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">To study the imprints of the solar–ENSO–geomagnetic activity on the Indian
subcontinent, we have applied singular spectral analysis (SSA) and wavelet
analysis to the tree-ring temperature variability record from the Western
Himalayas. Other data used in the present study are the solar sunspot
number (SSN), geomagnetic indices (aa index), and the Southern Oscillation
Index (SOI) for the common time period of 1876–2000. Both SSA and wavelet
spectral analyses reveal the presence of 5–7-year short-term ENSO variations
and the 11-year solar cycle, indicating the possible combined influences of
solar–geomagnetic activities and ENSO on the Indian temperature. Another
prominent signal corresponding to 33-year periodicity in the tree-ring record
suggests the Sun-temperature variability link probably induced by changes in
the basic state of the Earth's atmosphere. In order to complement the above
findings, we performed a wavelet analysis of SSA reconstructed time series,
which agrees well with our earlier results and increases the signal-to-noise
ratio, thereby showing the strong influence of solar–geomagnetic activity
and ENSO throughout the entire period. The solar flares are considered
responsible for causing the atmospheric circulation patterns. The net effect
of solar–geomagnetic processes on the temperature record might suggest
counteracting influences on shorter (about 5–6-year) and longer (about
11–12-year) timescales. The present analyses suggest that the influence of
solar activities on the Indian temperature variability operates in part
indirectly through coupling of ENSO on multilateral timescales. The analyses,
hence, provide credible evidence of teleconnections of tropical Pacific
climatic variability and Indian climate ranging from inter-annual to decadal
timescales and also suggest the possible role of exogenic triggering in
reorganizing the global Earth–ocean–atmospheric systems.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alonso, F. J., Castillo, J., and Pintado, P.: Application of Singular
Spectrum Analysisto the Smoothing of Raw Kinematic Signals, J. Biomech., 38,
1085–1092, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Appenzeller, C., Stocker, T. F., and Anklin, M.: North Atlantic Oscillation
Dynamics Record in Greenland Ice Cores, Science, 282, 446–449, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Barnett, T. P., Dumeil, L., Schlese, U., and Roeckner, L.: The effect of Eurasian
snow cover on regional and global climate variations, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 661–685, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Benestaed, R. E. and Schmidt, G. A.: Solar trends and global warming, J. Geophys.
Res., 114, D1401, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011639" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD011639</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, A. and Chaudhary, V.: Late-summer temperature reconstruction of
the Eastern Himalayan Region based on tree-ring data of Abies densa, Arct.
Antarct. Alp. Res., 35, 196–202, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, A. and Yadav, R. R.: Dendrochronological reconnaissance of Pinus
wallichiana to study glacial behaviour in the western Himalaya, Current Science,
70, 739–744, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bhatacharyya, A., LaMarche, V. C., and Telewski, F. W.: Dendrochronological
reconnaissance of the conifers of Northwest India, Tree-Ring Bull., 48,
21–30, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, A., Yadav, R. R., Borgaonkar, H. P., and Pant, G. B.: Growth ring
analysis of Indian tropical trees: Dendroclimatic potential, Current Science,
62, 736–741, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, A., Shah, S. K., Santosh, K., and Chaudhary, V.: Would tree-ring data
of Betula utilis be potential for the analysis of Himalayan Glacial fluctuations?,
Current Science, 91, 754–761, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Borgaonkar, H. P., Pant, G. B., and Rupa Kumar, K.: Ring width variations in
Cedrus deodara and its climatic response over the Western Himalaya, Int. J.
Climatol., 16, 1409–1422, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Broomhead, D. S.  and King, G. P.: Extracting qualitative dynamics from
experimental data, Physica D, 20, 217–236, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Budyko, M. I.: The effect of solar radiation variations on the climate of the
Earth, Tellus, 21, 611–619, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chaudhary, V., Bhattacharyya, A., and Yadav, R. R.: Tree-ring studies in the
Eastern Himalayan region: Prospects and problems, IAWA – International Association
of Wood Anatomists, 20, 317–324, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chowdary, J. S., Gnanseelan, C., Vaid, B. H., and Salvekar, P. S.: Changing
trends in the tropical Indian Ocean SST during La Nina years, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
33, L18610, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026707" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GL026707</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chowdary, J. S., John, N., and Gnanseelan, C.: Interannual variability of surface
air-temperature over India: impact of ENSO and Indian Ocean Sea surface temperature,
Int. J. Climatol., 34, 416–429, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. E., Fairbanks, R. G., and Shen, G. T.: Recent variability in the
Southern Oscillation: Isotopic results from a Tarawa Atoll coral, Science,
260, 1790–1793, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
De Freitas, C. and Mclean, J.: Update of the Chronology of Natural Signals in
the Near Surface Mean Global Temperature Record and the Southern Oscillation
Index, Int. J. Geosci., 4, 234–239, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Delworth, T. and Mann, M.: Observed and Stimulated multideacadl variability in
the Northern Hemisphere, Clim. Dynam., 16, 661–676, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Delworth, T., Manabe, S., and Stouffer, R. J.: Interdecadal variations of the
thermohaline circulation in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model, J. Climate, 6, 1991–2011, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
El-Borie, M. A. and Al-Thoyaib, S. S.: Can we use the aa geomagnetic activity
index to predict partially the variability in global mean temperature, J.
Phys. Sci., 1, 67–74, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
El-Borie, M. A., Al. Thoyaib, S. S, and Al-Sayed, N.: The possible role of solar
activity in variability of global mean temperature, in: The 2nd International
conference of Physics and Material Science, Vol. 1, 302–310, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
El-Borie, M. A., Shafik, E., Abdel-Halim, A. A., and El-Monier, S.: Spectral
analysis of solar variability and their possible role on the global warming
(1880–2008), J. Environ. Protect., 1, 111–120, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, S. H., Kaufman, D., Yoneji, S., Nelson, D., Shemesh, A., Huang, Y.,
Tian, J., Bond, G., Benjamin, C., and Brown, T.: Cyclic Variation and Solar
Forcing of Holocene Climate in the Alaskan Subarctic, Science, 301, 1890–1893, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Foufoula-Georgiou, E. and Kumar, P. (Eds.): Wavelets in Geophysics, Academic
San Diego, San Diego, California, 373 pp., 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Friis, C. E. and Lassen, K.: Length of the Solar Cycle: An Indicator of Solar
Activity Closely Associated with Climate, Science, 254, 698–700, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Friis, C. E. and Svensmark, H.: What do we really know about the sun–climate
connection?, Adv. Space Res., 20, 913–921, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Frohlich, C. and Lean, J.: Solar radiative output and its Variability: Evidence
and Mechanisms, Astron. Astropys. Rev., 12, 273–320, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Golyandina, N., Nekrutkin, V. V., and Zhigljavski, A. A.: Analysis of Time
Series Structure: SSA and Related Techniques, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gray, L. J., Beer, J., Geller, M., Haigh, J. D., Lockwood, M., Matthes, K.,
Cubasch, U., Fleitmann, D., Harrison, G., Hood, L., Luterbacher, J., Meehl, G. A.,
Shindell, D., van Geel, B., and White, W.: Solar influences on climate, Rev.
Geophys., 48, RG4001, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000282" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009RG000282</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Gray, S. T., Graumlich, L. J., Betancourt, J. L., and Pederson, G. T.: A tree-ring
based reconstruction of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation since 1567 A.D.,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L12205, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019932" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004GL019932</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Gray, W. M., Sheaffer, J. D., and Knaff, J. A.: Hypothesized mechanism for
stratospheric QBO influence on ENSO variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 107–110, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., and Jevrejeva, S.: Application of the cross wavelet
transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series, Nonlin. Processes
Geophys., 11, 561–566, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/npg-11-561-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Gu, D. and Philander, S. G. H.: Secular changes of annual and inter-annual
variability in the tropics during the past century, J. Climate, 8, 864–876,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00499-7" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00499-7</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Holschneider, M.: Wavelets: An Analysis Tool, Oxford University Press, New York, 1–455, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Horel, J. D. and Wallance, J. M.: Planetary-scale atmospheric Phenomena
associated with the Southern Oscillation, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 813–829, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, M. K.: Dendroclimatic evidence from the Western Himalaya, in: Climate
since AD 1500, edited by: Bradlay, R. S. and Jones, D., Routledge, London, 15–431, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Jevrejeva, S., Moore, J. C., and Grinsted, A.: Influence of the Arctic
Oscillation and El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on ice conditions in
the Baltic Sea: The wavelet approach, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4677, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003417" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD003417</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kasatkina, E. A., Shumilov, O. I., and Krapiec, M.: On periodicities in long
term climatic variations near 68° N, 30° E, Adv. Geosci.,
13, 25–29, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-13-25-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/adgeo-13-25-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kiladis, G. N. and Diaz, F. H.: Global Climatic Anomalies Associated with
Extremes in the Southern Oscillation, J. Climate, 2, 1069–1090, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Knight, J. R., Allan, R. J., Folland, C. K., Vellinga, M., and Mann, M. E.: A
signature of persistent natural thermohaline circulation cycles in observed
climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20708, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024233" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005GL024233</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kodera, K. and Kuroda, Y.: A possible mechanism of the spatial structure of the
North Atlantic Oscillation, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D02111, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005258" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD005258</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kothwale, D. R., Munot, A. A., and Krishna Kumar, K.: Surface air temperature
variability over India during 1901–2007 and its association with ENSO, Clim.
Res., 42, 89–104, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr00857" target="_blank">doi:10.3354/cr00857</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kryjov, V. N. and Park, C.-K.: Solar modulation of the El-Nino/Southern Oscillation
impact on the Northern Hemisphere annular mode, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L10701,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028015" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GL028015</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lean, J., Beer, J., and Bradley, R.: Reconstruction of solar
irradiance since 1610: Implications for climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
22, 3195–3198, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Lean, J. L. and Rind, D. H.: How natural and anthropogenic influences alter
global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006, J. Geophys. Res.,
35, L18701, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034864" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GL034864</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, M. E., Park, J., and Bradley, R. S.: Global interdecdal and century-scale
climate oscillations during the past 5 centuries, Nature, 378, 266–270, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., Matthes, K., Sassi, F., and Van Loon, H.:
Amplifying the Pacific climate system response to a small 11-year solar cycle
forcing, Science, 325, 1114–1118, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Mendoza, B., Perez-Enriquez, R., and Alvarez-Madrigal, M.: Analysis of solar
activity conditions during periods of El Nino events, Ann. Geophys., 9, 50–54, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Minobe, S.: A 50–70 year climatic oscillation over the North Pacific and North
America, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 683–686, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Mokhov, I. I., Eliseev, A. V., Handorf, D., Petukhov, V. K., Dethloff, K.,
Weishiemer, A., and Khvorostyanov, D. V.: North Atlantic Oscillation: Diagnosis
and simulation of decadal variability and its long period evolution, Atmos.
Ocean Phys., 36, 555–565, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nicolson, S. E.: An analysis of the Enso signal in the tropical Atlantic and
western Indian oceans, Int. J. Climatol., 17, 345–375, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Ogurtsov, M. G., Nagovitsyn, Y. A., Kocharov, G. E., and Jungner, H.: Long-period
cycles of the Sun's activity recorded in direct solar data and proxies, Solar
Physics, 211, 371–394, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Pant, G. B. and Rupa Kumar, K.: Climates of South Asia, John Wiley and Sons,
Chichester, 320 pp., 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Proctor, C. J., Baker, A., and Barnes, W. L.: A three thousand year record of
North Atlantic Climate, Clim. Dynam., 19, 449–454, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, G. C.: Solar irradiance variations and global Ocean Temperature, J. Geomag.
Geoelectr., 43, 795–801, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, G. C. and Gage, K. S.: The climatic impact of secular variations in solar
irradiance, in: Secular Solar and geomagnetic Variations in the Last 10 000 years,
NATO AS Series, edited by: Stephenson, F. R. and Wplfendale, A. W., Kluwer,
Dordrecht, 225–243, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Rigozo, N. R., Noredmann, D. J. R., Echer, E., Zanandrea, A., Gonzalez, W. D.:
Solar variability effects studied by tree-ring data wavelet analysis, Adv. Space
Res., 29, 1985–1988, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Rigozo, N. R., Vieira, L., Echer, E., and Nordemann, D. J. R.: Wavelet analysis
of Solar-ENSO imprints in tree-ring data from Southern Brazil in the last century,
Climatic Change, 60, 329–340, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Rigozo, N. R., Nordeman, D. J. R., Echer, E., Vieira, L. E. A., Echer, M. P. S.,
and Prestes, A.: Tree-ring width wavelet and spectral analysis of solar variability
and climatic effects on a Chilean cypress during the last two and a half millennia,
Clim. Past Discuss., 1, 121–135, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/cpd-1-121-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/cpd-1-121-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Rigozo, N. R., Nordeman, D. J. R., Silva, H. E., Echer, M. P. S., and Echer, E.:
Solar and climate signal records in tree ring width from Chile (AD1587–1994),
Planet. Space Sci., 55, 158–164, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Schlesinger, M. E. and Ramankutti, N.: An oscillation in the global climate
system of period 65–70 years, Nature, 367, 723–726, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Shah Santosh, K., Bhattacharyya, A., and Chaudhary, V.: Reconstruction of
June–September Precipitation based on tree-ring data of Teak (Tectona grandis L.)
from Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh, India, Dendrochronologia, 25, 57–64, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Steinhilber, F., Beer, J., and Frohlich, C.: Total solar irradiance during the
Holocene, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L19704, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040142" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GL040142</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T. F.: The variable ocean, Nature, 367, 221–222, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Tiwari, R. K.: Geospectroscopy, Capital Publ. Co., New Delhi, p. 308, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tiwari, R. K. and Srilakshmi, S.: Periodicities and non-stationary modes in tree
ring temperature variability record of the Western Himlayas by multitaper and
wavelet spectral analyses, Current Science, 97, 705–709, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Torrence, C. and Compo, G. P.: A practical guide to wavelet analysis, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 79, 61–78, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Torrence, C. and Webster, P.: Interdecadal changes in the ESNO-Monsoon System,
J. Climate, 12, 2679–2690, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Tsonis, A. A., Elsner, J. B., Hunt, A. G., and Jagger, T. H.: Unfolding the
relation between global temperature and ENSO, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L09701,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022875/2005" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005GL022875/2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Vautard, R. and Ghil, M.: Singular spectrum analysis in nonlinear dynamics,
with applications to paleoclimatic time series, Physica D, 35, 395–424, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Weng, H. and Lau, K.-M.: Wavelets, period doubling, and time-frequency
localization with application to organizationmof convection over the tropical
western Pacific, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2523–2541, 1994.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Wiles, G. C., D'Arrigo, R. D., and Jacoby, G. C.: Gulf of Alaska atmosphere-ocean
variability over recent centuries inferred from coastal tree-ring records,
Climatic Change, 38, 289–306, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005396027562" target="_blank">doi:10.1023/A:1005396027562</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Yadav, R. R., Park, W. K., and Bhattacharyya, A.: Spring-temperature variations
in western Himalaya, India, as reconstructed from tree-rings: AD 1390–1987,
Holocene, 9, 85–90, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Yadav, R. R., Park, W. K., Singh, J., and Dubey, B.: Do the western Himalayas
defy global warming?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L17201, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020201" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004GL020201</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Yasunari, T.: Zonally propagating modes of the global east-west circulation
associated with the Southern Oscillation, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 63, 1013–1029, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
