NPG Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics NPG Nonlin. Processes Geophys. 1607-7946 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/npg-18-415-2011 Strategies for coupling global and limited-area ensemble Kalman filter assimilation Merkova D. 1 Szunyogh I. 2 Ott E. 1 University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA Texas A&M, College Station, TX, USA 27 06 2011 18 3 415 430 Copyright: © 2011 D. Merkova et al. 2011 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/18/415/2011/npg-18-415-2011.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/18/415/2011/npg-18-415-2011.pdf

This paper compares the forecast performance of four strategies for coupling global and limited area data assimilation: three strategies propagate information from the global to the limited area process, while the fourth strategy feeds back information from the limited area to the global process. All four strategies are formulated in the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) framework. <br><br> Numerical experiments are carried out with the model component of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System (GFS) and the NCEP Regional Spectral Model (RSM). The limited area domain is an extended North-America region that includes part of the north-east Pacific. The GFS is integrated at horizontal resolution T62 (about 150 km in the mid-latitudes), while the RSM is integrated at horizontal resolution 48 km. Experiments are carried out both under the perfect model hypothesis and in a realistic setting. The coupling strategies are evaluated by comparing their deterministic forecast performance at 12-h and 48-h lead times. <br><br> The results suggest that the limited area data assimilation system has the potential to enhance the forecasts at 12-h lead time in the limited area domain at the synoptic and sub-synoptic scales (in the global wave number range of about 10 to 40). There is a clear indication that between the forecast performance of the different coupling strategies those that cycle the limited area assimilation process produce the most accurate forecasts. In the realistic setting, at 12-h forecast time the limited area systems produce more modest improvements compared to the global system than under the perfect model hypothesis, and at 48-h forecast time the global forecasts are more accurate than the limited area forecasts.

 References Bishop, C.&nbsp;H., Etherton, B.&nbsp;J., and Majumdar, S.&nbsp;J.: Adaptive Sampling with the ensemble transform {K}alman filter, {P}art {I}: Theoretical Aspects, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 420–436, 2001. Fertig, E.&nbsp;J., Baek, S.-J., Hunt, B.&nbsp;R., Ott, E., Szunyogh, I., Aravequia, J.&nbsp;A., Kalnay, E., Li, H., and Liu, J.: {O}bservation bias correction with an ensemble {K}alman filter, Tellus, 61A, 210–226, 2008. Harris, L.&nbsp;M. and Durran, D.&nbsp;R.: An Idealized Comparison of One-Way and Two-Way Grid Nesting, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 2174–2187, 2010. Huang, X.&nbsp;Y., Xiao, Q., Barker, D., Zhang, X., Michalakes, J., Huang, W., Henderson, T., Bray, J., Chen, Y., Ma, Z., Dudhia, J., Guo, Y., Zhang, X., Won, D., Lin, H., and Kuo, Y.: Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation for {WRF}: Formulation and Preliminary Results., Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 299–314, 2009. Hunt, B.&nbsp;R., Kalnay, E., Kostelich, E.&nbsp;J., Ott, E., Patil, D., Sauer, T., Szunyogh, I., Yorke, J., and Zimin, A.: Four-Dimensional Ensemble {K}alman Filtering, Tellus, 56A, 273–277, 2004. Hunt, B. R., Kostelich, E., and Sunyogh, I.: Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: a local ensemble transform kalman filter, Physica D, 236, 112–126, 2007. Juang, H. M.&nbsp;H.: A Spectral Fully Compressible Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model in Hydrostatic Sigma Coordinates: Formulation and Preliminary Results, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 50, 75–88, 1992. Juang, H. M.&nbsp;H.: The NCEP {M}esosacle {S}pectral {M}odel: A Revised Version of the Nonhydrostatic Regional Spectral Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 2329–2362, 2000. Juang, H. M.&nbsp;H. and Hong, S.&nbsp;Y.: Sensitivity of the NCEP {R}egional {S}pectral {M}odel to Domain Size and Nesting Strategy, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 2904–2922, 2001. Juang, H. M.&nbsp;H. and Kanamitsu, M.: The NMC Nested {R}egional {S}pectral {M}odel, Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 3–26, 1994. Juang, H. M.&nbsp;H., Hong, S.&nbsp;Y., and Kanamitsu, M.: The NCEP {R}egional {S}pectral {M}odel: {A}n Update, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2125–2143, 1997. Kalnay, E.: Atmospheric modeling, data assimilation, and predictability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. Lynch, P. and Huang, P.&nbsp;M.: Initialization of the HIRLAM model using a digital filter, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 1019–1034, 1992. Ott, E., Hunt, B.&nbsp;R., Szunyogh, I., Zimin, A.&nbsp;V., Kostelich, E.&nbsp;J., Corazza, M., Kalnay, E., Patil, D.&nbsp;J., and Yorke, J.&nbsp;A.: A Local Ensemble {K}alman Filter for Atmospheric Data Assimilation, Tellus, 56A, 415–428, 2004. Sela, J.&nbsp;G.: {S}pectral Modeling at the {N}ational {M}eteorological {C}enter, Mon. Weather Rev., 108, 1279–1292, 1980. Szunyogh, I., Toth, Z., R.&nbsp;E.&nbsp;Morss, S. J.&nbsp;M., Etherton, B.&nbsp;J., and Bishop, S.&nbsp;H.: The effect of targeted dropsond observations during the 1999 Winter Storm Reconnaissance program, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 3520–3537, 2000. Szunyogh, I., Kostelich, E.&nbsp;J., Gyarmati, G., Kalnay, E., Hunt, B.&nbsp;R., Ott, E., Satterfield, E., and Yorke, J.&nbsp;A.: A Local Ensemble Transform K}alman Filter Data Assimilation system for the {NCEP Global Model, Tellus, 60A, 113–130, 2008. Tippett, M.&nbsp;K., Anderson, J.&nbsp;L., Bishop, C.&nbsp;H., Hamill, T.&nbsp;M., and Whitaker, J.&nbsp;S.: Ensemble square-root filters, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 1485–1490, 2003. Torn, R.&nbsp;D., Hakim, G.&nbsp;J., and Snyder, C.: Boundary Conditions fro limited-area ensemble {K}alman filters, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2490–2502, 2006. Warner, T.&nbsp;T., Peterson, R.&nbsp;A., and Treadon, R.&nbsp;E.: A tutorial on Lateral Boundary Conditions as a basic and Potentially Serious Limitation to Regional Numerical Weather Prediction, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2599–2617, 1997. Zhang, F., Meng, Z., and Aksoy, A.: Tests of an Ensemble {K}alman Filter for Mesoscale and Regional-scale Data Assimilation, Part {I}: Perfect Model Experiments, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 722–736, 2006.