References

NPG

Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics

NPG

Nonlin. Processes Geophys.

1607-7946

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/npg-18-111-2011

Role of multifractal analysis in understanding the preparation zone for large size earthquake in the North-Western Himalaya region

Teotia

S. S.

¹ Kumar

Department of Geophysics, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra – 136 119, India

15 02 2011

18 1 111 118

2011

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/18/111/2011/npg-18-111-2011.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/18/111/2011/npg-18-111-2011.pdf

Seismicity has power law in space, time and magnitude distributions and same is expressed by the fractal dimension D, Omori's exponent p and b-value. The spatio-temporal patterns of epicenters have heterogeneous characteristics. As the crust gets self-organised into critical state, the spatio-temporal clustering of epicenters emerges to heterogeneous nature of seismicity. To understand the heterogeneous characteristics of seismicity in a region, multifractal studies hold promise to characterise the dynamics of region. Multifractal study is done on seismicity data of the North-Western Himalaya region which mainly involve seismogenic region of 1905 Kangra great earthquake in the North-Western Himalaya region. The seismicity data obtained from USGS catalogue for time period 1973–2009 has been analysed for the region which includes the October 2005 Muzafrabad-Kashmir earthquake (Mw =7.6). Significant changes have been observed in generalised dimension Dq, Dq spectra and b-value. The significant temporal changes in generalised dimension Dq, b-value and Dq−q spectra prior to occurrence of Muzaffrabad-Kashmir earthquake relates to distribution of epicenters in the region. The decrease in generalised dimension and b-value observed in our study show the relationship with the clustering of seismicity as is expected in self-organised criticality behaviour of earthquake occurrences. Such study may become important in understanding the preparation zone of large and great size earthquake in various tectonic regions.

References 1

Aki, K.: Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log(N) = a-bM and its confidence limits, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ., 43, 237–239, 1965.

Aki, K.: A probabilistic synthesis of precursory phenomena, in earthquake prediction, in: An International Rev., M. Ewing series 4, edited by: simpson, D. W. and Richard, P. G., Am. Geophys. Union, Washington D.C., 566–574, 1981.

Allègre, C. J., Le Mouel, J. L., and Provost, A.: Scaling rules in rock failure and possible implications for earthquake prediction, Nature, 297, 47–49, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/297047a0">https://doi.org/10.1038/297047a0</a>, 1982.

Baddi, R. and Broggi, G.: Measurement of the dimension spectrum $f(\alpha)$: Fixed-mass approach, Phys. Lett. A., 131, 339–343, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(88)90784-0">https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(88)90784-0</a>, 1988.

Bak, P. and Tang, C.: Self-Organized Criticality, Phys. Rev. A, 38, 364–371, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.364">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.364</a>, 1988.

Bak, P. and Tang, C.: Earthquakes as a self-organised criticality phenomenon, J. Geophys. Res., 94(B11), 15635–15637, 1989.

Brown, S. R. and Scholz, C. H.: Broadband width with study of the topography of the natural surfaces, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 12575–12582, 1985.

Bullen, K. E. and Bolt, B. A: An introduction to theory of seismology, Cambridge university press, New York, 1985.

De Rubeis, V., Dimitriu, P. P., Papadimitriou, E., and Tosi, P.: Recurrence Patterns in the Spatial behaviour of Italian Seismicity revealed by the fractal approach, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20(18), 1911–1914, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/93GL01889">https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL01889</a>, 1993.

Dimitriu, P. P., Scordilis, E. M., and Karacostas, V. G.: Multifractal Analysis of the Arnea, Greece Seismicity with Potential Implications for Earthquake Prediction, Nat. Hazards, 21, 277–295, 2000.

Grassberger, P. and Procraccia, I.: Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors, Physica D, 9, 189–208, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1</a>, 1983.

Greenside, H. S., Wolf, A., Swift, J., and Pignataro, T: Impracticality of Box-counting algorithm for calculating the Dimensionality of strange attractors, Phys. Rev. A, 25, 3453–3459, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.3453">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.3453</a>, 1982.

Grassberger, P., Baddi, R., and Politi, A.: Scaling Laws for Invariant Measures on Hyperbolic attractors, J. Stat. Phys, 51, 135–178, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01015324">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015324</a>, 1988.

Halsey, T. C., Jensen, M. H., Kadanoff, L. P., Procraccia, I., and Shraiman, B. I.: Fractal Measures and Their Singularities: the Characterizations of strange sets, Phys. Rev. A, 33, 1141–1151, 1986.

Henderson, J., Main, I. G., Pearce, R. G., and Takeya, M.: Seismicity in north-eastern Brazil: Fractal clustering and the evaluation of b value, Geophys. J. Int., 116, 217–226, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb02138.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb02138.x</a>, 1994.

Hentschel, H. G. E. and Procraccia, I.: The infinite number of Generalized Dimensions of Fractals and strange attractor, Physica D, 8, 435–444, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(83)90235-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(83)90235-X</a>, 1983.

Hirabayashi, T., Ito, K., and Yoshii, T.: Multifractal analysis of earthquakes, Pure Appl. Geophys., 138, 561–610, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00876340">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876340</a>, 1992.

Hirata, T.: Omori's power law aftershock sequences of microfracturing in rock fracture experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 92((B7), 6215–6221, 1987.

Hirata, T.: A correlation between the b value and the fractal dimension of earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 94(B6), 7507–7514, 1989.

Hirata, T. and Imoto, M.: Multifractal analysis of spatial distribution of micro earthquakes in the Kanto region, Geophys. J. Int., 107, 155–162, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb01163.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb01163.x</a>, 1991.

Ito, K. and Matsuzaki, M.: Earthquakes as self-organized critical phenomena, J. Geophys. Res., 95(B5), 6853–6860, 1990.

Li, D., Zhaobi, Z., and Binghong, W.: Research into the multifractal of earthquake spatial distribution, Tectonophysics, 223, 91–97, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90222-4">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90222-4</a>, 1994.

Mandelbrot, B. B.: Multifractal measures, especially for Geophysicist, Pure Appl. Geophys., 131, 5–42, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00874478">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874478</a>, 1989.

Roy, P. N. S. and Mandal, S. K.: Fractal Nature of Earthquake Occurrence in Northwest Himalayan Region, J. Ind. Geophys. Union, 13(2), 63–68, 2009.

Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L., Shcherbakov, R., Klein, W., and Sammis, C.: Statistical physics approach to understanding the multiscale dynamics of earthquake fault system, Rev. Geophys., 41(4), 1019, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003RG000135">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003RG000135</a>, 2003.

Scholz, C. H. and Aviles, C. A.: The fractal geometry of faults and faulting, in: Source Mechanics, edited by: Das, S., Boatwright, J., and Scholz, C., Geophys. Mongr. Ser., 37, 147–155, 1986.

Stanley, H. E. and Meakin, P.: Multifractal phenomena in Physics and Chemistry, Nature, 335, 405–409, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/335405a0">https://doi.org/10.1038/335405a0</a>, 1988.

Sunmonu, L. A., Dimri, V. P., Ravi Prakash, M., and Bansal, A. R.: Multifractal approach of the time series of M>7 earthquakes in Himalayan region and its vicinity during 1985–1995, JGSI, 58, 163–169, 2001.

Telesca, L., Lapenna, V., and Macchiato, M.: Investigating the time-clustering properties in seismicity of Umberia-Marche region (Central Italy), Chaos Soliton. Fract., 18(2), 202–217, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00654-9">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00654-9</a>, 2003a.

Telesca, L., Lapenna, V., and Macchiato, M.: Spatial variability of the time-correlated behavior in Italian Seismicity, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 212(3–4), 279–290, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00286-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00286-3</a>, 2003b.

Telesca, L., Cumo, V., Lapenna, V., and Macchiato, M.: Detrended fluctuation analysis of the spatial variability of the temporal distribution of southern California seismicity, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 21(2), 335–342, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2003.10.021">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2003.10.021</a>, 2004.

Telesca, L., Lapenna, V., and Macchiato, M.: Multifractal fluctuations in seismic interspike series, Physica A, 354, 629–640, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.02.053">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.02.053</a>, 2005.

Teotia, S. S.: Multifractal analysis of earthquakes: An overview, edited by: Dimri, V. P., Oxford 7 IBH publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 161–170, 2000.

Teotia, S. S. and Kumar, D.: The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004 was predictable even from seismicity data of mb≥4.5: A lesson to learn from nature, Indian J. Mar. Sci., 36, 122–127, 2007.

Teotia, S. S., Khattri, K. N., and Roy, P. K.: Multifractal analysis of seismicity of the Himalyan region, Current Science, 73, 359–366, 1997.

Turcotte, D. L.: A model of crustal deformation, Tectonophysics, 132, 261–269, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(86)90036-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(86)90036-3</a>, 1986a.

Turcotte, D. L.: Fractals and fragmentation, J. Geophys. Res., 91(B2), 1921–1926, 1986b.

Utsu, T: A method of determining the value of b in a formula log n=a-bM showing the magnitude-frequency relation for earthquakes, Geophys. Bull. Hokkaido Univ., 13, 99–103, 1965 (in Japanese).

Yin, A.: Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogeny as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history, and foreland sedimentation, Earth Sci. Rev., 76, 1–131, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.05.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.05.004</a>, 2006.

Yin, A., Dubey, C. S., Kelty, T. K., Webb, A. A. G., Harrison, T. M., Chou, C. Y., and Célérier, J.: Geologic correlation of the Himalayan orogeny and Indian craton: Part 2. Structural geology, geochronology, and tectonic evolution of the Eastern Himalaya, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 122, 360–395 <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B26461.1">https://doi.org/10.1130/B26461.1</a>, 2010.