NPG Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics NPG Nonlin. Processes Geophys. 1607-7946 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/npg-17-77-2010 Shannon information of the geomagnetic field for the past 7000 years De Santis A. 1 2 Qamili E. 3 1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy Facoltà di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali, Università degli Studi "G. D'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy Scuola di dottorato in Scienze Polari, Università degli studi di Siena, Siena, Italy 12 02 2010 17 1 77 84 Copyright: © 2010 A. De Santis 2010 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/17/77/2010/npg-17-77-2010.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/17/77/2010/npg-17-77-2010.pdf

The present behaviour of the geomagnetic field as expressed by the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) deserves special attention when compared with that shown over the past few thousands of years by two paleomagnetic/archeomagnetic models, CALS3K and CALS7K. The application of the Information theory in terms of Shannon Information and K-entropy to these models shows characteristics of an instable geomagnetic field. Although the result is mitigated when we correct the CALS7K model for its typical spectral damping, the present geomagnetic field as represented by IGRF is still rather distinct, at least for the past 4000 years, a result that is further confirmed by the CALS3K model. This is consistent with a significant global critical state started at around 1750, and still present, characterised by significant decays of the geomagnetic dipole, energy and Shannon information and high K-entropy. The details of how these characteristics may develop are not clear, since the present state could move toward an excursion or a geomagnetic polarity reversal, but we cannot exclude the possibility that the "critical" behaviour will become again more "normal", stopping the apparent trend of the recent geomagnetic field decay.

 References Baranger, M., Latora, V., and Rapisarda, A.: Time evolution of thermodynamic entropy for conservative and dissipative chaotic maps, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 13, 471–478, 2002. Beck, C. and Schlögl, F.: Thermodynamics of Chaotic Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 306 pp., 1993. Buchner, T. and Zebrowski, J.: Local entropies as a measure of ordering in discrete maps, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 9(1/2), 19–28, 1998. Constable, C. G. and Korte, M.: Is Earth's magnetic field reversing?, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 246, 1–16, 2006. De Santis, A.: How persistent is the present trend of the geomagnetic field to decay and, possibly, to reverse?, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 162, 217–226, 2007. De Santis, A.: Erratum to "How persistent is the present trend of the geomagnetic field to decay and, possibly, to reverse?", Phys. Earth Planet. In., 170, p. 149, 2008. De Santis, A.: Geosystemics, Proceedings of WSEAS Conference on Geology and Seismology GES '09, Cambridge, 36–40, February 2009. De Santis, A. and Qamili, E.: Equivalent Monopole Source of the Geomagnetic South Atlantic Anomaly, Pure Appl. Geophys., in press, 2010. De Santis, A., Falcone, C., and Lowes, F. J.: Remarks on the mean-square values of the geomagnetic field and its components, Ann. Geofis., 38(2), 167–173, 1995. De Santis, A., Tozzi, R., and Gaya-Piquè, L. R.: Information Content and K-entropy of the Present Geomagnetic Field, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 218, 269–275, 2004. Eckmann, J.-P. and Ruelle, D.: Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors, Part I, Rev. Mod. Phys., 57(0.3), 617–654, 1985. Ferraro, M., Boccignone, G., and Caelli, T.: Entropy-based representation of image information, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 23(12), 1391–1398, 2002. Gubbins, D.: Mechanism for geomagnetic polarity reversals, Nature, 326, 167–169, 1987. Gubbins, D.: Geomagnetic polarity reversals: a connection with secular variation and core-mantle interaction?, Rev. Geophys., 32(1), 61–83, 1994. Gubbins, D., Jones, A. L., and Finlay, C. C.: Fall in Earth's Magnetic Field is erratic, Science, 312, 900–902, 2006. Holme, R. and Olsen, N.: The spectrum of the magnetic secular variation, in; Earth Observation with CHAMP, edited by: Reigber, C., Luhr, H., Schwintzer, P., and Wickert, J., Springer, New York, 329–334, 2005. Hulot, G., Eymin, C., Langlais, B., Mandea, M., and Olsen, N.: Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Øersted and Magsat satellite data, Nature, 416, 620–623, 2002. Jackson, A., Jonkers, A. R. T., and Walker, M. R.: Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 358, 957–990, 2000. Jacobs, J. A.: Reversals of the Earth's Magnetic Field, 2nd edn., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 366 pp., 1994. Jernigan, M. E. and D'Astous, F.: Entropy-based texture analysis in the spectral frequency domain, IEEE T. Pattern Anal., PAMI-6(2), 237–243, 1984. Korte, M. and Constable, C. G.: Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 6, Q02H16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000801, 2005a. Korte, M. and Constable, C. G.: The geomagnetic dipole moment over the last 7000 years – new results from a global model, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 236, 348–358, 2005b. Korte, M. and Constable, C. G.: Centennial and millennial geomagnetic secular variation, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 43–52, 2006. Korte, M., Donadini, F., and Constable, C. G.: Geomagnetic field for 0–3 ka: 2. A new series of time-varying global models, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 10, Q06008, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002297, 2009. Leonhardt, R. and Fabian, K.: Geomagnetic variation during the past 5000 years: A global reconstruction, IUGG XXIV General Assembly, Perugia, Italy, poster presentation 2554, ASI003, 2007. Lowes, F. J.: Mean-square values on sphere of spherical harmonic vector fields, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 2179, 1966. Lowes, F. J.: Spatial power spectrum of the main geomagnetic field, and extrapolation to the core, Geophys. J. Int., 36, 717–730, 1974. Lowes, F. J.: An estimate of the errors of the IGRF/DGRF fields 1945–2000, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1207–1211, 2000. Macmillan, S. and Maus, S.: International Geomagnetic Reference Field – the tenth generation, Earth Planets Space, 57, 1135–1140, 2005. Majewski, E.: Thermodynamics of Chaos and Fractals applied: Evolution of the Earth and Phase Transformations, in: Earthquake Thermodynamics and Phase Transformations in the Earth's Interior, edited by: Teisseyre, R. and Majewski, E., 25–80, 2001. Olsen, N. and Mandea, M.: Rapidly changing flows in the Earth's core, Nature Geoscience, 1, 390–394, 2008. Rodrìguez-Iturbe, I., D'Odorico, P., and Rinaldo, A.: Configuration entropy of fractal landscapes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25(7), 1015–1018, 1998. Ryzhikov, G., Biryulina, M., and Hanyga, A.: 3D nonlinear inversion by entropy of image contrast optimization, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 2, 228–240, 1995. Schuster, H. G.: Deterministic Chaos, VCH, Weinheim, 291 pp., 1995. Shannon, C.: A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656, 1948. Wales, D. J.: Calculating the rate of loss of information from chaotic time series by forecasting, Nature, 350, 485–488, 1991.