<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7946</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-10-573-2003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Characteristic scales of earthquake rupture from numerical models</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Heimpel</surname>
<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>University of Alberta, Department of Physics, Edmonton, AB T6G 2J1, Canada</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>573</fpage>
<lpage>584</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2003 M. H. Heimpel</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2003</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/10/573/2003/npg-10-573-2003.html">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/10/573/2003/npg-10-573-2003.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/10/573/2003/npg-10-573-2003.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/10/573/2003/npg-10-573-2003.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Numerical models of
      earthquake rupture are used to investigate characteristic length scales
      and size distributions of repeated earthquakes on vertical, planar fault
      segments. The models are based on exact solutions of static
      three-dimensional (3-D) elasticity. Dynamical rupture is approximated by
      allowing the static stress field to expand from slip motions at a single
      velocity. To show how the vertical fault width affects earthquake size
      distributions for a broad range of fault behaviors, two different fault
      strength models are used; a smooth model and a heterogeneous asperity
      model. The smooth model is a simplified version of the Dieterich-Ruina
      rate and state dependent friction law. The heterogeneous asperity model
      uses a slip-dependent random powerlaw strength distribution. It is shown
      that the characteristic scale of fault segmentation is proportional to the
      vertical width of a seismogenic fault. This conclusion holds for both the
      smooth and the heterogeneous models. For the smooth models characteristic
      quake distributions result, with populations of large events that are
      obviously distinct from smaller events. The distributions of large events
      have well-defined mean lengths and moments. The heterogeneous models
      result in Gutenberg-Richter (GR) powerlaw distributions of event sizes up
      to a characteristic quake size. Quakes larger than the characteristic size
      fall off the GR distribution such that the powerlaw would greatly
      overestimate the probability of occurrence of the larger events.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="12"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>