<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NPG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NPG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nonlin. Processes Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7946</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-10-245-2003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Statistics of locally coupled ocean and atmosphere intraseasonal anomalies in Reanalysis and AMIP data</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Peña</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kalnay</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland, 3431 Computer and Space Science Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>245</fpage>
<lpage>251</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2003 M. Peña et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2003</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/10/245/2003/npg-10-245-2003.html">This article is available from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/10/245/2003/npg-10-245-2003.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/10/245/2003/npg-10-245-2003.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://npg.copernicus.org/articles/10/245/2003/npg-10-245-2003.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>We apply a simple
      dynamical rule to determine the dominant forcing direction in locally
      coupled ocean-atmosphere anomalies in the National Centers for
      Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/
      NCAR) reanalysis data. The rule takes into account the phase relationship
      between the low-level vorticity anomalies and the Sea Surface Temperature
      (SST) anomalies. Analysis of the frequency of persistent coupled anomalies
      for five-day average data shows that, in general, the ocean tends to force
      the atmosphere in the tropics while the atmosphere tends to force the
      ocean in the extratropics. The results agree well with those obtained
      independently using lagged correlations between atmospheric and oceanic
      variables, suggesting that the dynamical rule is generally valid. A
      similar procedure carried out using data from the NCEP global model run
      with prescribed SST (in which the coupling is one-way, with the ocean
      always forcing the atmosphere) produces fewer coupled anomalies in the
      extratropics. They indicate, not surprisingly, an increase in
      ocean-driving anomalies in the model. In addition, and very importantly,
      there is a strong reduction of persistent atmosphere-driving anomalies,
      indicating that the one-way interaction of the ocean in the model run may
      provide a spurious negative feedback that damps atmospheric anomalies
      faster than observed.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="7"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>